3PEP RFP Questions and Responses - Rev 5.pdf

PDF 130 KB Posted

Attached to
Third Party Equipment Purchasing (3PEP) 8(a) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8517-21-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Air Force Sustainment Center

About this file

This document provides questions and responses related to solicitation number FA8517-21-R-0001, which is seeking to award multiple ID/IQ contracts for Third Party Equipment Purchasing (3PEP) services. The scope of work involves sourcing, acquiring, and delivering a broad range of support equipment national stock numbers with initial unit prices of $50,000 or less to support the Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Air Force Sustainment Center. Offerors must price a minimum of 70% of items on the NSN list and will utilize an electronic data exchange for order management. Three 8(a) contracts valued at a total of $10 billion over 10 years will be awarded based on best value. There is no incumbent information provided or economic price adjustment clause included.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Third Party Equipment Purchasing (3PEP) 8(a), newest first.
File Type Posted
FA8517-21-R-0001-0003.pdf PDF
3PEP SOW FD2060-21-00138_Feb_2021.pdf PDF
3PEP LM_FA8517-21-R-0001_8(a).pdf PDF
Attention All Offerors.docx DOCX document
FA8517-21-R-0001-0002.pdf PDF
3PEP RFP Questions and Responses - Rev 9.pdf PDF
NOTICE - Req. for TSR FORM FA8517-21-R-0001.pdf PDF
3PEP RFP Questions and Responses - Rev 8 (rev1).pdf PDF
FA8517-21-R-0001-0001.pdf PDF
3PEP RFP Questions and Responses - Rev 7.pdf PDF
3PEP RFP Questions and Responses - Rev 6 v2.pdf PDF
3PEP RFP Questions and Responses - Rev 4.pdf PDF
3PEP RFP Questions and Responses - Rev 3.pdf PDF
3PEP RFP Questions and Responses - Rev 2.pdf PDF
NOTICE - PPI Tool FA8517-21-R-0001.pdf PDF
NOTICE - BID SETS FA8517-21-R-0001 2.pdf PDF
FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire_Final.pdf PDF
FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 5 - Subcontractor and Teaming Member Consent Form_Final.pdf PDF
FA8517-21-R-0001 Section M_Final.pdf PDF
FA8517-21-R-0001 Section L Provision_Final.pdf PDF
3PEP SOW FD2060-21-00138_Jan_2021_Final.pdf PDF
A001_Technical_Report-Study_Services(JAN 2021)_Final.pdf PDF
Copy of FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 7 - Price Proposal Matrix - 06Jan21_Final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 6 - Client Authorization Letter_Final.pdf PDF
FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 1 - Intstructions to Offerors_Final.pdf PDF
FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 2 - Relevancy Table_Final.pdf PDF
A002_Scientific_and_Technical_Reports(JAN2021)_Final.pdf PDF
FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 4 - Transmittal Letter_Final.pdf PDF
FA8517-21-R-0001_Final.pdf PDF
NOTICE - BID SETS FA8517-21-R-0001.pdf PDF
NOTICE - BID SETS FA8517-21-R-0001.pdf PDF
3PEP RFP Questions and Responses - Addendum_1.pdf PDF
3PEP SOW FA8517-21-R-0001_Oct 29 2020.docx DOCX document
FA8517-21-R-0001.pdf PDF
FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 5 - Subcontractor and Teaming Member Consent Form.doc DOC document
FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 1 - Intstructions to Offerors.docx DOCX document
FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc DOC document
FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 4 - Transmittal Letter.doc DOC document
FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 7 - Price Proposal Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
3PEP LM_FA8517-21-R-0001.docx DOCX document
FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 2 - Relevancy Table.docx DOCX document
FA8517-21-R-0001 Attachment 6 - Client Authorization Letter.doc DOC document
Show all 42

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

3 PEP QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

SUBMITTED AFTER RELEASE

OF THE FINAL RFPS

ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS

The following additional questions and answers are provided for informational purposes only and intended to assist in clarifying issues raised by potential offerors regarding the official solicitation. Please note, the official solicitation has set forth and established the actual terms and conditions of this acquisition. Any discrepancy between the official solicitation and these questions and answers must be resolved based upon the parameters of the official solicitation. It was the intent of the Government to resolve the majority, if not all, of the issues raised by these questions and answers within the context of the official solicitation; however, additional questions have been raised after its release.

1. Question: In Section M Tradeoff Procedure - Section D. Price Factor C.TEP (c) PAGE 6 - Is a Technical Support Request (TSR) required for "no bid" items as part of this Solicitation Proposal response?

Response: For purposes of selecting offerors for contract award, the Price Matrix itself doesn’t require TSR submissions because the 70%+ (minimum for pricing) excludes items with TSRs.

2. Question: Attachment 7 Price Proposal Matrix, Column K - Column O row 7 states “APPLICABLE TSR NUMBER (CAGE-NSN-CLIN)”, should CLIN be replaced with ELIN?

Response: Concur with the suggestion to revise “…(CAGE-NSN-CLIN)” to read “…(CAGE- NSN-ELIN)”, documents will be updated to reflect changes.

3. Question: Statement of Work (SOW) for 3PEP - Section 1 - Please confirm the Offeror should price items that exceed a unit price of $50k and a total line value of $1,000,000.

Response: The Scope of the 3PEP effort is to acquire NSNs with a unit cost of $50K, or less, and not to exceed $1,000,000 in total per NSN per calendar year. Each calendar year the 3PEP vendor will receive a list of NSNs to price, if at this point if an NSN unit price exceeds $50K, the vendor will submit the price to the Government PCO who will determine if the item is outside the scope of the contract. Additionally, the “not to exceed $1,000,000 per NSN per year” is administered by the Government PCO, the vendor is only required to price the NSNs on the given price list.

4. Question: Attachment 1 Instructions to Offerors Past Performance Information (PPI) for Offerors - Section M instructs Offerors on how the Government will evaluate the Past Performance descriptions but there are no specific instructions specifying Factor or Sub-factor information requested for each Past Performance description. Please provide more detailed

Response: The past performance factors are listed in the L&M, M-900, Section II Proposal Evaluation, sub-section C. Volume II, Past Performance Factor, paragraph 4 Relevancy Definitions.

5. Question: Statement of Work (SOW) for 3PEP - Section 5.2.1 - Please confirm that use of a SharePoint cloud service to which guests can be invited, access from a .mil computer/network, and export information and reports is an acceptable EDE solution.

Response: At this point in time, SharePoint is not an option due to issue access and downloading data from SharePoint sites external to the Air Force, due to the Air Force network security. It is highly recommended that vendors use another form of database for their EDE when submitting proposals.

6. Question: Is this a new project?

Response: No, as stated in the RFP, this is a follow-on to an existing contract.

7. Question: Is there an incumbent? If so, will you provide the company?

Response: Part 1 - Yes, this is a multiple award IDIQ contract, with multiple incumbents.

Part 2 – I will not release this info.

8. Question: Is there a warehouse located at Robins?

Response: There is no warehouse for this effort located at Robins, AFB.

9. Question: If a vendor is not able to bid the entire list would they still be eligible?

Response: In accordance with Section M-900, Section II, Proposal Evaluation, para D, para C, para c, the Government will release the NSN list(s) for offerors to price. Each offeror must submit a price for a minimum of seventy percent (70%) of the items on the NSN list(s). Offerors submitting a price for less than 70% of the items may cause their proposal to be determined to be noncompliant with the terms of the RFP and determined to be not eligible for award.

10. Question: Is there an Economic Adjustment Clause for this effort?

Response: No, there is no Economic Adjustment Clause for the 3PEP effort.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .