Final_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_19Aug19.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- T-38 Structural Component Re-Engineering
- Solicitation number
- FA8220-19-R-0002
About this file
Final RFP Questions & Answers
View the file
Other files
Show all 42
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| T-38 Structural Component Reverse Engineering - Final RFP Q&A - 8/19/2019 | |
| Questions | Govt. Response |
| Solicitation, page 8 of 38, Item No. 1005, First Article Test For Batch #1, Firm Fixed Price, Estimated Quantity, 35...Is this quantity correct based on Batch #1 having (4) parts? Should it be a lower quantity? Please clarify | The government is asking the contractor to provide quoting for both 3 and 5 first articles for each component set (there are 7 total component sets included in the contract). In batch #1 (2 component sets) this would be 6 or 10 first articles and for batch #2 (5 component sets) this would be 15 or 25 first articles so the total number of first articles for the entire contract is 21 or 35. |
| Due to the nature of pricing, as the majority is firm fixed priced, will the need to follow CDRL item A008 specifically IMPR DID DI-MGMT-81861A paragragh 1.4 be required and or other elements of EVM? |
| As the PWS paragraph 2.4.1 is focused on the IMS and the level of detail it seems extreme to require EVM as part of the monthly reporting. Not saying we cannot utilize EVM but just want to verify as this will influence level of effort for Program Management. | The Form 1423 for CDRL A008 lists paragraph 1.4 of the IPMR DID as applicable for this effort, when it should be not applicable (N/A). The IPMR is only for IMS elements and we do not want to require any EVMS elements due to the size and scope of this effort. As a result, CDRL A008 has been revised and is included in solicitation amendment #0001. |
| We respectfully request that the following Organizational Conflict of Interests Clauses be removed from the solicitation to avoid any potential restrictions on competing on future follow on contracts. |
5352.209-9000 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (OCT 2010)(IAW AFFARS 5309.507-2, Policy Memo 10-C-15);
5352.209-9000 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST--ALTERNATE VI (OCT 2010)(IAW AFFARS 5309.507-2(a)(7), Policy Memo 10-C-15);
5352.209-9001 POTENTIAL ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (OCT 2010)(IAW AFFARS 5309.507-2(b), Policy Memo 10-C-15). The referenced clauses are being removed from the solicitaiton:
5352.209-9000 Organizational Conflict of Interest;
5352.209-9000 Organizational Conflict of Interest - Alternate VI; and 5352.209-9001 Potential Organizational Confllict of Interest.
Solicitation, Page 1, 8. NAICS Code 541330, Size Standard, $15.0M.
It seems possible that this solicitation could be under Exception A for NAICS 541330, Military and Aerospace Equipment and Military Weapons, which has a size standard of $38.5M. Will the Government consider changing the size standard for this solicitation?
| Yes, the size standard should be $38.5M. The size standard was incorrectly identified as $15.0M. This will be changed with a solicitation amendment. | |
| Is there an incumbent for this work? | No incumbent exists for this reverse engineering effort. |
| We would like to request the following TO's for the subject Solicitation: |
1T-38C-01; 1T-38C-3-1; 1T-38C-3-1-1; 1T-38C-4-27; and 1T-38C-4-51
| The following TO's have been identified as available: 1T-38C-1 sections; 1T-38C-3 sections; and 1T-38C-4-1 sections. If you would like to receive a copy of these documents, please submit a request to both of the POC's identified in this FBO announcement. | |
| Will the T-38 Loft Book be available for the awardee of this contracts, as to assist in the finalization of the overall loft surfacing? | No, the loft data has been determined not releasable. |
| Can you assist us in the definition of the "NOT SEPARATELY PRICED" CLIN with respect to the TDP's vs the DATA. DATA CLIN (0002, 1002, 2002), is a "NOT SEPARATELY PRICED" CLIN which calls out CDRLs A001-A020. As A005 is the CDRL for the TDP, we also note the that the TDP's (DRAFT and FINAL) is called out on CLIN 0003, 1003, 1004, and 2003. We are unclear if we are to include the A005 costs in the DATA CLIN #'s. | Each of the Data CLINs (0002, 1002, and 2002) is categorized as "Not Separately Priced" or NSP. The use of NSP is to identify that the offeror should not be proposing additional costs (or any costs at all) within these Data CLINs for the preparation/delivery of data deliverables. The actual costs for providing the data deliverables, should be applied within their appropriate CLIN. In the offeror's described situation, the costs for producing a TDP package, should be proposed within CLINs (0003, 1003, 1004, and 2003). |
File details come from the government source that posted it.