DRAFT_RFP_Attachment_6_Cross_Reference_Matrix_29Apr19.pdf

PDF 609 KB Posted

Attached to
T-38 Structural Component Re-Engineering
Solicitation number
FA8220-19-R-0002
Issued by

About this file

Draft - Cross Reference Matrix

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Final_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_03Oct19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA822019R0002_______0006.pdf PDF
Final_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_23Sep19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA822019R0002_______0005.pdf PDF
FA822019R0002_______0004.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_9_Section_M_05Sep19.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_8_Section_L_05Sep19.pdf PDF
Final_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_05Sep19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_11_T-38_Structural_Components_Re-Engineering_PWSv23_05Sep19.pdf PDF
FA822019R0002_______0003.pdf PDF
Final_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_19Aug19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Final_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_1Aug19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA822019R0002_______0002.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_7_PPI_Tool_23Jul19.accdb MDB file
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_10_CDRLs_17Jul19.pdf PDF
FA822019R0002_______0001.pdf PDF
Final_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_25Jul19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_2_Past_Performance_Information_Sheet_5Jun19.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_3_Teaming_Partner_Consent_Letter_5Jun19.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_11_T-38_Structural_Components_Re-Engineering_PWSv23_01Jul19.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_5_Client_Authorization_5Jun19.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_8_Section_L_25Jun19.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_7_PPI_Tool_5Jun19.accdb MDB file
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_5Jun19.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_1_Past_Performance_Information_PPI_Instructions_5Jun19.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_10_CDRLs_19Feb19.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_6_Cross_Reference_Matrix_25Jun19.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_9_Section_M_25Jun19.pdf PDF
FA822019R0002.pdf PDF
Draft_RFP_Questions_and_Answers.pdf PDF
Pre-Solicitation_Synopsis_of_FA8220-19-R-0002_T-38_Structural_Component_Reverse_Engineering.docx DOCX document
DRAFT_RFP_Attachment_8_Section_L_29Apr19.pdf PDF
DRAFT_RFP_Attachment_9_Section_M_29Apr19.pdf PDF
FA822019R0002.pdf PDF
DRAFT_RFP_Attachment_5_Client_Authorization_29Apr19.pdf PDF
DRAFT_RFP_Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_29Apr19.pdf PDF
DRAFT_RFP_Attachment_10_CDRLs_19Feb19.pdf PDF
DRAFT_RFP_Attachment_1_Past_Performance_Information_PPI_Instructions_29Apr19.pdf PDF
DRAFT_RFP_Attachment_7_PPI_Tool_29Apr19.accdb MDB file
DRAFT_RFP_Attachment_3_Teaming_Partner_Consent_Letter_29Apr19.pdf PDF
DRAFT_RFP_Attachment_11_T-38_Structural_Components_Re-Engineering_PWS_29Apr19.pdf PDF
DRAFT_RFP_Attachment_2_Past_Performance_Information_Sheet_29Apr19.pdf PDF
Show all 42

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP Attachment 6 – Cross Reference Matrix Sec. L, II.B.2 Sec. M, II.B.1

Subfactors Technical Rqmts Doc PWS, TDP

Section L Paragraph

Section M Paragraph CDRL

Proposal (Offeror

Completes) For each subfactor, identify risks, if any, associated proposed approach and actions offeror will take to mitigate identified risks.

PWS 2.4.6 Para. II, C.3 Para. II, C.1 A011

Subfactor A: Component Structural Analysis Plan

PWS 1.4.2.2, 1.4.2.3 Para. II, C.3.1 Para. II, C.2.1 A002 A003

1. Describe the hardware analysis techniques that will be used for reverse engineering to develop the technical data required to reproduce the required components. Define the process for establishing dimensional tolerances.

(a) Ability to fabricate, control and inspect bonded metallic composite structure (e.g. bonded honeycomb structure etc.) and bonded non-metallic composite structure (e.g. epoxy resin composite laminate, honeycomb sandwich construction, etc.).

(b) Ability to control stringent manufacturing tolerances including hole diameter, hole location, surface finish, surface profile, etc., especially at critical interfaces.

(c) Ability to manufacture, inspect and test high-strength fatigue critical parts and assemblies.

PWS 1.4.2.2, 1.4.2.3 Para. II, C.3.1 Para. II, C.2.1 A002 A003

DRAFT

Sec. M, II.B.1

Subfactors Technical Rqmts Doc

SOW, TDP

Section L Paragraph

Section M Paragraph CDRL

Proposal (Offeror

Completes) Subfactor B: Parts Reverse Engineering and Re-Engineering Manufacturing Plan

PWS 1.4.1, 1.4.2.1,

1.4.3, 1.4.4, 1.4.5

Para II, C.3.1 Para. II, C.2.2 A001 A004 A005

2. Provide detailed parts Reverse Engineering and/or Re- Engineering/Manufacturing and procurement plan that demonstrates ability to develop a technical data package sufficient for the production of parts that are Fit and Function replacements of the selected components.

(a) Required facilities, personnel, and resources to reverse engineer, manufacture FAT components, assemble, inspect (highlight FAI IAW AS9102), test, repair, and package components.

(b) Training, certifications, resources available, and/or existing training/qualification programs that ensure critical tasks are handled by qualified technicians.

(c) Ability to develop and implement a comprehensive manufacturing concept/process (to include necessary tooling development and manufacture).

(d) Ability to control component loft and contour as defined via model-based definition during manufacturing and assembly on FAT articles.

(e) Ability to manufacture and procure Critical Safety Items (CSI) and manage CSI requirements at all levels of manufacture and assembly.

PWS 1.4.1, 1.4.2.1,

1.4.3, 1.4.4, 1.4.5

Para II, C.3.1 Para. II, C.2.2 A001 A004 A005 A006 A007

Sec. M, II.B.1

Subfactors Technical Rqmts Doc

SOW, TDP

Section L Paragraph

Section M Paragraph CDRL

Proposal (Offeror

Completes) Subfactor C:

Program Management

PWS 2.4 Para. II, C.3.2 Para. II, C.2.3 A008, A009, A010, A011

3. RESOURCE MGMT: The prime contractor’s organizational structure which identifies key personnel. The proposal shall clearly document the primary roles and lines of responsibility, and technical interface with subject matter experts. The proposal shall identify personnel with experience in TDP development. The proposal shall illustrate all planned subcontractor relationships to include name and CAGE code with letter of intent between prime and sub agreeing to be on contract within 90 days of contract award. Proposal shall include a detailed IMS as specified.

PWS 2.4.1

PWS 2.4.2

Para. II, C.3.2 Para. II, C.2.3.1

A008 A009

4. SUBCONTRACTOR MGMT:

Offeror shall describe a clear and feasible approach to managing all subcontractors, partners, and sub-tier subcontractors/partners to meet quality system requirements, as well as supply chain partners and the process in which these partners are evaluated and selected.

PWS 2.4.5 Para. II, C.3.2 Para. II, C.2.3.2

A010

5. RISK MGMT: Offeror shall provide a complete description of risk management processes, explaining the criteria, methods, and procedures that would be used to identify the critical items associated with the implementation of this contract.

PWS 2.4.6 Para. II, C.3.2 Para. II, C.2.3.3

A011

File details come from the government source that posted it.