FA568518R00030005_Attachment_12_-_Questions_and_Answers.pdf

FA5685-18-R-0003 QUESTIONS (Technical)

Q1: Reference Solicitation Item iii, Subfactor I - We would like to state that we’ve seen “FA5685-18-R-0003, iii Subfactor I – Technical Capabilities, item 2” defining approach to unclear issues “assumptions should be made to carry design forward”. For the reason that pile foundation is a specific design, we kindly request you to share if you have topographical survey and soil report. Could you please share the dwg files of the drawings?

A1: DWG files were provided as Attachment 11 via Amendment 0003 of the solicitation.

Offerors shall make reasonable engineering assumptions, regarding soils and topographic survey. No actual survey will be provided to the offerors.

Q2: Reference Attached Drawing# AF.14-27-03 - Please confirm that ‘New Condition Drawings’ dated 28.04.2003 provided in Attachment-4 shall be considered as the current “As Built conditions” on site.

A2: Yes, referenced drawings shall be considered as current conditions.

Q3: Reference Attached Drawing# AF.14-27-03 - Please clarify the location of “Pool Snack Bar Area” shown on As Built site plans. Please confirm that the area labeled as “Existing Picnic Patio” is the defined Pool Snack Area.

A3: The Pool Snack Bar Area is highlighted in red, below.

Q4: Reference Attach 4 - Drawings & Attach 3-Mock SOS - The as-built drawings in Attachment- 4 show that there is a 120V power system in the existing buildings, however, Attachment 3 – Mock SOS paragraph 1.1.4.7 states to “Design, provide and install new power system complete with 220V duplex receptacles, wiring and conduits with all required accessories for the entire swimming pool facility parts”. Is the 120V system still required?

A4: 120V shall not be included in the offerors’ proposals.

Q5: Reference – Solicitation item iii. Subfactor I – Technical Capabilities: a. Project Deliverables

- Project Deliverables Section ‘i’ Item 1 requires “Drawings, with electronic signatures, in the title block. Engineers responsible for a discipline shall electronically sign the drawings for that discipline, in the “Designed By” block.” Please define electronic signature. We assume, related engineer’s name typed in the titleblock would satisfy this requirement. Please confirm or clarify the requirement.

A5: Offerors’ engineers, architects, and owners shall sign pdf drawings using Adobe Acrobat Pro’s digital signature feature.

Q6: IAW the Solicitation documents( page 32 of 49; II. Mechanical Items), 65% design package is requested to submit but also, there are some shop drawings are requested additionally. There is confusion due to requested shop drawings are going to submit in design package as a part of design. As you know that there is page limitation on this contract and there will be duplication due to the shop drawings. We will already provide requested shop drawings in 65% design package as part of design.

Please confirm that are we going to submit same drawings as shop drawings?

A6: Amendment 0005 of the solicitation revises this to eliminate the shop drawing requirement.

Offerors shall submit 65% drawings, but no shop drawings.

Q7: IAW the solicitation documents, Asbestos plan is requested to submit in Mechanical and Architectural Section. There is page limitation on this contract and there will be duplication due to asbestos removal plan. Please confirm that are we going to submit same plan in different section once again?

A7: Amendment 0005 of the solicitation revises this to no longer require an ACM Removal Plan.

Q8: IAW the solicitation documents( page 33 of 49; III. Electrical Items), 65% design package is requested to submit but also, there are some shop drawings are requested additionally. There is confusion due to requested shop drawings are going to submit in design package as a part of design.

There is page limitation on this contract and there will be duplication due to the shop drawings. We will already provide requested shop drawings in 65% design package as part of design. Please confirm that are we going to submit same drawings as shop drawings ?

A8: See A6 above

Q9: IAW the solicitation documents( page 33 of 49; IV. Architectural Items), 65% design package is requested to submit but also, there are some shop drawings are requested additionally. There is confusion due to requested shop drawings are going to submit in design package as a part of design.

There is page limitation on this contract and there will be duplication due to the shop drawings. We will already provide requested shop drawings in 65% design package as part of design. Please confirm that are we going to submit same drawings as shop drawings ?

A9: See A6 above.

Q10: IAW the solicitation documents ( page 33 of 49; V. Civil items), requested design and software input/output date (item 1,2,3) are part of design package and it is going to be in BOD. There is a page limitation and there will be duplication once again. We will already provide it BOD. Please confirm that are we going to submit same calculation once again in this section?

A10: Offerors are only required to submit input/output data in BOD, but description shall remain as is under Civil Items.

Q11: IAW the solicitation documents (page 35 of 49), Subfactor IV Schedule; are we going to provide schedule for Mock Project?

A11: Yes, offerors shall submit schedule for mock project.

Q12: IAW the solicitation documents, there is page limitations (100 pages for technical) but only the MOCK project’s specification could be more than 100 pages. We Kindly request your instructions?

A12: Offerors shall provide Outline specs only, in Table of Contents form. The title and specification number for all required specs for the mock project shall be provided in the Outline spec.

Q13: IAW the solicitation documents , there is page limitations (100 pages for technical) but only the MOCK project’s drawings and other requested document without specification could be more than 100 pages. We Kindly request your instructions?

A13: Amendment 0005 to this solicitation has increased the total technical maximum pages from 100 to 335.

Q14: IAW the solicitation documents, Subfactor V- Relevant experience/ key personnel; same information is requested over and over again in “1c, 1e, 2” . IAW the this section, we are going to provide 3 times 4-year bachelor of science for AE company. DUNS number and CAGE number are requested for in- house engineer so that they are individual personnel and it is impossible to provide these numbers for them. Requested information is not clear in this section and there are some duplication. Also, there is a page limitation but same documents are submitted over and over again.

Please clarify this items.

A14: Amendment 0005 revises this subfactor to provide more clarity on requirement.

Q15: IAW the solicitation documents, Page 31 of 39; Subfactor I; “A narrative to demonstrate a sound approach…” is requested. Is this request for design narrative or construction or both? This section is related about MOCK project but Please clarify this item.

A15: Amendment 0005 of this solicitation revises subfactor I for more clarity on requirement.

Q16: IAW the solicitation documents, page 30 of 49: There are some subtitles like “i” and “ii” under the Volume II-Technical Proposal but requested documents on “i and ii” are also requested in “iii. subfactor I-Technical Capabilities”. There is a confusion so that are we going to add documents for “ i and ii” or it is general information? If yes, same documents are to be provided also once again . We are asking this questions to make index for proposal documents. Will our index start directly from “iii. Subfactor I- Technical Capabilities”?

A16: Offerors are responsible for project deliverables outlined in Vol II, iii-2a. Offerors shall provide discussion in the BOD, as necessary, for requirements described in Vol II, i, ii-1 through 4, iii-1, and iii-2.

Q17: IAW the solicitation, there is page limitations but request documents on page 32 of 49, “a. Project deliverables” much more than 100 pages? We kindly request your instruction on page limitations which includes this section.

A17: See A13 above.

Q18: Reference Solicitation item iii. Subfactor I – Technical Capabilities:a. Project Deliverables i-2 & vii- Subfactor V - There is a requirement for submitting of resumes and diplomas in both referenced items .

Please clarify is it enough to submit all required resumes and diplomas in only item vii-Subfactor V.

A18: Revised language is provided in Amendment 0005 of this solicitation.

Q19: Reference Solicitation-Addendum to 52.215-1 item c-i Page Limitations - Please clarify that are "attachment title pages( seperators,divider pages) for defining the technical document to be submitted" included in the page limits?

A19: Divider pages and separators will not be counted against the page limitation.

Q20: Solicitation- Attach 3 - Mock SOS/1.1.4.10 - Please clarify if telecommnunication OSP cables (FO and copper cables) already exist and reused or these cables to be removed? If these cables to be removed please determine the distances between communication centre and costruction area.And also Please clarify if existing site infrastructure (manholes,duct line,pvc pipes etc.) to to used for new site infrastructure to be required? Please provide communication site infrastructure layout drawings.

A20: Offerors shall make assumptions regarding these questions, and provide engineering reasoning/explanation in BOD.

Q21: Solicitation- Attach 3 - Mock SOS/1.1.4.10 - Please clarify if fire alarm cable between constraction area and fire station already exist and reused or this cable to be removed? If this cable to be removed please determine the distances between fire staion and costruction area.And also please clarify if existing site infrastructure (manholes,duct line,pvc pipes etc.) to to used or new site infrastructure to be required?

A21: See A20 above.

Q22: Solicitation- Attach 3 - Mock SOS/1.1.4.16 - Please provide existing fire alarm system brand ,OM manuals and fire alarm system site infrastructure layout drawings.

A22: Make reasonable assumptions, based on available data, and explain in the BOD.

Q23: As it is shown on the as-built drawings there are numerous underground pipes related with the pool water supply and circulation systems. Are they going to be removed or abandoned in place? Please clarify.

A23: All pipes shall be removed.

Q24: There is an existing fence between the swimming and wading pools. Will it be kept or removed?

Please clarify.

A24: Existing fence between the swimming and wading pools shall be removed.

Q25: Existing Building No.925 and 926 have a built-up roofing systems on wood roof structure, on the other hand, patio / storage facility has a reinforced concrete slanted roof slab that has trapezoidal sheet metal cladding. According to the Statement of Work, existing roofing systems of Facilities No.925 and 926 will remain but minor repair works will be performed. What will be done with the roof of patio / storage building.

A25: The SOS makes no reference to a patio/storage facility.

Q26: A Geotechnical Report is not available for the MOCK project, but the following parameters are required to perform structural analysis of the superstructure and pile foundation;

Qall= allowable bearing capacity of the soil K=Modules of sub-grade reaction of soil Cu=Untrained shear strength of soil if soil is cohesive Φ=internal friction angle of soil if soil is cohesionless SPT= Standard penetration test values including N30 and N60 values Please provide above listed values.

A26: Offerors shall make reasonable engineering assumptions for this information, as stated in Vol II, ii-2 of the solicitation, and discussed at the site visit.

Q27: What is the recommended foundation depth below natural ground ?

A27: See A26 above.

Q28: Item 1.1.1.5 of the Statement of Work requests for the installation of gypsum board wall panels on the interior surfaces of exterior walls, the building is a wet space, even humidity resistant type gypsum board panels show failures and result in pealing and moulding. Also various detail problems will be created especially at the corners where gypsum board panels and ceramic wall tiles adjoin. Therefore we recommend the installation of ceramic wall tiles on the interior surfaces of exterior walls (up to 2.10

m. above ffl) or maintenance and painting of existing wall surfaces. Same paragraph mentions about the cladding of some of the exterior wall surfaces with cement board panels. The intent of this requirement is not clearly understood, if it is for insulation purposes we recommend the use of rigid board exterior insulation systems. Please clarify.

A28: Offerors shall explain their reasoning in the basis of design (BOD), for design choices and any interpretations of the SOS.

Q29: Item 1.1.1.5 of the Statement of Work requests for the removal of existing fence windows and requires their replacement with aluminium windows at Facility No.925. However the facility is a humid space and natural ventilation is the best solution for such facilities that are used only during warm seasons. As it has been mentioned in paragraph 1.1.4.13 new air conditioning and ventilation systems should be required if fenced openings would be replaced with aluminium windows. According to ASHRAE 62.1 toilet and locker areas require high rates of ventilation which will result in higher ventilation loads for the building, in other words system will mostly be cooling the exhausted air. Also, the existing building is not insulated and providing new insulation is not required in the SOW.

Providing windows will lead to very unnecessarily high cooling loads.Keeping the fences for natural ventilation and cooling (initial condition) is an option to solve the problem or in order to partially decrease the cooling load, envelope insulation should also be considered. Please clarify.

A29: The window installation is a requirement driven by customer complaints. Offerors shall develop their own theories about why such complaints exist, and explain them in the BOD. Bottom Line:

windows are required in the proposal.

Q30: Is it possible to provide some pictures of the swimming pool and related buildings.

A30: See Amendment 0005 to solicitation, Attachment 13 – Pool Photos.

Q31: IAW FA5685 - 18 - R003 Attachment - 3 Para 1 .1 . 4 .3 and 1 .1 . 4 . 4, the existing LV feeder from substation TR3 to the Swimming Pool Area shall be replaced. Since new design demand load of swimming Pool Facilities shall be impased on existing TR3, the following information will be required:

a) As - built drawings of TR3

b) Existing TR3 demand load data or load measurement results

A31: Offerors shall assume that TR3 has sufficient capacity. Offerors are responsible to size and spec TR3 circuit breaker and feeder cable. Assume any details required for the actual installation in the transformer building. As-built drawings will not be provided.

Q32: IAW FA5685 - 18 - R003 Attachment - 3 Para 1 .1 . 4 .10, new structured telecommunication cabling system is required in Swimming POOL Facilities. In this context, the following design criteria are required:

a) Location and MH number of connection point available for OSP cabling,

b) Requirement for copper cabling within the facilities

c) Fiber optic connection cable parameters (eg, SM / MM / No of fiber strands / Type)

d) What is specifically required in outdoor pool areas?

A32: Offerors are responsible for making reasonable engineering assumptions for this.

Q33: The requirements for the design package are quite much and the schedule is extremely tight, especially the 3D renderings are time taking, and they will start after the completion of the whole design. Therefore we would appreciate if the submittal date would be extended 20 days minimum.

A33: Renderings shall provide a conceptual understanding of the offeror’s design solution. In place of renderings, offerors may submit palette boards or digital visuals that show how colors of different materials will coordinate in an architectural sense.

Q34: Kindly request verification if we need to fill up the section of ITEM NO SUPPLIES/ SERVICES IAB MACC Ordering Period, since price is not considered for evaluation.

A34: Offerors are not required to fill in this item.

Q35: It is stated that under Volume II - Technical section page limitation is 100 pages; kindly request verification design package is not on that page limitation.

A35: Page limit of technical section increased to 335 pages. See 52.215-1 Add. 1.c-i.

Q36: Kindly request verification if the Certificate, organization chart, CV’s, Diploma etc. is considered under page limitation.

A36: These items are counted in the page limit; see A35, above.

Q37: Please verify, work schedule in both MS project and AFF 3064 will be prepared based on Mock Design.

A37: Offerors are required to submit work schedule in both formats.

Q38: Attachment 3 - Mock SOS, Civil Item 1.1.2.3 is requesting new utility rooms c/w piled mat type foundation. Is the piled mat foundation is a must, if it is not required according to static calculations?

A38: Offerors are required to submit piled mat foundation design. Assume soil condition that would require this type of foundation, and explain in BOD.

Q39: Attachment 3 - Mock SOS, Mechanical Item 1.1.2.10 is stating; “Existing 2 each sheet gaskets of boiler connection and tar paper roof of the Building 923 contain asbestos containing materials (ACM).

When required, the isolation, repair or removal of ACM will be conducted IAW FGS-T Chapter 15 and the IAB Asbestos Management and Asbestos Operations Plans. ACM shall only be sampled, tested, repaired and removed by authorized, certified and experienced personnel. Prepare Asbestos Removal and Work Plans.” As you know Statement of Services for MACC are being prepared for design & build contracts.

And, preparing of Asbestos Removal Plan and related Work Plans are a part of construction process.

These plans are also being requested in Please clarify if ACM Removal Plan and related Work Plan will be included in design package?

A39: ACM Removal Plan is no longer a requirement. It has been deleted from the solicitation.

Q40: Attachment 3 - Mock SOS, Electrical Item 1.1.4.3 is requesting remove cabling between transformer substation (TR3) and MDP complete with main circuit breaker in TR3. Can you please provide as built drawings for the MDP in TR3?

A40: See A31 above.

Q41: However, Proposal Package page limitation is 100 pages for Volume II Technical documents, same documents were requested in different sub-factors such as certificates of 4 yrs. bachelor of Science.

Please clarify if we should add same documents under different sub-factors.

A41: Offerors shall submit only one copy of required documents, duplicate items have been removed.

Q42: Solicitation, Specific Instructions, Volume II-TECHNICAL PROPOSAL, iii. Subfactor I – Technical Capabilities: Project Deliverables item “i.” is requesting drawings, copy of diplomas of architects and engineers, QA check set drawings, edited specifications, basis of design, calculations, cost estimate, design review check list, submittal register, constructability review check list. İtem “ii. Mechanical items” is requesting catalog data, shop drawings, working scenario for new water circulation system. Item “iii.

Electrical Items” is requesting catalog data, shop drawings, single line diagrams. Item “iv. Architectural Items” is requesting 3d visual presentation, shop drawings, catalog data. Item “v. Civil Items” is requesting Design Guide information, applicable codes and regulations for static calculations, software with input/output format of static calculations, method of installing pile foundation. However all of these requested documents are indicated in technical documents, all of them are part of mock project design package. Since these documents will be in the mock design package, should we assume that the items, listed under “a. Project deliverables” are only for instruction/reminder for preparation of mock design package, or should we add these items also in Volume II Technical Proposal beside mock design package? If we must add these items in Volume II Technical Proposal, please consider that these items are over 100 pages and Volume II page limitation is 100 pages. Please provide clarification for the Project Deliverables item.

A42: See A35 above.

Q43: Solicitation, Section L-Instructions,Conditions, and Notices to Offerors, para.1.f reads as ;

"Price/cost will not be evaluated for this solicitation, offerors shall omit all pricing data from thir proposals.." On the other hand, in Section iii. Subfactor I-Technical Capabilities, para.2.a.Project Delivearbles, it is included item 7. Cost Estimate (INC-1101). Please clarify whether Cost Estimate will be prepared and included, or not.

A43: Offerors shall not provide price information. Only quantities and man-hours shall be shown on INC-1101 cost estimates. Lump sum amounts shall not be accepted. Description items shall be broken down into as much detail as required to be able to judge the offeror’s understanding of the project. If any rental equipment is required, contractor shall describe in a note on the INC-1101, what type of equipment will be used and how long it is required.

Q44: As it is shown on the as-built drawings there are numerous underground pipes related with the pool water supply and circulation systems. Are they going to be removed or abandoned in place? Please clarify.

A44: See A23 above.

Q45: There is an existing fence between the swimming and wading pools. Will it be kept or removed? Please clarify.

A45: See A24 above.

Q46: Existing Building No.925 and 926 have a built-up roofing systems on wood roof structure, on the other hand, patio / storage facility has a reinforced concrete slanted roof slab that has trapezoidal sheet metal cladding. According to the Statement of Work, existing roofing systems of Facilities No.925 and 926 will remain but minor repair works will be performed. What will be done with the roof of patio / storage building?

A46: See A25 above.

Q47: A Geotechnical Report is not available for the MOCK project, but the following parameters are required to perform structural analysis of the superstructure and pile foundation;

Qall= allowable bearing capacity of the soil K=Modules of sub-grade reaction of soil Cu=Untrained shear strength of soil if soil is cohesive Φ=internal friction angle of soil if soil is cohesionless SPT= Standard penetration test values including N and N values

Please provide above listed values.

A47: See A26 above.

Q48: What is the recommended foundation depth below natural ground ?

A48: See A27 above.

Q49: Item 1.1.1.5 of the Statement of Work requests for the installation of gypsum board wall panels on the interior surfaces of exterior walls, the building is a wet space, even humidity resistant type gypsum board panels show failures and result in pealing and moulding. Also various detail problems will be created especially at the corners where gypsum board panels and ceramic wall tiles adjoin. Therefore we recommend the installation of ceramic wall tiles on the interior surfaces of exterior walls (up to 2.10 m. above ffl) or maintenance and painting of existing wall surfaces.

Same paragraph mentions about the cladding of some of the exterior wall surfaces with cement board panels. The intent of this requirement is not clearly understood, if it is for insulation purposes we recommend the use of rigid board exterior insulation systems. Please clarify.

A49: See A28 above.

Q50: Item 1.1.1.5 of the Statement of Work requests for the removal of existing fence windows and requires their replacement with aluminium windows at Facility No.925. However the facility is a humid space and natural ventilation is the best solution for such facilities that are used only during warm seasons. As it has been mentioned in paragraph 1.1.4.13 new air conditioning and ventilation systems should be required if fenced openings would be replaced with aluminium windows.

According to ASHRAE 62.1 toilet and locker areas require high rates of ventilation which will result in higher ventilation loads for the building, in other words system will mostly be cooling the exhausted air. Also, the existing building is not insulated and provision of new insulation is not required in the SOW. Providing windows will lead to very unnecessarily high cooling loads. Keeping the fences for natural ventilation and cooling (initial condition) is an option to solve the problem or in order to partially decrease the cooling load, envelope insulation should also be considered.

Please clarify.

A50: See A29 above.

Q51: Is it possible to provide some pictures of the swimming pool and related buildings?

A51: See A30 above.

Q52: Section iii-Subfactor I-Technical Capabilities, 2.a. Project Deliverables, para. ii.Mechanical Items ,Item 8. and para.Para.iv.Architectural Items,Item 6. are both "Asbestos Removal Plan" in duplicate. Please clarify.

A52: ACM Removal Plan is no longer a requirement. It has been deleted from the solicitation via Amendment 0005.

Q53: MACC General Specifications , SECTION 01 11 00.00 40,SUMMARY OF WORK, Subsection3.4.SAFETY PLAN REQUIREMENTS, para.1 reads as " The Contractor shall submit a detailed Safety Plan with his initial proposal for the MACC contract. This plan should be as complete as possible for all anticipated work requirements, and shall be in force on all individual TO’s. A Separate Safety Plan will not be required on individual TO’s, unless otherwise requested in each RFP issued for project specific requirements." On the other hand, SECTION 01 35 30, SAFETY, HEALTH, AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE (HTRW/UST) Subsection 1.8 STAFF ORGANIZATION, QUALIFICATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES, para. 1.8.1.a.requires " (Safety and Health Manager shall have ) A minimum of 3 years experience in developing and implementing safety and health programs at hazardous waste sites, in the hazardous waste disposal industry, in the chemical industry, in the petroleum processing industry or at underground storage tank removal projects." which seems a requirement of a very specific project. Please clarify.

A53: Offeror’s shall be required to provide HAZMAT credentialed personnel only on task orders that require HAZMAT clean-up, but not with this solicitation.

Q54: SECTION 01 35 30, SAFETY, HEALTH, AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE (HTRW/UST) Subsection 1.2-SUBMITTALS, requires " Employee Certificates : A certificate for each worker performing cleanup operations with potential for contaminant-related occupational exposure signed by the safety and health manager and the occupational physician indicating the workers meet the training and medical surveillance requirements of this contract." This seems a requirement of a specific project rather than generic requirement of MACC.

A54: See A53 above.

Q55: If unable to attend the site visit, can we still bid on the solicitation?

A55: Yes. While attendance in the site visit is highly encouraged, it is not mandatory in order to provide a proposal.

Q56: Reference Solicitation Item iii, Subfactor I & Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors - In reference to the subject solicitation, we think that there is a conflict between below listed solicitation items. Could you please clarify, will the price/cost estimate be submitted within the proposal package?

A56: Price will not be evaluated and an estimate shall not be provided. The reference to item 7 INC 1101 is to be unpriced and only represents material and man hour quantities.

Q57: IAW the solicitation documents (page 3 of 49), there are requested unit price and amount but this contract is not requested any price. Are we going to put any price on this sheet or put N/A?

A57: Price will not be evaluated and pricing does not need to be filled in on Page 3.

Q58: In order to meet the requirement in the solicitation for Past Performance mentioned in FA5685- 18-R-0003-0001, we would like to carry out a partnership with a firm. I would appreciate if you could confirm us which type of partnership is to be acceptable. (Ordinary Partnership, Joint Venture or Consortium)

A58: Joint Ventures will be the only partnership acceptable and will be evaluated based on a joint venture status, which includes an updated NCAGE, DUNS number, and SAM registration that reflects the JV name.

Q59: Solicitation page 28 specify the page limitation for each volume but does NOT specify any line spacing requirement. Is the 100 page limitation for technical proposal with "single" or "double" space?

A59: Amendment 0005 to the solicitation expands on this and identifies individual page limits within the Technical Factor.

Q60: Can we submit a proposal though we couldn’t participate to site visit?

A61: Please see A55 above.

Q62: We would like to participate to tender as JV. Each company has separate NCAGE Code, DUNS number and SAM registration. Do we have to get NCAGE Code, DUNS number and SAM registration on behalf of JV?

A62: Please see A58 above.

Q63: We would like to form a Joint Venture.

A64: Please see A58 above.

Q65: Kindly request proposal due date extension to be able to prepare proper design package.

A65: Amendment 0004 to the solicitation extends the proposal due date to 18 September 2018.

Q66: Is Section B in the RFP needs to be filled-in? There is no cost evaluation in this proposal therefore if we need to filled please let us know what we will need to write?

A66: Section B does not need to be filled out. The maximum for this program is $95 million.

Q67: The requirements for the design package are quite much and the schedule is extremely tight, especially the 3D renderings are time-consuming, and they will start after the completion of the whole design. Therefore we would appreciate if the proposal due date is extended 15 days minimum.

A67: Please see A65 above.

Q68: We kindly request your office to extend the subject proposal due date for 14 days from 27 Jul 2018, to 10 Aug 2018.

A68: Please see A65 above.