Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(PPQ).doc
DOC document 50 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Laundry and Dry Cleaning Services in Support of NAFI (Non-Appropriated Fund Instrumentality)
- Solicitation number
- FA5613-17-R-0001
About this file
Attachment 4, Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Atch_2_PWS_NAF_Laundry_Revised_Amd02.docx | DOCX document | |
| PWS_Appendix_1,_Estimated_Annual-Monthly_Workload_Revised_Amd02.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Pre-Prop_Conf-Site_Visit_Attend_Sheet.pdf | ||
| Amendment_02.doc | DOC document | |
| Pre-Proposal_Conf_Minutes_27Mar17.docx | DOCX document | |
| AF_Inns_Linen_Specifications_Standard.docx | DOCX document | |
| Pre-Proposal_Slides_Laundry.ppt | PPT presentation | |
| Site_Visit_Minutes_31Mar17.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_01.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_1,_Pricing_Schedule.doc | DOC document | |
| Combined_Synopsis-Solicitation.doc | DOC document | |
| PWS_Appendix_2_Surveillance_Plan.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_3,_General_Provisions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2,_Performance_Work_Statement_(PWS).docx | DOCX document | |
| PWS_Appendix_1,_Estimated_Annual-Monthly_Workload.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4, Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
FA5613-17-R-0001
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) This acquisition is for Laundry and Dry Cleaning Services, to include pick-up and return of items, Ramstein Air Base, Germany.
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address:
Telephone Number: ____________________
Email Address:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:
Contract Number*:
Contract Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B.
RATER INFORMATION:
Name of Rater:
Title:
Address:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT TO:
Erika Voss-Elsaesser/Contract Specialist Inge Jenkins/Contracting Officer
700 CONS/LGCA
and
700 CONS/LGCA
erika.voss_elsaesser.1.de@us.af.mil ingeborg.jenkins.1.de@us.af.mil
+49-631-536-6809 or DSN 489-6809 +49-631-536- 6800 or DSN 489-6800
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| returned all laundry and/or dry cleaned items clean and free of tears and stains. |
| 2. |
| returned all laundry and/or dry cleaned items appropriately packed, marked and separated. |
| 3. |
| returned all laundry and/or dry cleaned items dry and serviceable. |
| 4. |
| returned all laundry and/or dry cleaned items in accordance with the specified time frames. |
| 5. |
| provided adequate supervision and manpower to meet established schedules. |
| 6. |
| provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies pursuant to their quality control procedures and established procedures to prevent recurrence of discrepancy. |
| 7. |
| displayed initiative to solve problems and follow-up to ensure desired results were achieved. |
| 8. |
| adequately coped with any sudden surge in requirements (if applicable). |
| 9. |
| adequately coped with short notice requirements. |
| 10. |
| How would you rate the vendor's overall performance? |
REMARKS/COMMENTS:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .