Industry Questions with Government Responses 24 Apr 12.docx

DOCX document 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Air Force Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) Support
Solicitation number
FA4890-12-R-0006
Issued by

About this file

Industry Questions with Government Responses 24 Apr 12

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FA4890-12-R-0006-0003- Final RFP Amendment 0003.doc DOC document
FA4890-12-R-0006 CO Letter Amenment 0003.docx DOCX document
4 - AF FIAR Spt IDIQ PWS Amendment 0003.docx DOCX document
FA4890-12-R-0006 CO Letter Amenment 0002.docx DOCX document
Industry Questions with Government Responses 20 Apr 12.docx DOCX document
5 - FIAR Spt TO 0001 PM Spt PWS Amendment 0002.docx DOCX document
1 - AF FIAR Spt IDIQ Pricing Table Amendment 0002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
4 - AF FIAR Spt IDIQ PWS Amendment 0002.docx DOCX document
FA4890-12-R-0006-0002- Final RFP Amendment 0002.doc DOC document
FIAR QASP 20 Apr 2012.docx DOCX document
FA4890-12-R-0006 CO Letter Proposal Due Date.docx DOCX document
2 - SB Subcontracting Plan Checklist Amendment 0001.docx DOCX document
5 - FIAR Spt TO 0001 PM Spt PWS Amendment 0001.docx DOCX document
FA4890-12-R-0006-0001- Final RFP Amendment 0001.doc DOC document
A - FIAR Spt CDRL A001 Amendment 0001.docx DOCX document
8 - Draft- DD 254- Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
1 - AF FIAR Spt IDIQ Pricing Table Amendment 0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
3 - Subcontracting Plan Example Spreadsheet Amendment 0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Industry Questions with Government Responses.docx DOCX document
4 - AF FIAR Spt IDIQ PWS Amendment 0001.docx DOCX document
FA4890-12-R-0006 CO Letter Amendment 0001.docx DOCX document
6 - FIAR Spt TO 0002 SBR PWS Amendment 0001.docx DOCX document
7 - FIAR Spt TO 0003 E C PWS Amendment 0001 3 Apr 12.docx DOCX document
B - DI-MGMT-81453A.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Conference 4 Apr 12.pptx PPTX presentation
Industry Questions 3 Apr 12.docx DOCX document
Gov't Responses to Industry Questions.docx DOCX document
2 - SB Subcontracting Plan Checklist.docx DOCX document
3 - Subcontracting Plan Example Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
10 - Draft DD254- FA4890-12-R-0006 FIAR Support 23 Mar 12.pdf PDF
5 - FIAR Spt TO 0001 PM Spt FINAL PWS.docx DOCX document
8 - FIAR Spt CDRL A001.docx DOCX document
9 - DI-MGMT-81453A.pdf PDF
1 - AF FIAR Spt IDIQ Pricing Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
4 - FIAR Spt IDIQ FINAL PWS.docx DOCX document
Final RFP FA4890-12-R-0006- FIAR Support.doc DOC document
7 - FIAR Spt TO 0003 E C FINAL PWS.docx DOCX document
6 - FIAR Spt TO 0002 SBR FINAL PWS.docx DOCX document
FA4890-12-R-0006 CO Letter- Potential OCIs.docx DOCX document
Final Draft RFP 8 March 2012.docx DOCX document
FIAR Spt TO 0003 E C PWS 8 Mar 12.docx DOCX document
IDIQ Pricing Table 8 Mar 12.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA4890-12-R-0006 CO Letter.docx DOCX document
FIAR Spt TO 0002 SBR PWS 8 Mar 12.docx DOCX document
Attachment Subcontracting Plan Checklist.docx DOCX document
Attachement Subcontracting Goals.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FIAR Spt TO 0001 PM Spt PWS 8 Mar 12.docx DOCX document
FIAR Spt IDIQ PWS 8 Mar 12.docx DOCX document
FA4890-12-R-0006-CO Letter Request for SB Capabilities-MR Questions Letter.docx DOCX document
FA4890-12-R-0006-Request for SB Capabilities-MR Questions Letter.docx DOCX document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Government Answers to Industry Questions – 13 April 2012

#
Reference
Question
Response
1
ID/IQ PWS 2.5.3.1.2 & 2.5.3.1.3
Based on Government release 20 April 2012 (Question # 4) the Government has significantly changed staffing requirements since the initial release of this RFP. Is it truly the intent of the Government that any supervisor (which could include someone who works for an assessable (2.5.3.1.2) unit lead yet is supervising staff) must meet a higher standard (2.5.3.1.3) than their assessable unit lead (2.5.3.1.2)? Or a person who is leading a team not performing directly on an assessable unit team must now meet a higher standard than those in 2.5.3.1.3? The intent seems to significantly limit the contractor’s ability to staff the program, and thus reducing the efficiency of the programs leadership team and subsequently increasing the cost to the Government. We understood the intent for TO leads to have more experience/qualifications than the assessable unit leads based on the original solicitation (original PWS reference 2.5.3.1.2), however now it appears the intent has changed significantly, can the Government clarify? For example in sustainment an assessable unit lead may manage 7 related packages (per 2.5.3.1.2-more than 3 related) and yet a person who manages two staff on another portion of the program must meet the more stringent standard of 2.5.3.1.3.
The Government changed the order of paragraphs 2.5.3.1.2 and 2.5.3.1.3 again to reflect the hierarchical levels of management / key personnel from 2.5.3.1.1 to 2.5.3.1.3 and to clarify the roles at each level. Please see changes to referenced PWS paragraphs (highlighted) on pages 9 and 10 of the ID/IQ PWS.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .