Attach_20-_PPQ.pdf
PDF 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Ellsworth Air Force Base- SABER Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4690-16-R-0007
About this file
Attach 20- PPQ
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 20
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
15 August 16 Questionnaire on Contractor’s Present and Past Performance
Request you provide the following information on the contractor’s present and past performance by placing an X in the space provided by the most appropriate response. Please provide comments on the lines provided after each question for all ratings other than Satisfactory Confidence. If more space is needed, continue your comments on a separate sheet of paper and attach it to this questionnaire prior to submittal to the 28th Contracting Squadron. You are asked to provide frank, concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract identified. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in your organization. The following definitions are applicable rating levels of the contractor’s performance on the identified program.
Performance Assessment Rating Description
Adjectival Rating Description
Substantial Confidence
Based on the offeror' s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral Confidence
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror' s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.
Limited Confidence record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence
Based on. the offeror' s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Individual’s Name, Title, and Phone Number Completing Questionnaire:
Company’s Name: ______________________________________________________________________
Contractor’s Name:
Contract Number: Contract Title:
Period of Performance (Including Options): __________________________________________________
Contract Amount (Including Options): ______________________________________________________
Contract Type: Firm Price______ Cost Reimbursement______ Other (Specify)_____________________
MANAGEMENT
1. Rate the contractor on their ability to provide adequate manning and equipment to respond to surge requirements, contingencies, emergencies, and weather delays without falling behind the regular schedule.
Substantial Satisfactory Limited No Neutral Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence
Comments:
2. Rate the contractor on their ability to provide effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements and their ability to take appropriate action to take to correct deficiencies when identified.
(Does the contractor conform to the government accepted quality control plan? Does the contractor provide effective quality control and /or inspection procedures to meet contractual requirements?)
Comments:
3. Rate the contractor’s ability to proactively recognize and resolve unanticipated difficulties. (Does contractor display initiative to solve problems? Does contractor identify risks/problems as they occur?)
Substantial Satisfactory Limited No Neutral Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence
Comments:
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
4. Rate the contractor on their ability to provide a sufficient number of qualified personnel to ensure all contract requirements were successfully completed in an expedient manner. (Does contractor demonstrate ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period?)
Comments:
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
5. Rate the working relationship between the contractor and your company and your designated representatives.
(Includes inspection personnel)
Substantial Satisfactory Limited No Neutral Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence
Comments:
6. Rate the contractor on their environmental awareness. (Includes environmental compliance and environmental initiatives, such as affirmative procurement)
Substantial Satisfactory Limited No Neutral Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence
Comments:
7. Has the contractor ever been given a Cure Notice, Show Cause Notice, Letter of Concerns, or had payment withheld for services not rendered?
Number of Cure Notices: _____ Number of Show Cause Notices: _____ Number of Letter of Concerns: ____ Number of times payment withheld for services not rendered: _____
Comments:
SUMMARY
8. Would you hire this contractor again? Highly Likely Likely Unlikely Highly Unlikely
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________
| Questionnaire on Contractor’s Present and Past Performance |
| Request you provide the following information on the contractor’s present and past performance by placing an X in the space provided by the most appropriate response. Please provide comments on the lines provided after each question for all ratings o... |
| Performance Assessment Rating Description |
| Individual’s Name, Title, and Phone Number Completing Questionnaire: |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Company’s Name: ______________________________________________________________________ |
| Contractor’s Name: |
| Contract Number: Contract Title: |
| Period of Performance (Including Options): __________________________________________________ |
| Contract Amount (Including Options): ______________________________________________________ |
| Contract Type: Firm Price______ Cost Reimbursement______ Other (Specify)_____________________ |
| MANAGEMENT |
| 1. Rate the contractor on their ability to provide adequate manning and equipment to respond to surge requirements, contingencies, emergencies, and weather delays without falling behind the regular schedule. |
| Substantial Satisfactory Limited No Neutral |
| Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence |
| [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| 2. Rate the contractor on their ability to provide effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements and their ability to take appropriate action to take to correct deficiencies when identified. (Does the contractor... |
| Substantial Satisfactory Limited No Neutral |
| Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence |
| [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| 3. Rate the contractor’s ability to proactively recognize and resolve unanticipated difficulties. (Does contractor display initiative to solve problems? Does contractor identify risks/problems as they occur?) |
| Substantial Satisfactory Limited No Neutral |
| Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence |
| [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| 4. Rate the contractor on their ability to provide a sufficient number of qualified personnel to ensure all contract requirements were successfully completed in an expedient manner. (Does contractor demonstrate ability to hire, maintain, and replace, ... |
| Substantial Satisfactory Limited No Neutral |
| Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence |
| [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| CUSTOMER SATISFACTION |
| 5. Rate the working relationship between the contractor and your company and your designated representatives. (Includes inspection personnel) |
| Substantial Satisfactory Limited No Neutral |
| Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence |
| [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| 6. Rate the contractor on their environmental awareness. (Includes environmental compliance and environmental initiatives, such as affirmative procurement) |
| Substantial Satisfactory Limited No Neutral |
| Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence Confidence |
| [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| 7. Has the contractor ever been given a Cure Notice, Show Cause Notice, Letter of Concerns, or had payment withheld for services not rendered? |
| Number of Cure Notices: _____ |
| Number of times payment withheld for services not rendered: _____ |
| Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| SUMMARY |
| 8. Would you hire this contractor again? Highly Likely Likely Unlikely Highly Unlikely |
| [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] |
| Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
| ______________________________________________________________________________________ |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .