Past Performance Survey Carpet.doc

DOC document 209 KB Posted Aug 12, 2009

Attached to: Asbestos Abatement and Remove/Replace Carpet and Tile Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: FA4661-09-R-0008
Issued by: Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

From the source

Correction to Past Performance Survey FA466-09-R-0008 DUE 10 Sep 09 at 1400 hours.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Asbestos Abatement and Remove/Replace Carpet and Tile, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
MFR Change Time.doc	DOC document	Sep 14, 2009
FA4661-09-R-0008 Carpet Tile Solicitation Amend 01.doc	DOC document	Sep 14, 2009
Rev 1 Specs Carpet IDIQ FY10.doc	DOC document	Sep 11, 2009
FBO Clarification of Ques 11 Sep 09.docx	DOCX document	Sep 11, 2009
MFR Change Due Date.pdf	PDF	Sep 8, 2009
A12 Pre-Bid Conf SV Minutes.docx	DOCX document	Sep 1, 2009
tx17_r5 Jul 09.mht	MHT file	Aug 18, 2009
Dyess Carpet Tile Specs 09R0008.docx	DOCX document	Aug 12, 2009
Dyess Carpet Tile WD 09R0008.doc	DOC document	Aug 12, 2009
Past Performance Survey Carpet.doc	DOC document	Aug 12, 2009
FA4661-09-R-0008 Dyess Carpet Tile IDIQ.docx	DOCX document	Aug 12, 2009

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

7TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON (ACC)

381 THIRD STREET

DYESS AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS 79607-1581

CREATED: January 1994

OPR: HQ ACC/IMPSP (W. Bryson)

Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Solicitation FA4661-09-R-0008

MEMORANDUM FOR PROSPECTIVE EVALUATORS

FROM: 7 CONS/LGCA

381 Third Street

Dyess AFB TX 79607-1581

SUBJECT: Solicitation FA4661-09-R-0008, Asbestos Abatement and Remove/Replace Carpet and Tile Indefinite Delivery-Requirements, Past Performance Questionnaire

1. The 7th Contracting Squadron is conducting a proposal evaluation for subject solicitation at Dyess AFB, TX. Under the solicitation, the Air Force will perform a Performance Price Tradeoff (PPT) evaluation. The contractor listed in Section A of the attached questionnaire has identified your office as a source to evaluate the contractor’s past performance and it also authorizes release of this information to our office.

2. The individual most knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall condition of performance rendered should complete the survey. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge with the judgment of others in their organization.

3. Please complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible by indicating your ratings and providing comments wherever applicable. For any rating of E or U, request you provide an explanatory narrative and attach to your response. The narratives need not be lengthy, but should be detailed and descriptive. Use separate evaluation forms for each contract/order being evaluated.

4. Your time and effort in providing this information is greatly appreciated. The requested information is critical to our evaluation. Please complete and return the completed package as quickly as possible but not later than 2:00 PM CST 10 September 2009. You may email a scanned copy to april.kreps@dyess.af.mil, FAX it to 325-696-4084, or mail it to the following address:

7th Contracting Squadron

Attn: Ms. April Kreps

381 Third Street

Dyess AFB TX 79607

5. If you have any questions, please call Ms. April Kreps at (325) 696-1454. Thank you for your cooperation and quick response to this request.

//SIGNED//

RONALD G. MILLER

Contracting Officer

SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor requesting evaluation prior to mailing. NOTE: Contractor shall also include a verbatim copy of each SECTION A (completed and mailed to the proposed respondents) and corresponding respondents’ name/address in VOLUME II (Past Performance), Refer paragraph L-4) A. Contractor’s name and address:

B. Point of Contact:

C. Phone/Fax Numbers (with area code) & E-mail Address:

D. Contract number:

E. Project Title or Description of Work performed under this project:

F. Contractor’s Role (Prime, sub, designer, etc.) _______________________________________________________________________

G. Contracting or Procurement Official (Name & Contact information): ____________________________________________________

H. Project Designer of Record (Name & Contact information): ____________________________________________________________

I. Contract Type: FORMCHECKBOX Firm-Fixed-Price FORMCHECKBOX Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Task Order FORMCHECKBOX Cost-Reimbursement

J. Project Award Date:

Scheduled Completion Date:

Current/Final Completion Date:

K. Project Award Amount:

Current/Final Project Amount:

L. Comments (if desired): _________________________________________________________________________________________

M. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in SECTION B of this Questionnaire.

(Signature)

(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by respondent.)

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature) (Date)

Address:

(Typed or Printed Name)

(Title)

Phone/Fax Numbers (with area code) & E-mail Address

NOTE: The identity of individual(s) providing reference information shall not be disclosed.

Performance Evaluation Instructions

· When responding to the descriptive statements, select the letter, which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. If the contractor has no record of past performance relevant to a particular question, select “Neutral.”

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS

Rating

Description

Exceptional

(E)

SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Very Good

(V)

SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory

(S)

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral

(N)

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Unsatisfactory

(U)

CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

High Confidence

Significant Confidence

Satisfactory Confidence

Unknown Confidence

Little Confidence

Evaluation Areas

QUALITY CONTROL:

Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures that resulted in a quality-finished project.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor developed and submitted realistic progress schedule(s).

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications, resulting in minor, if any, punchlist items.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor designs were all concise, accurate and captured all details of the site visit.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor thoroughly reviewed design package proposals for accuracy, completeness and compliance with contract requirements

FORMCHECKBOX

II.

TIMELY PERFORMANCE:

Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time, as scheduled.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a CURE NOTICE or a SHOW CAUSE LETTER (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances on a separate sheet of paper and identify if Liquidated Damages were assessed)

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor provided timely cost/design proposals.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor submitted the progress schedule and interim progress reports as required in a timely manner and the schedule was approved prior to actual construction.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor provided on-time submittals as required.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor provided payrolls for both their firm and their subcontractors’ employees as required and scheduled.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor provided timely resolution of all punchlist items.

FORMCHECKBOX

III.

MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS:

Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor hired, maintained, and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor ensured the site manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor ensured the site manager was consistently present on site when work was performed.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor provided timely and satisfactory response to warranty issues after project completion.

FORMCHECKBOX

Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required.

FORMCHECKBOX

The contractor cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings and maintained communication to assure satisfactory resolution.

FORMCHECKBOX

IV.

PRICING:

The contractor submits proposals that accurately represent the work required.

FORMCHECKBOX

The contractor’s supporting price/cost information for modifications is accurate, complete and reasonable (not over inflated or under estimated).

FORMCHECKBOX

How would you rate the contractor’s overall Pricing performance.

FORMCHECKBOX

MANAGEMENT/SUPERINTENDENCE:

Site Manager ensured compliance to contact requirements and safety regulations.

FORMCHECKBOX

Site Manager acted promptly to resolve problems and ensure work quality.

FORMCHECKBOX

Site Manager had sufficient authority to make decisions or take actions during project performance.

FORMCHECKBOX

Site Manager consistently present on site when work was performed.

FORMCHECKBOX

VI.

COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR STANDARDS:

Submitted payrolls in a timely manner.

FORMCHECKBOX

Payrolls were complete and correct.

FORMCHECKBOX

Compliance with labor laws and regulations with specific attention to the Davis-Bacon Act.

FORMCHECKBOX

VII.

COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY STANDARDS:

Adequacy of Safety Plan.

FORMCHECKBOX

Implementation of Safety Plan.

FORMCHECKBOX

VIII.

GENERAL PERFORMANCE:

Please rate the contractor's performance on projects/task orders. (example: were any not accepted due to the quality of workmanship?)

(If yes, please briefly explain circumstances in comments section below)