Attach_6_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
Repair UST Fuel Tanks IDIQ
Solicitation number
FA4626-13-R-0007
Issued by

About this file

Attach 6 Past performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
General_Decision_Number_MT76.docx DOCX document
General_Decision_Number_MT78.docx DOCX document
Amendment_2-6-2014.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0003.doc DOC document
General_Decision_Number_MT67.docx DOCX document
312300_-_Earthwork.doc DOC document
SECTION_B_CONTINUATION_SHEET.docx DOCX document
231113_-_Fuel-Oil_Storage_Tank_Piping_and_Monitoring_Leak_Detection_System.doc DOC document
Amend_3_Drawings.zip ZIP file
Specification_Section_010000.docx DOCX document
Questions_and_Answers.docx DOCX document
Amendment_02.doc DOC document
Amendment_01.doc DOC document
Pre-Proposal_Site_Visit.pdf PDF
Attch_5-1_Wage_Determination.docx DOCX document
Attch_4_Drawings.zip ZIP file
Attch_2_Material_Submittal_Schedule.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attach_5-2_Wage_Determination.docx DOCX document
Attch_7_-_Subcontractor_Consent_Form_-_10R0027.docx DOCX document
Attch_5-3_Wage_Determination.docx DOCX document
Solicitation.doc DOC document
Attach_1_Specifications.zip ZIP file
Attch_8_Base_Entery_Policy.pdf PDF
Attach_3_Schedule_of_Drawings.doc DOC document
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

"SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104 WHEN FILLED IN"

Attachment 6 FA4626-13-R-0007

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone : ____________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

__________________________
__________________________

Submitting Survey as Prime or Sub-Contractor (please circle one) If submitting as Sub-Contractor, Prime Contractors Name:___________________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

__________________________
__________________________

Project Title and Detailed Description of Work: _____________________________________

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name and Title of Evaluator: ____________________________

Company Name: ______________________________________

Address: _____________________Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________Fax Number:_____________________
_____________________________Email Address: _____________________

C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

341 CONS/LGCA, 7015 Goddard Drive, Bldg 145, Malmstrom AFB, MT 59402 ATTN; Mark Jefferson EMAIL: mark.jefferson@malmstrom.af.mil

DUTY PHONE: (406) 731-4014

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
13.
Met established project schedules.
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

23.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________

Remarks:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .