FA4620-19-R-A001_Atch_3-_MATOC_Specifications,_dated_9_Apr_19.pdf
PDF 217 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FY19 MATOC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4620-19-R-A001
About this file
FA4620-19-R-A001 Atch 3- MATOC Specifications, dated 9 Apr 19
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 36
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT (MATOC)
Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington
MATOC SPECIFICATION
GENERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS
9 APRIL 2019
SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGES
01000 GENERAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS 01000-1 thru 01000-4
01100 GENERAL SITE REQUIREMENTS 01100-1 thru 01100-2
01200 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 01200-1 thru 01200-2
01300 GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 01300-1 thru 01300-21
01400 (NOT USED)
01500 TASK ORDER CLOSE OUT 01500-1 thru 01500-2
01600 MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT 01600-1
01700 CONTRACTOR’S QUALITY CONTROL 01700-1 thru 01700-5
01000-1
SECTION 01000
GENERAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
1. Contract Description: The Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) is an Indefinite- Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contracting program that supplements the Air Force Civil Engineer’s (CE) in-house capability to perform minor construction, facility repair, and real property maintenance projects on an as needed basis. This requirement is geared towards repair/maintenance projects typically ranging from $2,000 to $750,000. The contractor shall provide all material, equipment, labor and general conditions to accomplish “non-complex” and/or “simple” design, maintenance, repair, and minor construction projects in an expeditious manner. The work may include facility upgrades, utility work, airfield pavement, roads, roofs, and other assorted repair and maintenance projects. The construction work includes tasks in various trades such as carpentry, asbestos abatement/removal, demolition, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, concrete masonry, welding, and paving. Design as used in this acquisition means project estimating and preparation of minimal designs. All construction/Design should comply with the current Base Design Standards (BDS).
1.1. Work Element No. 1 (Design Build Effort Required): MATOC Contractor shall develop project design documentation including drawings, specifications, design analysis, etc… representative of a 35%, 65%, 95%, and/or 100% design effort, as identified within each Task Order. Upon completion of design, and upon direction by the Government, construction shall commence and be completed in accordance with Task Order requirements.
1.2. Work Element No. 2 (Design Build Effort Required with Provided Partial Design):
MATOC Contractor shall be provided a previously accomplished preliminary/ intermediate design effort (e.g., 15% / 35% design) including available drawings, specifications, and/or design analysis, etc... which shall be developed to the appropriate level of design per the requirements of the Task Order (35% / 65% / 95% / 100% final or a combination thereof). Upon completion and approval of the appropriate level of design per the Task Order, and upon direction by the Government, construction shall commence and be completed in accordance with Task Order requirements.
1.3. Work Element No. 3 (Construction Effort Only): MATOC Contractor shall be provided a 100% completed design document (drawings, specifications, and/or design analysis etc.) to initiate and complete construction execution in accordance with Task Order requirements.
2. Contract Requirements: The contractor shall furnish all personnel, labor, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and services necessary to design, manage, and accomplish a broad range of repair, alteration, and/or new construction work on various real property facilities. The projects will include tasks in a variety of trades such as demolition, site work, excavation, cast-in-place concrete, masonry, structural steel, electrical, mechanical (including HVAC), painting, carpentry, roofing, millwork, road repair, and other specialty and general contracting work.
3. Contractor Organization: The contractor shall have available a design and construction staff to respond to the requirements of this multi-discipline MATOC type contract. The contractor’s organizational approach shall integrate with this staff to provide project
01000-2 management, project design/engineering, on-site superintendence, quality control and administration.
4. Ordering Procedures: As the need arises for performance under the terms of this contract, the Contracting Officer (CO) or authorized representative will issue a ‘Task Order Request for Proposal’ (TORFP) providing a synopsis of the proposed project requirements, define the government evaluation method(s) to be used for subsequent award of Task Order, and establish the date, time and location of the pre-proposal site visit.
4.1. Normal Response Requirements: If the requirement is determined to be a normal response requirement by the CO, the contractor shall submit a Task Order Proposal to fulfill the requirement within a maximum of fourteen (14) calendar days from written notification. Additional time may be allowed at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.
4.2. Quick Response Requirements: If the requirement is determined to be a quick response requirement by the CO, the contractor shall submit a Task Order Proposal to fulfill the requirement within a maximum of seven (7) calendar days from written notification
4.3. During this period, a site visit with the contractor, CES MATOC technical representative, and the contracting officer’s representative shall take place to clarify the scope of the requirement and verify the existing conditions. The contractors shall email detailed questions arising from the site visit to the CO by the due date/time at the site visit. If necessary, the CO will provide revised RFP documents by amendment to the TORFP within two (2) business days following submission of the site visit questions; unless determined otherwise by the CO.
5. Project Locations: The contractor shall accomplish all work under this contract at Fairchild AFB, Washington and at the following remote locations in accordance with each Task Order.
5.1. The 336th Combat Crew Training Wing (CCTW)
5.2. Survival School Command Past areas (Tacoma and Ruby Creek) near Cusick, WA
5.3. Joint Personnel Recovery Agency (JPRA)
5.4. Fairchild Recreational Area at Clear Lake
5.5. Fort Wright Wells and Geiger Reservoir
5.6. Moses Lake
6. Standard Working Hours: See Base Design Standards.
7. Material Submittals: Upon issuance of a Task Order, the Contractor shall submit work plans, material submittal register, Interim QC Plan, samples, brochures, manufacturers data, product data sheets, shop drawings and/or certificates of materials (relative to the construction execution) to the Contracting Officer for approval prior to their installation within the project, in accordance with Base Design Standards /specifications and Task Order Requirements. If the material submittals provided are in variance from the Base Design Standards, the Contractor shall describe such variations in writing at the time of submission and request a variance from the design criteria in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract. Failure to provide such notification will not relieve the Contractor from his
01000-3 responsibility of meeting the design criteria and/or contract specifications regardless of whether or not the submittal is approved by the Government. Material submittals shall be as specified under each specification section and the designer of record shall review and stamp all material and design-related submittals (excluding as-builts). All the material submittals as indicated in the applicable specification section shall be submitted at the same time. If the submittal requirement is listed on the drawings, all material submittals of like work shall be submitted simultaneously and with all corresponding specification sections. A system of standard submittals for each contractor will be used to minimize the submittal requirement.
Failure to submit all material submittals associated with an individual specification section at the same time will be cause for rejection.
8. Project Status Updates: The contractor is required to provide weekly project status updates for all active projects. This meeting is to include staff from CES, Contracting Officials, and the Contractor. It will include any pertinent information regarding projects and provide a current percentage of completion for active construction projects.
9. Project Schedule: The proposed schedule must breakdown the project into distinct tasks, show which tasks will be accomplished simultaneously, and indicate the critical path. The purpose of the proposed project schedule is to aid in the determination of the construction period.
10. Mark Up: Documentation will be requested to substantiate all profit, overhead, and G&A rates. If rates are established for a specific project, it is anticipated that they will be utilized for the duration of that project.
11. Interruption of Work: If it becomes necessary to interrupt work activities in buildings and/or areas for construction purposes (except as otherwise described in the task order), the contractor shall request permission, in writing, from the CO fourteen (14) working days in advance. The contractor shall submit written requests for approved street closings fourteen
(14) working days prior to closing of the street.
12. Project Coordination: The contractor shall coordinate all work schedules with the contracting officer (CO) or designated representative and CES MATOC PM or representative prior to the start of work
12.1. Interruption of Work. If it becomes necessary to interrupt work activities in buildings and/or areas for construction purposes (except as otherwise described in the task order), the contractor shall request permission, in writing, from the CO fourteen (14) working days in advance. The contractor shall submit written requests for approved street closings fourteen (14) working days prior to closing of the street.
12.2. Coordination dates. Prior to start of any work under this contract, the contractor shall coordinate start and completion dates in writing with the CO fourteen (14) working days prior to the scheduled start date.
12.3. Temporary construction. Any contractor installed temporary construction intended to prevent interruption of normal work activity or loss of utility services is subject to approval of the Base Civil Engineer through the CO.
01000-4
12.4. Special Projects.
12.4.1. Medical Facilities. The contractor shall coordinate all work in medical facilities through the CES MATOC PM or representative with hospital staff liaisons to minimize interruption of service.
End of Section
01100-1
SECTION 01100
GENERAL SITE REQUIREMENTS
1. Coordination and Access to Site: Coordination with affected facility occupants (Using Agency) shall be made through the Contracting Officer (CO) to assist the Contractor in completing the work with a minimum of interference and inconvenience. Upon award of basic contract, passes shall be issued which will allow all contractor-controlled vehicles to access the Base in accordance with local procedures. Note, base access is subject to periodic changes based upon current ATFP conditions and updates to local policies & procedures. Note, base access is subject to periodic changes based upon current ATFP conditions and updates to local policies & procedures.
2. FPCON Restrictions: Access to Base may be restricted dependent upon the established ‘FPCON’ level at any time during the execution of the Task Order. Contractor shall be issued badge and vehicle pass allowing unrestricted access to the Base throughout FPCON levels ‘A’ and ‘B’. Increased FPCON levels approaching ‘C’ and/or ‘D’ shall be more restrictive, requiring further confirmation of current security requirements as provided by Contracting Officer.
3. Work Layout and Site Management: The Contractor shall coordinate the proposed layout of the work with the MATOC PM and submit various site plans, field office requirements, dust control plans, and proposed storage areas in accordance with the project requirements associated with each Task Order.
3.1. Administrative Field Offices and Material Storage Trailers: The exterior need not comply with base standard colors. See FAFB BDS for more guidance.
3.2. Staging/Material Storage Area(s): The requirement for lay-down areas (staging areas) associated with a Task Order shall be dependent upon the size of project and in accordance with specific criteria as detailed in the Task Order. Prior to starting the work, the Contractor shall submit site plan to the Contracting Officer for approval, showing the layout and details of all temporary facilities planned for use on identified Task Order. The plan shall include the location of the safety and construction fences, location of all site trailers, equipment and material storage areas, construction entrances, trash dumpsters, temporary sanitary facilities, and worker parking areas as required by the Task Order. Site photographs prior to the start of work may be included with the plan. At completion of work, the Contractor shall remove the facilities and restore the site to its original condition. For most construction projects, the MATOC PM will provide the contractor with a single staging area directly adjacent the project site. A supplemental storage area will be identified as required by the detailed Task Order. All staging areas determined necessary by the detailed Task Order shall be completely screened with six-foot high chain-link construction fencing and include visual screening with brown mesh.
Security of all materials and equipment will be the sole responsibility of the contractor.
3.3. All Contractor trailers, stored materials, and idle equipment shall be located in the designated staging area associated with each Task Order. The staging area shall be kept clean and orderly. Tarps are to be used, as necessary, to secure loose materials. The on-site representative of the Contracting Officer is the sole judge as to what constitutes an acceptable staging area. Dumpsters may be located outside
01100-2 the staging area, but must be sited as approved by the on-site representative of the Contracting Officer. Any movement of a dumpster to another area on the project site must be approved by the Contracting Officer’s representative.
3.4. All items in the staging area shall be promptly removed when no longer needed or when the contract is completed.
4. Protection of Government Property: Contractor shall protect all Government property within the buildings in which he is working, except for such property as is required to be demolished. Property that is to be demolished shall be protected until its scheduled demolition time. Protection shall include, but not be limited to, protection from construction-generated dust, debris, water, and vibration.
5. Safety: All work shall be accomplished in accordance with OSHA 29 CFR 1910, OSHA 29 1926 and applicable AFOSH Standards.
6. Waste Disposal: All spoil, waste, and debris removed from the work site and not specified for reuse or identified as salvageable items, shall become the responsibility of the Contractor and shall be disposed of off-base in areas authorized by the applicable county and/or state agencies and in accordance with current rules and regulations governing the disposal of solid waste. Disposal of hazardous waste shall be in compliance with local, state and federal standards as further described in Fairchild AFB Base Design Standards. There are no disposal or borrow pits located on Fairchild AFB.
7. Coordination, Safety and Regulatory Requirements:
7.1. Airfield Safety: The Fairchild AFB Airfield includes a Restricted Access Security Area, identified by a red boundary line and entry control points labeled “Entry Point.”
Individual Task Orders will identify applicable safety and security requirements.
Airfield Manager and Airfield Management will brief all workers and truck drivers on Flightline driving procedures. The Flightline Driving Briefing and Agreement for Contractor and TDY Personnel will be conducted by Airfield Management. This agreement, along with Contractor Badges (issued by Base Security Forces) shall be carried by all individuals operating vehicles on the airfield.
7.2. Site Safety Plans: All Construction Task Orders shall have a Safety Plan that meets the requirements of the most current version of EM 385-1-1.
8. Special Events: The Base may schedule a variety of special events during the contract effort. During the course of these events, more stringent standards may be required for contract operations. Examples are stricter requirements for staging areas, worksites, and haul routes or noise restrictions for events such as change of commands, memorials, or retreats that may be near the working areas. The on-site representative of the Contracting Officer will provide specific requirements to the Contractor. The special events, and their approximate time periods will be as identified during the contract performance period.
9. Safety Cones and Barricades: The use of orange safety cones (regardless of color) is limited to short-term duration not exceeding one workday. Sawhorse type barricades (white with orange banding) is the only allowed safety barricade authorized for extended periods exceeding one day. Safety candlestick cones left over the authorized time period will be confiscated by the Base. The use of yellow safety tape to outline limits of access to a site is not allowed.
01100-3
SECTION 01200
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS
1. The contractor shall follow all federal, state, and local environmental requirements, including the guidance detailed in the Fairchild AFB Base Design Standards (BDS).
2. Presence of Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT): The contractor is advised that hazardous materials (HAZMAT) may be encountered during the execution of Task Orders. When a Task Order identifies a Government-provided design, a HAZMAT Survey will be typically included as part of the design submittal. When a HAZMAT Survey cannot be provided, or when the Task Order specifically requires the MATOC Contractor to include the development of the HAZMAT Survey, the contractor will be responsible to perform a HAZMAT Survey of all anticipated surfaces/areas involved with the project that can be suspected of containing hazardous materials which will impact the construction/renovation process. This tasking will be required to establish the extent of hazardous materials which will require abatement or special handling procedures during the execution of the following-on construction/ renovation project. The potential hazardous materials may include asbestos, lead-based paint, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), radon, radioactive materials, and other materials identified by the Environmental Protection Agency, which typically affect construction.
3. Radioactive Materials (RAM):
3.1. Use of RAM during Contract Execution: Contractors bringing radioactive materials or devices containing radioactive sources onto Base must have prior approval from the Installation Radiation Safety Officer (IRSO). The IRSO for Fairchild AFB is the Bioenvironmental Engineering Flight Commander, who can be reached at (509) 247- 2391. Under no circumstances will a contractor use an unlicensed radioactive source/device on the installation. The contractor should direct any questions regarding responsibility on this issue to the IRSO prior to starting any work. Since the Air Force considers contracts involving radioactive materials a hazardous material items contract, the provisions of AFR 87-8, chapter 3, section 3.3(f) will also apply. In addition, the contractor must submit the following documentation to the IRSO for review prior to execution:
3.1.1. Copy of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission License or Agreement State Radioactive Material License, along with any amendments, covering the radioactive material to be used.
3.1.2. Copy of the user’s qualification and radiation training.
3.1.3. Copy of the radiation dosimetry results from the previous year.
3.1.4. Statement of expected use (use rate) of radioactive materials or devices for the length of the contract.
3.1.5. Statement of storage and security requirements.
01200-2
3.1.6. Copies of the last two (2) leak checks (if applicable).
3.2. Radioactive Demolition Recycling/Debris: Radioactive material encountered during demolition procedures will require a written request from the Contractor to the IRSO for instructions and subsequent actions involving disposal of the RAM debris through Base agencies. Examples include smoke detectors containing a radioactive substance (such as Americium-241) and self-luminous exit signs containing tritium.
3.3. The following requirements apply when removing potential radioactive items (i.e.
smoke detectors and non-electrical emergency exit signs) during demolition or renovation procedures. The contractor shall develop list of identified RAM items and forward to the IRSO via the Contracting Officer. The list shall include the following descriptions associated with the RAM:
3.3.1. Product Stock Number
3.3.2. Quantity
3.3.3. Nomenclature
3.3.4. Radionuclide
3.4. The IRSO will then coordinate with USAF Radioactive Material Recycling/Recovery Program at Wright Patterson AFB for recycling instructions to include packaging instructions for contractor shipment. The contractor shall then prepare the radioactive/recyclable items IAW 49 CFR 172, 49 CFR 173, and IRSO guidance, and then make the shipment.
01300-1
SECTION 01300
GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Specific Task Order Design Criteria shall be identified within each Task Order ‘Statement of Work’)
1. Design Philosophy: When directed by the Task Order ‘Statement of Work’, the MATOC Contractor shall prepare design documentation reflecting standard commercial industry standards, practices and products, and shall specify the use of commercially available materials and associated assemblies. Design shall be based upon consideration of all practical alternatives in support of defined Task Order requirements, with alternative selections being based upon Life Cycle Cost Analyses per AF Design Criteria (MIL-HDBK- 1190). All construction drawings and design calculations produced by the MATOC Contractor or design consultants shall be affixed with the registration stamp (seal) of the Architect or Engineer of Record and that of all consultants, as appropriate, (e.g., structural, civil, mechanical, electrical, environmental, and fire protection engineers). Approval shall be indicated on all documents by having the professional stamp/seal of architect or engineer with personal signature over same appearing on all sheets as applicable to their discipline.
1.1 Architectural Compatibility Compliance Policy: In accordance with Air Force policy letter dated 25 May 2005 from Air Mobility Command, all architectural or visually significant Task Orders will incorporate review by the local Base Architectural Compatibility Review Board (ACRB) including documented approval prior to proceeding on to the next scheduled design phase.
1.2 Historical buildings at Fairchild AFB: The following buildings or structures have been identified as having historical significance at Fairchild AFB and will require additional project design review by the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) before construction or renovation can occur: Hangar 2050; Bldg 2245 (Base Personnel); and Bldg 2025 (Snow Barn). In addition, the following site has archaeological significance: GKAW Water System Annex No. 1.
1.2.1 The MATOC Design Team shall be required to submit a single copy of all phased design submittals (complete submittal package including drawings, specifications and design analysis) to DAHP at the following address during the same time the Base receives their copies. Mail to the following:
Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Attention: Mr. Nicolas Vann P.O. Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98501
1.2.2 A courtesy copy of the DAHP cover letter shall be sent to the Fairchild AFB Environmental office at the following address:
92 CES/CEIEA
Attention: Mr. Shawn Woodard 100 W. Ent Street, Suite 155 Fairchild AFB, WA 99011-9404
1.2.3 All Task Orders involving historical review by DAHP will require up to 30
01300-2 calendar days for the design submittal review period in accordance with established Federal guidelines. This requirement takes precedence over any design submittal review period indicated within Task Order documentation.
2. Design Project Manager: The MATOC Contractor shall appoint a Design Project Manager to serve as a single point of contact (POC) and liaison between the Design Team element of the MATOC Contract and the Contracting Officer for all design work required under the MATOC contract. Upon award of individual Task Orders, the designated Design Project Manager shall be made known to the Contracting Officer in writing.
3. Review Conferences and Meetings: Design Submittal Review Conferences will be held as defined by individual Task Orders for all scheduled design submittals. In addition to scheduled design submittal review conferences, coordination conferences may be held as deemed necessary by the Government or the MATOC Designer at an agreed upon time and location. The MATOC Designer may request such conferences when it is deemed necessary by all parties to clarify the design direction or expedite the preparation of established plans and specifications in support of project. The MATOC Designer will be responsible for making ‘Confirmation Notices’ of any conversation (telephone, fax or e-mail) and/or minutes of any meeting with AF personnel concerning the execution of the project.
4. Confirmation Notices: The MATOC Contractor will be required to provide a record of all conferences, meetings, discussions, verbal directions, telephone conversations, etc., participated in by the MATOC Contractor and/or his representatives on matters relative to the execution of the Task Order. These records, entitled ‘Confirmation Notices’, will be numbered sequentially and shall fully identify participating personnel, subject discussed and conclusions reached. The MATOC Designer shall forward to the Contracting Officer a reproducible copy of said conference minutes not more than Five (5) Working Days after the discussion.
5. Drawing & Specification Numbers: Each individual awarded Task Order shall require the MATOC Designer to annotate the contract drawings and specifications with a Government provided ‘Drawing Number’ and ‘Specification Number’. The drawing number will be indicated within the title block of the cover sheet and each subsequent drawing sheet within the drawings set. The specification number will be located in the upper right-hand corner of each page of the specifications and design analysis.
6. Architect or Engineer of Record: All construction drawings and design calculations developed in support of a Task Order associated with this MATOC Contract shall be affixed with the registration stamp (seal) of the Architect or Engineer of Record and that of all consultants, as appropriate, (e.g. structural, civil, mechanical, electrical, and fire protection engineers) before submittal for review. All design professionals shall have current registration to practice in the United States. Approval shall be indicated on all documents by having the professional stamp/seal of architect or engineer with personal signature over same appearing on all sheets as applicable to their specialties.
7. Reference Publications: Technical design development and associated specifications shall conform to current Air Force design criteria represented by reference to Federal, Military (DOD and Air Force) Publications (directive and non-directive) including Policy Directives (AFPD), Instructions (AFI), Manuals (AFM), Joint Manuals (AFJAM), Pamphlets (AFPAM), Joint Pamphlets (AFJPAM), Handbooks(AFH), and Engineering Technical Letters (ETL) as referenced in Section 01300 – Technical References and as specified within each Task
01300-3
Order. Federal and Military Specifications and Standards (FMSS) are presently in the process of being phased out of use, with required criteria being obtained from non-governmental standards and commercial specifications and item descriptions (CIDs) per GSA Acquisition Reform Initiative. Various FMSS have been retained for continued use by means of a waiver from DOD Standardization Office (DODSO), and are as indicated within this document (e.g. FED-STD 595).
7.1 Due to the numerous available suppliers of Government technical references, including those accessible electronically through the Internet, neither the Base Civil Engineering Squadron nor the Contracting Officer will be providing copies of technical references to the Designer unless document is ‘Restricted’ and only available through the Government personnel. Typically, it will instead be the burden of the Designer to locate applicable sources of technical references as identified within each Task Order.
7.2 The official Air Force web site for electronic publications and forms is (http://afpubs.hq.af.mil). Air Force technical references are available as .PDF files downloadable using ‘Acrobat Reader’. To review or acquire Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) and other engineering-related publications Corps of Engineers (COE) Guide Specifications and other COE-related publications, visit the Headquarters COE website at http://www.usace.army.mil for general guidance and additional directions to other websites. Construction Criteria Base (CCB) offers downloadable UFGS at http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/. Additional help in acquiring COE publications and other DOD publications can be received by calling the local Seattle District office at (206) 764-3828 or accessing their web site at (http://www.nws.usace.army.mil). The Mil Hdbk series can be obtained by accessing (http:/dodssp.daps.dla.mil). A partial listing of the latest Air Force Engineering Technical Letters (ETLs) can be obtained at (http://www.afcesa.af.mil/library/etl.asp?Category=Engineering%20Technical%20Lett ers). Air Force Hazardous Material criteria can be obtained at (http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/pubfiles/af/32/afi32-7086/afi32-7086.pdf). AFCEC Design Guides can be obtained at (http://www.wbdg.org).
8. Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Investigation: MATOC Contractors shall perform investigative evaluations of existing facility/site conditions and coordinate project requirements with Using Agency by means of a single Pre-Proposal Conference to be scheduled by the Contracting Officer. This conference will be held prior to the development and submittal of a ‘Concept’ Design (when required by the TORFP) and associated Price.
Investigative services associated with development of the initial ‘Concept’ Design and associated Price Proposal shall be limited to acquiring data from the Pre-Proposal Conference and scheduled site visits, including a scheduled question and answer period.
To prevent uncorroborated information from becoming part of a MATOC proposal, discussions with Using Agency outside of the scheduled conferences shall not be permitted.
Supplemental site investigative evaluations and discussions with Using Agency for clarification of design direction shall be permitted and encouraged (and coordinated by the Contractor through the designated CM) once award of Task Order to selected MATOC Contractor has been made.
9. Design Development Phases: Design accomplishment shall be as identified by each individual Task Order, and must be completed in accordance with the Design Development Phases defined herein (e.g. 35%, 65%, 95%, and/or 100%). Discrepancies and/or
01300-4 omissions within the design documentation relative to the required Task Order design phases shall be eliminated. Each Task Order shall identify the maximum level of design accomplishment required (35%, 65%, 95%, and/or 100%) including a re-submittal of the ‘Corrected’ final submittal, with back-check review performed and comments provided by the Government. Design Development Phase definitions and required criteria are provided for in the following paragraphs.
10. Supplemental Site Investigation: The MATOC Contractor selected to proceed with execution of Task Order will be required to perform supplemental technical field investigations and surveys in support of awarded Task Order project criteria. Investigations and surveys may include utility locates, topographical surveys, and geotechnical surveys as identified within each Task Order project criteria. All engineering disciplines will be required to perform fact-finding engineering investigations to determine the most economical method of design and construction. This will include architectural, civil/structural, mechanical, electrical, communications, and environmental controls. A Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) Survey will be a requirement of the MATOC Contractor in accordance with Section 01200 – Environmental Controls upon award of Task Order and subsequent development of following design phases.
10.1 Geotechnical Studies: Geotechnical studies, when needed for the design or required per the Task Order, shall be provided prior to the 35% design submittal. Failure to submit a required geotechnical study will be cause for rejection of the design submittals.
10.2 Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) Survey: HAZMAT surveys, when required per the Task Order, shall be provided prior to the 35% design submittal.
10.3 Preliminary Hydraulic Analysis (PHA): A PHA, when required per the Task Order, shall be provided prior to the 35% design submittal.
11. Preliminary (35%) Design:
11.1 Preliminary (35%) Design Analysis: MATOC Contractor shall develop the Design Analysis incorporating narrative scope identifying Task Order requirements, project parameters, functional and technical requirements of the Task Order, design objectives, and calculations applicable to the project’s design. The MATOC Contractor shall delineate the basic scope and character of the project in support of the plans and specifications for all relevant disciplines (e.g. Architectural, Civil/Structural, Electrical, Mechanical, Fire Protection, and Environmental).
Preliminary Design Analysis shall include narrative, product literature and other descriptive catalog cut-sheets as appropriate providing sufficient detail for proper evaluation.
11.1.1 Civil/Site Design: Provide a brief description of the basic site layout including utility runs and the rationale behind this design. Address environmental conditions, existing site features, and the relationship of the site and building activities to the surrounding environment.
11.1.2 Civil/Site Calculations: The calculations for Civil/Site design elements, such as those listed below, will utilize metric units. If the project warrants the use of inch-pound (IP) units, the calculations shall be performed in normally accepted and
01300-5 recognized IP units.
- Soil bearing capacities, settlement analysis, slope stability, erosion control, lateral earth pressures and frost design.
- Road, paving, grading and storm drainage design. Storm drainage design shall be in accordance with EISA Section 438.
- Parking allowances including handicapped spaces and organizational equipment.
- Verification of the adequacy of existing and planned utility systems required for complete project support.
- Sizing of domestic water and fire protection systems
- Sizing of waste-water collection systems, to include maximum flow rated in units per second for waste-water and sewage.
11.1.3 Architectural Design: Provide a brief description of the buildings architectural configuration and the rationale behind the design. Address environmental conditions, the relationship of the site and its activities to the building, appearance of the building, response to the architectural program requirements, section of interior and exterior materials, and construction techniques. Describe fire safety measures, including fire egress routes, stair and passage dimensions, detection and alarm systems, and fire suppression systems.
11.1.4 Architectural Calculations: The calculations for Architectural design elements (including Life Safety), such as those listed below, will utilize metric units. If the project warrants the use of inch-pound (IP) units, the calculations shall be performed in normally accepted and recognized IP units. - Allowable Floor Area and building height calculations in accordance with the International Building Code and Military Handbook 1008(c).
- Life Safety Code (NFPA 101) Analysis. Complete exiting requirement calculations based on the Life Safety Code.
- Thermal conductance values for each wall section, which should be selected in coordination with the mechanical engineer to satisfy life cycle cost and energy conservation requirements.
- Physical Security, Evaluation of Force Protection Criteria as referenced in UFC 4-010-01 DOD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings dated 08 October 2003.
- Roof Drainage and connection to storm drainage system.
11.1.5 Structural Interior Design (SID) and Comprehensive Interior Design (CID) Requirements: MATOC Contractor must comply with the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE) “Interior Design Presentation Format” in development of the 35% Design Submittal. For definition purposes, the Preliminary 35% Design Submittal requirement will consist of the requirements identified as ‘Project Definition’ (PD) within the AFCEE document. All applicable ‘Project Definition’ criteria identified within the Part-3 (SID) and Part-4 (CID) AFCEE Submittal Matrix shall be submitted at this phase.
11.1.6 Structural Design: Provide a brief narrative description of the proposed structural approach. Describe the basic construction type and major structural components. Indicate the rationale behind the proposed structural system.
01300-6
Identify the codes, standards, criteria, and design methods around which the structural design will be developed. Indicate how the specified minimum structural criteria will be met or exceeded in the proposed design.
11.1.7 Structural Calculations: The calculations for Structural design elements, such as those listed below, will utilize metric units. If the project warrants the use of inch-pound (IP) units (integration of as-built drawings using IP etc.), the calculations shall be performed in normally accepted and recognized IP units.
- Wind, snow, seismic and dynamic loads
- Shear, moments and axial loads; to include stress analysis diagrams and torsional effects where applicable.
- Deflection of members and walls
- Type and sizing of foundations, structural members and connections.
- Uplift and stability of the structure
- Expansion and crack control
- Construction or erection limitations
- Structural adequacy of existing structures to account for new functional loads or new criteria.
11.1.8 Mechanical Systems:
11.1.8.1 Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC): Provide a brief narrative description of the proposed mechanical design. Indicate the rationale behind the selection of the proposed systems. Address the fuel source, environmental conditions, thermal envelope design, and operating characteristics of the HVAC system. Identify the codes, standards, criteria, and design methods around which the mechanical design will be developed.
Indicate how the specified minimum mechanical and environmental criteria will be met or exceeded in the proposed design. The calculations for HVAC design elements, such as those listed below, will utilize metric units. If the project warrants the use of inch-pound (IP) units (integration of as-built drawings using IP etc.), the calculations shall be performed in normally accepted and recognized IP units.
- Heating and cooling design loads. Computerized calculations will indicate the basis of all input data.
- Estimated annual unit energy consumption (see architectural).
- Determine the design energy use and compliance with the energy use budget.
- Energy recovery systems
- Total energy and selective energy studies
- Complete system and unit capacities, indicating the dimensions of all equipment.
- System vibration and noise isolation and control, safety, security and fire protection.
- Size of heating and chilled water distribution, gas distribution, fuel storage, and special liquid, compressed air and vacuum systems.
- Sizing of mechanical lifts, hoists and passenger and service elevators.
- Outside air, ventilation and exhaust air design.
- Supply, return and exhaust air duct sizing, and pressures.
01300-7
- Acoustic analysis including system noise isolation and reduction.
- Building and related mechanical system commissioning, and the testing, adjusting, and balancing of mechanical systems.
- Surge analysis of closed loop systems
- HVAC control system parameters and constraints
11.1.8.2 Energy Analysis: All ‘Energy Management Systems’ (EMS), Energy Use Budget (EUB), minimum mandatory 10 CFR 435 Energy Conservation Measures (ECM), and analyses/evaluations shall be completed as of this 35% submittal.
11.1.8.3 Plumbing: Provide a brief narrative description of the proposed plumbing design. Indicate the rationale behind selection of plumbing systems. Identify the codes, standards, criteria, and design methods around which the plumbing design will be developed. Indicate how the specified minimum plumbing criteria will be met or exceeded in the proposed design. The calculations for Plumbing design elements, such as those listed below, will utilize metric units. If the project warrants the use of inch-pound (IP) units (integration of as-built drawings using IP etc.), the calculations shall be performed in normally accepted and recognized IP units.
- Size of wastewater and sewage drainage systems inside the building.
- Allocation of Restroom fixtures
11.1.9 Fire Protection: Define the type of automatic fire detection that will be provided.
Include a description of the control system such as activation of the system, interlocks with HVAC system and connection to detection and alarm system.
The calculations for Fire Protection design elements, such as those listed below, will utilize metric units. If the project warrants the use of inch-pound (IP) units (integration of as-built drawings using IP etc.), the calculations shall be performed in normally accepted and recognized IP units.
- Water supply calculations indicating the adequacy of the design to meet sprinkler and hose stream flow demands. Calculations must be based on residual and static pressures and flow data obtained from water flow tests (as performed by the MATOC Contractor in coordination with the Base Water Shop).
- Sprinkler calculations to determine water flow and pressure demands.
- Complete hydraulic design calculations for detailed sprinkler and Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) system design.
11.1.10 Electrical Systems: Provide a brief narrative description of the proposed electrical and lighting designs. Indicate the rational of selecting these systems.
Identify the codes, standards, criteria, and design methods around which the electrical and lighting design will be developed. Indicate how the specified minimum electrical and lighting criteria will be met or exceeded in the proposed design.
Electrical Calculations: The calculations for Electrical design elements, such as those listed below, will utilize metric units. If the project warrants the use of inch-pound (IP) units (integration of as-built drawings using IP etc.), the calculations shall be performed in normally accepted and recognized IP units.
01300-8
- Maintained lux [Foot-candle (FC)] levels in all areas. Where areas are similar in size and usage, only a typical calculation is required.
- Individual circuit and system load analysis tabulated in amperes for each panel board or switchboard.
- Transformers, generators, switchboards and feeders indicating all demand, diversity, and ambient-temperature or conductor-grouping factors considered in the selection of equipment or conductor sizes.
- Nonlinear loads and harmonic contributions, kilowatt rating of transformers etc.
- Ground fault and its circuitry protection.
- Voltage-drop on all service and feeder circuits, and on worst-case branch circuits supplied by each panel board and switchboard.
- Weight, dimensions and electrical characteristics of each major item of equipment supported by manufacturer’s names, and catalog cut sheets and model numbers.
- Short circuit calculations
- Electromagnetic Protection
11.1.11 Life-Cycle Cost Analysis: Identify a proposed energy budget for the facility during the final design submittal (regardless of design percentage). Indicate factors for HVAC systems, lighting, and plumbing systems. Provide the specified energy budget analysis for the proposed building. Perform development of all ‘Energy Management Systems’ (EMS), Energy Use Budget (EUB), minimum mandatory 10 CFR 435 Energy Conservation Measures (ECM), and analyses/evaluations in support of energy consuming equipment. Design calculations shall include Life Cycle Cost Analyses on which selection of design alternatives are based and clarification of code references for project compliance.
11.1.12 Energy Conservation: Energy directives in the form of Executive Order 12902 issued in 1994, and as a result of Public Law 94-163 and Public Law 102-486, identify minimum requirements for energy considerations in facility operation, construction or alteration (additional Executive Orders have also been issued).
This includes details as expanded by Federal regulations in the form of 10 CFR 435 and interpreted by the Air Force in ETL 94-4. Air Force design criteria for Energy Conservation consist of specifically following Engineering Technical Letter (ETL) 94-4 and 10 CFR 435. All requirements stated within these two documents shall be reviewed and incorporated into the design of each Task Order as applicable.
11.1.13 Energy Use Budgets (EUB) Technical Analysis/Evaluation: Provide as part of the 35% Design Submittal, a technical analysis/evaluation to comply with AF design criteria regarding requirements for Energy Use Budgets. The technical analysis/evaluation is for information purposes only.
The technical analysis/evaluation shall consist of an energy consumption analysis to determine actual Energy Use Budget figures for the facility per the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 435, Part A) as required by AF ETL 94-4, and per MIL HDBK 1190, Chapter 8. If the facility energy consumption does not comply with design energy use budget figures, provide prioritized recommendations for specific energy conservation measures, i.e., work items for the facility to reduce energy consumption and comply with the design energy use budget figures. The EUB analysis shall be accomplished by means of a
01300-9 simulation tool defined by 10 CRF 435, subpart A, section 435.111, paragraph
11.6. The TRANE Company, for example, certifies that the TRACE 600 complies fully with all requirements of 10 CFR 435, Subpart A Section 435.111, para 11.6.
The required minimum output of the EUB submittal shall address the following:
- Analysis title page
- System Summary (24 hr/day)
- Design capacity summary and engineering checks
- Peak Load summary
- Internal Loads
- Building Envelope Loads
- Airflow Loads
- Building Envelope Composition
- System Load Profile
- Building Cool-Heat Demand
- Building Temperature Profile
- Monthly Energy Consumption Report
- Equipment Energy Consumption Report
11.1.14 General Energy Use Budget Guidance: The MATOC Contractor is required to adequately size various energy consuming equipment and provide alternatives.
Information about the facility and/or preliminary design criteria shall be input into computer program (e.g., TRACE-600) for computations. The location, building orientation, design temperatures, and U-values in addition to types of equipment, lighting, and numbers of people shall be included. The resultant program outputs heating and cooling loads, cfm requirements, coil loads, etc. Optionally, the program can provide monthly and annual energy consumption figures for review.
For the facility design to meet energy criteria, the energy consumption must be less than the budget identified (e.g. 45,000 btu/sq ft/year). The designer is tasked with selecting the most advantageous alternative – that which meets the requirements at the lowest life cycle cost. All of this is inherent during a proper design process. If the budget is not met, alternatives to the construction would need to be determined and included in the design. This may result in a modification to the designer’s scope-of-work in order to comply. The MATOC Contractor shall certify that the facility is designed to meet the energy requirements.
11.1.15 Energy Source Selection: Provide a life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) to identify the most economic energy source for heating the facility in accordance with Air Force Engineering Technical Letter (ETL) 86-5. The LCCA shall be provided no later than the 35% Design Submittal. Unit costs for available energy sources are available per kilowatt/hour for electricity, per gallon for fuel oil, and per therm for natural gas by contacting 92 CES/CEOE at (509) 247 2603 and asking for current rates.
11.1.16 The Energy Use Budget (EUB) analysis shall be provided as a final copy with the last (Final) Design Submittal (in accordance with each Task Order), with revisions to resolve or otherwise accommodate review comments provided for the previous design submittals. The final copy shall be bound and shall be separate from the project Design Analysis submittal.
01300-10
11.1.17 A completed unsigned Certificate of Compliance, Detailed Summary (Attachment 10 of ETL 94-4) shall be included with the EUB analysis submittal.
The signature for the certificate will be provided by the design agent (as indicated by the certificate). The Certificate of Compliance submittal shall be unbound, separate from the EUB submittal.
11.1.18 Lighting levels shall be determined in accordance with Illuminating Engineers Society lighting handbook requirements and Mil Handbook 1190. Illumination levels and requirements defined in accordance with 41 CFR chapter 101, paragraph 20.107 shall not be exceeded.
11.1.19 Metering of each facility…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.