RFI Questions and Responses.pdf

PDF 165 KB Posted

Attached to
Child Development Center Renovation Solicitation
Solicitation number
FA452824R0001
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a set of Questions and Responses related to a Request for Information (RFI) for a federal contract opportunity. The key details are as follows:

The contract opportunity is for the renovation of Building 164 at Minot Air Force Base into a Child Development Center. The renovation requires the contractor to supply and install new mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and communication systems, as well as exterior windows and doors, plumbing, fire suppression, electrical, communications, and fire alarm systems. The acquisition is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside valued between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000. A pre-proposal site visit is scheduled for January 9, 2024. The solicitation notes that the government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions, so the initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms. It also provides guidance on base access requirements.

The Questions and Responses cover various technical details related to the integration of new systems with existing systems in Building 166, as well as clarification on requirements for roofing, utilities, schedules, floor finishes, abatement, and other construction-related items.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Section M - Evaluation Factors_Amendment 11.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA452824R00010011 SF 30.pdf PDF
Bid Schedule_Amendment 11.pdf PDF
Section L _ Instructions to Offerors_Amendment 11.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment - FA452824R00010011.pdf PDF
Past Performance Questionnaire_Amendment 11.pdf PDF
Additional RFI Responses.pdf PDF
10 Bid Schedule_amendment 5.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA452824R00010009 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA452824R00010008 SF 30.pdf PDF
RFI Questions and Responses 2.pdf PDF
09 Specs_amendment 4.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA452824R00010007 SF 30.pdf PDF
08 Drawings Specs amendment 3.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA452824R00010006 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA452824R00010005 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA452824R00010004 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation FA452824R00010003 SF30 Amendment 3.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA452824R00010002 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA452824R00010001 Amendment.pdf PDF
Final Section L Amend.pdf PDF
Final Section L Amend 1.pdf PDF
Final Section M.pdf PDF
07 Bid Schedule.pdf PDF
05 AF Form 66 Schedule of Materials Submittals.pdf PDF
03 Drawings.pdf PDF
01 CDC B164 Specifications.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA452824R0001.pdf PDF
Past Performance Information Form.pdf PDF
06 Wage Determination ND.txt TXT text file
Final Section L.pdf PDF
04 As-Built Drawings.pdf PDF
02 Specifications amendment.pdf PDF
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFI Ques�ons and Responses.

- On sheet EY101 note 7 states that new intercom system is to be networked with the existing intercom system in building 166. Please provide the brand and model number of the existing intercom system in building 166.

Design change amendment will have contractor only installing rough ins for the intercom system.

- On sheet EY101 note 6 states that new CCTV system is to be compatible and networked with the existing CCTV system in building 166. Please provide the brand and model number of the existing CCTV system in building 166.

Design change amendment will have contractor only installing rough ins for the CCTV system.

- On sheet EY101 note 5 states that new intrusion detection system is to be compatible and networked with the existing intrusion detection system in building 166. Please provide the brand and model number of the existing intrusion detection system in building 166.

Design change amendment will have contractor only installing rough ins for the intrusion detec�on system.

- Can the government provide exis�ng roofing manufacturer and installer informa�on?

Roofing Manufacturer – Mule-Hide Products Co., Inc Installer – Global-Pacific Tech JV 1

- Is a full-�me on-site superintendent, SSHO, QC required?

Yes, refer to spec sec�on 01 35 26.

- Are all u�li�es to be contracted through Base U�li�es?

All u�li�es are priva�zed and will have to be contracted and coordinated with base u�li�es, Verendrye Electric Coopera�ve and Montana-Dakota-U�li�es. Refer to Spec sec�on 01 11 00

- Is a Microso� projects schedule acceptable for proposal packages?

Comply with Spec Sec�on 01 32 16.00

- Will the government require a project management pla�orm during construc�on? Procore, submital exchange, etc.?

Refer to Spec Sec�on 01 33 00

- I only see it calls for RF-1 in rooms 120,122,126 (I believe they meant 124 not 126 numbers don’t match room names )127,130,135 with cove base CB-3 And ERF-1 in 111,112, 124,125 ( bathroom on print ae 125,126) not 124,125) cove base CB-2 .

Yes, the room numbers are incorrect, and the room numbers should be swapped on the room finish schedule. This will be amended.

- In the spec there is standard epoxy, looks to be just a clear coa�ng of epoxy and urethane topcoat 09 67 23.13 and Fuel resis�ve Resinous flooring 3 coat system 09 67 23.15 with CB-2 don’t see color or clarifica�on on what system goes with what spec. It is guessed that 3 coat is EF-1 09 67 23.15 and ERF in 09 67 23.13 – please confirm.

Please Refer to Spec sec�on 09 06 00. The ERF is the standard, and the RF is the three coat.

- Does MINOT AFB want new underlayment drainage material course as seen on sheet C-105 or will exis�ng drainage course be acceptable.

New drainage material is required.

- Should ACC courses be 3” and 3” to allow for beter and more consistent densi�es as called out in sheet 105-C Yes. This will be amended.

- Will a 2 Layer poly barrier in addi�on to a we�ng agent be required for the demoli�on of the ACM containing soffit on the exterior of the building?

External abatement does not require the plas�c encasement, but poly should be used to cover the ground under the work area.

- Will all visible walls on site receive the level V finish 4” above ACT ceiling �le?

No. In reference to spec sec�on 09 29 00 3.3 and 3.3.1, level 5 will be changed to level 4 and plenum areas above ceiling �le will be finished to level 1. This will be amended.

- Can R06 on page AD101 be indicated to show where slab removal is required for installa�on of new plumbing?

Refer to Plumbing plan sheets and spec sec�ons.

- Will a resilient corner guard be installed on the southwest 45-degree corner in room 101 to match the opposite side of the room?

No, there is store front in front of room 113 which does not require corner guard.

- Will infill of brick veneer on page A-201, North Eleva�on, le� most infill where brick is tuckpointed into exis�ng or should the brick be installed as shown elsewhere on page A-201?

Refer to plan sheet A-501 detail 4.

- Is sec�on cut 1 at page A-501 referencing the ves�bule shown on A-101?

Yes.

- What are the acceptable materials for the bio-degradable stoop void forms as seen on S-201 detail 3 and 4?

Any standard biodegradable form.

- Will removal of outside water faucets and their repair match style used for infill as seen on A- 201?

Yes, match the style but do not recess the brick.

- On page PD 101 Keynote 10, Sheet PL101 is referenced but does not exist in the set. Is PL101 referencing informa�on located on sheet P-202?

Refer to plan sheet P-201.

- On sheet MD 101 in Keynote 1, it is said “Within dashed area remove all HVAV, HVAC piping, HVAC equipment and controls”. Does this include all ductwork as well?

- Should Geothermal loop in mechanical room shown on MD-301 be capped at slab, if so how much of the remaining pipe should remain exposed?

Refer to 3/MD301 and 1/M301.

- Does the nota�on HP6 on sheet M-101 call out the heat pumps noted in keynote 1 on M-101?

- Should all demolished copper wiring and conduit be saved and handed over to the AFB personal?

Comply with Spec Sec�on 01 74 19

- Can the weld called out on detail 1 sheet S-102 be replaced with fasteners installed 1’ OC?

No, follow plans and specs.

- Will Microso� project be acceptable for project schedule?

Comply with Spec Sec�on 01 32 16.00

- Will the contractor or the owner be responsible for moving all exis�ng equipment out of the construc�on area?

Construc�on area is already cleared out by owner. Any remaining items would be responsibility of contractor.

- Are we able to work federal holidays? Are we able to accelerate and work nights if needed?

Refer to Spec Sec�on 01 32 16.00

- Is an OSHA 10 cer�fica�on required for all employees on site?

Refer to spec sec�on 01 35 26.

- Spec Sec�on 01 11 00, 1.4 states building will be Occupied during the performance of work. Due to the nature of the scope will the project need to be phased to allow for occupancy of areas of the building during construc�on? How much Space will be needed at any given �me?

There will be no occupancy in building during construc�on.

- Can the Schedule representa�ve share roles with the Project Manager and/or superintendent?

Yes, refer to spec sec�on 01 32 16.00. Authorized person may share du�es of other roles in accordance with specifica�ons.

- In Lieu of AutoCAD redline drawings would handwriten redlines be acceptable for this project?

Or marked up PDF Files?

Comply with 01 78 39 1.3.2. Hardcopy or electronic pdf copy of redlines are acceptable.

- Will the contractor be required to perform addi�onal asbestos tes�ng prior to abatement?

No, refer to hazardous material survey report and sec�on 02 82 00.

- Please indicate if furniture on I-101 are to be included in the contractor’s proposal. If so, can further details of furniture be provided.

Not in contract, furniture shown for coordina�on purposes.

- A review of the aluminum storefront specifica�ons indicates blast impact requirements. Will this project require these? If it does, we cannot meet thermal/energy performance and thermal performance will have to be excluded. The blast windows will be considerably more expensive.

Also, will design calcula�ons be required?

Please refer to UFC 4-010-01 sec�on 3-11.1 Glazing. Provide windows in compliance with 2.1.1 and 3.4 in sec�on 08 41 13.

- The solicita�on for this project says that bid bonds or "bid guarantees" for this project are required. It does not state the amount the bid bond is supposed to be. Please advise on the amount of the bid bond.

20%.

- We would like to request informa�on on Sec�on B - Supplies or Services & Prices on Costs Op�on Line Item 0002 En�re work complete for removal and disposal of addi�onal asbestos not included in the basic amount. Page 4 of 59 of the solicita�on. We do not have the full iden�fied quan�ty of Asbestos removal and therefore cannot provide a lump sum as proposed in the line item. We would request a quan�ty so we are able to provide a lump sum or could this item quan�ty be changed to a sq � cost and any calcula�on of quan�ty could be firmly established.

The base bid quantity covers all aspects of removals within the hazardous materials report.

The 500 S.F, in the line item 0002, is to cover any additional unforeseen asbestos quantities found in building 164.

- There is only one small asphalt patch on this project. It is approximately one truck load of hot mix. The specifica�ons are for a full-blown paving project. Can an exis�ng NDDOT/City of Minot mix design be used such as a NDDOT FAA 43 mix that the city of Minot uses on a daily basis?

There will be an amendment to the specs that will call for replacement of the paving spec to follow City of Minot spec section: SECTION 3010 – BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR. In regard to this section, FAA 43 is acceptable.

- This project is calling for a new asphalt design mix to be developed for a small patch. The mix design itself would cost almost the same amount of the actual paving on this project. Can PG 58- 28 asphalt cement be used instead of PG 58-34? We use PG 58-28 asphalt cement on a daily basis in our Minot asphalt plant, it would be very expensive to buy a tanker load of the other asphalt for such a small patch.

There will be an amendment to the specs that will call for replacement of the paving spec to follow City of Minot spec section: SECTION 3010 – BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR. In regard to this section, PG 58S-28 is acceptable.

- The tack coat spec is calling for SS-1h emulsion, can CSS-1H be used instead? We use CSS-1H on a daily basis for all NDDOT and City of Minot work. Once again, it would be very cost beneficial to not have to order a tanker of different tack for one small patch.

There will be an amendment to the specs that will call for replacement of the current paving spec to follow City of Minot spec section: SECTION 3010 – BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR. In regard to this section, CSS-1H is acceptable.

- Does the jobsite require Temporary fencing around the en�re perimeter?

Yes, Refer to spec section 01 50 00

- If so, is there a specifica�on on what type of fence is necessary?

Refer to spec section 01 50 00 replace 2.3.1 Polyethylene Mesh Safety Fencing with Chain Link Panel Fencing as seen below.

2.3.1 Chain Link Panel Fencing

Temporary panel fencing must be galvanized steel chain link panels 6 feet high. Multiple fencing panels may be linked together at the bases to form long spans as needed. Each panel base must be weighted down using sand bags or other suitable materials in order for the fencing to withstand anticipated winds while remaining upright. Fencing must remain rigid and taut with a minimum of 200 pounds of force exerted on it from any direction with less than 4 inches of deflection.

- Does this job require a building permit?

Not a building permit, but the job does require clearance work request form 103. Refer to section 01 11 00 1.7 Permits.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .