Attachment 10-FA449726Q0031 QA Log.pdf
PDF 80 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Water Treatment Service HVAC System
- Solicitation number
- FA449726Q0031
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) log for federal contract FA449726Q0031 addressing consolidated vendor inquiries regarding water conditioning systems and related equipment.
The document clarifies key specifications and Government intentions regarding existing water treatment infrastructure. The current water conditioner operates at 1,000 gallons per week during winter months and less than half that volume in summer, treating air handlers and crack units. The Government does not plan to install an additional water conditioner or replace the existing unit with larger-capacity equipment, though the contract may be modified if needed. Regarding four water conditioners identified in the buildings during site visits, only two were demonstrated to vendors; the Government confirmed that two units are no longer in use and should not be removed, replaced, or left in place. The Government will not pursue replacement recommendations based on building current water demand. Additionally, the Government identified a CALMAC-brand glycol ice bank system (model number not provided) requiring maintenance or support services. The Government committed to updating the Performance Work Statement (PWS) to reflect the accurate total of water conditioners and to issue an updated building list that includes new systems identified at Building 206 during the site walkthrough.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA449726Q0031-Consolidated Vendor(Q&A Log)
1. What is the current flow rate (GPM) of the existing water conditioner?
1000 Gal per week in the winter and less than half in the summertime.
2. What is the existing water conditioner currently treating?
Air Handlers and Crack Units
3. Is the plan to install an additional water conditioner, or will the existing unit remain in service?
No, but if needed the contract will be modified.
4. If the current system is undersized or no longer operating efficiently, would you like it to be replaced with a larger-capacity unit?
No.
5. If replacement is anticipated because the existing unit is undersized or no longer operating efficiently, should the replacement be sized to match the existing unit or based on the building's current water demand?
See Question 4 answer
6. If replacement of existing water conditioners becomes necessary, should replacement units match the existing capacity, or would the Government prefer recommendations based on the building's current water demand?
See Question 4 answer
7. During the site visit, we were informed that there are four water conditioners in the buildings; however, only two were shown to us. Could you please confirm the status of the remaining two units?
The PWS will be adjusted to show the new total.
8. Since the other two units are no longer in use, should they be removed, replaced, or left in place?
No
9. If replacement is required, should the new units match the existing capacity, or would you prefer that we recommend appropriately sized replacements based on the building's current water demand?
See Question 4 answer
10. Can we have the glycol ice bank model # , and make?
Make Is CALMAC no model#
11. During the site walkthrough, new systems at Building 206 were mentioned. Will an updated building list be issued that includes these additional systems?
Yes, PWS will be updated.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .