Past_Perf_Questionnaire_22_Oct_14.docx
DOCX document 58 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Dix Full Food Service Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4484-15-R-0005
About this file
Past Performance Cover Letter and Questionnaire - Dix Food Service
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
87TH AIR BASE WING (AMC)
22 Oct 14
FROM: 87 CONS/LGCC
2402 Vandenberg Ave Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, NJ 08641-1712
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
1. You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached survey. This firm is currently being considered for a full food service contract at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst.
2. Please respond to this survey no later than 15 Dec 14. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Michael Petty at 609-754-4768. Please fax all completed surveys to 609-754-4642 or scan and email to michael.petty.5@us.af.mil.
\\SIGNED\\
KAREN THORNGREN
Contracting Officer
Attachment:
Past and Present Performance Survey
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: _________________ Telephone Number: ______________________
Address: _________________________ Fax Number: ____________________________
________________________________ Point of Contact: _________________________
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: ________________________________________*
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ____________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: _________________________*
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________
Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________
_____________________________ Fax Number: _________________________
_____________________________ Email Address: _______________________
C. FAX/EMAILCOMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: 609-754-4768 and/or michael.petty.5@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (O, S, M, U or NA) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| O |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| Outstanding |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Contractor Name: _______________________ Contract Number.____________________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor:
| O |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 12. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 13. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 14. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 15. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 16. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 17. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 18. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 19. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 20. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
| 21. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
| 22. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
Remarks:
FA4484-15-R-0005
22 Oct 14 image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .