Amendment 0001 Attachment 9 - Past Performance Questionaire.pdf
PDF 128 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Simplified Acquisition Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA303020R0001
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for maintenance, repair, and construction services on a Simplified Acquisition Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) contract at Goodfellow Air Force Base in Texas. The Air Force is soliciting proposals for a single-award IDIQ contract with a basic period of one year plus four one-year options and a maximum value of $10 million over the life of the contract. Interested 8(a) contractors located in Texas may submit proposals by December 2, 2019. The past performance questionnaire is intended to collect performance history on contractors being evaluated for the SABER contract and includes questions related to planning, quality control, schedule adherence, and modifications on previous contracts.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 32
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA303020R0001
Attachment 7
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FA303020R0001 SABER IDIQ
Contractor Being Evaluated:
(If Applicable) Teaming with:
I. Background. The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain past performance information relative to contracts that have previously been completed or are currently being performed by the contractor identified above that. This company is a potential source for performing a SABER contract.
II. Instructions. Please complete the questionnaire based on the following guidance:
A. Handwritten responses are sufficient.
B. Indicate, based on the description below, the contractor's performance on the identified program in the assessment area. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance.
The following is a definition of the scoring levels:
Acceptable Meets specified minimum performance or capability requirements delineated in the Request for
Proposal; proposal rated green must have no deficiencies but may have one or more strengths.
Unacceptable Fails to meet specified minimum performance or capability requirements; proposal has one or more deficiencies. Proposals with an unacceptable rating are not awardable.
[Circle the word corresponding to your rating.] C. Please provide comments for all questions as appropriate. Space for your comments is provided in each area. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets to the end of the questionnaire and reference the respective questions.
D. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the offeror's performance with the judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the program, we solicit your comments on other similar programs for which your office has contracts with this offeror.
E. PLEASE FAX OR MAIL YOUR COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE NO LATER
THAN THE SOLICITATION CLOSING DATE TO:
ATTN:
SABER
CONS/PKA
210 Scherz Blvd Goodfellow AFB, TX 76908-4705
Commercial FAX: (325) 654-5149 DSN FAX: 477-5149 Commercial Voice: (325) 654-5174 DSN Voice: 477-5174
YOUR ASSISTANCE IN EVALUATING THE CONTRACTOR'S PAST PERFORMANCE
IS APPRECIATED. OUR GOAL IS TO SELECT THE BEST VALUE TO THE
GOVERNMENT. YOUR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IS A CONSIDERATION
IN DETERMINING THE BEST VALUE.
III. Program Identification. Evaluator, please complete:
Adjectival Rating Definition
A. Contractor Being Evaluated:
B. Cage Code:
C. Contract Number:
D. Estimated Contract Dollar Amount:
E. Dates of Contract Performance:
F. Contract Type:
G. Describe Contract:
H. Description of specific work performed by contractor:
I. Are there Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Evaluation or other Past Performance Reports available for this contract? Yes No
IV. Past Performance Evaluation.
A. Overall performance in planning and managing the construction project?
Acceptable Unacceptable Not Applicable
Comments:
B. How well did the contractor's on-site management/superintendent control overall quality?
C. How well did the contractor manage subcontractors?
D. How well did the contractor adhere to the contract schedule(s)?
E. How well did the contractor comply with contract terms and conditions?
F. Were any cure or delinquency notices issued? If so, explain the situation.
G. IDIQ Contracts: Overall Assessment of Contractor’s initial proposals/estimates under this contract:
H. IDIQ Contracts: Overall Assessment of Contractor’s modification proposals/estimates under this contract:
I. IDIQ Contracts: Task/Delivery Order Modifications:
Please provide the approximate percentage for the following modification types:
Government/ Customer Requested: %
Contractor Requested: %
J. Overall Assessment of Contractor’s performance under this contract:
K. Would you enter into another contract with this contractor?
V. Respondent Information. The following information will assist in the analysis of the data, and will be kept confidential.
A. Name of Evaluator:
B. Position Title/Grade:
C. Office Symbol/Location:
D. Phone (Commercial/DSN)
E. Email address:
F. Length of Time on Program/Contract:
G. Date Questionnaire Completed:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .