Questions.docx

Questions:

1. The attached PWS dated 26 Jan 2009 has a RFP number (FA3022-09-P-0008) instead of the original FA3022-08-Q-0001 as listed on the current Performance Plan. Is this correct or in error?

2. A review of the new PWS shows the deletions that are addressed in amendment 4’s summary of changes have been made. However other areas that had been removed or modified from the last PWS (18 Jun 2008) used are now back in original form in this new PWS. These additions are not addressed in the summary of changes. Are these additions correct or were they placed back in the new PWS in error?

3. Received amendment yesterday but wanted to point that period of performance is still showing 1 Feb 09-30 Sep 09 for the Base Year. Do you want us to price it that way? Since, we are submitting NLT 3 Feb 09 – thought that might be a small problem.

Answers:

1. The revised PWS dated 26 Jan 2009 referenced an incorrect solicitation number. The correct number FA3022-08-Q-0001 is referenced on the posted newly revised PWS.

2. The newly revised PWS, version 7 has been attached. This is the final revision for this solicitation.

3. Amendment FA3022-08-Q-0001-0005 has been posted, and reflects the period of peformance of 1 Apr 09 – 30 Sep 09.