Atch 5 BNCC FY09 PPerf Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 56 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Base Network Control Center Operations and Management Services at Columbus, AFB MS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA3022-08-Q-0001
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA3022-08-Q-0001
Attachment #5
CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
9 Apr 08 The below named contractor is being considered for award of a contract for Base Network Control Center Services at Columbus AFB, MS resulting from RFQ FA3022-08-Q-0001. A primary consideration in our selection process is the contractor’s history of performance of similar efforts. Please make every effort to be thorough in your answers/comments. Please fax or email the completed questionnaire to:
14 CONS/LGCA Attn: Stephen Pritchett
Telephone: 662-434-7763
Fax: 662-434-7753
Email: stephen.pritchett@columbus.af.mil
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
Contractor Name and Address:
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION
Name and Title: _____________________________
Organization: _______________________________
Address: ___________________________________
Telephone/Fax: ______________________________
Email: _____________________________________
C. CONTRACT INFORMATION
Contract Number and Title: ________________________________
Period of Performance: ____________________________________
Contract Amount: ________________________________________
D. SERVICES PROVIDED: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
E. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| None |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Exceptional |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive. |
| Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems that the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner |
| How well did the contractor: |
| U |
| M |
| N |
| S |
| VG |
| E |
| 1. |
| Provide experienced/qualified supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| N/A |
| 2. |
| Demonstrate ability to hire, maintain, and replace in a timely manner if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period that meet the requirements of the statement of work. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| N/A |
| 3. |
| Have a valid internal (company sponsored) proficiency training program for employees |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| N/A |
| 4. |
| Maintain a workforce capable of providing surge requirement support without compromising other work center activities |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| N/A |
| 5. |
| Handle disputes, grievances, and issues with employees? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| N/A |
| 6. |
| Display initiative and technical skills by proactively identifying risks/problems and providing valid approaches and solutions. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| N/A |
| 7. |
| Provide effective quality control, inspection procedures and documentation that met contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| N/A |
| 8. |
| Correct deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| N/A |
| 9. |
| Expeditiously and fairly respond to contract modifications. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| N/A |
| 10. |
| Meet all reasonable project schedules, task suspense’s and downward directed program/directive implementations?. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| N/A |
| 11. |
| Respond to extended hour requirements levied because of contingencies? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 6 |
| N/A |
| 12. |
| Adapt to changing requirements and understand new ideas/policies? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 6 |
| N/A |
| 13. |
| Harmoniously interface with appointed government QAP representatives? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 6 |
| N/A |
| 14. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| Yes |
| No |
| 15. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| Yes |
| No |
Remarks: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PAGE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .