Solicitation Amendment FA301024R00050001 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this Amendment is to incorporate the following:Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

- Revision to L and M section

- Extension of proposal due date to 12:00 pm CDT, July 11th, 2024

- Addition of the following attachments related to the submitted technical questions:

- Attachment 11 - MAHG 23-00002 Technical Question and Answers

- Attachment 12 - MAHG 23-00002 Question 1A Geotechnical Report

- Attachment 13 - MAHG 23-00002 Question 4

- Attachment 14 - MAHG 23-00002 Question 18

- Attachment 15 - MAHG 23-00002 Question 22

- Attachment 16 - MAHG 23-00002 Tower light beacon L-810-Data-Sheet

- Attachment 17 MAHG 23-00002 Question 38

- Attachment 18 - MAHG 23-00002 Addendum 1

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date 08 Jul 2024 11 Jul 2024

Section J - List of Attachments

The following attachments were added:

Attachment 11 - MAHG 23-00002 Technical Question and Answers Attachment 12 - MAHG 23-00002 Question 1A Geotechnical Report Attachment 13 - MAHG 23-00002 Question 4 Attachment 14 - MAHG 23-00002 Question 18 Attachment 15 - MAHG 23-00002 Question 22 Attachment 16 - MAHG 23-00002 Tower light beacon L-810-Data-Sheet Attachment 17 MAHG 23-00002 Question 38 Attachment 18 - MAHG 23-00002 Addendum 1

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

A. General Instructions

1. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts, Part I - Technical Proposal, Part II-Price Proposal and Part III- Past Performance Information.

FA301024R00050001

2. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims.

The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but, rather, shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities or experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal.

Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

3. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information will be requested. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness of the price.

4. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. If an Offeror believes the requirements in these instructions contain an error or omission, or are otherwise unsound, the Offeror shall immediately notify the PCO and Contract Specialist in writing with supporting rationale, as well as the remedies the Offeror is asking the PCO to consider as related to the omission or error.

5. The CO will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range; whereupon they may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors excluded from the competitive range may request a pre-award debriefing or a post-award debriefing upon notification of exclusion from the competitive range. However, offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing for each proposal. The CO will notify unsuccessful offerors in the competitive range of the source selection. Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing.

6. Written questions or requests for clarification may be sent via email to the 81st Contracting Org box: 81cons.lgcb.construction@us.af.mil. After RFP release, it is encouraged that any questions or clarifications be submitted within ten (10) days of the RFP release date. The decision whether to respond to questions and requests for clarification submitted after those ten (10) days shall be at the sole discretion of the PCO.

7. A pre-proposal conference will be conducted as specified in 52.236-27 Site Visit (Construction). Offerors are requested to submit questions to the email address noted above not later than 5:00 p.m. on 14 June 2024. Information provided at this conference shall not qualify the terms and conditions of the solicitation and specifications. Terms of the solicitation and specifications remain unchanged unless the solicitation is amended in writing.

If an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgment and receipt of solicitation amendments shall apply.

All prospective Offerors are highly encouraged to attend this conference/site visit and are advised that this will be held solely for the purpose of explaining the concepts involved in the project and the specification, terms, and conditions of this solicitation. Failure of a prospective Offeror to submit any questions or attend the conference will be construed to mean that the prospective Offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation.

B. Specific Instructions:

1. Offerors will submit their proposals in either of the following ways:

Electronic proposals may be submitted via email to 81CONS.LGCB.Construction@us.af.mil.

Hard copy submissions may be hand-carried or mailed to the address listed in solicitation block 8.

mailto:81cons.lgcb.construction@us.af.mil

***It's the offeror's responsibility to verify the receipt of their proposal prior to solicitation close date and time. ***

2. shall provide a cover letter listing the name(s), title(s), office phone number (if applicable, mobile number), and e-mail address(es) The Offeror of those individuals authorized to make decisions on behalf of the Offeror with respect to the proposal and those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government for this solicitation. The Offeror shall also provide the official company/division street address, CAGE code, and UEI number as reflected in the current System for Award Management (SAM) registration.

3. PART I - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL:

Subfactor 1: Technical

(a) Provide a Statement of Work (SOW) meeting all objectives and integrating all requirements listed within the Statement of Objectives (SOO). IAW the SOO, provide information in the SOW supporting the offeror's ability to provide the Motorola Certified Technician(s) to accomplish work

. . The SOW shall pertaining to the LMR equipment In addition to this, the offeror shall submit a Motorola Letter of Authorization with their proposal be a stand-alone document in the offeror's own words, providing detailed information on how the offeror will accomplish all objectives listed in the SOO and may reference the Supplemental Information included in this solicitation. SOW submission will be incorporated into any resultant contract.

(b)Provide a list of Materials/Deliverables using the Material Submittals Schedule (MSS) (Attachment 9). This list shall include all materials to be used in completing the objectives identified in the SOO. MSS submission will be incorporated into any resultant contract.

(c) Detailed construction Progress Schedule (the task schedule can be created in any software package but needs to be submitted as a PDF.)

Subfactor 2: Bonding

Submit bonding as specified in FAR 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee

4. PART II - PRICE PROPOSAL

Factor 2: Price

All pricing information shall be addressed in this part of the offer.

(A) Complete blocks 14, 15, 16, 17, 19 (if any amendments are issued), and 20A, 20B, 20C of the RFP, SF1442. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the Refection A through J. These sections constitute the model contract.

(B) Insert proposed unit price(s) in Section B for Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) 0001.

(C) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Section K. Section K shall be returned in its entirety if unless that offeror has completed the annual representations and certifications electronically in SAM.gov and FAR 52.204-8(d) is applicable.

5. PART III - PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

(A) Provide a list of five (5), of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies or private customers within the last three no more than

(3) years. For the purpose of this solicitation, recent contracts are defined as those on which some portion of performance occurred during the last three (3) years from date of receipt of proposal. Relevant performance includes present/past performance effort involving similar scope, magnitude of

The offeror shall submit references by completing the Solicitation Attachment titled PAST effort and complexities of this solicitation.

PERFORMANCE REFERENCE LIST (PPRL), for contracts that you consider relevant in demonstrating your ability to perform the requirements in this solicitation.

The completed PPRL must be submitted with your offer and received by the RFP closing date and time. The offeror shall ensure that the references listed in the PPRL are provided the attachment titled PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) for completion after the offeror completes Section A of the PPQ. If a CPAR is available for your references, annotate on the PPRL and no PPQ will be required. Completed questionnaires shall be sent by the reference completing the questionnaires directly to the Government Contract Specialist at the address shown in Block 7 of the SF 1442 or the email address below. THIS OFFICE STRONGLY RECOMMENDS ALL OFFERORS REQUEST THEIR REFERENCES TO SUBMIT THEIR PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES IMMEDIATELY TO THE 81ST CONTRACTING SQUADRON, 81 CONS/PKA, 310 M STREET ROOM 106, KEESLER AFB, MS 39534-2147 OR EMAIL THEM TO .81CONS.LGCB.Construction@us.af.mil

***Note: If the contract you are submitting for reference is an IDIQ, only after issuance of a task order does performance occur. Given this, an individual order under the basic contract shall be submitted, in lieu of just the basic ordering contract itself. If no CPAR is available for the task order then PPQs are required.

(B) The evaluation of Past Performance Information (PPI) will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this solicitation. of PPI identified within the PPRL will determine which of the remaining paragraphs apply. The type

(1) For PPI where the offeror was the prime contractor; comply with paragraph (C)

(2) For PPI where the offeror was a subcontractor; comply with paragraphs (C) & (D)

(3) For PPI where the offeror is using a subcontractor's PPI; comply with paragraph (C) & (E)

(4) For PPI where the offeror is part of a teaming arrangement; comply with paragraph (F)

(5) For PPI where the offeror is citing key personnel; comply with paragraph (G)

(C) Furnish the following information for each contract listed:

(i) Company name

(ii) Contract Task Order number if applicable number and

(iii) Contracting Agency/Customer

(iv) Total Contract/Task Order Dollar Value

(v) Period of identify Task Order Period of Performance if applicable) Performance (

(vi) Verified, up-to-date name, address & telephone number of the contracting officer or customer POC

(vii) Description of work performed relevant to this solicitation

(viii) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

(D) If offeror is using PPI from work they performed as a subcontractor listed on the PPRL, in addition to information requested in paragraph (c) above, furnish the following information:

(i) What function(s)/task(s) did the offeror perform on the PPRL listed contract?

(ii) What percentage of the total contract value did the offeror perform on the PPRL listed contract?

(iii) What was the value of the subcontract on the PPRL listed contract?

(E) If using PPI from subcontractors as part of the PPRL, in addition to information requested in paragraph (c) above, furnish the following information:

(i) What function(s)/task(s) did the subcontractor perform on the PPRL contract? listed

(ii) What function(s)/task(s) will the subcontractor perform on this contract?

(iii) What percentage of the total contract value did the subcontractor perform on the PPRL contract? listed

(iv) What percentage of the total contract value will the subcontractor perform on this contract?

(F) If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, the offerors shall provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first-time joint effort each party of the recent past/present performance information on previous arrangement shall provide any past and present relevant contracts to be evaluated, a maximum of three relevant contracts per party. Additionally furnish the following information:

(i) What function(s)/task(s) did the party perform on the PPRL listed contract?

(ii) What function(s)/task(s) will the party perform on this contract?

(G) If using PPI from key personnel as part of the PPRL, in addition to information requested in paragraph (c) above, furnish the following information:

(i) What function(s)/task(s) did the key personnel perform on the PPRL listed contract?

(ii) What function(s)/task(s) would the key personnel perform on this contract?

(iii) What percentage of the total contract value did the key personnel perform on the PPRL listed contract?

(iv) What percentage of the total contract value will the key personnel perform on this contract?

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a lowest price technically acceptable source selection in which competing offerors will be evaluated based on the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors or subfactors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable and the proposal, therefore, ineligible for award. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

A. Technical Factor- Initially, each offer will be evaluated for technical acceptability. The Government's technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals on a pass/fail basis, assigning one of the ratings described below. Any technical proposal evaluated as "Unacceptable" will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, not awardable. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions (if used), will be considered for award. However, the offeror is cautioned that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

Table 1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Adjectival Rating

Description

Acceptable

Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation

The offeror must provide the necessary documentation specified in Section L regarding the technical subfactors. The proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical subfactors as identified in Section L:

Subfactor 1: Technical

(a) The offeror's Statement of Work (SOW) will be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal evaluation. To be determined Acceptable, the offeror's SOW must meet all objectives and integrate all requirements listed within the SOO. IAW the SOO, provide information in the SOW supporting the offeror's ability to provide the Motorola Certified Technician(s) to accomplish work pertaining to the LMR

The SOW shall be a stand-alone equipment. In addition to this, the offeror shall submit a Motorola Letter of Authorization with their proposal.

document in the offeror's own words, providing detailed information on how the offeror will accomplish all objectives listed in the SOO and may reference the Supplemental Information included in this solicitation.

(b) Complete list of Materials/Deliverables using the Material Submittals Schedule (MSS). This list shall include all materials to be used in completing the objectives identified in the SOO.

(c) Detailed construction Progress Schedule (the task schedule can be created in any software package but needs to be submitted as a PDF.)

Subfactor 2: Bonding

Submit bonding as specified in FAR 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee

B. Price Factor - Price proposals will be evaluated for reasonableness. Offerors whose price is determined to be unreasonable will not be considered for award. Proposals that are determined to be incomplete may be ineligible for award.

a) Reasonableness: A comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation will be conducted and will be evaluated for reasonableness with one or more of the proposal analysis techniques described in FAR 15.404, which may include, but not limited to, comparison to similar contracts to include comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation and comparison to the Independent Government Estimate (IGE). The proposed price will also be looked at for unbalanced pricing.

PasC. t Performance Factor - If the lowest priced offer receives an Acceptable technical rating, then past performance will be reviewed to confirm no Marginal or lower ratings exist. The contracting officer shall seek recent and relevant past performance information based on (1) the past and present efforts provided by the offeror and (2) data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources. Ratings are defined in Table 2 below. Offerors evaluated for past performance will receive a rating of "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable".

Table2. Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Adjectival Rating

Description

Acceptable

No marginal or lower rating exists in the offeror's performance record, or the offeror's performance record is unknown (neutral).

Unacceptable

Marginal or lower rating exists in the offeror's performance record.

1. If the lowest priced technically acceptable offer is assessed an "Acceptable" past performance rating, that offer represents the best value for the Government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

2. If the lowest priced technically acceptable offeror is not assessed an "Acceptable" past performance rating, the next lowest priced technically acceptable offeror will be evaluated, and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is assessed an "Acceptable" past or until all offerors are evaluated. The Source Selection Authority shall then make an integrated performance rating assessment best value award decision.

3. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and, in the format, specified in Section L. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of past performance information) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

4. Clarifications and communications do not constitute discussions. The government intends to evaluate proposals and make award without discussions. However, the government may determine it is necessary to conduct discussions.

5. The Government will consider, throughout the evaluation, the "correction potential" of any deficiency. The judgment of such "correction potential" is within the sole discretion of the Government. If an aspect of an offeror's proposal does not meet the Government's requirements and is not considered correctable, the offeror may be eliminated from the competitive range.

310 M ST BLDG 4605, CP 228 377 3230

KEESLER AFB, MS 39534-2701

UNITED STATES

Ian Smith, Email: ian.smith.33@us.af.mil Telephone: 597-1825 AdminBy:

SCD: PAS: