7. Attch 6 L-2 PP Questionnaire_PARCS.docx

THIS QUESTIONNAIRE, WHEN COMPLETED, MUST BE TREATED AS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION (FAR) 2.101 AND 3.104 AND MUST NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANYONE OUTSIDE THE U.S. GOVERNMENT

Attachment 6 Present/Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

We are contemplating offering a proposal for a solicitation from the 21st Contracting Squadron located at Peterson AFB, CO. This proposal requires that we provide present/past performance information. Please complete the attached present/past performance questionnaire and return it to the following email addresses:

John.corbett.4@us.af.mil

In order to ensure the questionnaire is received at the contracting office in time, please email this survey no later than 12 August 2016.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor: ___________________________ Contract number and/or program title: ______________________________________________________________ Period of performance: _______________________________ Contract value at award: ________________ Final/current value: ________________ Changes in contract dollar amount throughout the life of the contract are/were attributable for the most part to:

Customer issue change orders, Claims submitted by the contractor, Other customer actions, or other contract actions. Please elaborate: _________________________________________________________________ Identify the Specific Contract Elements from Section 5 of this PPQ addressed as part of this questionnaire.

Mission System Operations Mission System Maintenance Communications Operations and Maintenance Logistics Management Civil Engineering and Operations and Maintenance Program Management

SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

Evaluator’s name: _____________________________________________________________________________ Organization and/or office symbol: ________________________________________________________________ Phone number/fax number: ______________________________________________________________________ E-mail address: ________________________________________________________________________________ Dates of involvement in program/contract: __________________________________________________________ Evaluator’s role on subject contract: _______________________________________________________________

SECTION 3: DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT EFFORT

Description (scope and magnitude) of services provided under this contract: _______________________________ Contractual responsibility involved the following management requirements:

Prime or subcontractor on the referenced contract? PRIME SUBCONTRACTOR

1. Management of multiple subcontractor/team members

1. Staffing with personnel that require TS/SCI clearances

1. Cost control and matrixing personnel and requirements

1. Contract type: ________________________ (firm-fixed-price, fixed-price with performance incentives, cost-plus-fixed-fee, etc.)

SECTION 4: RESPONDENT EVALUATION

For each question below, please rate the contractor’s quality of performance from unsatisfactory to exceptional (as defined below) and please provide the basis for your rating. A rating of N/A should be used if either the question is not applicable or the answer is unknown.

EXCEPTIONAL (E): Performance met contractual requirements and EXCEEDED MANY to the client’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD (VG): Performance met contractual requirements and EXCEEDED SOME to the client’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY (S): Performance MET contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or was effective.

MARGINAL (M): Performance DID NOT MEET SOME contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflected a serious problem for which the contractor has not identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear or were only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY (U): Performance DID NOT MEET MOST contractual requirements and recovery is not likely or was not in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contained serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A): Not applicable or unknown. Did not observe performance in this area.

SECTION 5: SPECIFIC CONTRACT ELEMENTS

Element I – Mission System Operations

1.1 In which area did the contract provide mission system operations or maintenance? Check All Applicable:

Operations Support Technical Services Mission System Software and Equipment

1.2. Radar Operations Support: Effectiveness in the operation and maintenance of complex and critical radar mission equipment.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

1.3. Technical Services: Effectiveness in the operation and maintenance of complex and critical radar mission equipment.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

1.4. Mission System Software and Equipment: Effectiveness in the operation and maintenance of complex and critical Mission System Software and Equipment.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

Element II – Mission System Maintenance

2.1 In which area did the contract provide mission system maintenance? Check All Applicable:

Equipment Status Reporting (ESR) Maintenance Data Collection (MDC) Scheduled and Unscheduled Maintenance Procedures

2.2. Effectiveness of equipment status reporting (ESR).

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

2.3. Effectiveness of maintenance data collection (MDC).

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

2.4. Effectiveness in providing scheduled maintenance and responding to unscheduled maintenance calls.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

Element III – Communications Operations and Maintenance

3.1 In which area did the contract provide critical Communications Operations and Maintenance? Check All Applicable:

Desktop Support Mission System Cybersecurity Management Information Assurance Procedures

3.2. Effectiveness in the operation and maintenance of complex and critical communications equipment.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

3.3. Ability to manage the operations of a Network Control Center.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

3.4. Ability to implement current standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

3.5. Security: Effectiveness in implementing and performing industrial security functions, physical security requirements, Computer Security (COMSEC) and Operational Security (OPSEC).

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

Element IV – Logistics Management

4.1 Did the contract provide logistic management?

Yes No

4.2. Supply: Effectiveness in managing, controlling, acquiring and issuing supplies and equipment to assure continuous system operations.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

Element V – Civil Engineering and Operations and Maintenance

5.1 In which area did the contract provide critical utility services? Check All Applicable:

Civil Engineering Operations Maintenance and repair of Real Property and Real Property Installed Equipment Real Property Management Critical Utilities Systems

5.2. Effectiveness of real property maintenance and maintaining facility drawings.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

5.3. Ability to perform technical/engineering for project draft and design packages.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

5.4. Ability to operate, maintain and repair power plant generators and ancillary equipment.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

5.5. Effectiveness in providing 24/7 Service Call Help Desk to receive and execute work requests.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

Element VI – Program Management

6.1 In which area did the contract provide advisory and assistance type services? Check All Applicable:

Management of Key Personnel Government-Furnished Property Management of a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) Contract Transition Subcontract Management

6.2. Ability to attract and retain a qualified workforce at remote location(s).

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

6.3. Ability to hire, retain and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel with required expertise to include appropriate certifications (when applicable).

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

6.4. Effectiveness and efficiency of contractor’s organizational structure and staffing concept providing ability to organize, staff, lead, plan, coordinate and control resources.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

6.5. Contractor employees obtained and maintained the appropriate certifications (when applicable).

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

6.6. Quality/effectiveness of subcontracted efforts.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

6.7. Effectiveness in managing Collective Bargaining Agreements and/or union negotiations Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

6.8. Quality/effectiveness of subcontracted efforts.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

6.9. Effectiveness of material management (including Government-Furnished Property) Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

6.10. Effectiveness of the contractor’s quality control plan.

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

6.11. Effectiveness of the contractor’s ability to identify deficiencies and effectiveness of contractor’s corrections to prevent recurrence..

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

SECTION 6: OVERALL ASSESSMENT

1. How effectively did the contractor implement corrective actions for marginal or unsatisfactory performance?

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A _____________________________________________________________________________________________

2. How well did the contractor manage, report, and control contract costs?

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

3. How well did the contractor define program risk areas and implement corrective actions to mitigate the risk?

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

4. How well did the contractor accurately estimate its costs?

Basis for rating: U M S VG E N/A

5. Given the opportunity, would you hire this contractor again?

Definitely Would Probably Would Might or Might Not Probably Would Not Definitely Would Not

Please explain: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ All information provided will help us track the responses, as well as resolve whatever differences may arise between your perception of the contractor’s performance and the contractor’s perception of its performance. You are advised that the Air Force FAR Supplements (AFFARS) requires the offeror be given an opportunity to respond to adverse past performance information.

Again, thank you for your time and effort in assisting us with our requirement.

image2.png image3.png