RFP_QA__2.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 16 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA2486-16-R-0002
About this file
RFP Questions and Answers 2
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 215 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Model Contract & Attmnts E-OMS Model Contract and Attachments Government Responses to Offeror Questions
| # | Model Contract & Attachments Reference | Detailed Reference (paragraph, page, etc) | Critical Comment | Recommended Revision | Gov Response |
| 1 | Section B | CLINs X011-X016 | Section B states these CLINs are cost plus award fee. However, section L 4.4.2.5 states "these are cost reimbursement CLINs (no fee)". This is contradictory. | Are CLINs X011-X016 fee bearing? Please reconcile Section B and Section L. | Yes, CLINs X011-X016 are fee bearing. The Government will remove the statement "These are Cost Reimbursement CLINs only (no fee)" in Section L 4.4.2.5 via RFP amendment. |
| 2 | Sec J | AWD Attmnts | It appears that updated AWDs were released, dated 7/8. | Will the Government be sending an amendment with the most recent AWDs or should we use the ones provided in the RFP? Also, where is the current CBA for the NRTF location? | The Government will replace the affected Section J attachments with the most recent AWDs (dated 8 July 2015) via RFP Amendment. |
The NRTF CBA is available on FBO under the E-OMS Presolicitation Notice/Updated Draft RFP posting (dated 28 May 15), at the Section_J_Attachment_10_NRTF_Collective_Bargaining_Agreement.pdf link.
Section L E-OMS Section L Government Responses to Offeror Questions
| # | Section L Reference | Detailed Reference (paragraph, page, etc) | Critical Comment | Recommended Revision | Gov Response |
| 1 | Section L 1.3.2 | Page L-8 | The RFP requires all pages to be numbered sequentially by volume. However, each tab of each citation printed from the Past Performance Tool begins with page 1. The Past Performance Tool does not allow offerors to change the pagination. | Is it acceptable to include these documents at the back of the Past Performance Volume so that the remainder of the material can be sequentially numbered? | Yes, It is acceptable to include these documents at the back of the Past Performance Volume. |
| 2 | Section 1.3 | Reference 1.3.2, L-8 | Previous Q&A provided conflicting guidance regarding line spacing in tables, charts, graphs, and figures. | Please clarify | Yes, disregard Comment #2 under the Section L tab of the RFP Questions & Answers spreadsheet posted on 23 July 2015. |
Adhere to the following spacing requirements: Narrative responses shall be typed with 1.5 line spacing. Tables, charts, graphs, and figures are to be legible and are excluded from the 1.5 line spacing requirement.
Section L 1.3.2 is correct as written and will not be amended.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .