Exhibit D - Proposal Ranking.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-R33123-00011021
- Issued by
- Wasco County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Exhibit D - Proposal Ranking scoring matrix for a state and local contract opportunity issued by Northern Wasco County PUD in Oregon. The opportunity is for the purchase and installation of two 32/36/40 transformers at a location within the City of The Dalles. The proposal ranking criteria include the contractor's experience with comparable projects, the proposed price schedule, delivery schedule, resumes of key personnel, references, and an optional interview. Contractors are scored on a 5-point scale across these criteria, with 5 being the highest. The total score for each contractor is not provided.
The related state and local contract opportunity is for the SKOV SUBSTATION TRANSFORMER PURCHASE, with a Request for Proposal issued by Northern Wasco County PUD. The project is located within Wasco County and the City of The Dalles in the state of Oregon. The scope involves the furnishing and installation of two transformers at a location to be determined within The Dalles city limits.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Exhibit C - Personal Service Contract - Sample Boilerplate.pdf | ||
| Amendment 001.1 - Responses to RFI's 8.7.2024.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Amendment 001.2 - Exhibit B - Revised Bid Form~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit A - 33 73 13 - Power Transformer Spec - Skov 05302024.pdf | ||
| Exhibit E - Bid Bond.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit F - Payment Bond.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment 001 - Skov Substation Transformers~2.pdf | ||
| Amendment 001.3 - EO 13920 Foreign Adversaries~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Notice of Intent to Award~3.pdf | ||
| 01 - RFP - NWCPUD Skov Substation Transformer Purchase.pdf | ||
| Exhibit B - Bid Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Exhibit G - Performance Bond.docx | DOCX document | |
| Privacy Pod RFQ Questions.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Ranking
| Criteria | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Contractor Experience: | The contractor's extensive experience in comparable projects showcasing a level of proficiency and know-how that exceeds industry standards. | The contractor has significant experience in similar projects, demonstrating a high level of proficiency and know-how that meets industry standards. | The contractor has some relevant experience in similar projects, meeting basic industry standards but lacking in depth compared to competitors. | The contractor's experience in similar projects is limited, meeting only minimum industry standards. | The contractor's experience in similar projects is insufficient and falls below industry standards. |
| Price Schedule: | The proposed price schedule offers exceptional value, significantly undercutting competitors while still meeting or surpassing all project specifications and quality standards set by the district. | The proposed price schedule offers competitive pricing, slightly lower than competitors, while meeting or surpassing all project specifications and quality standards. This falls within 5 % of low bidder. | The proposed price schedule meets project specifications and quality standards but lacks significant cost competitiveness compared to competitors.This falls within 10 % of low bidder. | The proposed price schedule meets only minimum project specifications and quality standards and is not competitive compared to competitors. This falls within 15 % of low bidder. | The proposed price schedule fails to meet project specifications and quality standards and is uncompetitive compared to competitors. |
| Delivery Schedule: | The proposed delivery schedule is the fastest available schedule | The proposed delivery schedule is the next fastest available schedule | The proposed delivery schedule is the next fastest available schedule | The proposed delivery schedule is the next fastest available schedule | The proposed delivery schedule is the next fastest available schedule |
| Resumes for Key Personnel: | The resumes provided for key personnel showcase exemplary qualifications, experience, and achievements that greatly surpass the minimum requirements outlined by the district, ensuring a high level of expertise and capability in executing the project. | The resumes of key personnel demonstrate strong qualifications, experience, and achievements meeting or slightly exceeding minimum district requirements, ensuring a high level of expertise and capability in executing the project. | The resumes of key personnel meet minimum district requirements but lack notable qualifications, experience, or achievements beyond these requirements, potentially impacting the execution of the project. | The resumes of key personnel marginally meet minimum district requirements and lack sufficient qualifications, experience, or achievements, raising concerns about the capability to execute the project. | The resumes of key personnel fail to meet minimum district requirements, indicating a lack of necessary qualifications, experience, or achievements essential for executing the project effectively. |
| References: | The provided references offer overwhelmingly positive endorsements, showcasing numerous achievements and successful project completions that significantly surpass the district's expectations, providing strong confidence in the contractor's ability to deliver exceptional results. | The provided references offer predominantly positive endorsements, highlighting several achievements and successful project completions that exceed the district's expectations, instilling confidence in the contractor's ability to deliver exceptional results. | The provided references offer generally positive endorsements, indicating some achievements and successful project completions that meet the district's expectations, providing moderate confidence in the contractor's ability to deliver satisfactory results. | The provided references offer mixed endorsements, with limited achievements and successful project completions meeting the district's expectations, raising concerns about the contractor's ability to deliver satisfactory results. | The provided references offer negative endorsements, indicating a lack of achievements and successful project completions meeting the district's expectations, undermining confidence in the contractor's ability to deliver satisfactory results. |
| Interview (if applicable): | In the event of an interview, the contractor's presentation and responses demonstrate a level of preparedness, innovation, and commitment that greatly exceeds the district's expectations, further reinforcing their suitability for the project. | During the interview, the contractor's presentation and responses demonstrate a high level of preparedness, innovation, and commitment, meeting or slightly exceeding the district's expectations and reinforcing their suitability for the project. | During the interview, the contractor's presentation and responses show moderate preparedness, innovation, and commitment, meeting basic district expectations and partially reinforcing their suitability for the project. | During the interview, the contractor's presentation and responses indicate limited preparedness, innovation, and commitment, falling below the district's expectations and raising concerns about their suitability for the project. | During the interview, the contractor's presentation and responses lack preparedness, innovation, and commitment, significantly below the district's expectations, and questioning their suitability for the project. |
| Contractor 1 | Contractor 2 | Contractor 3 | Contractor 4 | Contractor 5 | |
| Contractor Experience: | |||||
| Price Schedule: | |||||
| Inspection Schedule: | |||||
| Resumes for Key Personnel: | |||||
| References: | |||||
| Interview (if applicable): | |||||
| Score Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .