Exhibit A-3-Client Reference Form.docx

DOCX document 71 KB Posted

Attached to
WSDOT- Highway Speed Camera Pilot Program
Solicitation number
RFQQ 2024-0904
Issued by
Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington

About this file

This document is a client reference form for a bidder on the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) Dispatching Software RFP for the Highway Speed Camera Pilot Program. The form requests information on the bidder's efforts to develop a collaborative relationship, whether they delivered all scope and addressed defects prior to implementation according to schedule and budget, and evaluates the bidder's overall satisfaction, customer service, flexibility in meeting changing requirements, and whether the reference would select the company again. The pilot program involves the installation of 2 Average Speed systems at locations to be determined by WSDOT across multiple counties in the state of Washington.

The document does not provide details on pricing, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements or sources, or contract term and renewal options. The focus is on evaluating the performance and working relationship of the bidding software vendor.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
2024-0904 -Highway Speed Camera RFQQ.docx DOCX document
Exhibit E-ContractIssuesList.docx DOCX document
2024-0904 - Amendment1.docx DOCX document
SLA Table.docx DOCX document
Mailing Process Graphic.pdf PDF
Exhibit A -1-BiddersCertification.docx DOCX document
Exhibit F-DiverseBusinessInclusionPlan.docx DOCX document
REVISED Exhibit B-PerformanceRequirements.docx DOCX document
Deliverables Table.docx DOCX document
Exhibit C-CostProposal.docx DOCX document
Exhibit D-Contract.docx DOCX document
2024-0904 - Amendment2.docx DOCX document
REVISED-2-Exhibit B-PerformanceRequirements.docx DOCX document
Exhibit A -2-BiddersProfile.docx DOCX document
Exhibit B-PerformanceRequirements.docx DOCX document
2024-0904-Q&A-1.docx DOCX document
2024-0904-Q&A-2.docx DOCX document
Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EXHIBIT A-3 – CLIENT REFERENCE

Instructions: Please complete the below reference form for the software vendor bidding on WSDOT’s Dispatching Software RFP. Once completed, please sign, date, and electronically send to WSDOT’s Procurement Coordinator.

Solicitation 2024-0904 – Highway Speed Camera Pilot Program

BIDDER NAME:

DATE OF REFERENCE:

REFERENCE COMPANY NAME:

NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON COMPLETING FORM:

TELEPHONE NUMBER (WITH AREA CODE):

1. Please describe this company’s efforts to develop a collaborative business relationship with you, the customer:

2. Did vendor deliver all scope and address defects prior to implementation according to agreed-upon schedule and budget?

Additional comments:

Please check the value which best represents your experience with this company using the following definitions:

0 = Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2= Average 3=Good 4=Exceptional

3. Overall satisfaction with work deliverables (on-time with deliverables)?

0 |_| 1 |_| 2 |_| 3 |_| 4 |_|

Additional comments: Easy to contact and very responsive.

4. Overall customer service: What is your opinion of this company’s level of customer service?

0 |_| 1 |_| 2 |_| 3 |_| 4 |_|

Additional comments: Very responsive to questions and resolution to problems.

5. How flexible is/was this company in meeting changing requirements?

0 |_| 1 |_| 2 |_| 3 |_| 4 |_|

Additional comments: If we need them a different day or time they are always very accommodating.

6. Based on skill and working relationship, would you select this company again to provide services? |_| Yes |_| No

Thank you for your assistance in this evaluation process.

SignatureDate
Representative Name:

Thank you for taking the time to fill out this information. Please contact Procurement Coordinator name at phone number or email address if you have any questions.

Procurement Coordinator

Name:
Tariq Ohab
Telephone:
360-705-7547
Email:
acoacquisitionsubmittal@wsdot.wa.gov

Total points:

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .