The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Exhibit 3.2 (Service Level Definitions) Solicitation No. 5400026039
SCEIS Modernization
Exhibit 3.2 Service Level Definitions
Solicitation No. 5400026039
Table of Contents
| Offeror Guidelines | 2 | |
| Offeror Instructions | 2 | |
| 1 | Critical Service Levels | 3 |
| 1.1 | Service Availability | 3 |
| 1.2 | Incident Resolution Time –Priority 1 and Priority 2 Incidents | 4 |
| 1.3 | Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Delivery | 6 |
| 1.4 | Service Request Fulfillment | 8 |
| 1.5 | Solution Proposal Delivery | 10 |
| 1.6 | Project Deliverable Completion | 12 |
| 1.7 | Data Protection: Backups | 13 |
| 1.8 | Batch Processing | 15 |
| 2 | Key Service Levels | 16 |
| 2.1 | Response Time of Application | 16 |
| 2.2 | Change Management Effectiveness | 18 |
| 2.3 | Invoice Dispute Resolution | 19 |
| 2.4 | License and Maintenance Renewal Timeliness | 20 |
| 2.5 | Corrective Actions | 22 |
| 2.6 | Incident Resolution Time –Priority 3 and Priority 4 Incidents | 24 |
| 2.7 | Patch Compliance | 26 |
Offeror GuidelinesThis Exhibit 3.2 (Service Level Definitions) contains specific functional requirements that the Offeror must meet in order to successfully perform the requested Services. The response must address all requirements contained in this Exhibit according to the instructions below and be in the prescribed format.
Offeror Instructions1. The Offeror’s response to the RFP shall reflect and comply with the information contained in this Exhibit 3.2 (Service Level Definitions).
2. If the Offeror wishes to suggest changes to the content or requirements contained in this Exhibit 3.2 (Service Level Definitions), these suggestions shall be summarized and submitted separately as detailed in RFP Exhibit J.2.1 (Exceptions). Any notation of objections or issues associated with this Exhibit 3.2 (Service Level Definitions) content does not eliminate or modify the requirements herein or of this RFP, and the Offeror’s Proposal must not assume any incorporation of the Offeror’s suggested changes.
3. The Offeror should not view the possibility of requesting changes as an opportunity to rewrite the entire RFP. Admin expects the Offeror to comply with the requirements as written, and changes should only be made for minor clarifications or if an Offeror will not comply with the requirement as written.
4. The Offeror will complete the highlighted sections Service Provider to Complete in each of the Critical Services Levels and Key Measurements by the following methods:
a. Metric Exclusions: Offeror to include in RFP Exhibit J.2.1 (Exceptions).
b. Collection Process: Not required for initial RFP response; this will be completed at a later stage in the procurement.
c. Reporting Tools: Offeror to include reporting tools in Section 4.20 Service Level Management of Exhibit 2.2 (SCEIS Modernization Services Solution).
Critical Service Levels This Section sets forth qualitative descriptions of the Critical Service Levels. The numerical Minimum Service Levels, Expected Service Levels, and commencement of obligations associated with such Critical Service Levels are set forth in Exhibit 3.1 (Service Level and Deliverable Matrix).
Service Availability
SERVICE LEVEL NAME
Service Availability
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Critical Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level “Service Availability” measures the percentage of time Service Provider Services (e.g., Infrastructure, Platform, Applications) are Available to the using system or end user (e.g., Application uses Platform and Infrastructure Services, end user uses Application Services) during the applicable Measurement Window. |
If downtime occurs for a Service, the Outage is counted against the Service, and the Service is considered unavailable for purposes of this Service Level.
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| Each Service and related CIs are identified in the CMDB. Scheduled hours of operations and maintenance windows for each supporting element related to the Services will be maintained in the Service Management Manual (SMM). |
| METRIC EXCLUSIONS |
| Individual Services unavailable as a result of events in which the root cause is determined to be outside the control of the Service Provider. |
Failures that do not result in any Outage.
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 365(366) |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 99.95% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 99.99% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level calculation for “Service Availability” is (a) the total number of available minutes during the Measurement Window, minus (b) the total number of unscheduled downtime, divided by (c) available minutes during the Measurement Window, with the result expressed as a percentage to two decimal places. |
Available minutes = the total number of minutes in a month (60 minutes x 24 hours x number of days in the month) for the service.
Unscheduled Downtime = the total number of available minutes in which a service is not available for reasons outside of metric exclusions and solely due to the fault of the Service Provider.
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Service Provider to Complete |
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| Service Provider to Complete |
Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to users via report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Availability |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
|_| Quarterly |_| Semi Annual
Incident Resolution Time –Priority 1 and Priority 2 Incidents
SERVICE LEVEL NAME
Incident Resolution Time –Priority 1 and Priority 2 Incidents
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Critical Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level for “Incident Resolution Time –Priority 1 and Priority 2 Incidents” measures the percentage of time Service Provider Resolves Priority 1 or 2 Incidents (Level 2 and Level 3 Support) assigned by the Service Desk, or automated event to Incident creation, within the applicable timeframes. |
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| Includes all Priority 1 and Priority 2 Service Provider Incidents assigned to Level 2 or Level 3 Support. |
The applicable resolution timeframes are listed below.
Priority 1 Incidents: < 2 hours Priority 2 Incidents: < 4 hours
| METRIC EXCLUSIONS |
| Events determined to be outside the control of the Service Provider. Security Incidents will follow the Security Incident Management process as defined in the SMM and may be eligible for an SLA exception or as otherwise mutually agreed upon. |
| HOURS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 24 hours |
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 365(366) |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 95.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 99.00% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level calculation for “Incident Resolution Time Priority 1 and Priority 2” is the total number of Priority 1 and Priority 2 Incidents (Level 2 Support and Level 3 Support) assigned to the Service Provider for which the Resolution time is less than or equal to the relevant resolution timeframe, divided by the total number of Resolved Priority 1 and Priority 2 Incidents plus the total number of open Priority 1 and Priority 2 Incidents that have exceeded the relevant resolution timeframe, with the result expressed as a percentage. |
For purposes of clarity, note the following:
If an Incident is opened within the current Measurement Window, but its relevant resolution timeframe extends beyond the end of the current Measurement Window, then it is excluded from the current Measurement Window’s calculation (unless such Incident is actually Resolved in the current Measurement Window, in which case it is included in the current Measurement Window’s calculation).
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Incident tickets will be logged in the SCEIS Admin ITSM system. Incidents will be categorized and assigned to resolver teams who will work to resolve the incident and progress the ticket through the incident management lifecycle. |
Incident data will be loaded to Service Level Management Reporting system on a daily basis, where the Service Level result will be calculated and reported based on appropriate measurement criteria.
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| SCEIS Admin ITSM system |
Service Level Management Reporting system
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to users via report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Incident, Problem, and Request |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Delivery
Root Cause Analysis Delivery
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Critical Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level “Root Cause Analysis Delivery” measures the percentage of time Service Provider delivers to Admin, a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) within (i) ten (10) Business Days from service restoration (for Priority 1), (ii) ten (10) Business Days from request by Admin, (iii) fifteen (15) Business Days from Service Level Improvement Plan initiation, or (iv) otherwise as agreed upon by Admin. |
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| The RCA is documented and tracked within the Problem Management process, and upon completion, is submitted by the Service Provider to the Admin for review and approval. |
Service Provider will provide Root Cause Analyses on the most business-critical events, as maintained in the SMM, and as requested by Admin for all other Incidents.
| HOURS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 7:00 AM – 6:00 PM |
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 10 Business Days (110 Business Hours) |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 96.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 98.00% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level calculation for “Root Cause Analysis Delivery – Enterprise” is the total number of Root Cause Analyses that are delivered to Admin within the required timeframe, divided by the total number of Root Cause Analyses delivered to Admin during the applicable Measurement Window, with the result expressed as a percentage. |
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Problem investigations for Root Cause Analyses will be logged and tracked in the SCEIS Admin ITSM system. Problems will be categorized and assigned to teams who will analyze the Problem, perform, and document the root cause analysis. The Problem record will be completed and progressed through the Problem Management lifecycle. |
Problem data will be loaded to Service Level Management Reporting System on a daily basis, where the Service Level result will be calculated and reported based on appropriate measurement criteria.
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| Admin SCEIS ITSM system |
Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to users via report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Incident, Problem, and Request |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
Service Request Fulfillment
Service Request Fulfillment
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Critical Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level “Service Request Fulfillment” measures the percentage of time Service Provider successfully completes Service Requests on schedule. Service Requests, which are defined as requests that do not require solution proposal development, include such requests as provisioning ID access, password resets, Service Catalog requests, etc. |
Specific target timeframes are maintained in the SMM.
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| Service Requests shall be an agreed upon set of service requests as specified in the SMM. |
| HOURS OF MEASUREMENT |
| As maintained in SMM. |
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| As maintained in SMM. |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 94.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 96.00% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level for “Service Request Fulfillment” is, for a given Measurement Window, the total number of Service Requests that are completed within the committed timeframes, divided by the total number of Service Requests scheduled for completion during such Measurement Window as well as all uncompleted Service Requests scheduled to be completed in a prior Measurement Window, with the result expressed as a percentage. |
For purposes of clarity, note the following:
If a Service Request is opened within the current Measurement Window, but its relevant committed timeframe extends beyond the end of the current Measurement Window, then it is excluded from the current Measurement Window’s calculation (unless such Service Request is actually resolved in the current Measurement Window, in which case it is included in the current Measurement Window’s calculation).
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Service Requests that do not require solution proposal development will be logged and tracked in the SCEIS Admin ITSM system. Service Requests will be categorized and assigned to resolver teams who will work to fulfill the Service Request and progress the ticket through the service request management lifecycle. |
Service Request data will be uploaded to Service Level Management Reporting system on a daily basis; this tool will filter service request tickets based on appropriate measurement criteria.
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| SCEIS Admin ITSM system |
Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the SLA results for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to authorized users via inherent report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Incident, Problem, and Request |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
Solution Proposal Delivery
Solution Proposal Delivery
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Critical Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level for “Solution Proposal Delivery” measures the percentage of time Service Provider delivers a viable proposal to Admin within the committed timeframes, in response to a solution request. |
Following validation of requirements by Service Provider, the Service Provider shall deliver a proposal for each request within the process defined in the SMM and in accordance with the following solution proposal targets:
· Simple - 10 business days
· Medium - 15 business days
· High - 20 business days
· Custom - 30 business days Definitions for simple, medium, high and custom solution complexities to be defined in the Request Management SMM.
When a proposal is delivered, it must include a committed timeframe for project implementation specified as Business Days from the time the project is assigned to the Service Provider to the implementation completion, including Deliverable(s) as agreed by Admin. These defined Deliverable due dates will be used in the “Project Deliverable Completion” Service Level.
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| Each proposal submitted to Admin will be counted as a measurable event. If there are multiple proposals for one request due to requirements changes then subsequent iterations will be counted as another event. Each will count as an event and an opportunity to succeed or fail. |
| HOURS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 7:00 AM – 6:00 PM |
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| Business Days |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 95.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 97.00% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level calculation for “Solution Proposal Delivery” is the total number of solution proposals that are delivered within the committed timeframes, divided by the total number of delivered proposals plus the total number of open proposals that have exceeded the committed timeframes, with the result expressed as a percentage. |
For purposes of clarity, note the following:
If a solution proposal request is opened within the current Measurement Window, but its relevant committed timeframe extends beyond the end of the current Measurement Window, then it is excluded from the current Measurement Window’s calculation (unless such request is actually delivered in the current Measurement Window, in which case it is included in the current Measurement Window’s calculation).
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Solution proposal requests will be logged and tracked in the SCEIS Admin ITSM system. Solution proposal requests will be categorized and assigned to teams who will work to deliver a proposal and progress the ticket through the service Request management lifecycle. |
Solution proposal data will be uploaded to Service Level Management Reporting System on a daily basis, where the Service Level result will be calculated and reported based on appropriate measurement criteria.
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| SCEIS Admin ITSM system |
Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to authorized users via inherent report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Projects |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
Project Deliverable Completion
Project Deliverable Completion
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Critical Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level “Project Deliverable Completion” measures the percentage of time critical project milestones are completed as defined in Acceptance Criteria including on-time. |
On-time critical Project Deliverable Completion is defined as critical project milestones that are completed on or before the originally estimated date in accordance with defined Acceptance Criteria (or as modified to reflect changes agreed to in writing by Admin through Project Change Request process).
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| Critical Project Milestones |
| HOURS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 24 hours |
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 365(366) |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 95.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 97.00% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level calculation for “Project Deliverable Completion” is the total number of project Deliverables completed as defined in Acceptance Criteria including on-time, divided by the total number of project Deliverables completed, with the result expressed as a percentage. |
Project Deliverables will be reported in the Measurement Window that the project is completed.
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Project data, including project Deliverables, will be maintained by the Service Provider in the approved Admin project management System. |
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| SCEIS Admin ITSM system |
Admin project management System Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to users via report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Projects |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
Data Protection: Backups
Data Protection: Backups
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Critical Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| Backup executions (including all backup objects and backup targets such as file systems, databases, application files, operating systems, applications, and respective data) within the SCEIS environment. |
The Service Level for “Data Protection: Backups” measures the percentage of time Service Provider completes backup executions successfully during the applicable Measurement Window in accordance with the relevant criteria specified in the Service Management Manual.
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| Backups targeted for the Measurement window |
| HOURS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 24 hours |
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 365(366) |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 99.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 99.50% |
| ALGORITHM |
| Timeframes for backup executions are maintained in the SMM by Service Provider, to include the schedule, retention-periods, and target directories. |
Backup executions include all backup objects and backup targets such as file systems, databases, application files, operating systems, applications, and respective data.
(a) If there is an appropriate backup tool in use that captures open files, then the backup of open files is included as part of the backup. If there is not an appropriate backup tool in use for the capture of open files, then open files are skipped and not counted against this Service Level.
(b) Backups of functionality exclusively for Service Provider are excluded.
The Service Level measurement is the number of times Service Provider completes backup executions successfully and within the specified timeframes during the applicable Measurement Window divided by the number of times Service Provider should have completed backup executions within the applicable Measurement Window, with the result expressed as a percentage.
Priority 3 Incidents are created for backups that are not successfully completed the first time. Subsequent backup failures generate additional Incidents with escalating priority.
Scheduled Backup Window will be maintained in the SMM.
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Service Provider to Complete |
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| Service Provider to Complete |
Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to users via report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Operations |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
Batch Processing
Batch Processing
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Critical Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level “Batch Processing” measures the number of batch jobs successfully completed within the time frame required by Admin. |
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| Batch processing created in the Measurement window |
| HOURS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 24 hours |
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 365(366) |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 99.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 99.50% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level calculation for “Batch Processing” is the total number of batch jobs that were initiated and that successfully ran to completion within the “Scheduled Batch Window” and if applicable within the specific execution ties for that batch job during the Measurement Window, divided by the total number of batch jobs that were initiated during the Measurement Window, with the result expressed as a percentage. |
Scheduled Batch Window will be maintained in the SMM.
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Service Provider to Complete |
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| Service Provider to Complete |
Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to users via report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Operations |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
Key Service Levels This Article sets forth qualitative descriptions of the Key Service Levels. The numerical Minimum Service Levels, Expected Service Levels, and commencement of obligations associated with such Key Service Levels are set forth in Exhibit 3.1 (Service Level and Deliverable Matrix).
Response Time of Application
SERVICE LEVEL NAME
Response Time of Application
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Key Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level “Response Time of the Application” measures the percentage of time the supported applications provide appropriate response times. |
Response times, measurement frequency, and associated test page or representative page or transaction type identifiers, as agreed by Admin, for each supported application will be maintained in the SMM (for example, an application home page may be a representative test page).
Material changes to test pages shall result in re-establishment of the applicable response time.
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| All accesses to the application by Admin, Service Provider personnel, SCPs, and any Authorized Users. |
| METRIC EXCLUSIONS |
| Events determined to be outside the control of the Service Provider. |
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 365(366) |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 97.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 99.00% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level calculation for “Response Time of Application” is the total number of page load time responses received for the supported applications that meet the required response times divided by the total number of page load time response requests issued for the supported applications during the Measurement Window, with the result expressed as a percentage. |
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Service Provider to Complete |
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| Service Provider to Complete |
Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to users via report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Availability |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
Change Management Effectiveness
Change Management Effectiveness
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Key Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level for “Change Management Effectiveness” measures the percentage of time Service Provider successfully implements Changes to Services. |
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| Includes all Service Provider Service Provider Changes. |
Changes are not successfully implemented if they: (i) do not comply with the Change Management procedures (including the Change Control Process), the SMM, and except as specified in clause (iii) to this sentence, any associated project plan; (ii) cause either a Priority 1 Incident or Priority 2 Incident; (iii) exceeded the change window; (iv) are backed out; or (v) partial success of change is backed out or unsuccessful.
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 365 (366) |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 96.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 98.00% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level calculation for “Change Management Effectiveness” is the number of changes that are successfully implemented by Service Provider divided by the number of changes implemented by Service Provider, with the result expressed as a percentage. Changes will be reported in the Measurement Window that the Change ticket is closed. |
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Changes will be logged and tracked in the SCEIS Admin ITSM system. Changes will be documented, categorized, and assigned to implementer teams who will work to plan, review, obtain approvals, and progress the change through the Change Management lifecycle. |
Change data will be loaded to Service Level Management Reporting System on a daily basis, where the Service Level result will be calculated and reported based on appropriate measurement criteria.
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| SCEIS Admin ITSM system |
Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to users via report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Service Management |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
Invoice Dispute Resolution
Invoice Dispute Resolution
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Key Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level for “Invoice Dispute Resolution” measures the percentage of invoice disputes that are resolved within twenty (20) Business Days. |
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| N/A |
| HOURS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 7:00 AM – 6:00 PM |
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| Business Days |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 95.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 97.00% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level calculation for “Invoice Dispute Resolution” is the total number of invoice disputes that are resolved within twenty (20) Business Days of submission, divided by the total number of resolved invoice disputes plus the total number of open invoice disputes that have exceeded twenty (20) Business Days, with the result expressed as a percentage. |
For purposes of clarity, note the following:
If an invoice dispute is initiated within the current Measurement Window, but the twenty Business Days extends beyond the end of the current Measurement Window, then it is excluded from the current Measurement Window’s calculation (unless such dispute is actually resolved in the current Measurement Window, in which case it is included in the current Measurement Window’s calculation).
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Invoice Disputes will be logged and tracked in the SCEIS Admin ITSM system as a Service Request. Invoice dispute requests will be categorized and assigned to teams who will work to research and resolve the dispute and progress the request through the Request management lifecycle. |
Invoice Dispute data will be loaded to Service Level Management Reporting System on a daily basis, where the Service Level result will be calculated and reported based on appropriate measurement criteria.
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| SCEIS Admin ITSM system |
Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to users via report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Service Management |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
License and Maintenance Renewal Timeliness
License and Maintenance Renewal Timeliness
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Key Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level for “License and Maintenance Renewal Timeliness” measures the timeliness of all software license, service license (e.g., Public Cloud services), and hardware maintenance renewals and installs as appropriate managed by Service Provider. |
Expirations for software license and hardware maintenance are maintained in the SCEIS Admin ITSM system.
METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 365 (366) |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 98.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 99.50% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level calculation for “License and Maintenance Renewal Timeliness” is the total number of license or maintenance renewals processed and installed as appropriate prior to their expiration divided by the total number of license or maintenance agreements scheduled to expire within the Measurement Window. |
For months in which the total volume of license renewals is low, such that missing three (3) renewals would result in a miss of a Minimum Service Level target or missing two (2) renewals would result in a miss of an Expected Service Level target, the following will apply:
1. If the Service Provider misses three (3) renewals, then the performance for this Service Level shall be deemed to equal the Minimum Service Level target (e.g., reported as 98%).
2. If the Service Provider misses two (2) or less renewals, then the performance for this Service Level shall be deemed to equal the Expected Service Level target (e.g., reported as 99%).
3. If the Service Provider misses four (4) or more renewals, then the standard calculation applies.
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Service Provider will provide current proof of entitlements, license renewal dates, and maintenance renewal dates to Admin. Data will be maintained in the approved Admin tool. A license and maintenance renewal report will compare renewals that are due in the Measurement Window against those that met or failed the target renewal date. |
Software and hardware renewals and software installations as appropriate will be logged and tracked in the SCEIS Admin ITSM system. Service Provider will receive a Service Request to renew from the SCEIS Admin ITSM system.
When appropriate a Change Request will be issued to install software. Software renewal installations will be categorized and assigned to resolver teams who will work to fulfill the request.
Software and hardware renewal data will be uploaded to the Service Level Management Reporting system on a daily basis, where the Service Level result will be calculated and reported based on appropriate measurement criteria.
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| Service Provider to Complete |
SCEIS Admin ITSM system Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to users via report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Service Management |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
Corrective Actions
Corrective Actions
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Key Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level “Corrective Actions” measures the percentage of time Service Provider completes Corrective Actions activities within the committed timeframes. |
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| Corrective Actions activities associated with all Service Provider Problem Tickets. |
| METRIC EXCLUSIONS |
| Corrective Actions activities internal to Service Provider other than those for Service Level Improvement Plans. |
Corrective Actions activities solely owned by Third Parties, not the Service Provider.
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 365 (366) |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 90.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 95.00% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level calculation for “Corrective Actions” is the total number of corrective actions activities that are completed within the required timeframe, divided by the total number of corrective actions activities completed plus the total number of corrective actions activities that have passed the committed timeframe, with the result expressed as a percentage. |
For purposes of clarity, note the following:
If a corrective actions activity is opened within the current Measurement Window, but its relevant committed timeframe extends beyond the end of the current Measurement Window, then it is excluded from the current Measurement Window’s calculation (unless such corrective actions activity is actually closed in the current Measurement Window, in which case it is included in the current Measurement Window’s calculation).
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Corrective action activities will be logged and tracked in the SCIS Admin ITSM system. Corrective action activities will be assigned to responsible teams who will implement the corrective action activities. The corrective action activities will be progressed through the Problem management lifecycle. |
Problem data will be loaded to Service Level Management Reporting System on a daily basis, where the Service Level result will be calculated and reported based on appropriate measurement criteria.
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| SCEIS Admin ITSM system |
Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to users via report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Incident, Problem and Request |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
Incident Resolution Time –Priority 3 and Priority 4 Incidents
Incident Resolution Time – Priority 3 and 4 Incidents
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Key Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level for “Incident Resolution Time –Priority 3 and 4 Incidents” measures the percentage of time Service Provider Resolves Priority 3 and Priority 4 Incidents (Level 2 and Level 3 Support) assigned by the Service Desk within the applicable timeframes. |
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| Includes all Priority 3 and Priority 4 Service Provider Incidents. |
The applicable resolution timeframes are listed below.
Priority 3 Incidents:
The Incident shall be Resolved within 1320 minutes (i.e., 22 Business Hours) where such minutes shall be measured only between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM inclusive on Business Days.
Priority 4 Incidents:
The Incident shall be Resolved within 1980 minutes (i.e., 33 Business Hours) where such minutes shall be measured only between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM inclusive on Business Days.
| METRIC EXCLUSIONS |
| Events determined to be outside the control of the Service Provider. Security Incidents will follow the Security Incident Management process as defined in the SMM and may be eligible for an SLA exception or as otherwise mutually agreed upon. |
| HOURS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 24 hours |
| DAYS OF MEASUREMENT |
| 365(366) |
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 95.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 99.00% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level calculation for “Incident Resolution Time – Priority 3 and Priority 4 Incidents” is the total number of Priority 3 and Priority 4 Incidents (Level 2 Support and Level 3 Support) assigned by the Service Desk for which the Resolution time is less than or equal to the relevant resolution timeframe, divided by the total number of Resolved Priority 3 and 4 Incidents plus the total number of open Priority 3 and 4 Incidents that have exceeded the relevant resolution timeframe, with the result expressed as a percentage. |
For purposes of clarity, note the following:
if an Incident is opened within the current Measurement Window, but its relevant resolution timeframe extends beyond the end of the current Measurement Window, then it is excluded from the current Measurement Window’s calculation (unless such Incident is actually Resolved in the current Measurement Window, in which case it is included in the current Measurement Window’s calculation)
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Incident tickets will be logged in the SCEIS Admin ITSM system. Incidents will be categorized and assigned to resolver teams who will work to resolve the incident and progress the ticket through the incident management lifecycle. |
Incident data will be loaded to Service Level Management Reporting System on a daily basis, where the Service Level result will be calculated and reported based on appropriate measurement criteria.
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| SCEIS Admin ITSM system |
Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to users via report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Incident, Problem, and Request |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
Patch Compliance
Patch Compliance
| SERVICE LEVEL TYPE |
| Key Service Level |
| METRIC DESCRIPTION |
| The Service Level for “Patch Compliance” measures the percentage of patches (both Security and Software) initiated timely and applied successfully as documented in the Change request ticket. Timeliness requirements to initiate a patch are defined in the SMM. |
| METRIC INCLUSIONS and DATA SOURCES |
| Timeliness measurement is based on the time the patches are received from the vendor to the time the change request ticket to the Admin is created. |
Scheduled hours of operations and maintenance windows for each infrastructure element will be maintained in the SMM. Changes are not successfully implemented if they: (i) do not comply with the Change Management procedures (including the Change Control Process) and the SMM; (ii) cause either a Priority 1 Incident or Priority 2 Incident; (iii) exceed the change window; (iv) are backed out; or (v) partial success of change is backed out or unsuccessful.
Patches not approved by Admin for implementation are excluded from this SLA.
| MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL |
| 95.00% |
| EXPECTED SERVICE LEVEL |
| 97.00% |
| ALGORITHM |
| The Service Level calculation for “Patch Compliance” is the total number of patch Change Requests initiated within the required timeframes and applied successfully, divided by the total number of patches that were released from the vendor and approved by Admin for application in the environment. |
| COLLECTION PROCESS |
| Changes will be logged and tracked in the SCEIS Admin ITSM system. Changes will be documented, categorized, and assigned to implementer teams who will work to plan, review, obtain approvals, and progress the change through the Change Management lifecycle. |
Change data will be loaded to Service Level Management Reporting System on a daily basis, where the Service Level result will be calculated and reported based on appropriate measurement criteria
| REPORTING TOOLS |
| SCEIS Admin ITSM system |
Service Level Management Reporting System
| RAW DATA STORAGE (ARCHIVES) |
| Data used to calculate the Service Level result for reporting will be stored in the Service Level Management Reporting System, which will be accessible to users via report drill-down functionality for a rolling 13 months. |
| PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Operations Management |
| METRIC REPORTING |
| |X| Monthly |
Department of Administration Page 1 image1.png