DOCUMENT 5 HOWTO Team Scoring Form.pdf
PDF 84 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-44300-00008989
- Issued by
- Benton County, Oregon
About this file
This document is a HOWTO Team Scoring Form for a state or local grant opportunity. The form outlines the evaluation criteria and scoring system that will be used to review and score proposals submitted for the HOWTO Grant Round 6. The criteria include alignment of the proposal's goals with HOWTO's values and purpose, the proposal's potential impact on the healthcare workforce, the innovativeness of the proposed approach, and the sustainability of the proposed program beyond the grant period. Reviewers are instructed to rate each criterion on a scale of 0 to 5, with 5 representing the highest level of performance. The total possible score is 20 points.
The form also includes sections for the reviewer to identify any concerns, weaknesses, assets, or strengths in the proposer's response, as well as any additional questions or comments. This feedback is intended to provide the proposer with constructive input to improve their proposal for future submissions.
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HOWTO Team Scoring Form
Proposer Name:
HOWTO Team Reviewer Name:
Date of Review:
Amount Requested:
Current HOWTO recipient?
Service Area(s) or County:
On a scale of 1-3 (1 = top priority) what priority would you give this proposal? Please explain your priority score:
Evaluation Rubric Items
Does not meet criteria/ expectations;
missing all or important components
Partially meets criteria/ expectations;
some edits may be needed
Meets criteria/ expectations; very minor edits may be needed
Excels/ excellent in meeting criteria/ expectations; no edits needed Enter scores below
What are the concerns/weaknesses identified in proposer’s response?
(please describe)
Are there any assets/strengths identified in proposer’s response?
(please describe)
Questions or additional comments?
Proposal goals are in alignment with HOWTO values and purpose.
0- Proposal goals are not in alignment with HOWTO values and purpose.
1- Proposal goals are partially in alignment with HOWTO values and purpose or are in the beginning stages of alignment.
3- Proposal goals are in alignment with HOWTO values and purpose.
5- Proposal goals are in alignment with HOWTO values and purpose and they are an expert at practicing these.
Proposal strategies and outcomes will have significant impact on health care workforce.
0 - Proposal strategies and outcomes will not have significant impact on health care workforce.
1 - Proposal strategies and outcomes will have limited impact on health care workforce.
3 - Proposal strategies and outcomes will have significant impact on health care workforce.
5 - Proposal strategies and outcomes will excel in having significant impact on health care workforce.
Project is innovative in its approach to addressing a health care workforce need.
0 - Proposal is not innovative. 1 - Proposal is partially innovative. 3 - Proposal is innovative. 5 - Proposal excels in using an innovative approach.
Sustainability of approach beyond grant period is clearly defined and well-positioned for success.
0 - Plan for program sustainability is missing information or is not well-positioned for success.
1 - Plan for program sustainability outlines limited information, more information needed to evaluate.
3- Plan for program sustainability is detailed in approach and supports success of continuation beyond grant period.
5- Plan for program sustainability excels in its approach and is especially well-positioned for success beyond the grant period.
0 Total score (of 20 pts)
Reviewer Scoring Sheet: RFGP S-44300-00008989 HOWTO Grant Round 6
Doc 5 HOWTO Team scoring form
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .