DOCUMENT 4 HOWTO Reviewer Scoring Form.pdf

HOWTO RFGP 5328

Review Rubric

Proposer Name:

Reviewer Name:

Date of Review:

Amount Requested:

On a scale of 1-3 (1 = top priority) what priority would you give this proposal? Please explain your priority score:

Evaluation Rubric Items Does not meet criteria/ expectations;

missing all or important components

Partially meets criteria/ expectations;

some edits may be needed

Meets criteria/ expectations; very minor edits may be needed

Excels/excellent in meeting criteria/ expectations; no edits needed

Enter scores below

What are the concerns/weaknesses identified in proposer’s response?

(please describe)

Are there any assets/strengths identified in proposer’s response?

(please describe)

Questions or additional comments?

Proposal is innovative in its approach to addressing a health care workforce need.

0- Proposal is not innovative. 1- Proposal demonstrates minor innovation in its approach.

3- Proposal is innovative. 5- Proposal utilizes an exceptionally innovative approach.

Proposal addresses the workforce needs identified within Oregon and their community.

0 - Proposal does not address the workforce needs identified within

Oregon and their community

1 - Proposal partially addresses the workforce needs identified within Oregon and/or their community

3 - Proposal addresses the workforce needs identified within

Oregon and their community

5 - Proposal is clear and excels in addressing the workforce needs identified within Oregon and their community

Proposal increases the Oregon health care workforce by building workforce capacity or skills to build retention and training.

0 - Proposal does not increase the Oregon health care workforce by building workforce capacity or skills to build retention and training.

1 - Proposal partially increases the Oregon health care workforce by building workforce capacity or skills to build retention and training.

3- Proposal increases the Oregon health care workforce by building workforce capacity or skills to build retention and training.

5 - Proposal greatly increases the Oregon health care workforce by drastically building workforce capacity or skills to build retention and training.

Proposal advances health equity, ethnic and racial diversity, and inclusion in Oregon’s health care workforce

0- Proposal does not advance health equity, ethnic and racial diversity, and inclusion in Oregon’s health care workforce

1- Proposal mentions or partially advances health equity, ethnic and racial diversity, and inclusion in Oregon’s health care workforce

3- Proposal advances health equity, ethnic and racial diversity, and inclusion in Oregon’s health care workforce

5- Proposal is innovative, tailored to community needs, and excels in advancing health equity, ethnic and racial diversity, and inclusion in Oregon’s health care workforce

Proposal advances linguistic diversity and inclusion in Oregon’s health care workforce

0- Proposal does not advance linguistic diversity and inclusion in

Oregon's health care workforce

1-Proposal mentions or partially advances linguistic diversity and inclusion in Oregon's health care workforce

3- Proposal advances linguistic diversity and inclusion in Oregon's health care workforce

5- Proposal is innovative, tailored to community needs, and excels in advancing linguistic diversity and inclusion in Oregon's health care workforce

Proposal advances trauma informed practice, policies, training, environment in Oregon’s health care workforce

0- Proposal does not advance trauma informed practice, policies, training, environment in Oregon’s health care workforce

1-Proposal mentions or partially advances trauma informed practice, policies, training, environment in Oregon’s health care workforce

3- Proposal advances trauma informed practice, policies, training, environment in Oregon’s health care workforce

5- Proposal is innovative, tailored to community needs, and excels in advancing trauma informed practice, policies, training, environment in Oregon’s health care workforce

Proposal provides culturally responsive or specific services to communities experiencing inequities

0- Proposal does not provide culturally responsive or specific services to communities experiencing inequities

1-Proposal mentions or partially provides culturally responsive or specific services to communities experiencing inequities

3- Proposal provides culturally responsive or specific services to communities experiencing inequities

5- Proposal is innovative, tailored to community needs, and excels in providing culturally responsive or specific services to communities experiencing inequities

Overall project: Workforce need

Reviewer Scoring Form: RFGP S-44300-00008989 HOWTO Grant Round 6

Overall project: Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

# Level 3 - Restricted

Evaluation Rubric Items Does not meet criteria/ expectations;

missing all or important components

Partially meets criteria/ expectations;

some edits may be needed

Meets criteria/ expectations; very minor edits may be needed

Excels/excellent in meeting criteria/ expectations; no edits needed

Enter scores below

What are the concerns/weaknesses identified in proposer’s response?

(please describe)

Are there any assets/strengths identified in proposer’s response?

(please describe)

Questions or additional comments?

Organization is advancing equity, antiracism and inclusion in its policies, programs, and practices.

0- Organization is not advancing equity, antiracism and inclusion in its policies, programs, and practices or does not include this within the application

1- Organization mentions or is partially advancing equity, antiracism and inclusion in its policies, programs, and practices or express they are in the beginning stages of development

3- Organization is actively advancing equity, antiracism and inclusion throughout its policies, programs, and practices. Has knowledge and is using it.

5- Organization is considered an expert in this and is actively advancing equity, antiracism and inclusion throughout its policies, programs, and practices. Has knowledge and is using it and is training/ assisting other organizations to grow as well.

Has a history of serving people from Tribal communities, other communities of color, and/or other communities historically experiencing health inequities

0- Organization does not have history of serving people from the communities outlined or does not include this within the application

1- Organization is beginning to serve people from the communities outlined or expresses they are in the beginning stages of development

3- Organization is actively serving people from the communities outlined

5- Organization is considered an expert in this and is actively serving people from the communities outlined. Has knowledge and is using it and is training/ assisting other organizations as well.

Project Abstract Summary is clear in outlining the nature and scope of the project.

0- Project Abstract Summary is incomplete, missing or is in need of serious edits

1- Project Abstract Summary is present but unclear or in need of significant edits

2- Project Abstract Summary is complete and clearly outlines project but may be in need of minor edits

3- (Note: Max points for item = 3) Project Abstract Summary is excellent, complete and demonstrates expert understanding /comprehension of the project/goals

Problem statement demonstrates a depth and breadth of knowledge of the problem to be addressed by the application.

0- The demonstrated knowledge of the problem area is incomplete, confusing, or missing all or some key components

1-The demonstrated knowledge of the problem area is present but missing key pieces or depth, major edits and information needed

2- The demonstrated knowledge of the problem area is comprehensive and complete, minor edits may be needed

3- The demonstrated knowledge of the problem area is at an expert level, fully comprehensive and complete

Proposer ties the project to the need and details how the need will be addressed

0- Project is not clearly tied to the need and/or does not clearly explain how the need will be addressed, major edits needed

1- Project is at least partially tied to the need and/or explains partially how the need will be addressed, major edits needed

2- Project is clearly tied to the need and explains clearly how the need will be addressed, minor edits may be needed

3- Project is exceptionally clear in tying to the need and explains clearly how the need will be addressed, fully comprehensive, no edits needed

The quality and nature of the proposed goals, objectives, and measurable outcomes

0 - The quality and nature of the proposed goals, objectives, and measurable outcomes is poor, incomplete or missing key information.

1 - The quality and nature of the proposed goals, objectives, and measurable outcomes is fair, partially complete, may need edits.

2 - The quality and nature of the proposed goals, objectives, and measurable outcomes is good, complete, may need minor edits.

3 - The quality and nature of the proposed goals, objectives, and measurable outcomes is excellent, complete and needs no edits.

Extent to which proposed strategies and plan are designed to improve upon an evidence-based model or culturally specific/relevant model (ex. Tribal Based Practices).

0 - The proposed strategies and plan are not designed to utilize an evidence-based or culturally specific/relevant model (ex. Tribal

Based Practices)

1 - Proposed strategies and plan are utilizing an evidence-based model or culturally specific/relevant model (ex.

Tribal Based Practices).

2 - Proposed strategies and plan are designed to improve upon an evidence-based model culturally specific/relevant model (ex. Tribal

Based Practices).

3 - Proposed strategies and plan excel at improving upon and innovating from an evidence-based model or culturally specific/relevant model (ex. Tribal Based

Practices).

Timeline is clearly outlined and logic/sequencing of the planned approaches are clear as they relate to the specified workforce need being addressed.

0 - The timeline, logic and sequencing of the planned approaches to address the workforce need are unclear or missing

1- The timeline, logic and sequencing of the planned approaches to address the workforce need are partial, may need minor changes to clarify

2 - The timeline, logic and sequencing of the planned approaches to address the workforce need are present and mostly complete

3 - The timeline, logic and sequencing of the planned approaches to address the workforce need excels, is clear, concise, and align throughout the proposal and project

Proposal has clear plan for outreach and engagement

0- Proposal has no plan for outreach and engagement

1- Proposal has a partial or incomplete plan for outreach and engagement

2- Proposal has plan for outreach and engagement, minor edits may be needed

3- Proposal has clear plan for outreach and engagement, no edits needed

Proposal is realistic and achievable. 0 - Proposal is not realistic and achievable

1 - Proposal is partially realistic, and achievable

2 - Proposal is realistic and achievable

3 - Proposal is clear, specific, very realistic, and achievable

Applicant Information Form

Program Plan

Goals, Objectives & Outcomes

Problem statement

Evaluation Rubric Items Does not meet criteria/ expectations;

missing all or important components

Partially meets criteria/ expectations;

some edits may be needed

Meets criteria/ expectations; very minor edits may be needed

Excels/excellent in meeting criteria/ expectations; no edits needed

Enter scores below

What are the concerns/weaknesses identified in proposer’s response?

(please describe)

Are there any assets/strengths identified in proposer’s response?

(please describe)

Questions or additional comments?

Evaluation plan is clear and will effectively assess challenges, successes, and lessons learned by effectively collecting/analyzing project data.

0-The evaluation plan is unclear, incomplete, or will not effectively assess outcomes.

1- The evaluation plan may need further clarification but demonstrates some ability to assess project outcomes/use data.

2- The evaluation plan is clear and would effectively measure project outcomes.

3- The evaluation plan is excellent and demonstrates expertise and experience in collecting and analyzing project outcomes/data.

Evidence of the organization’s (and any partners’) ability to successfully conduct the proposed program. (Also refer to Appendix B for key project personnel information)

0- Organization is missing evidence and/or is not able to demonstrate their ability to successfully conduct the proposed program

1- Organization provided partial evidence of their ability to successfully conduct the proposed program; need some modifications/ verification of ability

2- Organization provided evidence and is able to demonstrate their ability to successfully conduct the proposed program; may need minor modifications/ verification of ability

3- Organization provided full evidence and is more than able to demonstrate their ability to successfully conduct the proposed program;

need no modifications/ verification of ability

Demonstrated ability of the organization to effectively implement community or regional initiatives (including collaborations) and manage multiple projects.

0- Did not demonstrate the ability of the organization to effectively implement community or regional initiatives (including collaborations) and/or manage multiple projects.

1- Partially demonstrates the ability of the organization to implement community or regional initiatives (including collaborations) and/or manage multiple projects.

2- Demonstrates the ability of the organization to effectively implement community or regional initiatives (including collaborations) and/or manage multiple projects.

3- Demonstrates the exceptional ability of the organization to effectively implement community or regional initiatives (including collaborations) and/or manage multiple projects.; no modifications or edits needed

Appropriateness of defined roles and responsibilities of project staff including any proposed consultants.

0- Defined roles and responsibilities of project staff including any proposed consultants are missing or not appropriate

1- Defined roles and responsibilities of project staff including any proposed consultants are incomplete, unclear or partially appropriate, major edits needed

2- Defined roles and responsibilities of project staff including any proposed consultants are appropriate, minor edits may be needed

3- Defined roles and responsibilities of project staff including any proposed consultants are clear, appropriate, and thorough, no edits needed.

The proposal clearly explains how the funds will be used to increase the health care workforce in Oregon

0- The proposal does not explain how the funds will be used to increase health care workforce in Oregon

1- The proposal partially explains how the funds will be used to increase health care workforce in Oregon

2- The proposal mostly explains how the funds will be used to increase health care workforce in Oregon

3- The proposal excels in clearly and concisely explaining how the funds will be used to increase health care workforce in Oregon

The budget is realistic considering area of need identified in the proposal

0- The budget is not realistic considering the area of need identified in the proposal

1- The budget is partially realistic considering the area of need identified in the proposal

2- The budget is realistic considering the area of need identified in the proposal

3- The budget is realistic considering the area of need identified in the proposal, needs no work and exceeds expectations

The budget and its line items are clear and in alignment with the proposal. It is clear how the budget relates to and supports the goals and objectives.

0- The Budget line items are not clear and/or are not in alignment with the proposal

1- The Budget line items are partially clear and/or are partially in alignment with the proposal; the budget needs work

2- The Budget line items are clear and are in alignment with the proposal; the budget needs little to no work

3- The Budget line items are extremely clear and are in alignment with the proposal; the budget needs no work and exceeds expectations

0 Total score (of 90 pts)

Budget

Organizational Capacity

Evaluation Plan

Doc 4 HOWTO Reviewer Scring Frm