CDRLs A021 thru A045 15 May 2020.pdf

5/15/2020 7:10:30 AM CDT CDRL Table of Contents

CONTRACT #:

CONTRACTOR:

SET NAME: B-52 CERP/Engine SS SYSTEM ITEM: B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement Program

PROGRAM: B-52 CERP

DATA ITEM REQUIRING OFFICE AUTHORITY/TITLE/SUBTITLE SOW PARAGRAPH

A021 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-QCIC-81722 BLK16

Quality Program Plan (QPP)

Quality Management Plan

A022 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-QCIC-81187 BLK16

Quality Assessment Report

A023 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-PSSS-81534A BLK16

Teardown Deficiency Report

A024 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-SESS-80255B BLK16

Failure Summary and Analysis Report

A025 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-SAFT-81626 BLK16

System Safety Program Plan (SSPP)

A027 AFLCMC/LPA DI-SESS-81495B SOW Paragraph 4.9.3

Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis Report

A028 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-SAFT-80102C BLK16

Safety Assessment Report (SAR)

Safety Risk Assessment Report

A030 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-MISC-80508B/T BLK16

Technical Report-Study/Services

Organizational Engine Service/Installation/Component Maintenance Manuals

A032 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-MISC-80508B/T BLK16

Technical Report-Study/Services

Initial BOM

A033 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-MISC-80508B/T BLK16

Technical Report-Study/Services

Delivery BOM

A034 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-MISC-80508B/T BLK16

Technical Report-Study/Services

Final BOM

A035 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-MISC-80508B BLK16

Technical Report-Study/Services

5/15/2020 7:10:30 AM CDT CDRL Table of Contents

Service Compliance Publications

A036 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-MISC-80508B/T BLK16

Technical Report-Study/Services

Depot Illustrated Parts Catalog (IPC)/Illustrated Parts Breakdown (IPB)

A037 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-MISC-80508B/T BLK16

Technical Report-Study/Services

Depot Peculiar Support Equipment

A038 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-MGMT-81398C BLK16

Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) Plan

CERP Engine Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) Plan

A039 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-ILSS-81226/T BLK16

Interim Contractor Support (ICS) Parts Usage and Maintenance Data Collection Report

Depot Parts Usage and Maintenance Data

A040 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-MISC-80508B/T BLK16

Technical Report-Study/Services

Depot Engine Build-Up Manual

A041 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-MISC-80508B BLK16

Technical Report-Study/Services

Depot Component Maintenance Manual

A042 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-MISC-80508B/T BLK16

Technical Report-Study/Services

Engine Standard Practices Manual

A045 AFLCMC/WWDC DI-SESS-80294B/T BLK16

Maintenance Test and Support Equipment List

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item)

Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please do not return your form to the above organization. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for the Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

XX21

B. EXHIBIT

Appendix B

C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER QCIC

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement Program

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A021

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Quality Program Plan (QPP)

3. SUBTITLE

Quality Management Plan

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-QCIC-81722

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

BLK16

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

AFLCMC/WWDC

7. DD 250 REQ

DD

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

BLK16

10. FREQUENCY

BLK16

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

BLK16

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

8. APP CODE

A

11. AS OF DATE

BLK16

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

BLK16

Draft

Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Block 5: The contract reference is stated in SOW paragraph 4.8.2.

Note: Certification to either the International Organization for Standardization standard ISO 9001:2015 or the SAE AS9100D quality standard is acceptable.

Block 9: Distribution Statement D: Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and US contractors only, operational use, 6 January 2020. Other requests shall be referred to AFLCMC/WWD.

Export Control Warning Notice: Warning- This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, USC Section 2571 Et Seq) or the Export Administration Act of 1979 (Title 50, USC, App 2401 Et Seq), as amended. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties.

Disseminate in accordance with provisions of DOD directives 5230.25.

Destruction Notice for Unclassified Documents: Destroyed by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document.

Destruction Notice for Classified Documents: Follow the procedures in DOD 5220.22-M, National Industry Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), Section 5-705, or DOD 5200.01M, Information Security Program, Volume 3, Protection of Classified Information.

Block 10: The contractor shall submit the data 120 calendar days after contract award.

Block 11: The as of date shall be accurate as of the date of submittal.

Block 12: The date of the first submission shall be 120 calendar days after contract award.

Block 13: The date of subsequent submission shall be as requested.

Block 14: Deliverable shall be made to the B-52 CERP Configuration Management Office, Tinker AFB, OK. Contractors shall use the specified Configuration Management/Data Management (CM/DM) System in accordance with the Statement of Work.

Format shall be compatible with the latest Adobe Acrobat Reader version in Portable Document Format (PDF) or the latest Microsoft Office file type. The contractor shall use US DOD PKI compliant encryption mechanism when submitting sensitive but unclassified data as attachments to emails. All CDRLs will be submitted in an editable (PDF) format.

AFLCMC/WWDC 1

15. TOTAL 0 1 0

G. PREPARED BY

shepherd.debra.1044063553 Debby Shepherd

H. DATE

2020/05/14

I. APPROVED BY

crowder.celia.dyanne.1162383848

J. DATE

2020/05/14

Contract Nr:

Mod#:

Exhibit:

Appendix B

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

17. PRICE GROUP

DD FORM 1423-1, FEB 2001 PREVIOUS EDITION MAY BE USED Page 1 of 2 Pages

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

XX21

B. EXHIBIT

Appendix B

C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER QCIC

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement Program

E. CONTRACT/PR NO.

F. CONTRACTOR

16. REMARKS (Continued) Documents are to be clearly marked and NO CLASSIFIED data is ever sent or uploaded via the (CM/DM) System or normal e-mail channels.

Note: Government CDRL monitor will ensure personnel assigned to the following organizations have been granted access to MEARS or the current system the government is using: WWDC, DCMA, LPS and LPA as required.

DD FORM 1423-1, FEB 2001 Page 2 of 2 Pages

Contract Nr:

Exhibit:

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

Title: Quality Program Plan (QPP)

Number: DI-QCIC-81722 Approval Date: 29 NOV 2006 AMSC Number: 7676 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: NS/I5223 Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/Relationship:

The Quality Program Plan (QPP) describes the methodology that will be used to meet the quality requirements needed for the specific program. The object of the plan is to define and document what, where, and how to procure, fabricate, assemble, inspect, test and deliver only units and other end products that conform to quality standards. The QPP should start with the contractor’s standard quality system and detail changes to that. The QPP shall be used to verify attainability of contract objectives in the area of producing reliable, quality products. This DID is applicable to development, low rate initial production and full rate production efforts.

a. This DID contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific requirement delineated in the contract and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001, Quality Management Systems – Requirements (Entire Document).

b. The prime contractor is required to include information from significant suppliers (eg, PWAs) or teammates regarding their standard quality system requirements and any deviations specific to this program.

Requirements:

1. Reference Documents: The applicable issue of the documents herein, including, their approval dates and the dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in the current issue of the DODISS at the time of the solicitation; or, for non DODISS-listed documents, as stated herein. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001 Quality Management Systems – Requirements, current edition, is available at International Organization for Standardization website http://www.iso.org/iso/en/ISOOnline.frontpage.

2. Format: Contractor format is acceptable using 8 ½ x 11 in. paper.

3. Content:

3.1 The data item shall have a Title page containing the following information as a minimum:

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-03-19T13:46Z

Check the source to verify that this is the current version before use.

DI-QCIC-81722

3.1.1 Title

3.1.2 CDRL exhibit number

3.1.3 Revision level

3.1.4 Approval/submission

3.1.5 Date

3.1.6 Program name

3.1.7 Contract number

3.1.8 Contractor’s name and address

3.1.9 Data item author

3.1.10 Signature

3.1.11 Approval record

3.2 The data item shall have a table of contents if the length of the document warrants.

3.3 The data item shall have a revision status log page which includes the various revision levels, dates, and summary description of the changes made.

3.4 The QPP shall reference any Industry standard for which the contractor has a current certification. The plan shall reference the contractor’s current Quality Manual, number or identification, and date. The plan shall then detail any changes, deletions or additions to the contractor’s standard requirements, and shall delineate the specific Industry workmanship standards and levels for soldering, printed wiring assembly, etc, that are to be applied to the program. The government shall concur in use of any standard repair procedures and conditions for use on the program.

3.5 The QPP shall include an organizational chart identifying the Product Assurance (PA) organization, names and titles of key PA personnel assigned to the program, and how the PA organization relates to the corporate structure.

3.6 The QPP shall include a proposed end item product flow including test & inspection points. The plan shall briefly address the following topics if different from or not included in the quality manual: quality audit frequency, depth, and independence; process certification and control of automated processes; “cannot duplicate” (CND) and nonconforming material processes; incoming inspection/test, certified supplier program and parts control; and any unique requirements for the program.

4. END OF DI-QCIC-81722

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-03-19T13:46Z

Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please do not return your form to the above organization. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for the Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

XX21

B. EXHIBIT

Appendix B

C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER QCIC

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement Program

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A022

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Quality Assessment Report

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-QCIC-81187

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

BLK16

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

AFLCMC/WWDC

7. DD 250 REQ

DD

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

BLK16

10. FREQUENCY

BLK16

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

BLK16

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

8. APP CODE

A

11. AS OF DATE

BLK16

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

BLK16

Draft

Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Block 5: The contract reference is stated in SOW paragraph 4.8.3.

Block 9: Distribution Statement D: Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and US contractors only, operational use, 6 January 2020. Other requests shall be referred to AFLCMC/WWD.

Export Control Warning Notice: Warning- This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, USC Section 2571 Et Seq) or the Export Administration Act of 1979 (Title 50, USC, App 2401 Et Seq), as amended. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties.

Disseminate in accordance with provisions of DOD directives 5230.25.

Destruction Notice for Unclassified Documents: Destroyed by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document.

Destruction Notice for Classified Documents: Follow the procedures in DOD 5220.22-M, National Industry Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), Section 5-705, or DOD 5200.01M, Information Security Program, Volume 3, Protection of Classified Information.

Block 10: The contractor shall submit the data NLT 365 calendar days after the first submission.

Block 11: The as of date shall be accurate as of the date of submittal.

Block 12: The date of the first submission shall be 365 calendar days after contract award.

Block 13: The date of subsequent submission shall be as requested.

Government may request in-process reports in between submittal periods to capture information for a specific quality issue, in the event a quality issue is impacting CERP program.

Block 14: Deliverable shall be made to the B-52 CERP Configuration Management Office, Tinker AFB, OK. Contractors shall use the specified Configuration Management/Data Management (CM/DM) System in accordance with the Statement of Work.

Format shall be compatible with the latest Adobe Acrobat Reader version in Portable Document Format (PDF) or the latest Microsoft Office file type. The contractor shall use US DOD PKI compliant encryption mechanism when submitting sensitive but unclassified data as attachments to emails. All CDRLs will be submitted in an editable (PDF) format.

AFLCMC/WWDC 1

15. TOTAL 0 1 0

G. PREPARED BY

shepherd.debra.1044063553 Debby Shepherd

H. DATE

2020/05/14

I. APPROVED BY

crowder.celia.dyanne.1162383848

J. DATE

2020/05/14

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

XX21

B. EXHIBIT

Appendix B

C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER QCIC

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement

Documents are to be clearly marked and NO CLASSIFIED data is ever sent or uploaded via the (CM/DM) System or normal e-mail channels.

Note: Government CDRL monitor will ensure personnel assigned to the following organizations have been granted access to MEARS or the current system the government is using: WWDC, DCMA, LPS and LPA as required.

DD FORM 1423-1, FEB 2001 Page 2 of 2 Pages

Contract Nr:

Exhibit:

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-04-22T18:55Z

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-04-22T18:55Z

Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please do not return your form to the above organization. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for the Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

XX21

B. EXHIBIT

Appendix B

C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER PSSS

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement Program

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A023

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Teardown Deficiency Report

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-PSSS-81534A

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

BLK16

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

AFLCMC/WWDC

7. DD 250 REQ

DD

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

BLK16

10. FREQUENCY

BLK16

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

BLK16

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

8. APP CODE

A

11. AS OF DATE

BLK16

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

BLK16

Draft

Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Block 5: The contract reference is stated in SOW paragraph 4.8.4.

Block 9: Distribution Statement D: Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and US contractors only, operational use, 6 January 2020. Other requests shall be referred to AFLCMC/WWD.

Export Control Warning Notice: Warning- This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, USC Section 2571 Et Seq) or the Export Administration Act of 1979 (Title 50, USC, App 2401 Et Seq), as amended. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties.

Disseminate in accordance with provisions of DOD directives 5230.25.

Destruction Notice for Unclassified Documents: Destroyed by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document.

Destruction Notice for Classified Documents: Follow the procedures in DOD 5220.22-M, National Industry Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), Section 5-705, or DOD 5200.01M, Information Security Program, Volume 3, Protection of Classified Information.

Block 10: The contractor shall submit the data when a Deficiency Report (DR) has been submitted.

Block 11: The as of date shall be accurate as of the date of submittal.

Block 12: The date of the first submission shall be when the first DR is submitted.

Block 13: The date of subsequent submission shall be when subsequent DRs are submitted.

Block 14: Deliverable shall be made to the B-52 CERP Configuration Management Office, Tinker AFB, OK. Contractors shall use the specified Configuration Management/Data Management (CM/DM) System in accordance with the Statement of Work.

Format shall be compatible with the latest Adobe Acrobat Reader version in Portable Document Format (PDF) or the latest Microsoft Office file type. The contractor shall use US DOD PKI compliant encryption mechanism when submitting sensitive but unclassified data as attachments to emails. All CDRLs will be submitted in an editable (PDF) format.

Documents are to be clearly marked and NO CLASSIFIED data is ever sent or uploaded via the (CM/DM) System or normal e-mail channels.

AFLCMC/WWDC 1

15. TOTAL 0 1 0

G. PREPARED BY

shepherd.debra.1044063553 Debby Shepherd

H. DATE

2020/05/14

I. APPROVED BY

crowder.celia.dyanne.1162383848

J. DATE

2020/05/14

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

XX21

B. EXHIBIT

Appendix B

C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER PSSS

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement

Note: Government CDRL monitor will ensure personnel assigned to the following organizations have been granted access to MEARS or the current system the government is using: WWDC, DCMA, LPS and LPA as required.

DD FORM 1423-1, FEB 2001 Page 2 of 2 Pages

Contract Nr:

Exhibit:

Title: TEARDOWN DEFICIENCY REPORT

Number: DI-PSSS-81534A Approved Date: 20160608

AMSC Number: F9670 Limitation: N/A

DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No

Preparing Activity: 11 (AFLCMC/EZSC) Project Number: PSSS-2015-024

Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/Relationship: The Teardown Deficiency Report provides a factual narrative analysis of a deficiency which has been noted on equipment.

a. This Data Item Description (DID) is applicable when contractors are responsible for maintaining custodial records for government property being repaired.

b. This DID contains the format, content and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in the solicitation.

c. This DID supersedes DI-ALSS-81534.

Requirements:

1. Reference documents. None.

2. Format. The Teardown Deficiency Report shall be in the contactor’s format.

3. Content. This report shall include an analysis of the deficiency which includes cause of failure, recommended corrective action and recommendations for actions to prevent recurrence of the failure/deficiency, and the applicable category of the failure defined as follows:

a. Workmanship and non-conformance. Any deficiency (e.g., physical, chemical, electrical, functional) noted in materiel which is attributed to non-conformance to applicable specifications, drawing, standards, or Technical Order (TO); or workmanship during manufacture, repair modification or maintenance.

b. Material failure. The failure of an end item which was attributable to neither the repair nor the manufacturing process, but was due to an unpredictable failure of an internal component or sub-assembly.

c. No defect found/could not duplicate: Investigation of the exhibit revealed no deficiency.

Equipment conforms to specifications and TO standards and procedures.

d. Technical data, deficiency: Technical data (including TOs, drawings, and work specifications) was deficient or inadequate so as to cause the deficiency/failure on the item.

e. Field induced deficiency. Deficiency confirmed by the investigation to have been caused by operator error, i.e., wrong voltage applied, misaligned, maladjusted, mishandling, or not used for intended purpose.

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-07-31T14:40Z

DI-PSSS-81534A

f. Maintenance deficiency. An unfavorable characteristic of an item that impedes the accomplishment of maintenance operations which results in excessive maintenance operations and/or in excessive maintenance man-hour consumption.

g. Design deficiency. A condition that limits or prevents the use of material for purpose intended or required where the material meets all other specifications.

h. Handling or shipping deficiency. A deficiency induced by improper handling or shipping, i.e., improper packaging, which prohibits the use for intended purpose.

i. Packaging specifications inadequate - not complied with. Unsatisfactory conditions including item damage resulting from improper packaging.

End of DI-PSSS-81534A.

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-07-31T14:40Z

Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please do not return your form to the above organization. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for the Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

XX21

B. EXHIBIT

Appendix B

C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER SESS

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement Program

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A024

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Failure Summary and Analysis Report

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-SESS-80255B

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

BLK16

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

AFLCMC/WWDC

7. DD 250 REQ

DD

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

BLK16

10. FREQUENCY

BLK16

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

BLK16

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

8. APP CODE

A

11. AS OF DATE

BLK16

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

BLK16

Draft

Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Block 5: The contract reference is stated in SOW paragraph 4.8.4.

Block 9: Distribution Statement D: Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and US contractors only, operational use, 6 January 2020. Other requests shall be referred to AFLCMC/WWD.

Export Control Warning Notice: Warning- This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, USC Section 2571 Et Seq) or the Export Administration Act of 1979 (Title 50, USC, App 2401 Et Seq), as amended. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties.

Disseminate in accordance with provisions of DOD directives 5230.25.

Destruction Notice for Unclassified Documents: Destroyed by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document.

Destruction Notice for Classified Documents: Follow the procedures in DOD 5220.22-M, National Industry Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), Section 5-705, or DOD 5200.01M, Information Security Program, Volume 3, Protection of Classified Information.

Block 10: The contractor shall submit the data at the completion of Deficiency Report (DR) analyses.

Block 11: The as of date shall be accurate as of the date of submittal.

Block 12: The date of the first submission shall be at the completion of the first DR analysis.

Block 13: The date of subsequent submission shall be at the completion of each subsequent DR analysis.

Block 14: Deliverable shall be made to the B-52 CERP Configuration Management Office, Tinker AFB, OK. Contractors shall use the specified Configuration Management/Data Management (CM/DM) System in accordance with the Statement of Work.

Format shall be compatible with the latest Adobe Acrobat Reader version in Portable Document Format (PDF) or the latest Microsoft Office file type. The contractor shall use US DOD PKI compliant encryption mechanism when submitting sensitive but unclassified data as attachments to emails. All CDRLs will be submitted in an editable (PDF) format.

Documents are to be clearly marked and NO CLASSIFIED data is ever sent or uploaded via the (CM/DM) System or normal e-mail channels.

AFLCMC/WWDC 1

15. TOTAL 0 1 0

G. PREPARED BY

shepherd.debra.1044063553 Debby Shepherd

H. DATE

2020/05/14

I. APPROVED BY

crowder.celia.dyanne.1162383848

J. DATE

2020/05/14

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

XX21

B. EXHIBIT

Appendix B

C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER SESS

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement

Note: Government CDRL monitor will ensure personnel assigned to the following organizations have been granted access to MEARS or the current system the government is using: WWDC, DCMA, LPS and LPA as required.

DD FORM 1423-1, FEB 2001 Page 2 of 2 Pages

Contract Nr:

Exhibit:

Title: FAILURE SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS REPORT

Number: DI-SESS-80255B Approval Date: 20191015

AMSC Number: N10166 Limitation: N/A

DTIC Applicable: Yes GIDEP Applicable: Yes http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/submit http://www.gidep.org/data/submit.htm

Preparing Activity: AS

Applicable Forms: N/A

Project Number: SESS-2019-063

Use/relationship: The Failure Summary and Analysis Report presents a summary of the individual failures that occur prior to and during the reporting period and describes the analysis and corrective actions performed. This report is used to evaluate the contractor’s failure reporting, analysis, and corrective action efforts in accordance with the solicitation.

This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in the contract.

This DID supersedes DI-SESS-80255A.

1. Reference Documents. None

2. Format. The Failure Summary and Analysis Report shall be in contractor’s format.

3. Content. The report shall summarize the results of the contractor’s Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) implementation required by the statement of work, and shall include a cumulative tabulation of failure data. Failures that occurred during the latest report period shall be identified by suitable notation. The report shall include the following elements at a minimum:

3.1 Failure number

3.2 Failure analysis number

3.3 Failure date

3.4 Name of engineer responsible for failure analysis

3.5 Failed part name

3.6 Failed part number (e.g. national stock number (NSN), logistics control number, work unit code)

3.7 Manufacturer of failed part

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-11-13T20:57Z Check the source to verify that this is the current version before use.

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/submit http://www.gidep.org/data/submit.htm

DI-SESS-80255B

3.8 Subassembly name and number

3.9 Major assembly name and number

3.10 Equipment name and serial number

3.11 Failed part’s accumulated test or field operational life data

3.12 Test or mission being performed when the failure occurred

3.13 Test or mission mode of operation and environmental and use conditions when the failure occurred

3.14 Failure symptoms and description of detection or diagnosis methods (e.g. Built In Test)

3.15 Failure effects (e.g. none, degradation, abort)

3.16 Repair action (e.g. remove/replace)

3.17 Failure mode description

3.18 Description of engineering analysis method employed in failure analysis

3.19 Failure mechanism/cause of failure

3.20 Contributing factors, including multiple factor interactions, or secondary effects of the failure

3.21 Categorization of failure (e.g. equipment design, equipment manufacturing workmanship, part design, part manufacturing workmanship, software errors, unverified, intermittent, non-relevant)

3.22 Information on previous corrective actions for the same part or failure mode.

Corrective action required to mitigate the failure mode, including:

3.22.1 Identification of the failure mode

3.22.2 The recommended process or process control changes, when the failure cause was due to workmanship defects

3.22.3 Proposals for retrofit of all equipment already delivered or assembled, including recommended effectivity, in accordance with the contract

DI-SESS-80255B

3.22.4 Disposition of all defective material and material rendered obsolete because of any necessary redesign, to assure their exclusion from production items

3.22.5 Identification of previous functional and environmental qualification tests, if any, invalidated by the corrective action changes and a recommendation of those tests that should be repeated, in accordance with the terms of the contract, to demonstrate the corrective action’s effectiveness

3.22.6 Effect on operational and diagnostic software programs and plan for changes, if necessary

3.23 Corrective action status

3.24 The recommended fix effectiveness factor (FEF) to be applied to the failure mode based on the proposed corrective action

3.25 Rationale for any open failure analyses past the contract-specified closeout time

3.26 Severity criticality ranking of the failure modes. The severity classification categories are:

3.26.1 Category I - Catastrophic - A failure which may cause death or system loss (i.e., aircraft, tank, missile, ship)

3.26.2 Category II - Critical - A failure which may cause severe injury, major property damage, or major system damage resulting in mission loss.

3.26.3. Category III - Marginal - A failure that may cause minor injury, minor property damage, or minor system damage which will result in delay or loss of availability or mission degradation.

3.26.4 Category IV - Minor - A failure not serious enough to cause injury, property or system damage, but which results in unscheduled maintenance or repair.

End of DI-SESS-80255B

Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please do not return your form to the above organization. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for the Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

XX21

B. EXHIBIT

Appendix B

C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER SAFT

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement Program

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A025

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

System Safety Program Plan (SSPP)

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-SAFT-81626

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

BLK16

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

AFLCMC/WWDC

7. DD 250 REQ

DD

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

BLK16

10. FREQUENCY

BLK16

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

BLK16

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

8. APP CODE

A

11. AS OF DATE

BLK16

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

BLK16

Draft

Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Block 5: The contract reference is stated in SOW paragraph 4.9.1.

Block 9: Distribution Statement D: Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and US DOD contractors only, operational use, 6 January 2020. Other requests shall be referred to AFLCMC/WWD.

Export Control Warning Notice: Warning- This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, USC Section 2571 Et Seq) or the Export Administration Act of 1979 (Title 50, USC, App 2401 Et Seq), as amended. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties.

Disseminate in accordance with provisions of DOD directives 5230.25.

Destruction Notice for Unclassified Documents: Destroyed by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document.

Destruction Notice for Classified Documents: Follow the procedures in DOD 5220.22-M, National Industry Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), Section 5-705, or DOD 5200.01M, Information Security Program, Volume 3, Protection of Classified Information.

Block 10: The Contractor shall submit annually.

Block 11: The as of date shall be accurate as of the date of submittal.

Block 12: The date of the first submission shall be 90 days after contract award.

Block 13: The Contractor shall submit annual updates. In the event there are no changes to the SSPP, the Contractor shall submit a letter stating there are no changes to the most recent submittal.

Block 14: Deliverable shall be made to the B-52 CERP Configuration Management Office, Tinker AFB, OK. Contractors shall use the specified Configuration Management/Data Management (CM/DM) System in accordance with the Statement of Work.

Format shall be compatible with the latest Adobe Acrobat Reader version in Portable Document Format (PDF) or the latest Microsoft Office file type. The contractor shall use US DOD PKI compliant encryption mechanism when submitting sensitive but unclassified data as attachments to emails. All CDRLs will be submitted in an editable (PDF) format.

Documents are to be clearly marked and NO CLASSIFIED data is ever sent or uploaded via the (CM/DM) System or normal e-mail channels.

AFLCMC/WWDC 1

15. TOTAL 0 1 0

G. PREPARED BY

leone.christopher.nmi.1195614780 Debby Shepherd

H. DATE

2019/07/24

I. APPROVED BY

crowder.celia.dyanne.1162383848

J. DATE

2020/05/14

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

XX21

B. EXHIBIT

Appendix B

C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER SAFT

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement

Note: Government CDRL monitor will ensure personnel assigned to the following organizations have been granted access to MEARS or the current system the government is using: WWDC, DCMA, LPS and LPA as required.

DD FORM 1423-1, FEB 2001 Page 2 of 2 Pages

Contract Nr:

Exhibit:

Title: SYSTEM SAFETY PROGRAM PLAN (SSPP)

Number: DI-SAFT-81626 Approval Date: 20010801 AMSC Number: N7456 Limitation:

DTIC Applicable: GIDEP Applicable:

Office of Primary Responsibility: N/PMS377 Applicable Forms:

Use/Relationship: This plan details the task and activities of system safety management and system safety engineering required to identify, evaluate, and eliminate or control hazards throughout the changes from the baseline configuration. The System Safety Program Plan describes fully the planned safety tasks and activities required to meet the System Safety Program requirements.

a. This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task required as delineated in the contract.

1. Format. The Systems Safety Program Plan (SSPP) shall be presented in the Contractor’s format.

2. Content. The Systems Safety Program Plan shall contain the following:

2.1 System Safety Organization. The plan shall describe:

a. The system safety organization or function within the organization of the total program using charts to show the organizational and functional relationships, and lines of communication.

b. The responsibility, authority, and accountability of system safety personnel, other contractor organizational elements involved in the system safety effort, subcontractors, and system safety groups.

Identify the organizational unit responsible for executing each task.

Identify the authority in regard to resolution of all identified hazards.

Include the name, address, and telephone number of the lead Engineer for System Safety.

c. The staffing of the system safety organization for the duration of contract to include manpower loading and the qualifications of assigned key personnel.

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE;

DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED.

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-03-15T20:08Z

d. The process through which contractor management decisions will be made to include notification of critical and catastrophic hazards, corrective action taken, mishaps or malfunctions, waivers to safety requirements, and program deviations.

2.2 System Safety Program Milestones. The plan shall:

a. Identify safety milestones so that evaluations of the effectiveness of the system safety effort can be made at Quarterly Program Reviews.

b. Provide a program schedule of safety tasks showing start and completion dates, reports, reviews, and man loading, in relationship to other program milestones.

c. Identify integrated system activities (i.e., design analyses, tests, and demonstrations) applicable to the system safety program but specified in other engineering studies to preclude duplication. Included as a part of this section shall be the estimated manpower loading required to do these activities.

2.3 System Safety Requirements. The plan shall:

a. Describe or reference the methods that will be used to identify and apply safety/hazard control. List the safety standards and system specifications that are the sources of safety requirements with which the contractor is required to comply and any others he/she intends to use.

b. Describe the risk assessment procedures. The hazard severity categories, hazard probability levels, and the system safety precedence to be followed in satisfying safety requirements shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-882.

c. Describe the integration of subcontractor equipment safety information.

2.4 Hazard Analysis. The plan shall describe:

a. The analysis technique and format that will be used in qualitative and quantitative analysis to identify hazards, their causes and effects, and recommended corrective action.

b. The depth within the system to which each analysis technique will be used including hazard identification associated with the system, subsystem, components, personnel, ground support equipment, government furnished equipment, facilities, and their interrelationship in the logistics support, training, maintenance, transportability, and operational environments.

c. The technique for establishing a single closed-loop hazard tracking system.

2.5 Safety Verification. The plan shall describe:

a. The verification requirements for ensuring that safety is adequately demonstrated by analysis.

2.6 Training. Describe techniques and procedures to be used by the contractor to ensure that the objectives and requirements of the system safety program are met in the safety training for engineers, technicians, operating and maintenance personnel.

2.7 Mishap Reporting and Investigation. The plan shall describe the mishap and hazardous malfunction analysis process for mishaps prior to delivery of the craft.

2.7.1 System Safety Interfaces. The plan shall identify, as addendums, the interface between system and safety and all other applicable disciplines, such as Maintainability, Quality Assurance, Reliability, Human Factors Engineering, Transportability Engineering, and Medical Support (Health Hazard Assessments).

End of DI-SAFT-81626.

Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please do not return your form to the above organization. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for the Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

XX21

B. EXHIBIT

Appendix B

C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER SESS

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement Program

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A027

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis Report

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-SESS-81495B

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

SOW Paragraph 4.9.3

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

AFLCMC/LPA

7. DD 250 REQ

DD

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

BLK16

10. FREQUENCY

ONE/R

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

BLK16

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

8. APP CODE

A

11. AS OF DATE

BLK16

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

BLK16

Draft

Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Block 9: Distribution Statement D: Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and US DOD contractors only, operational use, 6 January 2020. Other requests shall be referred to AFLCMC/WWD.

Export Control Warning Notice: Warning- This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, USC Section 2571 Et Seq) or the Export Administration Act of 1979 (Title 50, USC, App 2401 Et Seq), as amended. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties.

Disseminate in accordance with provisions of DOD directives 5230.25.

Destruction Notice for Unclassified Documents: Destroyed by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document.

Destruction Notice for Classified Documents: Follow the procedures in DOD 5220.22-M, National Industry Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), Section 5-705, or DOD 5200.01M, Information Security Program, Volume 3, Protection of Classified Information.

Block 11: The as of date shall be accurate as of the date of submittal.

Block 12: The date of the first submission shall be NLT 90 days prior to Critical Design Review.

Block 13: The date of subsequent submission shall be as required to maintain accuracy.

Block 14: Deliverable shall be made to the B-52 CERP Configuration Management Office, Tinker AFB, OK. Contractors shall use the specified Configuration Management/Data Management (CM/DM) System in accordance with the Statement of Work.

Format shall be compatible with the latest Adobe Acrobat Reader version in Portable Document Format (PDF) or the latest Microsoft Office file type. The contractor shall use US DOD PKI compliant encryption mechanism when submitting sensitive but unclassified data as attachments to emails. All CDRLs will be submitted in an editable (PDF) format.

Documents are to be clearly marked and NO CLASSIFIED data is ever sent or uploaded via the (CM/DM) System or normal e-mail channels.

Note: Government CDRL monitor will ensure personnel assigned to the following organizations have been granted access to MEARS or the current system the government is using: WWDC, DCMA, LPS and LPA as required.

AFLCMC/WWDC 1

15. TOTAL 0 1 0

G. PREPARED BY

shepherd.debra.1044063553 Debby Shepherd

H. DATE

2020/05/14

I. APPROVED BY

crowder.celia.dyanne.1162383848

J. DATE

2020/05/14

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DD FORM 1423-1, FEB 2001 PREVIOUS EDITION MAY BE USED Page 1 of 1 Pages

Title: FAILURE MODES, EFFECTS, AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS

Number: DI-SESS-81495B Approval Date: 20190516

AMSC Number: N10028 Limitation: N/A

DTIC Applicable: Yes GIDEP Applicable: Yes http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/submit http://www.gidep.org/data/submit.htm

Preparing Activity: AS Project Number: SESS-2019-016

Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship:

The Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) identifies independent single item failures and the resulting potential impact on mission success, performance, safety, and maintainability. The FMECA promotes corrective actions by identifying potential failure risk and maintainability issues in order that appropriate corrective actions may be taken early to eliminate or control high risk items to improve operational readiness and reduce life cycle cost. The FMECA also establishes the baseline engineering information to identify and eliminate or control all failure modes throughout the systems life cycle. The FMECA analytics establish the basis for fault detection, fault isolation, operator and maintainer failure recognition, depot test parameters and lay-in repair parts.

This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format, intended use information, and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task described in the solicitation, and should be tailored appropriately.

This DID supersedes DI-ILSS-81495A.

1. Format. The Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) shall be in contractor’s format.

2. Content. These data shall explicitly show and document the relationship of the FMECA to the systems architecture and engineering artifacts and analysis, as required by the contract statement of work, and shall include:

a. Identification of how the FMECA aligns to the digital systems engineering environment.

b. Identification of the system overview, operational profile, scope, level of analysis, assumptions, summary of results, documentation of the data sources and techniques used in performing the analysis, and worksheets used during the analysis. The worksheets shall be organized to first display the highest indenture levels of the system. Sample worksheets for

Failure Modes Effect Analysis (FMEA) and Criticality Analysis (CA) are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively not all inclusive.

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2020-02-19T14:11Z http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/submit http://www.gidep.org/data/submit.htm

DI-SESS-81495B

c. Analysis performed for all mission profile(s), under worst-case conditions, which shall document and relate all associated failure modes from the piece part (or lowest indenture level specified) through all indenture levels through the subsystem and system levels, as well as identifying severity levels (categories I through IV) for each indenture level. All single-point failure modes shall be identified, evaluated and design mitigation documented.

d. Identification of those failure modes which are detectable by Built-In-Test (BIT) and to what level they will be isolated. When failures are identified as undetectable but the failure has no effect on the mission, the consequences of a second, separate item failure shall be analyzed. For those cases in which the mission would be jeopardized by the second failure, it shall be determined whether or not a failure indication would now be evident to the operator, maintainer, or detectable by BIT. The report shall also identify failure modes that result in an out-of-tolerance condition or loss of functionality rather than a “hard” failure. The report shall identify the extent to which system monitoring and warning features will provide warning of impending failure, to facilitate corrective action during a preventive maintenance period.

e. Identification of both the preventive maintenance provisions which would minimize the probability of occurrence and the corrective maintenance features which would minimize downtime in the event of occurrence, and a description of the methodology and controls used to ensure the preventive and corrective actions are adequate.

f. Identification and description of the hardware and software design provisions for maintenance by modular replacement, indication probable adjustment requirements following repair, and identification of the first point at which the post-repair checkout can be made to verify that the maintenance action is complete.

g. A description of the impact of the FMECA analysis on design, maintenance planning/supportability, and diagnostics. Major problems detected by the analysis shall be detailed, including how the problems were resolved (e.g. design changes, etc), including impacts on safety, supportability, and diagnostics.