C250166_PP_01-22-26.docx
DOCX document 43 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Grants Administration Consultant Support
- Solicitation number
- 250166
- Issued by
- Orange County, California
About this file
This is a Procurement Plan (RFP 250166) prepared by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) for grants administration consultant support services. The Authority seeks qualified consultants to provide post-award grant administration and regulatory compliance support on an as-needed basis. The contract will be awarded for a two-year term effective April 1, 2026, through March 31, 2028. No specific response date, due date, site visit, or bidder's conference information is detailed in the procurement plan document itself.
The total contract budget is $250,000 over the two-year period, funded through local sources. The procurement will be conducted as a Request for Proposals (RFP) using a time-and-expense contract type, with consultants proposing hourly rates for specified services. Evaluation criteria are weighted as follows: Qualifications of the Firm (25%), Staffing and Project Organization (30%), Work Plan (20%), and Cost (25%). No prevailing wage requirements, liquidated damages, retention provisions, or DBE goals apply to this procurement. An independent cost estimate and requisition (#R000850) have been received. The evaluation team comprises internal OCTA staff members from Revenue Administration, Transportation Modeling, and State and Federal Programming departments.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
INTEROFFICE MEMO
Procurement Plan, RFP 250166
Date: January 22, 2026
To: Rachel Mak, Senior Financial Analyst, Revenue Administration
From: Rhea Aninzo, Contract Administrator, CAMM
Subject: PROCUREMENT PLAN – RFP 250166 “Grants Administration Consultant Support”
Please review the procurement plan for the subject RFP and advise on your concurrence with the evaluation criteria and contract elements. Include suggested evaluation team members and/or comments.
Procurement Type: |X| RFP |_| IFB
Justification (explain the rationale for using the particular procurement type):
An RFP is applicable as the procurement requires evaluation criteria, in addition to price, to be used to select a firm to provide grants administration consultant support services.
Evaluation Criteria:
| PROPOSAL |
| WEIGHT |
| Qualifications of the Firm |
| 25% |
| Staffing/Project Organization |
| 30% |
| Work Plan |
| 20% |
| Cost |
| 25% |
Justification:
Qualifications of the firm is weighted at twenty-five percent (25%) as firms must demonstrate prior experience with state and federal post-award grant administration and regulatory compliance. Staffing and project organization is weighted the highest at thirty percent (30%) as the proposed team must demonstrate grant post-award administration knowledge, coordinate effectively with OCTA staff, and provide support across grant administration, financial analysis, and system-related tasks. Work plan is weighted twenty percent (20%) as the firm’s proposed work plan should clearly demonstrate its approach to successfully completing the scope of work. Cost and price is weighted at twenty percent (20%) to ensure OCTA receives the best value for the services.
Contract Type: |X| Time & Expense |_| CTO-Based |_| Firm Fixed Price
Justification (Explain the rationale for using the particular contract type):
Time-and-expense is the appropriate contract type for this effort as firms are required to propose hourly rates for the services specified in the scope of work.
| Retention: |
| |_| Yes |
| % |
| |X| No |
| |_| N/A |
| Prevailing Wages: |
| |_| Yes |
| $ |
| |_| No |
| |X| N/A |
| Liquidated Damages: |
| |_| Yes |
| $ |
| |_| No |
| |X| N/A |
P.M. to provide support documentation identifying how the LD amount was established.
Procurement Schedule: |X| Attached
Suggested Evaluation Team Members:
Internal Evaluators:
Alex Cuestas. Senior Financial Analyst, Revenue Administration Alicia Yang, Senior Program Manager, Transportation Modeling Jason Huang, Transportation Funding Analyst, State and Federal Programming Rachel Mak, Senior Financial Analyst, Revenue Administration
Contract Term: (Include Option Years)
Two (2)-year term effective April 1, 2026 – March 31, 2028
Funding Source: |X| Local |_| Measure M |_| Federal (CMAQ)
Dollar Amount: $250,000
Independent Cost Estimate Received: |X| Yes |_| No
Requisition Received: |X| Yes #R000850 |_| No
DBE Goal: |_| Yes |X| No
Project Manager Concurrence:
| _______________________________________________ | ______________ | |
| Rachel Mak, Senior Financial Analyst, Revenue Administration | Date |
CAMM Section/Department Manager Concurrence:
| ___________________________________________ | ______________ | |
| Iris Deneau, Section Manager, Procurement | Date |
Revised: 07/20/2010 Revised: 0720/2010 image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .