BIR_9500-062P-2019.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2) Olym Bridge Preservation
Solicitation number
69056722B000002
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation is for bridge preservation work at multiple locations within Olympic National Park in Washington State. The fixed price contract will be awarded through a sealed bid process to rehabilitate and perform maintenance on bridges located in Clallam, Grays Harbor, and Jefferson counties. The work must be completed by December 31, 2020 and is funded through the Federal Highway Administration budget allocated to the National Park Service. Bidders should submit pricing for structural repairs, bearing replacements, deck sealing, and other preservation activities specified in the solicitation documents, which include plans, specifications, and physical condition assessment files for the subject bridges.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bid Tabulation_WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2).pdf PDF
BidSum_WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2).pdf PDF
Amendment A002.pdf PDF
QA_11-29-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment A001.pdf PDF
QA_11-22-2022.pdf PDF
QA_11-16-2022.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-006P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-019P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-009P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-023P-2019.pdf PDF
FLH Bridge oversized or overload vehicle permit request form Oct 2018.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-060P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-050P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-052P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-061P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-051P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-007P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-026P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-003P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-008P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-020P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-049S-2019.pdf PDF
olym201902_plans.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-022P-2019.pdf PDF
IFB OLYM Bridge Preservation.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-025P-2019.pdf PDF
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-062P

GRAVES CREEK ROAD SPANNER #3 INSPECTION DATE: 8/22/19

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 10 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 39.0 FT (11.9 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... STEEL PLATE (includes orthotropic) MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 37.0 FT (11.3 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NONE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 12.8 FT (3.9 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SILL CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 12.0 FT (3.7 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... PMIS 123966 / SPS4072402 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE FRACTURE CRITICAL:

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... STRUCTURE PROCURED AND INSTALLED BY NPS PERSONNEL. INTENT IS FOR

STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED AS NEEDED TO CLEAN OUT DEBRIS FLOW

LOCATION

OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 15.60 (KM PT 25.11)

STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: 15.6 MI. NE OF JCT. HWY. 101 (MP 125.5) ON SOUTH SHORE ROAD/GRAVES CREEK FACILITY CARRIED: ............ GRAVE CREEK ROAD

ROAD.

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO QUINAULT RIV

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This structure is in satisfactory condition overall. Problems with the structure include failure of the paint system on the steel stringers/beams, with corrosion becoming widespread on the webs and flanges of the stringers.

Other problems include a faded object marker at west approach, erosion along the west abutment sill, and potholes in the gravel approaches.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-062P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.7, 59.2,7 PERIODICALLY CLEAN GRAVEL AND DEBRIS FROM BRIDGE DECK AND BEARING

SEATS.

1 LS

222.7 REPLACE MISSING OBJECT MARKER. 1 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

59.2,7 CLEAN AND REPAINT STEEL STRINGERS. 1 LS

61.2 PLACE ENGINEERED RIPRAP ALONG WEST ABUTMENT SILL

EXTENDING TO UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK.

1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-062P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal 5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 7 ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

G1. DECK SLAB

N2. EXPANSION JOINTS

N3. WEARING SURFACE

G4. RIDEABILITY

G5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

N6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

G7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

N8. UTILITIES

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

N10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 6

G1. BEARING DEVICES

F2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

N3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

N5. TRUSSES

G6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

F7. PAINT

N8. FASCIA(E)

F9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

G10. ALIGNMENT

58.7 MODERATE DEBRIS BUILDUP OF SOIL AND GRAVEL ON DECK

SURFACE.

59.2,7 WIDESPREAD FAILURE OF PAINT SYSTEM ON STEEL STRINGERS

WITH AREAS OF CORROSION ON WEBS AND FLANGES.

59.9 MODERATE VIBRATION UNDER SMALL VEHICLE LOADS NOTED.

60.3 GRAVEL, DIRT BUILDUP ON BOTH BEARING SEATS.

60.9, 61.2 CHANNEL FLOWS AGAINST WEST ABUTMENT SILL. SILL EXPOSED

34" AT SW CORNER. SILL IS 36" TALL.

N11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS (SILL) G

6. WINGWALLS N

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11. SLOPE PROTECTION N

12. OTHER N

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

14. PILE BENTS N

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

16. FOUNDATIONS N

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION N

19. OTHER N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-062P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61. CHANNEL 7

1. ALIGNMENT G

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION N

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS G

5. OTHER N

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF

7. NORMAL VELOCITY DRY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 4 FT.

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

BOULDERS, STONES, GRAVEL

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

61.1 CHANNEL ALIGNED TOWARD SW CORNER (UPSTREAM).

61.2 BANK EROSION UPSTREAM WEST BANK WITH TREES UNDERMINED.

SEE ALSO 60.9.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.3 RIPRAP PROTECTION AT SW CORNER (UPSTREAM).

61.4 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN CHANNEL UNDER BRIDGE.

LARGE TREES IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL.

222.4 POTHOLES IN BOTH GRAVEL APPROACHES.

222.7 OBJECT MARKER OM-3R ON WEST APPROACH IS FADED.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-062P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 17 15 25 23

HS 29 26 41 37

TYPE 3 22 20 36 33

TYPE 3S2 33 30 56 51

TYPE 3-3 43 39 71 64

DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 10/19

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: INTERIOR BEAMS

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-062P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... GRAVES CREEK ROAD SPANNER #3

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-062P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ...

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........062P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................PMIS 123966

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... SPS4072402

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

530 - WASHINGTON (WA)

031 - JEFFERSON

168000000

UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO Q

GRAVE CREEK ROAD

9500062P0000000

15.6 MI. NE OF JCT. HWY.

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

15.60 (KM PT 25.11)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

3 - STEEL

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

37.0 FT (11.3 M)

39.0 FT (11.9 M)

1 - SILL

1 - SILL

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

5 - STEEL PLATE (includes orthotropic)

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... E - OPEN, TEMP. STRUCTURE

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 29.0 TONS (26.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 41.0 TONS (37.2 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-062P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 47°33'19.00"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 123°36'52.00"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 199 MI (199 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

12.0 FT (3.7 M)

12.8 FT (3.9 M)

14.0 FT (4.3 M)

12.0 FT (3.7 M)

1.0 FT (0.3 M)

1.0 FT (0.3 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

12.0 FT (3.7 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

4 - CURB-TYPE WHEEL GUAR

4 - STEEL

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

0.75 FT (0.23 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

4 - Stable; action required to pro

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

TBD

TBD

TBD

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

STRUCTURE PROCURED AND INSTALLED BY NPS PERSONNEL. INTENT IS FOR STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED AS

NEEDED TO CLEAN OUT DEBRIS FLOW AND SPAN SHIFTING CHANNEL IN ALLUVIAL FAN

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

https://123�36'52.00 https://47�33'19.00 john.davis

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-062P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-062P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST (AHEAD) TOWARD CAMPGROUND

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - LOOKING WEST (BACK) TOWARD US RTE 101

PHOTO #4 - NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL GRAVEL AND SOIL ACCUMULATION ONTO DECK;

NOTE WATER PONDING IN WHEEL LINE ON DECK SURFACE AT EAST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL GRAVEL AND SOIL ACCUMULATION ONTO DECK;

NOTE WATER PONDING IN WHEEL LINE ON DECK SURFACE, AT WEST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF LIFTING HOOKS FOR YARD KING

PANELS; HOOKS LOCATED AT CENTERLINE OF BRIDGE AND AT

GUTTERLINES; MIDSPAN, LOOKING WEST SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL CORROSION ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK, BOTTOM

FLANGE, AND BOTTOM OF WEB ON GIRDERS; SOUTH SIDE SHOWN,

NEAR WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL CORROSION AND LEAKAGE BETWEEN GIRDERS

#5 AND #6, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL CORROSION AND PITTING OF BOTTOM FLANGE

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL CORROSION ON BOTTOM FLANGE AND BOTTOM

OF WEB ON GIRDERS; FOURTH GIRDER FROM SOUTH SIDE SHOWN,

NEAR WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL CORROSION ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK; SECOND

BAY FROM SOUTH LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL CORROSION ON GIRDER WEB TO BOTTOM

FLANGE INTERFACE; SECOND GIRDER FROM SOUTH AT MIDSPAN

SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL CORROSION AT GIRDER WEB TO FLANGE

INTERFACE AT MIDSPAN, SOUTH EXTERIOR GIRDER SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL BRIDGE INFORMATION PLATE ON EXTERIOR

GIRDERS; NORTH SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT BEARING SEATS;

SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STRUCTURE SHOWN

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW ABUTMENT #1

PHOTO #20 - GENERAL VIEW ABUTMENT #2

PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH CURBLINE LOOKING WEST;

NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN CURBLINE

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH CURBLINE LOOKING WEST;

NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN CURBLINE

PHOTO #23 - FADED OBJECT MAKER AT SOUTHWEST CORNER

PHOTO #24 - EROSION HOLE AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #25 - WEST APPROACH LOOKING WEST TOWARD US RTE 101

PHOTO #26 - TYPICAL RUTTING AND POTHOLING AT WHEEL LINES OF

APPROACH; WEST APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #27 - GENERAL CONDITION OF EAST APPROACH; NOTE

SETTLEMENT OF GRAVEL IN WHEEL LINE

PHOTO #28 - TYPICAL RUTTING AND POTHOLING AT WHEEL LINES OF

APPROACH; EAST APPROACH, NORTH WHEEL LINE SHOWN

PHOTO #29 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM)

PHOTO #30 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM)

PHOTO #31 - LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

BRIDGE

PHOTO #32 - LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

BRIDGE

PHOTO #33 - GENERAL CONDITION OF SOUTHWEST EMBANKMENT

PHOTO #34 - GENERAL CONDITION OF SOUTHEAST EMBANKMENT

PHOTO #35 - GENERAL CONDITION OF NORTHWEST EMBANKMENT

PHOTO #36 - GENERAL CONDITION OF NORTHEAST EMBANKMENT

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .