BIR_9500-003P-2019.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2) Olym Bridge Preservation
Solicitation number
69056722B000002
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation is for bridge preservation work at multiple locations within Olympic National Park in Washington State. The firm fixed price contract will be awarded following a sealed bid process. Bids are due by the date specified in the solicitation documents. The work includes preventative and corrective maintenance of various bridges to address issues like cracking, spalling, corrosion and vegetation growth. The solicitation provides plans, specifications and physical data files for the bridges to be preserved. The Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration is the contracting agency.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bid Tabulation_WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2).pdf PDF
BidSum_WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2).pdf PDF
Amendment A002.pdf PDF
QA_11-29-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment A001.pdf PDF
QA_11-22-2022.pdf PDF
QA_11-16-2022.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-006P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-019P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-009P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-023P-2019.pdf PDF
FLH Bridge oversized or overload vehicle permit request form Oct 2018.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-060P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-050P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-052P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-061P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-051P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-007P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-026P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-008P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-020P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-049S-2019.pdf PDF
olym201902_plans.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-062P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-022P-2019.pdf PDF
IFB OLYM Bridge Preservation.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-025P-2019.pdf PDF
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-003P

LYRE RIVER BRIDGE (LAKE CRESCENT) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19/19

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

NONE

N/A

SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

CONCRETE

UNKNOWN / RG2428

2 - CONNECTOR ROAD

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

102.0 FT (31.1 M)

66.0 FT (20.1 M)

19.6 FT (6.0 M)

16.1 FT (4.9 M)

N/A

0 °

NO

LOCATION

OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 4.10 (KM PT 6.60)

STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: 4.1 MI NW OF JCT HWY 101 (MP 231.8) AND NORTH SHORE RD (STAY TO LEFT AROUND FACILITY CARRIED: ............ LYRE RIVER ROAD

LAKE TAKING RAILROAD TRAIL ROAD)

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LYRE RIVER

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete box girder "bobtail" cantilever bridge is in satisfactory condition overall, and no repairs are required at this time.

Problems include full-height vertical cracking of the sides of the box girder near the pier, at midspan, and at several other locations. The cracking is not considered a serious matter at this time, but will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

Other problems include minor undermining of the cantilevered endwalls. As the endwalls are not designed to bear on the embankment, this is also not considered a serious problem.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-003P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: No repairs are required at this time.

john.davis

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-003P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N F N N N G N N G

F G

((VEGETATION))

N N N G N N N N G G G N

G N N N G G

N(STREAM GAGE)

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1 MINOR ABRASION WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE ON DECK SURFACE.

MINOR MAP CRACKING IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS; WIDESPREAD IN

SOUTH SPAN.

MINOR STAINING AND MOSS GROWTH ON FACE AND UNDERSIDE OF

DECK OVERHANGS. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF WEST OVERHANG BEYOND

DRIP GROOVE.

58.5 MINOR CRACKING OF CURBS, MAINLY OVER PIERS. MINOR

ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS WITH MOSS GROWTH ON CURBS AND

IN CURB JOINTS.

58.6 MINOR MOSS GROWTH ON BRIDGE RAILINGS. MODERATE

VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST

PARAPET ENDS.

58.7 NO DECK DRAINS PRESENT. BOX GIRDER DRAINS ARE CLEAR.

58.10, 60.19 STREAM GAGE MONITOR PREVIOUSLY ATTACHED TO EAST DECK

SIDE HAS BEEN REMOVED. WATERBORNE PORTION OF GAGE

DISPLACED; LAYING ON BANK AT SOUTH PIER.

59.2 FULL-HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACKS ON BOX GIRDER WEBS NEAR

PIERS, AT MIDSPAN, AND IN SEVERAL OTHER LOCATIONS; MINOR

MAP CRACKING ELSEWHERE.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER, EAST SIDE AT MIDSPAN; MINOR

HONEYCOMBING ALSO PRESENT. EXPOSED REBAR WITH RUST

STAINING ON UNDERSIDE IN NORTH SPAN NEAR PIER.

59.11 HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG BOTH SIDES OF NORTH AND

SOUTH SPANS.

60.9 MINOR EROSION AT CANTILEVERED ENDWALLS.

N G F G F N

N

N

G

F

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-003P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61. CHANNEL 7

1. ALIGNMENT G

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION G

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS G

5. OTHER N

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF

7. NORMAL VELOCITY MED

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 7 FT.

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

GRAVEL, ROCK

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER (DRAINAGE)

N N N G G G G F G

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

60.11 RIPRAP SLOPE PROTECTION MOSTLY DISPLACED AT SOUTH BANK.

60.13 MINOR HONEYCOMBING ON SOUTH PIER.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

222.4 ASPHALT PAVEMENT AT BOTH APPROACHES.

222.7 "ONE LANE BRIDGE" SIGN AT BOTH APPROACHES.

222.8 MODERATE CURVES AT BOTH APPROACHES.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-003P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 17 15 29 26

HS 23 21 39 35

TYPE 3 22 20 38 34

TYPE 3S2 28 25 47 43

TYPE 3-3 32 29 54 49

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 7/16

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: GIRDER WEB

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-003P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... LYRE RIVER BRIDGE (LAKE CRESCENT)

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-003P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 101

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........003P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................UNKNOWN

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... RG2428

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

530 - WASHINGTON (WA)

009 - CLALLAM

168001010

LYRE RIVER

LYRE RIVER ROAD

9500003P0000000

4.1 MI NW OF JCT HWY 101

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

4.10 (KM PT 6.60)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

66.0 FT (20.1 M)

102.0 FT (31.1 M)

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 23.0 TONS (20.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 39.0 TONS (35.4 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-003P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 48°05'41.10"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 123°48'18.90"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 20 MI (32 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

16.1 FT (4.9 M)

19.6 FT (6.0 M)

20.0 FT (6.1 M)

16.0 FT (4.9 M)

2.0 FT (0.6 M)

2.0 FT (0.6 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

16.1 FT (4.9 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.38 FT (0.73 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

TBD

TBD

TBD

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

SPAN #1 & #3 - LENGTH 17.5', SPAN #2 - LENGTH 67'; TYPE 206 (CIP CONC. BOX)

https://123�48'18.90 https://48�05'41.10 john.davis

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-003P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-003P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH (AHEAD) TOWARD END OF ROAD

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - LOOKING NORTH (BACK) TOWARD CITY

PHOTO #4 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL ABRASION WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE ON DECK

SURFACE ON NORTH SPAN

PHOTO #7 - SPALLING IN DECK SURFACE IN SOUTH SPAN NEAR WEST

CURB

PHOTO #8 - GENERAL UNDERVIEW OF WEST OVERHANG LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERVIEW OF EAST OVERHANG LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL FULL-HEIGHT CRACKS ON BOX GIRDER WEBS;

WEST SIDE NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - EXPOSED REBAR WITH RUST STAINING ON UNDERSIDE

OF NORTH SPAN NEAR NORTH PIER

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL FULL-HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK S ON BOX

GIRDER WEBS, EAST SIDE OVER NORTH PIER

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK; SPAN 3 LOOKING

SOUTH TOWARD ENDWALL 2

PHOTO #14 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW; CENTER SPAN LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW ENDWALL 1 AND GENERAL UNDERSIDE

VIEW SPAN 1, NORTH SPAN

PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW PIER 1, NORTH FACE

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW PIER 1, SOUTH SIDE

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW PIER 2, NORTH FACE

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW PIER 2, SOUTH FACE

PHOTO #20 - GENERAL VIEW OF ABUTMENT 2

PHOTO #21 - GENERAL UNDERMINING, ABUTMENT 2

PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES AND

VEGETATION ENCROACHING ON BRIDGE; UPSTREAM RAIL SHOWN,

PICTURE TAKEN LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES,

DOWNSTREAM RAIL SHOWN, PICTURE TAKEN LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #24 - TYPICAL VEGETATION ENCROACHING ON BRIDGE, EAST

(UPSTREAM) RAIL SHOWN AT NORTH END

PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH ON RAILINGS AND CURBS;

WEST SIDE SHOWN, LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #26 - NORTH APPROACH

PHOTO #27 - SOUTH APPROACH

PHOTO #28 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING EAST (UPSTREAM)

PHOTO #29 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING WEST (DOWNSTREAM)

PHOTO #30 - EAST UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #31 - WEST DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .