BIR_9500-019P-2019.pdf

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-019P

BIG CREEK BRIDGE (QUINAULT) INSPECTION DATE: 8/22/19

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

NONE

N/A

SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

N/A / CONCRETE

104(2) / RG2519

2 - CONNECTOR ROAD

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

135.0 FT (41.1 M)

87.0 FT (26.5 M)

23.5 FT (7.2 M)

20.0 FT (6.1 M)

N/A

15 °

NO

LOCATION

OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 9.92 (KM PT 15.96)

STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: 10.7 MI. NE OF JCT. HWY. 101 (MP

128.7) AND NORTH SHORE ROAD. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NORTH SHORE ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. BIG CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete box girder "bobtail" cantilever bridge is in good condition overall. The main structural problem at this time is cracking with efflorescence on the sides of the box girder at the piers. This cracking is not considered a serious matter at this time, and no repairs are deemed necessary. However, this condition will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

Corrective measures for other problems should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-019P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.9 PERIODICALLY REMOVE VEGETATION / TREES FROM ALONG ALL BRIDGE

CORNERS.

1 LS

58.7 PERIODICALLY REMOVE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION FROM ALONG CURBLINES. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-019P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N G N N N G N N G

N G

N G G G F N

N

N

G

G

58.1 MINOR ABRASION OF DECK SURFACE WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE.

SHALLOW SPALL ON DECK SURFACE NEAR MIDSPAN OF CENTER

SPAN.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

UNDERSIDE OF DECK OVERHANGS, MAINLY AT PIERS. MINOR

VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EXTERIOR FACES

OF DECK, MAINLY AT PIERS, ABUTMENTS, AND DECK DRAINS.

58.5 MINOR MOSS GROWTH ON CURBS AND RAILINGS.

58.6 MINOR SPALLING ON NORTHEAST PARAPET END. MINOR

COLLISION SCRAPES ON NORTHWEST PARAPET. SOUTHWEST

CORNER BENCHMARK MISSING.

58.7 BOX GIRDER DRAINS ARE CLEAR; MINOR LEAKAGE AT DRAIN IN

EAST SPAN NEAR EAST PIER.

59.2 MINOR VERTICAL, DIAGONAL, AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON EXTERIOR FACE OF BOX GIRDER WEBS IN

VICINITY OF PIERS, ESPECIALLY SOUTH WEB AT EAST PIER.

MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE IN SEVERAL

LOCATIONS; MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ON CENTER SPAN NEAR

EAST PIER. PATCHING ON BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE IN SEVERAL

LOCATIONS. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE IN EAST SPAN.

60.4 MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF EAST ENDWALL, BOTH SIDES.

60.6 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

WINGWALLS. MINOR TO MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG

NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS N

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION N

11. SLOPE PROTECTION G

12. OTHER (DEBRIS) F

PIER(S)

G13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

N14. PILE BENTS

N15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

N16. FOUNDATIONS

G17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

G18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

N19. OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-019P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61. CHANNEL 6

1. ALIGNMENT F

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION F

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS F

5. OTHER N

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF

7. NORMAL VELOCITY MED

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 5 FT.

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

GRAVEL, COBBLE

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER (VEGETATION)

N N N G G G G G P

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

60.11, 61.1,2,3

MAIN CHANNEL FLOW IS ALONG WEST UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK

TOWARD WEST PIER; PIER IS PROTECTED BY RIPRAP. RIPRAP

SLOPE PROTECTION ALSO ON WEST ABUTMENT SLOPE.

MODERATE EROSION (5' DEEP) ALONG WEST UPSTREAM CHANNEL

BANK; SEVERAL UNDERMINED ALDER TREES NEAR END OF RIPRAP.

TREE LODGED ON WEST SLOPE AT WEST ABUTMENT.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 SEVERAL FALLEN TREES ALONG EAST DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

BANK.

222.7 TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS.

222.9 HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG BRIDGE AT ALL CORNERS.

TREE ENCROACHING NE CORNER.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-019P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 22 20

HS 36 33 40 36

TYPE 3 22 20 25 23

TYPE 3S2 32 29 36 33

TYPE 3-3 36 33 40 36

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 3/20

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE

EVALUATION (MBE). SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR MORE INFORMATION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-019P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... BIG CREEK BRIDGE (QUINAULT)

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-019P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 104

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........019P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................104(2)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... RG2519

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

530 - WASHINGTON (WA)

031 - JEFFERSON

161001040

BIG CREEK

NORTH SHORE ROAD

9500019P0000000

10.7 MI. NE OF JCT. HWY.

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

9.92 (KM PT 15.96)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

87.0 FT (26.5 M)

135.0 FT (41.1 M)

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 40.0 TONS (36.3 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-019P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 47°32'08.30"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 123°45'31.40"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 4 MI (6 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

20.0 FT (6.1 M)

23.5 FT (7.2 M)

21.0 FT (6.4 M)

15.0 FT (4.6 M)

3.0 FT (0.9 M)

3.0 FT (0.9 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

15 °

NO

20.0 FT (6.1 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.25 FT (0.69 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

TBD

TBD

TBD

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

Span #1 & #3 Length 23.5', Span #2 - Length 88'; Type 105 (Conc. Box Beam) https://123�45'31.40 https://47�32'08.30 john.davis

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-019P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-019P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST (AHEAD)

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL VIEW LOOKING WEST (BACK) TOWARD US RTE

PHOTO #4 - SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL VIEW OF DECK, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL ABRASION OF DECK SURFACE WITH EXPOSED

AGGREGATE; EAST SPAN SHOW

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL ABRASION OF DECK SURFACE WITH EXPOSED

AGGREGATE; WEST SPAN SHOWN , LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #8 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW WEST SPAN, LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW CONCRETE BOX; MAIN SPAN

SHOWN, LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF EAST SPAN, LOOKING

TOWARD EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #11 - CRACKING UNDERSIDE OF CONCRETE BOX WITH

MOISTURE STAINING; EAST MID-SPAN SHOWN, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #12 - LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER; UPSTREAM SIDE, EAST SPAN, LOOKING

EAST

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL VERTICAL, DIAGONAL AND HORIZONTAL

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EXTERIOR FACE OF BOX

GIRDER WEBS NEAR PIERS; SOUTH SIDE SHOWN AT EAST PIER

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE NEXT TO DECK DRAIN PIPE ALONG UNDERSIDE OF

NORTH OVERHANG, NEAR WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE NEXT TO DECK DRAIN PIPE ALONG UNDERSIDE OF

SOUTH OVERHANG SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE UNDERSIDE DECK OVERHANG; SOUTH OVERHANG,

MID-SPAN OF MAIN SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW PIER 1, WEST FACE SHOWN

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER 1, EAST FACE SHOWN

PHOTO #20 - GENERAL VIEW PIER 2, WEST FACE SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW PIER 2, EAST FACE SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #23 - GENERAL CONDITION NORTH (UPSTREAM) RAIL,

LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #24 - GENERAL CONDITION SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) RAIL,

LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #25 - GENERAL CONDITION SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) RAIL,

LOOKING WEST; NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN CURBLINE

PHOTO #26 - TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH ON OUTSIDE FACE OF

CONCRETE PARAPET; SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) PARAPET

SHOWN,NEAR EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #27 - WEST APPROACH LOOKING WEST (BACK) TOWARD US

RTE 101

PHOTO #28 - GENERAL CONDITION WEST APPROACH, LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #29 - EAST APPROACH LOOKING EAST (AHEAD)

PHOTO #30 - GENERAL CONDITION OF EAST APPROACH, LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #31 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING NORTH (UPSTREAM)

PHOTO #32 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM)

PHOTO #33 - LOOKING NORTH (UPSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #34 - LOOKING SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #35 - DEBRIS RESTRICTING CHANNEL AT NORTH (UPSTREAM)

SIDE OF PIER

PHOTO #36 - EROSION AT NORTHWEST EMBANKMENT

PHOTO #37 - HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH AT SOUTHWEST

EMBANKMENT