BIR_9500-060P-2019.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2) Olym Bridge Preservation
Solicitation number
69056722B000002
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation requests bids for bridge preservation work on multiple bridges located in Olympic National Park. The work includes cleaning and painting steel components, repairing concrete, and addressing scour. Bids are due by August 15, 2019 with award anticipated by September 30, 2019. The fixed price contract will be awarded to the lowest priced technically acceptable offer. The soliciting agency is the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration for work benefiting the National Park Service.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bid Tabulation_WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2).pdf PDF
BidSum_WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2).pdf PDF
Amendment A002.pdf PDF
QA_11-29-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment A001.pdf PDF
QA_11-22-2022.pdf PDF
QA_11-16-2022.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-006P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-019P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-009P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-023P-2019.pdf PDF
FLH Bridge oversized or overload vehicle permit request form Oct 2018.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-050P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-052P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-061P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-051P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-007P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-026P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-003P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-008P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-020P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-049S-2019.pdf PDF
olym201902_plans.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-062P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-022P-2019.pdf PDF
IFB OLYM Bridge Preservation.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-025P-2019.pdf PDF
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P

GRAVES CREEK ROAD SPANNER #1 INSPECTION DATE: 8/22/19

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 10 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 40.0 FT (12.2 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... STEEL PLATE (includes orthotropic) MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 38.0 FT (11.6 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NONE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 13.2 FT (4.0 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SILL CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 12.0 FT (3.7 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... PMIS 123966 / SPS4072402 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... STRUCTURE PROCURED AND INSTALLED BY NPS PERSONNEL. INTENT IS FOR

STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED AS NEEDED TO CLEAN OUT DEBRIS FLOW

LOCATION

OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 15.29 (KM PT 24.61)

STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: 15.29 MI. NE OF JCT. HWY. 101 (MP 125.5) ON SOUTH SHORE ROAD/GRAVES CREEK FACILITY CARRIED: ............ GRAVES CREEK ROAD

ROAD.

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO QUINAULT RIV

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This structure is in satisfactory condition overall. Problems with the structure include the failure of the paint system on the steel stringers/beams, with corrosion becoming widespread on webs and flanges of the stringers.

Other problems include debris buildup in the curblines on the deck and bearing seats.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.7 PERIODICALLY CLEAN GRAVEL AND DEBRIS FROM BRIDGE DECK AND

CURBLINES.

1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

59.2,7 CLEAN AND REPAINT STEEL STRINGERS. 1 LS

59.2,7 CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal 5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 7 ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

G1. DECK SLAB

N2. EXPANSION JOINTS

N3. WEARING SURFACE

G4. RIDEABILITY

G5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

N6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

F7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

N8. UTILITIES

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

N10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 6

N1. BEARING DEVICES

F2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

N3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

N5. TRUSSES

G6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

58.7 MODERATE TO HEAVY DEBRIS BUILDUP OF SOIL AND GRAVEL ON

DECK SURFACE.

59.2,7 WIDESPREAD FAILURE OF PAINT SYSTEM ON STEEL STRINGERS

WITH AREAS OF CORROSION ON WEBS AND FLANGES.

59.9 MODERATE VIBRATION UNDER SMALL VEHICLE LOADS NOTED.

60.3 MINOR SOIL AND GRAVEL BUILDUP ON BOTH BEARING SEATS.

F7. PAINT

N8. FASCIA(E)

F9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

G10. ALIGNMENT

N11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS (SILL) G

6. WINGWALLS N

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11. SLOPE PROTECTION N

12. OTHER N

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

14. PILE BENTS N

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

16. FOUNDATIONS N

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION N

19. OTHER N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61. CHANNEL 7

1. ALIGNMENT G

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION N

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS G

5. OTHER N

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF

7. NORMAL VELOCITY DRY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 4 FT.

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

BOULDERS, STONES, GRAVEL

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL.

222.7 TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS AT ALL CORNERS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 17 15 29 26

HS 25 23 41 37

TYPE 3 22 20 36 33

TYPE 3S2 33 30 56 51

TYPE 3-3 43 39 71 64

DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 10/19

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: LOAD FACTOR

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... GRAVES CREEK ROAD SPANNER #1

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-060P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 210

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........060P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................PMIS 123966

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... SPS4072402

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

530 - WASHINGTON (WA)

031 - JEFFERSON

168000000

UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO Q

GRAVES CREEK ROAD

9500060P0000000

15.29 MI. NE OF JCT. HWY.

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

15.29 (KM PT 24.61)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

3 - STEEL

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

38.0 FT (11.6 M)

40.0 FT (12.2 M)

1 - SILL

1 - SILL

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

5 - STEEL PLATE (includes orthotropic)

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... E - OPEN, TEMP. STRUCTURE

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 25.0 TONS (22.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 41.0 TONS (37.2 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 47°33'16.00"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 123°37'12.00"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 199 MI (199 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

12.0 FT (3.7 M)

13.2 FT (4.0 M)

14.0 FT (4.3 M)

12.0 FT (3.7 M)

1.0 FT (0.3 M)

1.0 FT (0.3 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

12.0 FT (3.7 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

4 - CURB-TYPE WHEEL GUAR

4 - STEEL

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

0.75 FT (0.23 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

TBD

TBD

TBD

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

STRUCTURE PROCURED AND INSTALLED BY NPS PERSONNEL. INTENT IS FOR STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED AS

NEEDED TO CLEAN OUT DEBRIS FLOW AND SPAN SHIFTING CHANNEL IN ALLUVIAL FAN

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

https://123�37'12.00 https://47�33'16.00 john.davis

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST (AHEAD) TOWARD CAMPGROUND

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - LOOKING WEST (BACK) TOWARD US RTE 101

PHOTO #4 - NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST TOWARD US RTE

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF LIFTING HOOKS FOR YARD KING

PANELS; HOOKS LOCATED AT CENTERLINE AND ALONG CURBLINE;

EAST SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - GENERAL UNDERVIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #8 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK; NOTE TYPICAL

PAINT SYSTEM FAILURE AND SURFACE CORROSION; MIDSPAN

BETWEEN 2ND AND 3RD GIRDER FROM SOUTH SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK; NOTE TYPICAL

PAINT SYSTEM FAILURE AND SURFACE CORROSION;MIDSPAN

BETWEEN 3RD AND 4TH GIRDER FROM SOUTH SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL CONDITION OF DIAPHRAGMS; NOTE TYPICAL

PAINT SYSTEM FAILURE AND SURFACE CORROSION; 3RD AND 4TH

GIRDERS FROM SOUTH SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL PAINT SYSTEM FAILURE AND SURFACE

CORROSION ON GIRDERS; 3RD GIRDER IN FROM SOUTH, LOOKING

WEST

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL CONDITION OF JOINT BETWEEN DECK PANELS;

NOTE TYPICAL PAINT SYSTEM FAILURE AND SURFACE CORROSION,

LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL PAINT SYSTEM FAILURE AND SURFACE

CORROSION ON GIRDERS; 5TH GIRDER IN FROM THE SOUTH,

LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL INFORMATION AND LOADING PLATES ON

EXTERIOR GIRDERS; SOUTH SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON OUTSIDE BOTTOM

FLANGE; NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) GIRDER SHOWN, LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL DEBRIS AND VEGETATION ACCUMULATION AT

BEARING SEATS; NORTHEAST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW SOUTH CURB, LOOKING WEST; NOTE

DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN CURBLINE

PHOTO #20 - GENERAL VIEW NORTH CURB, LOOKING WEST; NOTE

DEBRIS AND WATER ACCUMULATION IN CURBLINE

PHOTO #21 - WEST APPROACH LOOKING TOWARD US RTE 101

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL CONDITION OF WEST APPROACH, LOOKING

NORTH; NOTE RUTTING IN WHEEL PATH

PHOTO #23 - EAST APPROACH LOOKING TOWARD CAMPGROUND

PHOTO #24 - GENERAL CONDITION OF EAST APPROACH; NOTE

RUTTING IN WHEEL PATH

PHOTO #25 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM)

PHOTO #26 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM)

PHOTO #27 - LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

BRIDGE

PHOTO #28 - LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

BRIDGE

PHOTO #29 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF SOUTHWEST EMBANKMENT

PHOTO #30 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF SOUTHEAST EMBANKMENT

PHOTO #31 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF NORTHWEST EMBANKMENT

PHOTO #32 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF NORTHEAST EMBANKMENT

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .