BIR_9500-060P-2019.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2) Olym Bridge Preservation
- Solicitation number
- 69056722B000002
About this file
This solicitation requests bids for bridge preservation work on multiple bridges located in Olympic National Park. The work includes cleaning and painting steel components, repairing concrete, and addressing scour. Bids are due by August 15, 2019 with award anticipated by September 30, 2019. The fixed price contract will be awarded to the lowest priced technically acceptable offer. The soliciting agency is the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration for work benefiting the National Park Service.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P
GRAVES CREEK ROAD SPANNER #1 INSPECTION DATE: 8/22/19
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 10 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 40.0 FT (12.2 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... STEEL PLATE (includes orthotropic) MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 38.0 FT (11.6 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... NONE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 13.2 FT (4.0 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SILL CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 12.0 FT (3.7 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... PMIS 123966 / SPS4072402 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... STRUCTURE PROCURED AND INSTALLED BY NPS PERSONNEL. INTENT IS FOR
STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED AS NEEDED TO CLEAN OUT DEBRIS FLOW
LOCATION
OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 15.29 (KM PT 24.61)
STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: 15.29 MI. NE OF JCT. HWY. 101 (MP 125.5) ON SOUTH SHORE ROAD/GRAVES CREEK FACILITY CARRIED: ............ GRAVES CREEK ROAD
ROAD.
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO QUINAULT RIV
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This structure is in satisfactory condition overall. Problems with the structure include the failure of the paint system on the steel stringers/beams, with corrosion becoming widespread on webs and flanges of the stringers.
Other problems include debris buildup in the curblines on the deck and bearing seats.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.7 PERIODICALLY CLEAN GRAVEL AND DEBRIS FROM BRIDGE DECK AND
CURBLINES.
1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
59.2,7 CLEAN AND REPAINT STEEL STRINGERS. 1 LS
59.2,7 CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal 5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK 7 ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
G1. DECK SLAB
N2. EXPANSION JOINTS
N3. WEARING SURFACE
G4. RIDEABILITY
G5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
N6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
F7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
N8. UTILITIES
G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
N10. OTHER
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 6
N1. BEARING DEVICES
F2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
N3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
N5. TRUSSES
G6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
58.7 MODERATE TO HEAVY DEBRIS BUILDUP OF SOIL AND GRAVEL ON
DECK SURFACE.
59.2,7 WIDESPREAD FAILURE OF PAINT SYSTEM ON STEEL STRINGERS
WITH AREAS OF CORROSION ON WEBS AND FLANGES.
59.9 MODERATE VIBRATION UNDER SMALL VEHICLE LOADS NOTED.
60.3 MINOR SOIL AND GRAVEL BUILDUP ON BOTH BEARING SEATS.
F7. PAINT
N8. FASCIA(E)
F9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
G10. ALIGNMENT
N11. OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N
5. FOUNDATIONS (SILL) G
6. WINGWALLS N
7. WEEP HOLES N
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11. SLOPE PROTECTION N
12. OTHER N
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N
14. PILE BENTS N
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N
16. FOUNDATIONS N
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION N
19. OTHER N
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
61. CHANNEL 7
1. ALIGNMENT G
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION N
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS G
5. OTHER N
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF
7. NORMAL VELOCITY DRY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 4 FT.
9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :
BOULDERS, STONES, GRAVEL
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
N N N G G G G G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N N N
61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
61.4 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL.
222.7 TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS AT ALL CORNERS.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 17 15 29 26
HS 25 23 41 37
TYPE 3 22 20 36 33
TYPE 3S2 33 30 56 51
TYPE 3-3 43 39 71 64
DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 10/19
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: LOAD FACTOR
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... GRAVES CREEK ROAD SPANNER #1
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-060P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 210
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........060P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................PMIS 123966
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... SPS4072402
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
530 - WASHINGTON (WA)
031 - JEFFERSON
168000000
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO Q
GRAVES CREEK ROAD
9500060P0000000
15.29 MI. NE OF JCT. HWY.
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
15.29 (KM PT 24.61)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
3 - STEEL
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
38.0 FT (11.6 M)
40.0 FT (12.2 M)
1 - SILL
1 - SILL
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
5 - STEEL PLATE (includes orthotropic)
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... E - OPEN, TEMP. STRUCTURE
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 25.0 TONS (22.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 41.0 TONS (37.2 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 47°33'16.00"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 123°37'12.00"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 199 MI (199 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
12.0 FT (3.7 M)
13.2 FT (4.0 M)
14.0 FT (4.3 M)
12.0 FT (3.7 M)
1.0 FT (0.3 M)
1.0 FT (0.3 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
0 °
NO
12.0 FT (3.7 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
4 - CURB-TYPE WHEEL GUAR
4 - STEEL
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
0.75 FT (0.23 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
5 - Stable; scour within limits of
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
TBD
TBD
TBD
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
STRUCTURE PROCURED AND INSTALLED BY NPS PERSONNEL. INTENT IS FOR STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED AS
NEEDED TO CLEAN OUT DEBRIS FLOW AND SPAN SHIFTING CHANNEL IN ALLUVIAL FAN
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
https://123�37'12.00 https://47�33'16.00 john.davis
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-060P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST (AHEAD) TOWARD CAMPGROUND
PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - LOOKING WEST (BACK) TOWARD US RTE 101
PHOTO #4 - NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #5 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST TOWARD US RTE
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF LIFTING HOOKS FOR YARD KING
PANELS; HOOKS LOCATED AT CENTERLINE AND ALONG CURBLINE;
EAST SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - GENERAL UNDERVIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #8 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK; NOTE TYPICAL
PAINT SYSTEM FAILURE AND SURFACE CORROSION; MIDSPAN
BETWEEN 2ND AND 3RD GIRDER FROM SOUTH SHOWN
PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK; NOTE TYPICAL
PAINT SYSTEM FAILURE AND SURFACE CORROSION;MIDSPAN
BETWEEN 3RD AND 4TH GIRDER FROM SOUTH SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - GENERAL CONDITION OF DIAPHRAGMS; NOTE TYPICAL
PAINT SYSTEM FAILURE AND SURFACE CORROSION; 3RD AND 4TH
GIRDERS FROM SOUTH SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL PAINT SYSTEM FAILURE AND SURFACE
CORROSION ON GIRDERS; 3RD GIRDER IN FROM SOUTH, LOOKING
WEST
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL CONDITION OF JOINT BETWEEN DECK PANELS;
NOTE TYPICAL PAINT SYSTEM FAILURE AND SURFACE CORROSION,
LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL PAINT SYSTEM FAILURE AND SURFACE
CORROSION ON GIRDERS; 5TH GIRDER IN FROM THE SOUTH,
LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL INFORMATION AND LOADING PLATES ON
EXTERIOR GIRDERS; SOUTH SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON OUTSIDE BOTTOM
FLANGE; NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) GIRDER SHOWN, LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL DEBRIS AND VEGETATION ACCUMULATION AT
BEARING SEATS; NORTHEAST CORNER SHOWN
PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW SOUTH CURB, LOOKING WEST; NOTE
DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN CURBLINE
PHOTO #20 - GENERAL VIEW NORTH CURB, LOOKING WEST; NOTE
DEBRIS AND WATER ACCUMULATION IN CURBLINE
PHOTO #21 - WEST APPROACH LOOKING TOWARD US RTE 101
PHOTO #22 - GENERAL CONDITION OF WEST APPROACH, LOOKING
NORTH; NOTE RUTTING IN WHEEL PATH
PHOTO #23 - EAST APPROACH LOOKING TOWARD CAMPGROUND
PHOTO #24 - GENERAL CONDITION OF EAST APPROACH; NOTE
RUTTING IN WHEEL PATH
PHOTO #25 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM)
PHOTO #26 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM)
PHOTO #27 - LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF
BRIDGE
PHOTO #28 - LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF
BRIDGE
PHOTO #29 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF SOUTHWEST EMBANKMENT
PHOTO #30 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF SOUTHEAST EMBANKMENT
PHOTO #31 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF NORTHWEST EMBANKMENT
PHOTO #32 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF NORTHEAST EMBANKMENT
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .