BIR_9500-009P-2019.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2) Olym Bridge Preservation
- Solicitation number
- 69056722B000002
About this file
This solicitation is for a firm fixed price contract to perform bridge preservation work at multiple locations within Olympic National Park in Clallam, Grays Harbor, and Jefferson Counties in Washington State. Required services include repairs to concrete decks, bearings, expansion joints and other structural elements. Bids are due by August 15, 2022 with award anticipated by September 30, 2022. The total estimated value is between $500,000 and $1,000,000. The soliciting agency is the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. The attached physical data files and plans provide location-specific inspection reports and recommendations for the bridges to be preserved under this contract.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P
SALMON RIVER BRIDGE (QUEETS) INSPECTION DATE: 8/21/19
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUNDATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD
CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
NONE
N/A
SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
N/A / CONCRETE
ONP 2190 / RG2238
2 - CONNECTOR ROAD
NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..
MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
DECK WIDTH:
CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
YEAR BUILT:
YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
SKEW ANGLE:
FRACTURE CRITICAL:
161.7 FT (49.3 M)
101.7 FT (31.0 M)
22.5 FT (6.9 M)
20.1 FT (6.1 M)
N/A
18 °
NO
LOCATION
OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 1.40 (KM PT 2.25)
STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: 1.4 MI. S. OF JCT. HWY. 101 (MP 144.5)
AND QUEETS VALLEY ROAD. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ LOWER QUEETS VALLEY ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. SALMON RIVER
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete box girder "bobtail" cantilever bridge is in fair to good condition overall. The main structural problem is cracking with efflorescence, leakage, and rust staining throughout the box girder concrete. While no repairs to the box girder are deemed advisable at this time, the condition of the concrete will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.
Site-related problems include minor scour at the piers, damage to the north railing, exposed rebar on the east pier and east endwall, and settlement at the east approach.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
60.17 PLACE ENGINEERED RIPRAP AT PIERS TO PROTECT FROM
FURTHER SCOUR.
1 LS
58.6 REPAIR NORTH RAILING AND POST AT EAST END OF BRIDGE. 1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK
1. DECK SLAB
2. EXPANSION JOINTS
3. WEARING SURFACE
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10. OTHER
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 6
1. BEARING DEVICES N
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS F
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S) N
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS N
5. TRUSSES N
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING N
7. PAINT N
8. FASCIA(E) N
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G
10. ALIGNMENT G
11. OTHER N
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
2. PILE BENTS
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
5. FOUNDATIONS
6. WINGWALLS
7. WEEP HOLES
8. EXPANSION JOINTS
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
11. SLOPE PROTECTION
12. OTHER
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
14. PILE BENTS
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
16. FOUNDATIONS
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19. OTHER
G N N G G F F N G N
N N N G N N N N F F G N
G N N N G G N
58.1
58.5
58.6
58.7
59.2
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
MINOR ABRASION WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE ON DECK SURFACE.
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING THROUGHOUT UNDERSIDE OF
OVERHANGS WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS.
MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND MOSS
GROWTH ON EXTERIOR FACE OF DECK. SEE ALSO 59.2.
MODERATE MOSS WITH MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON CURBS
AND IN CURB JOINTS.
WEATHERING STEEL BRIDGE RAILINGS. MODERATE DAMAGE TO
TOP RAIL AND ADJACENT RAIL POST ON NORTH RAILING NEAR
EAST END OF BRIDGE. MINOR DAMAGE TO TOP RAIL ON NORTH
RAILING NEAR WEST END OF BRIDGE. ENDS OF BOTH RAILINGS
SIT SLIGHTLY FORWARD (TOWARD ROADWAY) RELATIVE TO END
PARAPET.
PACK RUST AND SECTION LOSS IN RAIL EXPANSION JOINTS.
MINOR GRAVEL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES
AND AT ENDS OF DECK; EVIDENCE OF PONDING ALONG
CURBLINES. DECK DRAINS ARE PARTIALLY CLOGGED.
BOX GIRDER DRAINS ARE CLEAR; STAINING AT DRAIN IN CENTER
SPAN NEAR WEST PIER.
MINOR VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING ON EXTERIOR FACE OF
BOX GIRDER WEBS AT PIERS AND CENTER SPAN, SEVERAL CRACKS
WITH EFFLORESCENCE; SEVERAL CRACKS EXTEND INTO DECK
OVERHANGS. MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING ON EXTERIOR FACE OF
BOX GIRDER WEBS IN VERTICAL FACE THROUGHOUT END SPANS;
CONCENTRATED CRACKING AT SOUTH SIDE OF EAST SPAN AT
MIDSPAN.
MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH LEAKAGE AND RUST
STAINING ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER; EFFLORESCENCE IN
EAST SPAN. MINOR WIDESPREAD TRANSVERSE AND RANDOM
CRACKING WITH HONEYCOMBING, EFFLORESCENCE, AND RUST
STAINING THROUGHOUT UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER, CENTER
SPAN. SMALL HOLES IN TWO AREAS OF STAINING AND
HONEYCOMBING ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER, EAST SPAN.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL 7
G G G F N
LOW
SUFF
10 FT.
MUD, SAND, GRAVEL
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER (VEGETATION)
N N N G G F G G F
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
60.4 ONE EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTH SIDE OF EAST ENDWALL AT TOP
DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER.
60.9,10 UNDERMINING/SETTLEMENT OF FILL UNDER ENDWALLS UP TO 12"
IN HEIGHT FOR ENTIRE LENGTH OF EAST ENDWALL AND 3/4 OF
WEST ENDWALL. SCOUR HOLE, (10' DIAMETER X 3'D) BENEATH
WEST SPAN NEAR ENDWALL.
60.11, 61.3 RIPRAP PROTECTION AT ABUTMENT SLOPES AND ALONG EAST
UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK.
60.13 EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTH SIDE OF EAST PIER DUE TO
INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER. MINOR SCALING OF PIERS AT
WATERLINE.
60.17, 61.1 STREAM FLOWS AGAINST EAST PIER, CAUSING MINOR SCOUR.
MINOR SCOUR ALSO EVIDENT AT WEST PIER, THOUGH NO FLOW
PRESENT AT TIME OF INSPECTION. STREAM DEPTH GAGE
LOCATED ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF WEST PIER.
61.1 MEANDERING CHANNEL AT LOW FLOW.
61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
222.6 UP TO 2" SETTLEMENT AT EAST APPROACH. 0.5" SETTLEMENT AT
WEST APPROACH.
222.7 OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS.
222.8 HORIZONTAL CURVES AT BOTH APPROACHES.
222.9 HEAVY VEGETATION OVERGROWTH AT BOTH ENDS.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 21 19 35 32
HS 37 34 63 57
TYPE 3 31 28 52 47
TYPE 3S2 49 44 83 75
TYPE 3-3 61 55 102 93
DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 8/16
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: GIRDER WEB
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 530 - WASHINGTON (WA)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... SALMON RIVER BRIDGE (QUEETS) (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 031 - JEFFERSON
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-009P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 106 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... SALMON RIVER
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........009P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. LOWER QUEETS VALLEY RO
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 9500009P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.4 MI. S. OF JCT. HWY. 1
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ONP 2190 (11) MILE POINT: .............................1.40 (KM PT 2.25)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... RG2238 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD
101.7 FT (31.0 M)
161.7 FT (49.3 M)
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 37.0 TONS (33.6 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 63.0 TONS (57.2 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 47°33'10.70"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 124°12'56.60"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 199 MI (199 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
20.1 FT (6.1 M)
22.5 FT (6.9 M)
20.0 FT (6.1 M)
16.0 FT (4.9 M)
2.0 FT (0.6 M)
2.0 FT (0.6 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
18 °
NO
20.1 FT (6.1 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
4 - STEEL
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
2.58 FT (0.79 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
5 - Stable; scour within limits of
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
TBD
TBD
TBD
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
SPAN #1 & #3 - LENGTH 32', SPAN #2 - LENGTH 99'; TYPE 205 (CONC. BOX GRD.)
https://124�12'56.60 https://47�33'10.70 john.davis
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST (AHEAD)
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - LOOKING WEST (BACK) TOWARD US 101
PHOTO #4 - NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #5 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL ABRASION WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE IN DECK
SURFACE; WEST SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW WEST SPAN, LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #8 - CRACKING WITH RUST STAINING ON UNDERSIDE OF
CONCRETE BOX GIRDER IN WEST SPAN NEAR SOUTH (UPSTREAM)
SIDE
PHOTO #9 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AROUND DECK DRAIN
IN SOUTH OVERHANG IN WEST SPAN
PHOTO #10 - CRACKING WITH RUST STAINING AND EFFLORESCENCE
ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER; MAIN SPAN NEAR PIER #1 SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON OUTSIDE OF
CONCRETE BOX GIRDER; NORTH FACE OVER PIER #1 SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF MAIN SPAN LOOKING
EAST
PHOTO #13 - RUST STAINING AROUND DECK DRAINS NEAR PIER #1,
MAIN SPAN
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN
UNDERSIDE OF DECK; MAIN SPAN LOOKING EAST TOWARD PIER #2
PHOTO #15 - SPALL WITH RUST STAINING UNDERSIDE OF CONCRETE
BOX GIRDER; MAIN SPAN SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE NEAR PIER #2
PHOTO #16 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW EAST SPAN, LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #17 - STAINING IN UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER DECK DRAIN,
EAST SPAN NEAR EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #18 - CRACKING ON OUTSIDE CONCRETE BOX GIRDER EAST
SPAN, NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #19 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW NORTH OVERHANG LOOKING
EAST
PHOTO #20 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH OVERHANG IN
MAIN SPAN, LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #22 - GENERAL UNDERMINING OF EAST ENDWALL;
NORTHEAST CORNER SHOWN
PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW PIER #1, WEST FACE
PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW PIER #1, EAST FACE
PHOTO #25 - GENERAL VIEW PIER #2, EAST FACE
PHOTO #26 - SCOUR HOLE AT NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE OF PIER #2
PHOTO #27 - GENERAL VIEW PIER #2, WEST FACE; NOTE ABRASION AT
WATERLINE
PHOTO #28 - GENERAL VIEW WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #29 - EROSION AT ABUTMENT BACKWALL; NORTHWEST
CORNER SHOWN
PHOTO #30 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH RAIL LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #31 - DAMAGE TO NORTH SIDE BRIDGE RAIL NEAR EAST
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #32 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH RAIL LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #33 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN CURBLINE; NORTH
CURBLINE IN WEST SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #34 - TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH ON CONCRETE CURB; NORTH
CURB IN WEST SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #35 - DAMAGE TO NORTH GUARDRAIL NEAR WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #36 - GENERAL CONDITION OF EAST APPROACH
PHOTO #37 - EAST APPROACH
PHOTO #38 - GENERAL CONDITION OF EAST APPROACH; NOTE
APPROXIMATELY 2 INCHES DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT BETWEEN
APPROACH AND DECK, LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #39 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT
BETWEEN EAST APPROACH AND DECK
PHOTO #40 - WEST APPROACH LOOKING TOWARD US 101
PHOTO #41 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM)
PHOTO #42 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM)
PHOTO #43 - LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF
BRIDGE
PHOTO #44 - LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF
BRIDGE
PHOTO #45 - TYPICAL VEGETATION ENCROACHING OBJECT MARKERS
AT CORNERS OF STRUCTURE; SOUTHEAST CORNER SHOWN
PHOTO #46 - HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH AT SOUTHWEST CORNER;
NOTE LARGE TIMBER DEBRIS AT SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE OF PIER #1
PHOTO #47 - VEGETATION GROWTH AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
STRUCTURE
PHOTO #48 - EMBANKMENT EROSION AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF
STRUCTURE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .