BIR_9500-009P-2019.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2) Olym Bridge Preservation
Solicitation number
69056722B000002
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation is for a firm fixed price contract to perform bridge preservation work at multiple locations within Olympic National Park in Clallam, Grays Harbor, and Jefferson Counties in Washington State. Required services include repairs to concrete decks, bearings, expansion joints and other structural elements. Bids are due by August 15, 2022 with award anticipated by September 30, 2022. The total estimated value is between $500,000 and $1,000,000. The soliciting agency is the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. The attached physical data files and plans provide location-specific inspection reports and recommendations for the bridges to be preserved under this contract.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bid Tabulation_WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2).pdf PDF
BidSum_WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2).pdf PDF
Amendment A002.pdf PDF
QA_11-29-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment A001.pdf PDF
QA_11-22-2022.pdf PDF
QA_11-16-2022.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-006P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-019P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-023P-2019.pdf PDF
FLH Bridge oversized or overload vehicle permit request form Oct 2018.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-060P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-050P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-052P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-061P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-051P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-007P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-026P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-003P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-008P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-020P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-049S-2019.pdf PDF
olym201902_plans.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-062P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-022P-2019.pdf PDF
IFB OLYM Bridge Preservation.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-025P-2019.pdf PDF
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P

SALMON RIVER BRIDGE (QUEETS) INSPECTION DATE: 8/21/19

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

NONE

N/A

SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

N/A / CONCRETE

ONP 2190 / RG2238

2 - CONNECTOR ROAD

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

161.7 FT (49.3 M)

101.7 FT (31.0 M)

22.5 FT (6.9 M)

20.1 FT (6.1 M)

N/A

18 °

NO

LOCATION

OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 1.40 (KM PT 2.25)

STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: 1.4 MI. S. OF JCT. HWY. 101 (MP 144.5)

AND QUEETS VALLEY ROAD. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ LOWER QUEETS VALLEY ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. SALMON RIVER

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete box girder "bobtail" cantilever bridge is in fair to good condition overall. The main structural problem is cracking with efflorescence, leakage, and rust staining throughout the box girder concrete. While no repairs to the box girder are deemed advisable at this time, the condition of the concrete will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

Site-related problems include minor scour at the piers, damage to the north railing, exposed rebar on the east pier and east endwall, and settlement at the east approach.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

60.17 PLACE ENGINEERED RIPRAP AT PIERS TO PROTECT FROM

FURTHER SCOUR.

1 LS

58.6 REPAIR NORTH RAILING AND POST AT EAST END OF BRIDGE. 1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

2. EXPANSION JOINTS

3. WEARING SURFACE

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 6

1. BEARING DEVICES N

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS F

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S) N

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS N

5. TRUSSES N

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING N

7. PAINT N

8. FASCIA(E) N

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G

10. ALIGNMENT G

11. OTHER N

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

2. PILE BENTS

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

5. FOUNDATIONS

6. WINGWALLS

7. WEEP HOLES

8. EXPANSION JOINTS

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

11. SLOPE PROTECTION

12. OTHER

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14. PILE BENTS

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16. FOUNDATIONS

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19. OTHER

G N N G G F F N G N

N N N G N N N N F F G N

G N N N G G N

58.1

58.5

58.6

58.7

59.2

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

MINOR ABRASION WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE ON DECK SURFACE.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING THROUGHOUT UNDERSIDE OF

OVERHANGS WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND MOSS

GROWTH ON EXTERIOR FACE OF DECK. SEE ALSO 59.2.

MODERATE MOSS WITH MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON CURBS

AND IN CURB JOINTS.

WEATHERING STEEL BRIDGE RAILINGS. MODERATE DAMAGE TO

TOP RAIL AND ADJACENT RAIL POST ON NORTH RAILING NEAR

EAST END OF BRIDGE. MINOR DAMAGE TO TOP RAIL ON NORTH

RAILING NEAR WEST END OF BRIDGE. ENDS OF BOTH RAILINGS

SIT SLIGHTLY FORWARD (TOWARD ROADWAY) RELATIVE TO END

PARAPET.

PACK RUST AND SECTION LOSS IN RAIL EXPANSION JOINTS.

MINOR GRAVEL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES

AND AT ENDS OF DECK; EVIDENCE OF PONDING ALONG

CURBLINES. DECK DRAINS ARE PARTIALLY CLOGGED.

BOX GIRDER DRAINS ARE CLEAR; STAINING AT DRAIN IN CENTER

SPAN NEAR WEST PIER.

MINOR VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING ON EXTERIOR FACE OF

BOX GIRDER WEBS AT PIERS AND CENTER SPAN, SEVERAL CRACKS

WITH EFFLORESCENCE; SEVERAL CRACKS EXTEND INTO DECK

OVERHANGS. MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING ON EXTERIOR FACE OF

BOX GIRDER WEBS IN VERTICAL FACE THROUGHOUT END SPANS;

CONCENTRATED CRACKING AT SOUTH SIDE OF EAST SPAN AT

MIDSPAN.

MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH LEAKAGE AND RUST

STAINING ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER; EFFLORESCENCE IN

EAST SPAN. MINOR WIDESPREAD TRANSVERSE AND RANDOM

CRACKING WITH HONEYCOMBING, EFFLORESCENCE, AND RUST

STAINING THROUGHOUT UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER, CENTER

SPAN. SMALL HOLES IN TWO AREAS OF STAINING AND

HONEYCOMBING ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER, EAST SPAN.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G G F N

LOW

SUFF

10 FT.

MUD, SAND, GRAVEL

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER (VEGETATION)

N N N G G F G G F

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.4 ONE EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTH SIDE OF EAST ENDWALL AT TOP

DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER.

60.9,10 UNDERMINING/SETTLEMENT OF FILL UNDER ENDWALLS UP TO 12"

IN HEIGHT FOR ENTIRE LENGTH OF EAST ENDWALL AND 3/4 OF

WEST ENDWALL. SCOUR HOLE, (10' DIAMETER X 3'D) BENEATH

WEST SPAN NEAR ENDWALL.

60.11, 61.3 RIPRAP PROTECTION AT ABUTMENT SLOPES AND ALONG EAST

UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK.

60.13 EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTH SIDE OF EAST PIER DUE TO

INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER. MINOR SCALING OF PIERS AT

WATERLINE.

60.17, 61.1 STREAM FLOWS AGAINST EAST PIER, CAUSING MINOR SCOUR.

MINOR SCOUR ALSO EVIDENT AT WEST PIER, THOUGH NO FLOW

PRESENT AT TIME OF INSPECTION. STREAM DEPTH GAGE

LOCATED ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF WEST PIER.

61.1 MEANDERING CHANNEL AT LOW FLOW.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

222.6 UP TO 2" SETTLEMENT AT EAST APPROACH. 0.5" SETTLEMENT AT

WEST APPROACH.

222.7 OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS.

222.8 HORIZONTAL CURVES AT BOTH APPROACHES.

222.9 HEAVY VEGETATION OVERGROWTH AT BOTH ENDS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 21 19 35 32

HS 37 34 63 57

TYPE 3 31 28 52 47

TYPE 3S2 49 44 83 75

TYPE 3-3 61 55 102 93

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 8/16

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: GIRDER WEB

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 530 - WASHINGTON (WA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... SALMON RIVER BRIDGE (QUEETS) (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 031 - JEFFERSON

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-009P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 106 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... SALMON RIVER

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........009P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. LOWER QUEETS VALLEY RO

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 9500009P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.4 MI. S. OF JCT. HWY. 1

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ONP 2190 (11) MILE POINT: .............................1.40 (KM PT 2.25)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... RG2238 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

101.7 FT (31.0 M)

161.7 FT (49.3 M)

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 37.0 TONS (33.6 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 63.0 TONS (57.2 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 47°33'10.70"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 124°12'56.60"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 199 MI (199 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

20.1 FT (6.1 M)

22.5 FT (6.9 M)

20.0 FT (6.1 M)

16.0 FT (4.9 M)

2.0 FT (0.6 M)

2.0 FT (0.6 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

18 °

NO

20.1 FT (6.1 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

4 - STEEL

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.58 FT (0.79 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

TBD

TBD

TBD

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

SPAN #1 & #3 - LENGTH 32', SPAN #2 - LENGTH 99'; TYPE 205 (CONC. BOX GRD.)

https://124�12'56.60 https://47�33'10.70 john.davis

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-009P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST (AHEAD)

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - LOOKING WEST (BACK) TOWARD US 101

PHOTO #4 - NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL ABRASION WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE IN DECK

SURFACE; WEST SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW WEST SPAN, LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #8 - CRACKING WITH RUST STAINING ON UNDERSIDE OF

CONCRETE BOX GIRDER IN WEST SPAN NEAR SOUTH (UPSTREAM)

SIDE

PHOTO #9 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AROUND DECK DRAIN

IN SOUTH OVERHANG IN WEST SPAN

PHOTO #10 - CRACKING WITH RUST STAINING AND EFFLORESCENCE

ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER; MAIN SPAN NEAR PIER #1 SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON OUTSIDE OF

CONCRETE BOX GIRDER; NORTH FACE OVER PIER #1 SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF MAIN SPAN LOOKING

EAST

PHOTO #13 - RUST STAINING AROUND DECK DRAINS NEAR PIER #1,

MAIN SPAN

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN

UNDERSIDE OF DECK; MAIN SPAN LOOKING EAST TOWARD PIER #2

PHOTO #15 - SPALL WITH RUST STAINING UNDERSIDE OF CONCRETE

BOX GIRDER; MAIN SPAN SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE NEAR PIER #2

PHOTO #16 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW EAST SPAN, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #17 - STAINING IN UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER DECK DRAIN,

EAST SPAN NEAR EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #18 - CRACKING ON OUTSIDE CONCRETE BOX GIRDER EAST

SPAN, NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW NORTH OVERHANG LOOKING

EAST

PHOTO #20 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH OVERHANG IN

MAIN SPAN, LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL UNDERMINING OF EAST ENDWALL;

NORTHEAST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW PIER #1, WEST FACE

PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW PIER #1, EAST FACE

PHOTO #25 - GENERAL VIEW PIER #2, EAST FACE

PHOTO #26 - SCOUR HOLE AT NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE OF PIER #2

PHOTO #27 - GENERAL VIEW PIER #2, WEST FACE; NOTE ABRASION AT

WATERLINE

PHOTO #28 - GENERAL VIEW WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #29 - EROSION AT ABUTMENT BACKWALL; NORTHWEST

CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #30 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH RAIL LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #31 - DAMAGE TO NORTH SIDE BRIDGE RAIL NEAR EAST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #32 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH RAIL LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #33 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN CURBLINE; NORTH

CURBLINE IN WEST SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #34 - TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH ON CONCRETE CURB; NORTH

CURB IN WEST SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #35 - DAMAGE TO NORTH GUARDRAIL NEAR WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #36 - GENERAL CONDITION OF EAST APPROACH

PHOTO #37 - EAST APPROACH

PHOTO #38 - GENERAL CONDITION OF EAST APPROACH; NOTE

APPROXIMATELY 2 INCHES DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT BETWEEN

APPROACH AND DECK, LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #39 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT

BETWEEN EAST APPROACH AND DECK

PHOTO #40 - WEST APPROACH LOOKING TOWARD US 101

PHOTO #41 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM)

PHOTO #42 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM)

PHOTO #43 - LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

BRIDGE

PHOTO #44 - LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

BRIDGE

PHOTO #45 - TYPICAL VEGETATION ENCROACHING OBJECT MARKERS

AT CORNERS OF STRUCTURE; SOUTHEAST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #46 - HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH AT SOUTHWEST CORNER;

NOTE LARGE TIMBER DEBRIS AT SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE OF PIER #1

PHOTO #47 - VEGETATION GROWTH AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #48 - EMBANKMENT EROSION AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF

STRUCTURE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .