BIR_9500-049S-2019.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2) Olym Bridge Preservation
Solicitation number
69056722B000002
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation is for a firm fixed price contract to perform bridge preservation work at multiple locations within Olympic National Park in Washington State. Services include structural repairs, deck replacements, painting, and other maintenance and rehabilitation activities on various bridges. The required completion date is October 31, 2020. The solicitation was issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and responses are due by June 5, 2022. Pricing is on a firm fixed price basis. The contract has a small business set-aside designation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bid Tabulation_WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2).pdf PDF
BidSum_WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2).pdf PDF
Amendment A002.pdf PDF
QA_11-29-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment A001.pdf PDF
QA_11-22-2022.pdf PDF
QA_11-16-2022.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-006P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-019P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-009P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-023P-2019.pdf PDF
FLH Bridge oversized or overload vehicle permit request form Oct 2018.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-060P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-050P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-052P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-061P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-051P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-007P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-026P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-003P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-008P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-020P-2019.pdf PDF
olym201902_plans.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-062P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-022P-2019.pdf PDF
IFB OLYM Bridge Preservation.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-025P-2019.pdf PDF
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S

KESTNER HOMESTEAD BRIDGE (QUINAULT) INSPECTION DATE: 8/23/19

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... TRUSS - THRU NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 2 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 81.0 FT (24.7 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... WOOD OR TIMBER MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 81.0 FT (24.7 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... WOOD OR TIMBER DECK WIDTH: ...................... 15.2 FT (4.6 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SILL CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 12.5 FT (3.8 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 4 - PRIMITIVE FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ YES

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2008 EST-ABUTMENTS REPLACED WITH CONCRETE BLOCK SUPPORT FOR TRUSS. SOUTH

ABUTMENT SLOPE REPAIRED WITH RIPRAP. 2011-STRUCTURAL STEEL REPAINTED, DECK

LOCATION

OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT:

STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: Approximately MP 6.2 on North Shore Road, then north on Kestner Homestead Access Road. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ KESTNER HOMESTEAD ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. KESTNER CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This single span Bailey-type steel truss bridge is in fair to good condition overall. Several of the truss members are pitted to varying degrees, and the floor beam stiffeners have small corrosion holes. However, the corrosion is not considered to be currently active, as the structural steel has been repainted. The condition of the steel will continue to be monitored during future inspections.

Other problems include a large undermined tree leaning over the north end of the bridge and several large trees in the channel upstream.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

59.11 REMOVE UNDERMINED TREE AT NW END OF BRIDGE 1 LS

61.4 REMOVE FALLEN TREES FROM UPSTREAM CHANNEL 1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

G N N F G G G N F

F G

(TREE GROWTH)

G N G G N N N N G F G N

N N N N N N N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1,3 2" X 6" TRANSVERSE TIMBER DECK PLANKS.

1" X 12" LONGITUDINAL TIMBER RUNNING BOARDS EXCEPT 1" X 7"

AND 1" X 9" LONGITUDINAL TIMBER RUNNER BOARDS ADJACENT TO

CURBS.

MINOR CHECKING OF RUNNER BOARDS THROUGHOUT.

58.5,6 SLIGHT MISALIGNMENT OF STEEL CURBS. TIMBER PICKET

RAILINGS.

58.7 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON DECK SURFACE AND BETWEEN

TIMBER RUNNER PLANKS. MINOR DEBRIS ON DECK EDGES

BETWEEN CURBS, RAIL POSTS, AND TRUSS MEMBERS.

59.1, 60.1,3,4,10

ABUTMENTS REPLACED WITH THREE CONCRETE BLOCKS IN 2008.

59.4,6,7 18 STRINGERS IN 3-STRINGER PANELS. 20 FLOOR BEAMS; FLOOR

BEAMS ARE DOUBLED UP AT ENDS OF BRIDGE (FLOOR BEAMS #1 &

#2 AND FLOOR BEAMS #19 & #20) AND AT FLOOR BEAMS #16 & #17.

THEREFORE, ONLY 16 TRUSS PANELS EXIST.

MINOR PITTING (UP TO 1/8") ON STRINGERS, FLOOR BEAMS, AND

LATERAL BRACING PREDATING PAINT. FLOOR BEAM STIFFENERS

HAVE SEVERE PITTING WITH SMALL AREAS OF 100% SECTION

LOSS; NOT CONSIDERED ACTIVE DUE TO REPAINTING IN 2011.

FLOOR BEAM #15, BELOW STRINGER #16, TWO (2"L) TEARS IN WEB

EXTENDING FROM HOLE CUT IN BEAM, PREDATES PAINT. FLOOR

BEAMS #17, #18 AND #19 TWISTED AT WEST SIDE.

SEVERAL TRANSVERSE CROSS-BRACING MEMBERS ARE SLIGHTLY

BENT. DAMAGED TRUSS LATERAL BRACING AT NORTH END OF

EAST TRUSS.

59.5 MINOR DENT IN BOTTOM CHORD OF WEST TRUSS BELOW FLOOR

BEAM #15 AND BETWEEN FLOOR BEAMS #17 AND #18.

TOP CHORD COVERED BY 2X8 TIMBER RAIL.

F G G G G N

N

N

G

G

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 6

F F G P N

MED

SUFF

7 FT.

GRAVEL, SAND

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER (GATE)

N N N G G G F G G

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.9 VIBRATION UNDER PEDESTRIAN LOADING.

59.11 LARGE UNDERMINED TREE LEANS OVER NORTH END OF

STRUCTURE; NUMEROUS SMALL TREES AND SHRUBS GROW

AGAINST WEST SIDE OF SUPERSTRUCTURE, NORTH END.

60.3 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON CONCRETE BLOCK SUPPORTS.

MINOR LATERAL TILTING OF BLOCK SUPPORTS AT NORTHEAST AND

SOUTHWEST CORNERS.

60.4 CONCRETE BACKWALLS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS. WOOD FORMS

STILL IN PLACE ON STREAM FACE SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT.

60.11, 61.3 RIPRAP ON ABUTMENT SLOPES.

61.1 CHANNEL FLOWS ALONG TOE OF NORTH ABUTMENT RIPRAP

SLOPE.

61.2 MINOR TO MODERATE SLOUGHING ALONG DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

BANKS.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 SEVERAL LARGE FALLEN TREES IN UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM

CHANNEL.

222.4 SOIL AND GRAVEL APPROACHES.

222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS.

222.9 CLOSED GATE AT SOUTH APPROACH.

"NO PARKING" SIGN ON GATE.

36.A BRIDGE RAILING DOES NOT MEET CURRENT AASHTO STANDARDS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 11 10 20 18

HS 21 19 36 33

TYPE 3 14 13 25 23

TYPE 3S2 21 19 36 33

TYPE 3-3 23 21 40 36

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 5/16

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT/LOAD TEST

REMARKS: LOAD RATING IS BASED ON LOAD TEST RESULTS FOR SIMILAR STRUCTURE. SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR MORE

INFORMATION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... KESTNER HOMESTEAD BRIDGE (QUINA

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-049S

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ...

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........049S

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 4 - PRIMITIVE

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......NO

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S):

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

530 - WASHINGTON (WA)

027 - GRAYS HARBOR

160000000

KESTNER CREEK

KESTNER HOMESTEAD ROA

9500049S0000000

Approximately MP 6.2 on N

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

3 - POSSIBLY ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

3 - STEEL

10 - TRUSS - THRU

81.0 FT (24.7 M)

81.0 FT (24.7 M)

1 - SILL

1 - SILL

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

8 - WOOD OR TIMBER

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 7 - WOOD OR TIMBER

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 21.0 TONS (19.1 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... YES

INSP. EVERY: 24 MONTHS - LAST INSP. : 8/19 (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE:

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 47°30'32.50"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 123°49'04.60"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 12 MI (19 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

12.5 FT (3.8 M)

15.2 FT (4.6 M)

12.0 FT (3.7 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

12.6 FT (3.8 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

7 - TIMBER

5 - OTHER

3.33 FT (1.01 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK: ..............31 - REPLACE

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

TBD

TBD

TBD

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2008 EST-ABUTMENTS REPLACED WITH CONCRETE BLOCK SUPPORT FOR TRUSS. SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE REPAIRED WITH

RIPRAP. 2011-STRUCTURAL STEEL REPAINTED, DECK REPLACED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

SINGLE-SINGLE BAILEY BRIDGE. TRUSS HEIGHT = 5'.

https://123�49'04.60 https://47�30'32.50 john.davis

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S

FLOW

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH (AHEAD) TOWARD KESTNER

HOMESTEAD

PHOTO #2 - EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - LOOKING SOUTH (BACK) TOWARD NORTH SHORE ROAD

PHOTO #4 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL VIEW OF DECK LOOKING NORTH (AHEAD)

TOWARD KESTNER HOMESTEAD

PHOTO #6 - REPLACED TIMBER DECK SECTIONS; EAST SIDE OVER

FLOOR BEAM #5

PHOTO #7 - REPLACED TIMBER DECK SECTIONS; EAST SIDE OVER

FLOOR BEAM #14

PHOTO #8 - REPLACED TIMBER DECK SECTIONS; EAST SIDE OVER

FLOOR BEAM #17, NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #10 - CLOSE-UP VIEW UNDERSIDE TIMBER DECK PLANKING;

NOTE MOISTURE AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION BETWEEN DECK

PLANKS

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL PITTING ON FLOOR BEAMS PREDATING

PAINTING SYSTEM

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL HEAVY PITTING AND SECTION LOSS ON

STRINGERS PREDATING THE PAINT SYSTEM

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL PITTING ON FLOOR BEAM AND STRINGERS

PREDATING PAINTING SYSTEM

PHOTO #14 - BUCKED WEB STIFFENERS ON FLOOR BEAM #2 FROM

NORTH ABUTMENT; SOUTH FACE CLOSE TO THE UPSTREAM BOTTOM

CHORD

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL PITTING OF LATERAL BRACING PREDATING

PAINT SYSTEM

PHOTO #16 - DAMAGE TO BOTTOM CHORD OF WEST TRUSS BETWEEN

FLOOR BEAMS #15 AND #16; WEST SIDE OF TRUSS, NEAR NORTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #17 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF DAMAGE TO BOTTOM CHORD OF

WEST TRUSS BETWEEN FLOOR BEAMS #15 AND #16 NEAR NORTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #18 - DAMAGE TO FLOOR BEAM #16; WEST SIDE OF TRUSS,

NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #19 - DAMAGE TO TRUSS LATERAL BRACING; NORTH END,

EAST TRUSS SHOWN

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BOTTOM CHORD

AND CROSS BRACING ; EAST TRUSS NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT BEARINGS;

SOUTHEAST BEARING SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE VARIATION IN

HEIGHT OF CONCRETE FOOTING BLOCKS

PHOTO #25 - GENERAL VIEW EAST (UPSTREAM) CURB AND RAILING,

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW WEST (DOWNSTREAM) CURB AND

RAILING, LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #27 - CLOSE-UP VIEW, TYPICAL SLIGHT MISALIGNMENT OF

STEEL CURB; EAST SIDE NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #28 - SOUTH APPROACH LOOKING SOUTH (BACK) TOWARD

NORTH SHORE ROAD

PHOTO #29 - GENERAL CONDITION OF SOUTH APPROACH, LOOKING

EAST

PHOTO #30 - NORTH APPROACH LOOKING NORTH (AHEAD) TOWARD

HOMESTEAD

PHOTO #31 - GENERAL CONDITION NORTH APPROACH, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #32 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING EAST (UPSTREAM)

PHOTO #33 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING WEST (DOWNSTREAM)

PHOTO #34 - LOOKING EAST (UPSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #35 - LOOKING WEST (DOWNSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #36 - NORTHWEST EMBANKMENT ADJACENT TO STRUCTURE;

NOTE UNDERMINED TREE LEANING ON STRUCTURE HAS BEEN

REMOVED

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .