BIR_9500-049S-2019.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2) Olym Bridge Preservation
- Solicitation number
- 69056722B000002
About this file
This solicitation is for a firm fixed price contract to perform bridge preservation work at multiple locations within Olympic National Park in Washington State. Services include structural repairs, deck replacements, painting, and other maintenance and rehabilitation activities on various bridges. The required completion date is October 31, 2020. The solicitation was issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and responses are due by June 5, 2022. Pricing is on a firm fixed price basis. The contract has a small business set-aside designation.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S
KESTNER HOMESTEAD BRIDGE (QUINAULT) INSPECTION DATE: 8/23/19
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... TRUSS - THRU NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 2 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 81.0 FT (24.7 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... WOOD OR TIMBER MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 81.0 FT (24.7 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... WOOD OR TIMBER DECK WIDTH: ...................... 15.2 FT (4.6 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SILL CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 12.5 FT (3.8 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 4 - PRIMITIVE FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ YES
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2008 EST-ABUTMENTS REPLACED WITH CONCRETE BLOCK SUPPORT FOR TRUSS. SOUTH
ABUTMENT SLOPE REPAIRED WITH RIPRAP. 2011-STRUCTURAL STEEL REPAINTED, DECK
LOCATION
OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT:
STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: Approximately MP 6.2 on North Shore Road, then north on Kestner Homestead Access Road. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ KESTNER HOMESTEAD ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. KESTNER CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This single span Bailey-type steel truss bridge is in fair to good condition overall. Several of the truss members are pitted to varying degrees, and the floor beam stiffeners have small corrosion holes. However, the corrosion is not considered to be currently active, as the structural steel has been repainted. The condition of the steel will continue to be monitored during future inspections.
Other problems include a large undermined tree leaning over the north end of the bridge and several large trees in the channel upstream.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
59.11 REMOVE UNDERMINED TREE AT NW END OF BRIDGE 1 LS
61.4 REMOVE FALLEN TREES FROM UPSTREAM CHANNEL 1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
OTHER
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
FOUNDATIONS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
PIER(S)
OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
G N N F G G G N F
F G
(TREE GROWTH)
G N G G N N N N G F G N
N N N N N N N
11.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
58.1,3 2" X 6" TRANSVERSE TIMBER DECK PLANKS.
1" X 12" LONGITUDINAL TIMBER RUNNING BOARDS EXCEPT 1" X 7"
AND 1" X 9" LONGITUDINAL TIMBER RUNNER BOARDS ADJACENT TO
CURBS.
MINOR CHECKING OF RUNNER BOARDS THROUGHOUT.
58.5,6 SLIGHT MISALIGNMENT OF STEEL CURBS. TIMBER PICKET
RAILINGS.
58.7 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON DECK SURFACE AND BETWEEN
TIMBER RUNNER PLANKS. MINOR DEBRIS ON DECK EDGES
BETWEEN CURBS, RAIL POSTS, AND TRUSS MEMBERS.
59.1, 60.1,3,4,10
ABUTMENTS REPLACED WITH THREE CONCRETE BLOCKS IN 2008.
59.4,6,7 18 STRINGERS IN 3-STRINGER PANELS. 20 FLOOR BEAMS; FLOOR
BEAMS ARE DOUBLED UP AT ENDS OF BRIDGE (FLOOR BEAMS #1 &
#2 AND FLOOR BEAMS #19 & #20) AND AT FLOOR BEAMS #16 & #17.
THEREFORE, ONLY 16 TRUSS PANELS EXIST.
MINOR PITTING (UP TO 1/8") ON STRINGERS, FLOOR BEAMS, AND
LATERAL BRACING PREDATING PAINT. FLOOR BEAM STIFFENERS
HAVE SEVERE PITTING WITH SMALL AREAS OF 100% SECTION
LOSS; NOT CONSIDERED ACTIVE DUE TO REPAINTING IN 2011.
FLOOR BEAM #15, BELOW STRINGER #16, TWO (2"L) TEARS IN WEB
EXTENDING FROM HOLE CUT IN BEAM, PREDATES PAINT. FLOOR
BEAMS #17, #18 AND #19 TWISTED AT WEST SIDE.
SEVERAL TRANSVERSE CROSS-BRACING MEMBERS ARE SLIGHTLY
BENT. DAMAGED TRUSS LATERAL BRACING AT NORTH END OF
EAST TRUSS.
59.5 MINOR DENT IN BOTTOM CHORD OF WEST TRUSS BELOW FLOOR
BEAM #15 AND BETWEEN FLOOR BEAMS #17 AND #18.
TOP CHORD COVERED BY 2X8 TIMBER RAIL.
F G G G G N
N
N
G
G
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL 6
F F G P N
MED
SUFF
7 FT.
GRAVEL, SAND
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER (GATE)
N N N G G G F G G
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
59.9 VIBRATION UNDER PEDESTRIAN LOADING.
59.11 LARGE UNDERMINED TREE LEANS OVER NORTH END OF
STRUCTURE; NUMEROUS SMALL TREES AND SHRUBS GROW
AGAINST WEST SIDE OF SUPERSTRUCTURE, NORTH END.
60.3 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON CONCRETE BLOCK SUPPORTS.
MINOR LATERAL TILTING OF BLOCK SUPPORTS AT NORTHEAST AND
SOUTHWEST CORNERS.
60.4 CONCRETE BACKWALLS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS. WOOD FORMS
STILL IN PLACE ON STREAM FACE SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT.
60.11, 61.3 RIPRAP ON ABUTMENT SLOPES.
61.1 CHANNEL FLOWS ALONG TOE OF NORTH ABUTMENT RIPRAP
SLOPE.
61.2 MINOR TO MODERATE SLOUGHING ALONG DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
BANKS.
61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
61.4 SEVERAL LARGE FALLEN TREES IN UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM
CHANNEL.
222.4 SOIL AND GRAVEL APPROACHES.
222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS.
222.9 CLOSED GATE AT SOUTH APPROACH.
"NO PARKING" SIGN ON GATE.
36.A BRIDGE RAILING DOES NOT MEET CURRENT AASHTO STANDARDS.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 11 10 20 18
HS 21 19 36 33
TYPE 3 14 13 25 23
TYPE 3S2 21 19 36 33
TYPE 3-3 23 21 40 36
DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 5/16
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT/LOAD TEST
REMARKS: LOAD RATING IS BASED ON LOAD TEST RESULTS FOR SIMILAR STRUCTURE. SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR MORE
INFORMATION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... KESTNER HOMESTEAD BRIDGE (QUINA
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-049S
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ...
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........049S
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 4 - PRIMITIVE
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......NO
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S):
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
530 - WASHINGTON (WA)
027 - GRAYS HARBOR
160000000
KESTNER CREEK
KESTNER HOMESTEAD ROA
9500049S0000000
Approximately MP 6.2 on N
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
3 - POSSIBLY ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
3 - STEEL
10 - TRUSS - THRU
81.0 FT (24.7 M)
81.0 FT (24.7 M)
1 - SILL
1 - SILL
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
8 - WOOD OR TIMBER
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 7 - WOOD OR TIMBER
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 21.0 TONS (19.1 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... YES
INSP. EVERY: 24 MONTHS - LAST INSP. : 8/19 (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE:
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 47°30'32.50"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 123°49'04.60"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 12 MI (19 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
12.5 FT (3.8 M)
15.2 FT (4.6 M)
12.0 FT (3.7 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
0 °
NO
12.6 FT (3.8 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
7 - TIMBER
5 - OTHER
3.33 FT (1.01 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK: ..............31 - REPLACE
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
5 - Stable; scour within limits of
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
TBD
TBD
TBD
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2008 EST-ABUTMENTS REPLACED WITH CONCRETE BLOCK SUPPORT FOR TRUSS. SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE REPAIRED WITH
RIPRAP. 2011-STRUCTURAL STEEL REPAINTED, DECK REPLACED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
SINGLE-SINGLE BAILEY BRIDGE. TRUSS HEIGHT = 5'.
https://123�49'04.60 https://47�30'32.50 john.davis
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-049S
FLOW
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH (AHEAD) TOWARD KESTNER
HOMESTEAD
PHOTO #2 - EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - LOOKING SOUTH (BACK) TOWARD NORTH SHORE ROAD
PHOTO #4 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #5 - GENERAL VIEW OF DECK LOOKING NORTH (AHEAD)
TOWARD KESTNER HOMESTEAD
PHOTO #6 - REPLACED TIMBER DECK SECTIONS; EAST SIDE OVER
FLOOR BEAM #5
PHOTO #7 - REPLACED TIMBER DECK SECTIONS; EAST SIDE OVER
FLOOR BEAM #14
PHOTO #8 - REPLACED TIMBER DECK SECTIONS; EAST SIDE OVER
FLOOR BEAM #17, NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #10 - CLOSE-UP VIEW UNDERSIDE TIMBER DECK PLANKING;
NOTE MOISTURE AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION BETWEEN DECK
PLANKS
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL PITTING ON FLOOR BEAMS PREDATING
PAINTING SYSTEM
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL HEAVY PITTING AND SECTION LOSS ON
STRINGERS PREDATING THE PAINT SYSTEM
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL PITTING ON FLOOR BEAM AND STRINGERS
PREDATING PAINTING SYSTEM
PHOTO #14 - BUCKED WEB STIFFENERS ON FLOOR BEAM #2 FROM
NORTH ABUTMENT; SOUTH FACE CLOSE TO THE UPSTREAM BOTTOM
CHORD
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL PITTING OF LATERAL BRACING PREDATING
PAINT SYSTEM
PHOTO #16 - DAMAGE TO BOTTOM CHORD OF WEST TRUSS BETWEEN
FLOOR BEAMS #15 AND #16; WEST SIDE OF TRUSS, NEAR NORTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #17 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF DAMAGE TO BOTTOM CHORD OF
WEST TRUSS BETWEEN FLOOR BEAMS #15 AND #16 NEAR NORTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #18 - DAMAGE TO FLOOR BEAM #16; WEST SIDE OF TRUSS,
NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #19 - DAMAGE TO TRUSS LATERAL BRACING; NORTH END,
EAST TRUSS SHOWN
PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BOTTOM CHORD
AND CROSS BRACING ; EAST TRUSS NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT BEARINGS;
SOUTHEAST BEARING SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE VARIATION IN
HEIGHT OF CONCRETE FOOTING BLOCKS
PHOTO #25 - GENERAL VIEW EAST (UPSTREAM) CURB AND RAILING,
LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW WEST (DOWNSTREAM) CURB AND
RAILING, LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #27 - CLOSE-UP VIEW, TYPICAL SLIGHT MISALIGNMENT OF
STEEL CURB; EAST SIDE NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #28 - SOUTH APPROACH LOOKING SOUTH (BACK) TOWARD
NORTH SHORE ROAD
PHOTO #29 - GENERAL CONDITION OF SOUTH APPROACH, LOOKING
EAST
PHOTO #30 - NORTH APPROACH LOOKING NORTH (AHEAD) TOWARD
HOMESTEAD
PHOTO #31 - GENERAL CONDITION NORTH APPROACH, LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #32 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING EAST (UPSTREAM)
PHOTO #33 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING WEST (DOWNSTREAM)
PHOTO #34 - LOOKING EAST (UPSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF
STRUCTURE
PHOTO #35 - LOOKING WEST (DOWNSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF
STRUCTURE
PHOTO #36 - NORTHWEST EMBANKMENT ADJACENT TO STRUCTURE;
NOTE UNDERMINED TREE LEANING ON STRUCTURE HAS BEEN
REMOVED
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .