BIR_9500-052P-2019.pdf

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-052P

NEW BARNES CREEK BRIDGE (LAKE CRESCENT) INSPECTION DATE: 8/28/19

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 4

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NONE

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ UNKNOWN

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2013 - APPROACHES RESURFACED.

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

80.5 FT (24.5 M)

80.5 FT (24.5 M)

35.1 FT (10.7 M)

30.6 FT (9.3 M)

N/A

0 °

NO

LOCATION

OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 227.90 (KM PT 366.76)

STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: 19.5 mi W of Port Angeles on Hwy 101 (MP

227.9).FACILITY CARRIED: ............ U.S. ROUTE 101

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. BARNES CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete multi-girder bridge is in good condition overall and has only minor structural problems at this time. However, the channel flow has continued to migrate toward the west abutment, resulting in moderate channel bank erosion downstream. The slope has been protected with riprap, but the riprap has moved toward the east bank as the channel has shifted.

Other problems include flood debris in the upstream and downstream channel, debris in the expansion joints, damage to the guard angle at the west deck joint, and moss/vegetation growth throughout the structure.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-052P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.2,5,6,7 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM DECK EXPANSION JOINTS AND ALONG CURBLINES.

REMOVE MOSS AND VEGETATION GROWTH FROM STRUCTURE.

1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

61.4 REMOVE FLOOD DEBRIS FROM UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM

CHANNEL.

1 LS

58.2, 222.4 REPAIR SPALLED CONCRETE AT LOCATION OF MISSING JOINT

ANGLE AT WEST END OF DECK.

1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-052P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

(VEGETATION)

G G N N N G N N G

N G

G N G G N G N G G G G N

N N N N N N N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1,10 MINOR ABRASION OF DECK SURFACE; SEVERAL MINOR SPALLS AND

POPOUTS THROUGHOUT. HEAVY MOSS GROWTH ON DECK FACES.

MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF

SOUTH OVERHANG BELOW CURB JOINT AND NORTH OVERHANG

NEAR EAST ABUTMENT.

SMALL TREES GROWING AGAINST SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST

CORNERS.

58.2 HEAVY DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN DECK EXPANSION JOINTS.

JOINT ANGLE BROKEN OFF AT WHEEL LINE OF WESTBOUND LANE

AND ALL OF EASTBOUND LANE, WEST END OF DECK; MINOR

SPALLING OF EXPOSED CONCRETE. MINOR DAMAGE TO

BACKWALL ANGLE.

58.5,6 MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS WITH MOSS AND

VEGETATION GROWTH ON CURBS, RAILINGS, AND IN CURB JOINTS.

58.7 DROP INLETS IN SHOULDERS AT WEST APPROACH. MINOR DEBRIS

WITH VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES.

59.2 GIRDERS #1 AND #2 AT WEST ABUTMENT BEAR ON FRONT CORNER

OF BEARING SEAT; SEE 60.3.

MINOR STAINING AND EFFLORESCENCE OF GIRDER WEBS AT

ISOLATED LOCATIONS. BIRD NESTS ON BOTTOM FLANGE OF

GIRDERS AT INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS.

59.6 ABUTMENT DIAPHRAGM AT EAST ABUTMENT ONLY.

60.1,6 HEAVY MOSS GROWTH ON WINGWALLS AND SIDE OF ABUTMENTS.

60.3 MINOR SPALL BELOW GIRDER #1 AT WEST ABUTMENT WHERE

GIRDER TOUCHES BEARING SEAT.

N G G G G N

G

F

G

G

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-052P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 6

F F G F N

HIGH

SUFF

6 FT.

SAND, STONES

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N F G G G G F N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

60.4 MINOR VERTICAL, HORIZONTAL, AND DIAGONAL CRACKING OF

BACKWALLS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR HORIZONTAL

CRACKING OF TOP SURFACE OF BACKWALLS.

60.9 MINOR EROSION ALONG WEST ABUTMENT WINGWALLS.

60.11, 61.1,2,3

RIPRAP PRESENT AT WEST ABUTMENT; STREAM FLOWS AGAINST

BOTTOM OF ABUTMENT SLOPE AND WEST DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

BANK. MODERATE SLOUGHING OF BANK AT BOTTOM OF WEST

ABUTMENT SLOPE. SEVERE SLOUGHING ALONG WEST

DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANK WITH UNDERMINING OF TREES.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 HEAVY FLOOD DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL;

MODERATE IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL.

222.7 OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS. "BARNES CREEK" SIGN AT

WEST APPROACH; MISSING AT EAST APPROACH.

222.8 MODERATE CURVE AT WEST APPROACH.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-052P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 26 24 33 30

HS 36 33 44 40

TYPE 3 34 31 57 52

TYPE 3S2 43 39 72 65

TYPE 3-3 49 44 81 73

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 3/16

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: ENGINEERING JUDGMENT

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE

EVALUATION (MBE). SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR MORE INFORMATION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-052P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... NEW BARNES CREEK BRIDGE (LAKE CR

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-052P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ...

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........052P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......NO

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S):

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 01 - STATE HIGHWAY AGENCY

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

530 - WASHINGTON (WA)

009 - CLALLAM

121001010

BARNES CREEK

U.S. ROUTE 101

9500052P0000000

19.5 mi W of Port Angeles

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

227.90 (KM PT 366.76)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

80.5 FT (24.5 M)

80.5 FT (24.5 M)

0 - UNKNOWN

0 - UNKNOWN

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 44.0 TONS (39.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE:

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-052P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 48°03'18.10"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 123°47'37.80"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

30.6 FT (9.3 M)

35.1 FT (10.7 M)

32.0 FT (9.8 M)

24.0 FT (7.3 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

30.6 FT (9.3 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.33 FT (0.71 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1000

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

TBD

TBD

TBD

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2013 - APPROACHES RESURFACED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

https://123�47'37.80 https://48�03'18.10 john.davis

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-052P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-052P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST (AHEAD) TOWARD FORKS

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - LOOKING EAST (BACK) TOWARD PORT ANGELES

PHOTO #4 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL VIEW OF DECK LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL VIEW OF DECK LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL SCALING OF DECK WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE

PHOTO #8 - GENERAL VIEW ABUTMENT #1 EXPANSION JOINT LOOKING

NORTH; NOTE DEBRIS IN JOINT

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL CONDITION ABUTMENT #2; NOTE BROKEN JOINT

HEADER LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL MAP CRACKING IN UNDERSIDE OF DECK; SOUTH

BAY NEAR ABUTMENT #1 SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH OVERHANG

LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF NORTH OVERHANG

LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL GIRDERS BEARING ON ABUTMENT SEAT AT

ABUTMENT #2

PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW ABUTMENT #1

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN

ABUTMENT #1 BACKWALL, BETWEEN GIRDERS #2 AND #3 SHOWN;

NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT BEARING SEAT AREA

PHOTO #17 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN ABUTMENT #1

BACKWALL; BETWEEN GIRDERS #2 AND #3 SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW ABUTMENT #2

PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN

BACKWALL ABUTMENT #2, BETWEEN GIRDERS #1 AND #2

PHOTO #20 - SPALL ON ABUTMENT #2 BEARING SEAT BELOW GIRDER

#1; NOTE GIRDER BEARS ON FRONT CORNER OF BEARING SEAT

PHOTO #21 - GENERAL CONDITION OF CONCRETE CURB AND

PARAPET; SOUTH PARAPET SHOWN, LOOKING WEST; NOTE TYPICAL

MOSS GROWTH

PHOTO #22 - APPROACH LOOKING EAST (BACK) TOWARD PORT

ANGELES

PHOTO #23 - APPROACH LOOKING WEST (AHEAD) TOWARD FORKS

PHOTO #24 - TYPICAL APPROACH GUARDRAIL WITH RUBBER

BLOCKOUTS; SOUTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL SHOWN

PHOTO #25 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM)

PHOTO #26 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM);

NOTE LARGE TREE DEBRIS IN DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #27 - LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #28 - LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #29 - EROSION OF NORTHWEST EMBANKMENT ADJACENT TO

DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL