BIR_9500-007P-2019.pdf

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-007P

SOL DUC HOT SPRINGS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 8/20/19

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... TEE BEAM NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 4 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 114.0 FT (34.7 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 74.0 FT (22.6 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NONE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 30.3 FT (9.2 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ N/A CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... N/A / CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... ERFO 71(1) / RG2005 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 11 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... To repair settlement issues both approaches were excavated and gabion baskets placed (circa 2016).

LOCATION

OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 0.03 (KM PT 0.05)

STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: 12.5 MI. SE OF JCT. HWY. 101 (MP 219.3) AND SOL DUC RIVER ROAD. LOCATED AT FACILITY CARRIED: ............ SOL DUC HOT SPRINGS ROAD

SOL DUC HOT SPRINGS.

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. SOL DUC RIVER

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete tee beam "bobtail" cantilever bridge is in good condition overall. The main structural problem is minor vertical and diagonal cracking of the tee beams near the piers. This condition will continue to be monitored during future inspections.

This bridge had significant problems with erosion and undermining of the endwalls and curtain walls. In years past, the undermining at the east endwall has caused pavement failure at the northeast approach. The erosion and undermining of the endwalls was repaired (circa 2016) in order to prevent further settlement and possible failure of the approaches. According to a conversation with a facilities staff member, a new sewer line is planned to be installed across the bridge after the 2019 inspection.

Other problems include a warped gate at the east approach that cannot be closed and object markers facing/slant the wrong way.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-007P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.7 PERIODICALLY REMOVE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION FROM CURBLINES. 1 LS

222.9 REPAIR GATE AT EAST APPROACH. 1 LS

222.7 REPLACE ALL OBJECT MARKERS. 4 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-007P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N G N N N G N N G

N G

N N N G N G N N F G N

F(STORAGE AREA)

G N N G G G

G(FLOOD GAGE)

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1 MINOR TO MODERATE ABRASION OF DECK SURFACE. UNEVEN

CONCRETE AT EAST END OF BRIDGE WITH MINOR DAMAGE TO

GUARD ANGLE.

LIGHT EFFLORESCENCE ALONG COLD JOINT BETWEEN SIDEWALK

AND SOUTH EDGE OF DECK.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

UNDERSIDE IN SOUTH AND CENTER BAYS NEAR EAST PIER; FOUR

MINOR SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN SOUTH BAY NEAR WEST

PIER.

58.5 SIDEWALK ON SOUTH SIDE; CURB ON NORTH SIDE. MINOR TO

MODERATE SCALING OF SIDEWALK AND CURB WHICH HAS CAUSED

MINOR SPALLING ALONG EXTERIOR EDGE. MINOR ACCUMULATION

OF DEBRIS WITH MOSS AND VEGETATION GROWTH ON CURBS,

SIDEWALKS, AND IN CURB JOINTS.

NEW RAMPS INSTALLED AT BOTH ENDS OF SIDEWALK (CIRCA 2016).

58.6 WEATHERING STEEL BRIDGE RAILINGS. EAST END OF BOTH

RAILINGS SIT SLIGHTLY FORWARD (TOWARD ROADWAY) RELATIVE

TO PARAPET END.

58.7 ASPHALT CURB PRESENT AT NORTHWEST CORNER TO DIRECT

RUNOFF AWAY FROM BRIDGE.

58.8 THREE UTILITY CONDUITS SUSPENDED UNDER DECK IN SOUTH

BAY. THREE ELECTRIC CABLES ATTACHED TO NORTH OVERHANG

WITH METER ATTACHED TO NORTHWEST APPROACH PARAPET. 14"

GALVANIZED PIPE ON SOUTH SIDE OF BRIDGE ATTACHED TO

RAILING BOLTS.

59.2 MINOR MOSS STAINING THROUGHOUT BEAMS. MINOR VERTICAL

AND DIAGONAL CRACKING OF BEAMS NEAR PIERS. MINOR

SPALLING ALONG SOUTH BOTTOM EDGE OF BEAM #3 AT WESTERN

THIRD-POINT OF MAIN SPAN.

60.6 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

SOUTHEAST AND NORTHWEST CURTAIN WALLS. HAIRLINE

DIAGONAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND AREA OF MINOR

HONEYCOMBING ON SOUTHWEST CURTAIN WALL.

N G F G G G

N

N

G

G

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-007P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 6

G F G G N

MED

SUFF

11 FT.

GRAVEL

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER (GATE)

N N N G F G G G F

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.9, 222.4,5 MODERATE EROSION OF U/S AND D/S ENDS OF EAST AND WEST

END WALLS WITH UNDERMINING FULL ROADWAY WIDTH.

60.12 MINOR DETERIORATION OF PLYWOOD COVERING STORAGE AREA

IN NORTHWEST EMBANKMENT SLOPE. PLYWOOD COVER SERVES

AS POSSIBLE FALLING HAZARD FOR PEDESTRIANS.

60.13 POOR CONSOLIDATION OF CONCRETE AT PIERS DURING

CONSTRUCTION; MINOR HONEYCOMBING. MINOR STAINING ON

PIERS; MINOR SCALING AT BASE. HAIRLINE VERTICAL CRACK ON

CENTER OF WEST PIER WALL WITH MINOR EFFLORESCENCE; TWO

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKS IN EAST PIER WALL. MINOR SPALL WITH

EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTH END OF WEST PIER WALL.

60.17 MINOR EROSION ALONG WEST CURTAIN WALLS. MINOR SCOUR

ALONG STREAM FACE OF BOTH PIERS; NO EXPOSED FOOTINGS

NOTED.

60.19 MINOR DAMAGE TO FLOOD GAGE ON NORTH SIDE OF EAST PIER.

61.1 STREAM FLOWS AGAINST FACE OF BOTH PIERS CAUSING MINOR

SCALING (SEE 60.13).

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.2,4 MODERATE SLOUGHING ALONG WEST UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK

WITH UNDERMINED TREES, ONE BEGINNING TO FALL INTO

CHANNEL; MINOR SLOUGHING ELSEWHERE.

MINOR DRIFT ACCUMULATION ALONG BOTH PIER WALLS.

61.3 RIPRAP ALONG CORNERS OF CURTAIN WALLS.

222.4,6 NEW ASPHALT APPROACHES (CIRCA 2016).

222.7 TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS AT THREE CORNERS OF BRIDGE. ONE

MISSING.

ALL THREE SIGNS FACING/SLANT THE WRONG WAY.

222.9 NORTH GATE AT EAST APPROACH IS WARPED AND DOES NOT

FULLY CLOSE.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-007P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 22 20 35 32

HS 25 23 42 38

TYPE 3 24 22 38 34

TYPE 3S2 32 29 49 44

TYPE 3-3 37 34 57 52

DESIGN LOADING: HS15 (MS13.5)

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 2/17

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: SHEAR

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-007P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 530 - WASHINGTON (WA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... SOL DUC HOT SPRINGS BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - CLALLAM

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-007P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 205 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... SOL DUC RIVER

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........007P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. SOL DUC HOT SPRINGS ROA

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 9500007P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 12.5 MI. SE OF JCT. HWY.

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ERFO 71(1) (11) MILE POINT: .............................0.03 (KM PT 0.05)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... RG2005 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

04 - TEE BEAM

74.0 FT (22.6 M)

114.0 FT (34.7 M)

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 3 - HS15 (MS13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 25.0 TONS (22.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 42.0 TONS (38.1 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-007P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 47°58'12.00"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 123°51'46.30"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 199 MI (199 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

24.0 FT (7.3 M)

30.3 FT (9.2 M)

35.0 FT (10.7 M)

25.0 FT (7.6 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

6.0 FT (1.8 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

11 °

NO

24.0 FT (7.3 M)

4.9 FT (1.5 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

4 - STEEL

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

3.00 FT (0.91 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

TBD

TBD

TBD

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

To repair settlement issues both approaches were excavated and gabion baskets placed (circa 2016).

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

SPAN #1 & #3 - LENGTH 20', SPAN #2 - LENGTH 74'; TYPE 204 (CIP CONCRETE)

https://123�51'46.30 https://47�58'12.00 john.davis

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-007P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-007P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST (AHEAD) TOWARD SOL DUC HOT SPRINGS

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - LOOKING EAST (BACK) TOWARD SOL DUC RIVER ROAD

PHOTO #4 - NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL ABRASION AND EXPOSED AGGREGATE OF DECK

SURFACE

PHOTO #7 - GENERAL UNDERVIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE UNDERSIDE

OF DECK CENTER BAY NEAR PIER #2

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL VIEW UNDERSIDE OVERHANG NORTH

(DOWNSTREAM) SIDE LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL VIEW UNDERSIDE OVERHANG SOUTH

(UPSTREAM) SIDE LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #11 - SPALLING ALONG SOUTH BOTTOM EDGE OF BEAM #3

NEAR WEST END, MAIN SPAN

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW EAST FACE, PIER #1

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL CRACKING, HONEYCOMBING, AND ABRASION IN

PIER WALLS; PIER #1 AT NORTHWEST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #14 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT SOUTHWEST CORNER PIER

#1

PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW WEST FACE PIER #2

PHOTO #16 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTH END OF WEST

PIER

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL CRACKING, HONEYCOMBING, AND ABRASION IN

PIER WALLS; PIER #2 AT NORTHEAST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL ABRASION OF PIER WALL AT WATERLINE, PIER

#2 SOUTHEAST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #19 - UTILITIES LINES COMING THROUGH AT WEST PIER,

SOUTH BAY SHOWN

PHOTO #20 - GENERAL VIEW NORTH RAIL AND CURBLINE; NOTE MOSS

GROWTH ON CURBLINE

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL DECK DRAINAGE, CURB, AND RAIL; SOUTH SIDE

MIDSPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW SOUTH PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK AND

RAMP AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STRUCTURE, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW SOUTH PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK AND

RAMP AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF STRUCTURE, LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #24 - EAST APPROACH

PHOTO #25 - GATE ON NORTHEAST CORNER WILL NOT OPEN FULLY

AND OVERHANGS CURB

PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW NORTH RAIL AND CURB, LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #27 - EAST END OF BOTH RAILINGS SIT SLIGHTLY FORWARD

TOWARDS ROADWAY RELATIVE TO PARAPET END; SOUTH RAILING

SHOWN

PHOTO #28 - CLOSE-UP EAST END OF BOTH RAILINGS SIT SLIGHTLY

FORWARD TOWARDS ROADWAY RELATIVE TO PARAPET END; SOUTH

RAILING SHOWN

PHOTO #29 - OBJECT MARKER AT NORTHEAST CORNER IS FACING THE

WRONG WAY

PHOTO #30 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN

SOUTHEAST AND NORTHWEST CURTAIN WALLS; SOUTHEAST CURTAIN

WALL SHOWN

PHOTO #31 - SETTLEMENT AT WEST APPROACH

PHOTO #32 - WEST APPROACH

PHOTO #33 - VIEW FROM DECK LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM)

PHOTO #34 - VIEW FROM DECK LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM)

PHOTO #35 - LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

BRIDGE

PHOTO #36 - LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

BRIDGE