BIR_9500-026P-2019.pdf

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-026P

NORTH TUNNEL (HURRICANE) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19/19

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

LINING MATERIAL: ............... CONCRETE MINIMUM VERTICAL CLR: .... 14.6 FT (4.4 M)

SPRINGLINE LENGTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M) STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ... 405.0 FT (123.4 M)

CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 26.8 FT (8.2 M) YEAR BUILT:

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... UNKNOWN / 7-367 YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ....N/A

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2008-NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY. 2013-TUNNEL LINING REHABILITATION.

LOCATION

OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 9.74 (KM PT 15.68)

STATE: .................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: 9.7 MI. S. OF JCT. HWY. 101 (MP 248.7) AND HEART-O-THE HILLS PARKWAY, AT PORT FACILITY CARRIED: ............. HURRICANE RIDGE ROAD

ANGELES, WASHINGTON.

FEATURE INTERSECTED: ... KLAHHANE RIDGE

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete lined tunnel is in fair condition overall and only has minor problems at this time. These include minor cracking with efflorescence and leakage throughout the tunnel lining; rust staining in isolated locations; and minor delamination along the construction joints.

Other problems include moderate soil and gravel accumulation along the sidewalks that has partially clogged most of the curb drains; numerous reflectors missing/damaged from the curbs, and the southeast approach guardrail is unattached at two posts.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-026P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.3 REATTACH SOUTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL TO POSTS. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

222.7 REPLACE MISSING/DAMAGED REFLECTORS FROM CURBS AS

NECESSARY.

1 LS

59.4 REMOVE SOIL AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION ALONG SIDEWALKS

AND CURBLINES. CLEAN CURB DRAINS.

1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-026P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

59. TUNNEL 6

F1. LINING

G2. PORTALS

G3. CURBS AND SIDEWALKS

F4. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

G5. WEARING SURFACE

G6. RIDEABILITY

N7. LIGHTING

N8. OTHER (STRIPING)

9. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF

222. APPROACHES 7

N1. APPROACH SLABS

N2. RELIEF JOINTS

N3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

G4. SURFACING

G5. EROSION

G6. SETTLEMENT

F7. SIGNS

G8. ALIGNMENT

F9. OTHER (GATE)

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

NA. BRIDGE RAILINGS

NB. TRANSITIONS

NC. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

ND. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

59.1 MINOR VERTICAL, LONGITUDINAL, AND DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH

LEAKAGE AND EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT TUNNEL LINING.

RUST STAINING IN ISOLATED LOCATIONS. NUMEROUS SOUND

PATCHES ON LINING.

MINOR DELAMINATION OF CROWN AT CONSTRUCTION JOINT,

APPROXIMATELY 365' FROM NORTH PORTAL.

59.2 MINOR SCALING AND HONEYCOMBING OF PORTALS; MINOR

VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH PORTAL.

NUMEROUS TREES ABOVE NORTH PORTAL. MINOR

HONEYCOMBING OF SOUTH PORTAL OVER SOUTHBOUND LANE.

59.3 MINOR VERTICAL AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF CURBS AND

SIDEWALKS. MINOR SPALLING ALONG TOP EDGE OF CURBS AND

SIDEWALKS, RANDOMLY LOCATED.

59.4 MODERATE SOIL AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES

AND SIDEWALKS. CURB DRAINS PARTIALLY CLOGGED. PARTIALLY

CLOGGED TRANSVERSE DRAIN AT SOUTH PORTAL. MINOR

DAMAGE TO ARMOR PLATE AT SOUTH PORAL. MINOR TO

MODERATE ABRASION OF JOINT HEADER AT SOUTH PORTAL.

59.8 FADING OF ROADWAY STRIPING.

222.3 WEATHERING STEEL GUARDRAILS WITH TIMBER POSTS AT

SOUTHEAST APPROACH. RAIL NOT ATTACHED AT TWO ADJACENT

INTERMEDIATE POSTS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

- Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

- Meets currently acceptable standards.

- Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-026P

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

222.7 FOUR - TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKER SIGNS AT TUNNEL ENTRANCES. BICYCLE TRAFFIC PICTORIAL SIGN AT NORTH APPROACH TO TUNNEL. OTHER TUNNEL SIGNS LOCATED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO ADJACENT SIDEHILL VIADUCT

STRUCTURES - REFER TO 9500-025P AND 9500-029P FOR ADDITIONAL TUNNEL SIGNS.

NORTHWEST OBJECT MARKER POST LEANING SLIGHTLY. NORTHEAST OBJECT MARKER STAINED, BUT STILL

REFLECTIVE.

REFLECTORS ON TOP OF CURBS; NUMEROUS REFLECTORS MISSING/DAMAGED FROM BOTH CURBS. TUNNEL LINING PAINTED REFLECTIVE WHITE ALONG BOTH LININGS FROM SIDEWALK TO 3' ABOVE SIDEWALK, ENTIRE LENGTH OF TUNNEL. WHITE REFLECTIVE PAINT ON SIDES OF PORTALS FROM GROUND TO APPROXIMATELY 10'

HEIGHT.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-026P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... NORTH TUNNEL (HURRICANE)

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............3 - TUNNEL

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-026P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........026P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................UNKNOWN

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 7-367

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

530 - WASHINGTON (WA)

009 - CLALLAM

261000100

KLAHHANE RIDGE

HURRICANE RIDGE ROAD

9500026P0000000

9.7 MI. S. OF JCT. HWY. 1

16.25 FT (4.95 M)

9.74 (KM PT 15.68)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

18 - TUNNEL

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

405.0 FT (123.4 M)

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 8 - UNKNOWN

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 8 - UNKNOWN

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 0.0 TONS (0.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 0 - POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 0.0 TONS (0.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-026P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 48°00'38.00"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 123°22'22.00"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 199 MI (199 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 0 - OTHER

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

26.8 FT (8.2 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

24.0 FT (7.3 M)

3.0 FT (0.9 M)

3.0 FT (0.9 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

26.8 FT (8.2 M)

3.4 FT (1.0 M)

3.3 FT (1.0 M)

0 - N/A

0 - N/A

0 - N/A

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

14.58 FT (4.44 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: .........N

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: ..............N

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... NNNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N

N

N - Not over waterway.

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

TBD

TBD

TBD

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2008-NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY. 2013-TUNNEL LINING REHABILITATION.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

Span #1 - Length 404.7'; Type 118 (Conc. Lined) https://123�22'22.00 https://48�00'38.00

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-026P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-026P

PHOTO #1 - NORTH PORTAL (LOOKING AHEAD)

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH PORTAL (LOOKING BACK)

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE, RUST STAINING, AND

LEAKAGE IN WEST LINING APPROXIMATELY 35' FROM NORTH PORTAL

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN EAST

LINING APPROXIMATELY 35' FROM NORTH PORTAL

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN EAST

LINING APPROXIMATELY 60' FROM NORTH PORTAL

PHOTO #7 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN WEST LINING

APPROXIMATELY 60' FROM NORTH PORTAL

PHOTO #8 - DELAMINATION AND LEAKAGE FROM CROWN OF LINING

APPROXIMATELY 80' FROM NORTH PORTAL

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN EAST

LINING APPROXIMATELY 100' FROM NORTH PORTAL

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL ROADWAY VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL ROADWAY VIEW LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE

TYPICAL FADING OF ROADWAY STRIPING

PHOTO #12 - ARMOR PLATE AND JOINT HEADER ABRASION AT SOUTH

PORTAL

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL PARTIALLY CLOGGED CURB DRAIN, WEST CURB

NEAR NORTH PORTAL SHOWN

PHOTO #14 - SPALLING AND CRACKING ON TOP EDGE OF WEST CURB

NEAR NORTH PORTAL; NOTE TYPICAL GRAVEL ACCUMULATION ON

SIDEWALK AND ALONG CURBLINE NEAR TUNNEL ENDS

PHOTO #15 - SPALLING AND CRACKING ON TOP EDGE OF WEST CURB

NEAR NORTH PORTAL; NOTE TYPICAL GRAVEL ACCUMULATION ON

SIDEWALK AND ALONG CURBLINE NEAR TUNNEL ENDS

PHOTO #16 - VEGETATION AND MOSS GROWTH ABOVE NORTH PORTAL

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL SCALING AND HONEYCOMBING OF PORTALS,

SOUTH PORTAL SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH PORTAL

PHOTO #19 - APPROACH RAIL POSTS NOT CONNECTED TO RAIL AT

SOUTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL