BIR_9500-020P-2019.pdf

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-020P

BUNCH CREEK BRIDGE (QUINAULT) INSPECTION DATE: 8/22/19

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 7 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 63.0 FT (19.2 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE PRECAST PANELS MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 59.7 FT (18.2 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 29.0 FT (8.8 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 25.5 FT (7.8 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 0NP 13-A2 / RG2301 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 12/93, Extreme runoff flushed stream channel, plugged opening, and overtopped deck. Log jam removal in 1994 caused minor damage to Slab Unit #7.

LOCATION

OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 12.40 (KM PT 19.96)

STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: 12.4 MI. NE OF JCT. HWY. 101 (MP

125.5) AND SOUTH SHORE ROAD. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ SOUTH SHORE ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. BUNCH CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete slab unit bridge is in good condition overall and has only minor problems at this time.

These include ungrouted post-tensioning block-outs in the exterior slab units, minor spalling with exposed rebar on the south side of Slab Unit #7, and debris along the south side of the east abutment near Slab Unit #7.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-020P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.7 PERIODICALLY REMOVE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION FROM CURBLINES. 1 LS

222.9 PERIODICALLY TRIM VEGETATION AT BRIDGE CORNERS. 1 LS

60.12 REMOVE DEBRIS AT SOUTH SIDE OF EAST ABUTMENT AND SLAB UNIT #7. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.1, 59.3 CLEAN AND GROUT TRANSVERSE POST-TENSIONING BLOCK-OUT

LOCATIONS.

1 LS

58.1, 59.3 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR ON SLAB UNIT #7 AND COAT WITH

APPROVED SEALANT.

1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-020P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

G N G N N N N N G

N G

N N G G N G N N G G G

F(DEBRIS)

N N N N N N N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1, 59.3 MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR (5-1/2'L TOTAL X 2"H X 5"

UNDER X 1-1/2"D) ON BOTTOM EDGE OF SLAB UNIT #7 NEAR

MIDSPAN DUE TO LOG JAM REMOVAL IN DECEMBER 1994. STAINING

ON SLAB UNIT #1 BELOW CURB JOINT. WATER LEAKAGE AND MOSS

GROWTH ALONG LONGITUDINAL JOINTS BETWEEN SLAB UNITS;

EFFLORESCENCE ON SEVERAL LOCATIONS. TRANSVERSE

POST-TENSIONING BOLTS ON EXTERIOR FACES OF SLAB UNITS

NOT GROUTED OVER; MINOR DEBRIS IN EAST POST-TENSIONING

BLOCK-OUT LOCATION OF SLAB UNIT #7.

DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION BETWEEN ADJACENT SLAB UNITS; UP

TO 1" VERTICAL OFFSET. NO OBSERVED CRACKING OF SLAB UNITS

OR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING IN WEARING SURFACE ASSOCIATED

WITH DIFFERENTIAL ELEVATION.

58.3 WIDESPREAD MINOR ABRASION OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE.

MINOR POTHOLE IN EASTBOUND LANE NEAR MIDSPAN (1" DEEP, 8"

WIDE, 8" LONG).

58.5,6 MINOR SPALL ON WEST END OF SOUTH RAILING.

58.7 NO DRAINS PRESENT. MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG

CURBLINES.

58.8, 222.9 OPEN GATE AT EAST APPROACH.

TRAFFIC SENSOR INSTALLED UNDER APPROACH PAVEMENT IN

EASTBOUND LANE AT WEST APPROACH. CABLES EXPOSED AT

TRAFFIC SENSOR BOX AT SOUTHWEST CORNER.

60.3 HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST ABUTMENT CAP; MODERATE ON

EAST.

60.11 RIPRAP PROTECTION IN PLACE AT ABUTMENT SLOPES.

G G G G F G

N

N

G

G

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-020P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 6

G F N F N

HIGH

SUFF

2 FT.

BOULDERS

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER ((VEGETATION))

N N N G G F F G G

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

60.12 MODERATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AGAINST SOUTH SIDE OF EAST

ABUTMENT AND SLAB UNIT #7.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.2 SEVERE SLOUGHING OF EAST DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANK WITH

UNDERMINING OF SEVERAL TREES. SEE ALSO 61.4.

61.4 HEAVY DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND TREES ACROSS DOWNSTREAM

CHANNEL AND ALONG WEST, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANK.

222.6 UP TO 1" SETTLEMENT OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT AT WEST

APPROACH.

222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS.

222.9 HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH AT BRIDGE CORNERS.

ROADWAY GATE LOCATED AT NE CORNER.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-020P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 31 28 71 64

HS 39 35 87 79

TYPE 3 36 33 81 73

TYPE 3S2 52 47 115 104

TYPE 3-3 61 55 137 124

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 1/17

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: TENSION (INVENTORY), MOMENT (OPERATING)

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-020P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... BUNCH CREEK BRIDGE (QUINAULT)

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-020P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 105

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........020P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................0NP 13-A2

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... RG2301

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

530 - WASHINGTON (WA)

031 - JEFFERSON

161001050

BUNCH CREEK

SOUTH SHORE ROAD

9500020P0000000

12.4 MI. NE OF JCT. HWY.

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

12.40 (KM PT 19.96)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

01 - SLAB

59.7 FT (18.2 M)

63.0 FT (19.2 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

2 - CONCRETE PRECAST PANELS

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 39.0 TONS (35.4 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 87.0 TONS (78.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-020P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 47°31'45.40"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 123°41'45.60"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 4 MI (6 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

25.5 FT (7.8 M)

29.0 FT (8.8 M)

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

26.0 FT (7.9 M)

2.0 FT (0.6 M)

2.0 FT (0.6 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

25.5 FT (7.8 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.17 FT (0.66 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

TBD

TBD

TBD

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

12/93, Extreme runoff flushed stream channel, plugged opening, and overtopped deck. Log jam removal in 1994 caused minor damage to Slab Unit #7.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

Span #1 - Length 59.6'; Type 505 (P/S Slab Units) 7-each https://123�41'45.60 https://47�31'45.40

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-020P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-020P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST (AHEAD) TOWARD CAMPGROUND

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - LOOKING WEST (BACK) TOWARD US RTE 101

PHOTO #4 - NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL VIEW OF DECK LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL VIEW OF DECK LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #7 - SPALL IN CONCRETE DECK (30"L X 8"W X 1" D) AT

MID-SPAN, OVER SOUTH WHEEL LINE, NEAR SOUTH RAILING

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL ABRASION OF CONCRETE DECK SURFACE

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL WATER LEAKAGE ALONG LONGITUDINAL JOINT

BETWEEN ADJACENT SLABS; JOINT BETWEEN PANELS 2 AND 3 FROM

NORTH DOWNSTREAM SIDE, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL MOISTURE JOINT PANELS; JOINT BETWEEN

PANELS 5 AND 6 FROM SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE NEAR MID-SPAN

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL 1" DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION BETWEEN

ADJACENT SLAB UNITS; JOINT BETWEEN PANELS 2 AND 3 FROM

SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE SHOWN, LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL STALACTITES BETWEEN LONGITUDINAL JOINTS;

JOINT BETWEEN PANELS 3 AND 4 FROM SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

MID-SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL STALACTITES BETWEEN LONGITUDINAL JOINTS;

JOINT BETWEEN PANELS 2 AND 3 NEAR WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF POST TENSIONING BOLT; SOUTH

(UPSTREAM) SIDE, SHOWN NEAR EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH CONCRETE RAIL AND

CURBLINE, LOOKING WEST; NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG

CURBLINE BLOCKING DECK DRAINS

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH CONCRETE RAIL AND

CURBLINE, LOOKING WEST; NOTE PONDING ON DECK AND DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINE

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH ON OUTSIDE OF CONCRETE

PARAPET; NORTH DOWNSTREAM SIDE SHOWN, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #21 - EAST APPROACH LOOKING EAST (AHEAD) TOWARD

CAMPGROUND

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL CONDITION OF EAST APPROACH; NOTE

SIGNIFICANT GRAVEL AND SEDIMENT MIGRATION ONTO BRIDGE DECK

PHOTO #23 - WEST APPROACH LOOKING WEST (BACK) TOWARD US

RTE 101

PHOTO #24 - GENERAL CONDITION WEST APPROACH, LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL SETTLEMENT AT WEST APPROACH, LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #26 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM)

PHOTO #27 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM)

PHOTO #28 - LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTEAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #29 - LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #30 - GATE AND OBJECT MARKER AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF

STRUCTURE; NOTE EXCESSIVE VEGETATION ENCROACHMENT

PHOTO #31 - HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH AT NORTHEAST CORNER

OF STRUCTURE

PHOTO #32 - VEGETATION GROWTH AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF

STRUCTURE