BIR_9500-025P-2019.pdf

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-025P

NORTH VIADUCT (HURRICANE) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19/19

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

TEE BEAM

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

BITUMINOUS

SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

CONCRETE

UNKNOWN / 2-336

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

160.0 FT (48.8 M)

40.0 FT (12.2 M)

27.3 FT (8.3 M)

25.8 FT (7.9 M)

N/A

0 °

NO

LOCATION

OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 9.65 (KM PT 15.53)

STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: 9.65 MI. S. OF JCT. HWY. 101 (MP 248.7) AND HEART-O-THE HILLS PARKWAY, AT PORT FACILITY CARRIED: ............ HURRICANE RIDGE ROAD

ANGELES, WASHINGTON.

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. RAVINE

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete tee beam bridge is in fair structural condition due to widespread vertical and longitudinal cracking of the beams and shifting of the structure at the north abutment. No work is recommended at this time to correct the beam cracking, but this condition will continue to be monitored. The previously noted shift of the structure (3/4" to the east at the north abutment), reported as early as 1981, will also continue to be monitored but the structure appears stable at this time.

Other problems include undermining in Spans #3 and #4 between the west beam/retaining wall and fill on the uphill side of the structure; approach fill spill through at the south abutment cap; a gap between the west retaining wall and the deck at the north abutment; a void at the west side of the north abutment backwall; and timber formwork left in place between the diaphragms at the center pier. In addition, there is a moderate gravel accumulation along the east curbline, the deck drains are partially clogged, and the drainage inlets at the west shoulder are clogged.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-025P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.7 REMOVE GRAVEL ACCUMULATION FROM EAST CURBLINE. CLEAN DECK DRAINS. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $1,000

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

59.11 REPAIR VOID BETWEEN WEST BEAM/RETAINING WALL AND UPHILL

SIDE OF STRUCTURE AT SPANS #3 AND #4.

1 LS

58.7, 60.9, 223.6

CLEAN OUT OR REPLACE WEST DITCH CULVERT INLETS. PLACE

PROTECTIVE GRATES OVER INLETS.

1 LS

60.9 FILL AND STABILIZE EROSION AND UNDERMINING OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT AND WEST BEAM IN SPANS #1 AND #4.

1 LS

59.6, 60.15 REMOVE CONSTRUCTION FORMWORK FROM BETWEEN END

DIAPHRAGMS OVER CENTER PIER.

1 LS

58.1, 223.1 REPAIR GAP BETWEEN WEST RETAINING WALL AND DECK AT

NORTH ABUTMENT WITH DRY PACKING OF APPROVED GROUT

MIXTURE.

1 LS 0

60.4 SEAL VOID ON WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL. 1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-025P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

G F N N N G N N G

F F

(GRAFFITI/UNDERMINING)

G N G G N N G N F F N N

G N G G G F

F(GRAFFITI)

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1 MINOR VOIDS IN DECK UNDERSIDE AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS; MINOR

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH END OF SPANS #1

AND #2.

58.1, 223.1 UP TO 1/2" GAP BETWEEN TOP OF WEST BEAM AND DECK

UNDERSIDE AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

58.2,3 JOINT AT CENTER PIER HAS BEEN PAVED OVER; MOISTURE

SEEPAGE WITH MOSS GROWTH ON DECK AND BEAMS BELOW.

MODERATE DETERIORATION OF PARAPET JOINT FILLER WITH MOSS

GROWTH.

58.6 PARAPET ON EAST SIDE ONLY. MINOR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON PARAPET; MINOR VEHICLE

SCRAPES AND SPALLS. PARAPET MISALIGNED UP TO 3/4" OVER

NORTH ABUTMENT.

58.7 MODERATE GRAVEL ACCUMULATION ALONG EAST CURB LINE.

DECK DRAINS ARE PARTIALLY CLOGGED.

58.7, 60.9,17, 223.6

18" CULVERT PIPES UNDER SPANS #1 AND #4; PIPES CLOGGED.

PIPE INLETS IN WEST DITCH HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR COVERED.

DRAIN PIPE UNDER SPAN #1 HAS CAUSED MINOR EROSION AT

SOUTH PIER. DRAIN PIPE UNDER SPAN #4 HAS CAUSED MINOR

EROSION NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT.

59.2 WIDESPREAD MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF TEE-BEAM STEMS

THROUGHOUT STRUCTURE; SEVERAL CRACKS AT CONTINUOUS

SECTIONS OVER PIERS EXTEND INTO DECK. FULL LENGTH

LONGITUDINAL CRACKING (UP TO 1/4" WIDE) ALONG WEST SIDE OF

CENTER BEAM IN SPAN #1 AT DECK INTERFACE; UP TO 1/8" ALONG

EAST SIDE OF CENTER BEAM IN SPAN #1, ALONG BOTH SIDES OF

WEST BEAM IN SPAN #2, AND ALONG WEST SIDE OF EAST BEAM IN

SPAN #2 (UP TO 1/8" WIDE).

59.6, 60.15 TIMBER FORMWORK FROM CONSTRUCTION STILL IN PLACE ON

PIERS BETWEEN END DIAPHRAGMS.

MINOR STAINING ON NORTH SIDE OF PIER 2 DIAPHRAGM, DRY AT

TIME OF INSPECTION.

G G N G F N

N

F

G

G

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61. CHANNEL N

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL 6

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER (PIPES)

G N N F G F

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.10 STRUCTURE APPEARS TO HAVE SHIFTED EASTWARD (TOWARD

DOWNHILL SIDE) AT NORTH ABUTMENT (SEE 60.10).

59.11 SIGNIFICANT VOID (APPROXIMATELY 20' L X 5' H X 4' D) BETWEEN

WEST BEAM/RETAINING WALL AND BACKFILL ON UPHILL SIDE OF

STRUCTURE ALONG SPANS #3 AND #4. UNDERMINING EXTENDS

UNDER SHOULDER AND DITCHLINE OF ROADWAY. NO VISIBLE

SETTLEMENT OF FILL ON TOPSIDE.

59.11, 60.19 GRAFFITI ON BEAMS, PIER CAPS, AND COLUMNS.

60.1 LEAKAGE AND STAINING ON NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL AND

ALONG DIAGONAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT. HAIRLINE HORIZONTAL

CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT TOP OF EAST COLUMN AT NORTH

ABUTMENT. (SEE ALSO 60.10)

60.4 12"H X 9"W X 8"D VOID BESIDE WEST STUB COLUMN IN NORTH

BACKWALL.

60.9 WEST STUB COLUMN AT NORTH ABUTMENT UNDERMINED 16"L

SOUTH FACE X 12"L EAST FACE X 9"H X 8" BACK AT SOUTHEAST

CORNER.

SOUTH ABUTMENT CAP UNDERMINED FULL LENGTH X 3' H X 2'

BACK, EXTENDING 1'-6" ABOVE BOTTOM OF CAP; EROSION

CONTINUES 8' ALONG WEST BEAM. MINOR VOIDS BETWEEN ALL

COLUMNS AND BACKWALL ON SOUTH ABUTMENT (SPILL THROUGH

TYPE ABUTMENT).

60.10 COLUMNS AT NORTH ABUTMENT ARE OUT OF PLUMB 1/4" IN 2'

TOWARD DOWNHILL SIDE. STRUCTURE APPEARS TO HAVE

SHIFTED OUT (1/2" TO 3/4") AND DOWN (1/4" TO 1/2") AT NORTH

ABUTMENT RELATIVE TO APPROACH PARAPET. STUB COLUMN

PULLED AWAY FROM RETAINING WALL 9/16" AT THIS LOCATION.

STUB COLUMN AND CAP AT NORTH ABUTMENT APPEAR TO HAVE

SHIFTED 3/4" TOWARD DOWNHILL SIDE RELATIVE TO WEST BEAM,

LEAVING 3/4" GAP; TAPERS TO 3/8" GAP AT NORTH PIER AND 1/8"

GAP AT CENTER PIER BETWEEN CAP AND WEST BEAM.

222.7 OBJECT MARKERS AT SOUTHEAST AND NORTHEAST CORNERS.

MILE POST SIGN ALONG WEST SHOULDER. OBJECT MARKER AT

SOUTHEAST CORNER LEANS EAST. "LIGHTS REQUIRED IN

TUNNELS" SIGN LOCATED ON NORTH APPROACH, EAST SIDE OF

ROAD FOR UPCOMING TUNNELS (26P, 27P, 28P).

223.1 MINOR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF RETAINING WALL

AT EAST SIDE OF NORTH APPROACH WITH HEAVY

EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF WEST

RETAINING WALL UNDER BRIDGE; WATER STAINING AND HEAVY

LEAKAGE ON FACE AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

36.A PARAPET HEIGHT OF 1'-10" DOES NOT MEET AASHTO MINIMUM HEIGHT SPECIFICATION OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC

BARRIERS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-025P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 8 7 15 14

HS 21 19 36 33

TYPE 3 14 13 25 23

TYPE 3S2 21 19 36 33

TYPE 3-3 23 21 40 36

DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 7/94

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: MOMENT CAPACITY OF CONCRETE DECK

REMARKS: RATING REDUCED DUE TO WIDESPREAD CRACKING OF GIRDER STEMS. SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD

RATING CALCULATIONS AND MORE INFORMATION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-025P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... NORTH VIADUCT (HURRICANE)

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-025P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........025P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................UNKNOWN

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 2-336

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

530 - WASHINGTON (WA)

009 - CLALLAM

161000100

RAVINE

HURRICANE RIDGE ROAD

9500025P0000000

9.65 MI. S. OF JCT. HWY.

16.25 FT (4.95 M)

9.65 (KM PT 15.53)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

04 - TEE BEAM

40.0 FT (12.2 M)

160.0 FT (48.8 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 20.7 TONS (18.8 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-025P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 48°00'42.60"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 123°22'19.00"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 199 MI (199 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 0 - OTHER

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

25.8 FT (7.9 M)

27.3 FT (8.3 M)

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

24.0 FT (7.3 M)

3.0 FT (0.9 M)

3.0 FT (0.9 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

25.8 FT (7.9 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

1.83 FT (0.56 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N

N - Not over waterway.

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

TBD

TBD

TBD

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

Span #1 & #4 - Length 39', Span #2 & #3 - Length 40'; Type 204 (CIP Concrete) https://123�22'19.00 https://48�00'42.60 john.davis

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-025P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-025P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH (AHEAD) TOWARD HURRICANE RIDGE

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #3 - LOOKING NORTH (BACK) TOWARD PORT ANGELES

PHOTO #4 - EAST SIDE LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL VIEW OF SHOULDER LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #7 - GENERAL VIEW OF UNDERSIDE OF SOUTH SPAN (SPAN 1)

LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #8 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW SPAN 2, LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL VERTICAL HAIRLINE CRACKING OF TEE-BEAM

STEMS THROUGHOUT STRUCTURE; EXTERIOR FACE OF WEST BEAM

IN SPAN 2 SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL CRACKING AT DECK TO TEE-BEAM INTERFACE

THROUGHOUT STRUCTURE; WEST BEAM, EXTERIOR FACE, IN SPAN 2

SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SPAN 3, LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #12 - VOID UNDER WEST BEAM IN NORTH SPAN, NEAR PIER 3

PHOTO #13 - CLOSE-UP OF VOID UNDER WEST BEAM IN NORTH SPAN,

NEAR PIER 3

PHOTO #14 - GAP BETWEEN DECK UNDERSIDE AND WEST BEAM IN

NORTH SPAN, NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #15 - CLOSE-UP OF GAP BETWEEN WEST BEAM AND NORTH

ABUTMENT BACKWALL

PHOTO #16 - GAP BETWEEN WEST BEAM AND NORTH ABUTMENT

BACKWALL

PHOTO #17 - CLOSE-UP OF VOID BETWEEN WEST BEAM AND NORTH

ABUTMENT BACKWALL AT STUB COLUMN

PHOTO #18 - GAP BETWEEN DECK UNDERSIDE AND WEST BEAM IN

NORTH SPAN, NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #19 - SPALL IN EXTERIOR FACE OF WEST BEAM IN NORTH

SPAN

PHOTO #20 - GENERAL VIEW OF DECK OVERHANG, LOOKING NORTH

FROM SOUTH SPAN

PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF DECK OVERHANG, LOOKING SOUTH

FROM NORTH SPAN

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT (ABUTMENT 1)

PHOTO #23 - SOUTH ABUTMENT CAP UNDERMINED FULL LENGTH

PHOTO #24 - DRAINAGE PIPE COMING FROM WEST SIDE THROUGH

RETAINING WALL IN SOUTH SPAN (SPAN 1), LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #25 - GENERAL VIEW PIER 1 NORTH FACE

PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER 1, SOUTH FACE SHOWN

PHOTO #27 - CLOSE-UP VIEW PIER 1 SOUTH FACE; NOTE VERTICAL

CRACKS

PHOTO #28 - GENERAL VIEW PIER 2, SOUTH FACE

PHOTO #29 - GENERAL VIEW PIER 2, SOUTH FACE; NOTE FORMWORK

BETWEEN DIAPHRAGMS ON BEARING SEATS

PHOTO #30 - DEBRIS ON PIER 2 CAP

PHOTO #31 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER 3, SOUTH FACE SHOWN

PHOTO #32 - GENERAL VIEW PIER 3, NORTH FACE SHOWN

PHOTO #33 - DRAINAGE PIPE COMING FROM WEST SIDE THROUGH

RETAINING WALL IN NORTH SPAN (SPAN 4), LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #34 - CLOSE-UP VIEW, CLOGGED DRAINAGE PIPE COMING

FROM WEST SIDE THROUGH RETAINING WALL IN NORTH SPAN (SPAN

4)

PHOTO #35 - GENERAL VIEW NORTH ABUTMENT (ABUTMENT 2), SOUTH

FACE LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #36 - NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL AND STUB COLUMN; NOTE

UNDERMINING OF COLUMN AND VOID IN NORTH BACKWALL

PHOTO #37 - UP TO 14" UNDERMINING OF STUB COLUMN IN NORTH

ABUTMENT BACKWALL

PHOTO #38 - CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN NORTH ABUTMENT AT

INTERFACE WITH EAST RETAINING WALL

PHOTO #39 - GENERAL VIEW OF RETAINING WALL AT EAST SIDE OF

NORTH APPROACH; NOTE VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #40 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST SIDE PARAPET, LOOKING

SOUTH

PHOTO #41 - SPALLING OF PARAPET NEAR NORTH END

PHOTO #42 - MISALIGNED PARAPET AT NORTH ABUTMENT, LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #43 - VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING IN PARAPET;

CRACK NEAR NORTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #44 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF JOINT FILLER; JOINT OVER

CENTER PIER (PIER 2) SHOWN

PHOTO #45 - SPALLING OF PARAPET AT SOUTHEAST CORNER

PHOTO #46 - NORTH APPROACH