BIR_9500-008P-2019.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2) Olym Bridge Preservation
Solicitation number
69056722B000002
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation is for bridge preservation work at multiple locations within Olympic National Park in Washington State. The work includes repairing and rehabilitating deteriorated concrete on bridges, including cleaning and sealing deck surfaces, replacing damaged expansion joints, and repairing cracks. The solicitation is a firm fixed-price contract to be awarded through sealed competitive bidding. The anticipated award date is in September 2019, with work to be completed by November 2020. The solicitation was issued by the Federal Highway Administration on behalf of the National Park Service.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bid Tabulation_WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2).pdf PDF
BidSum_WA NPS BP OLYM 2019(2).pdf PDF
Amendment A002.pdf PDF
QA_11-29-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment A001.pdf PDF
QA_11-22-2022.pdf PDF
QA_11-16-2022.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-006P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-019P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-009P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-023P-2019.pdf PDF
FLH Bridge oversized or overload vehicle permit request form Oct 2018.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-060P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-050P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-052P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-061P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-051P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-007P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-026P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-003P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-020P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-049S-2019.pdf PDF
olym201902_plans.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-062P-2019.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-022P-2019.pdf PDF
IFB OLYM Bridge Preservation.pdf PDF
BIR_9500-025P-2019.pdf PDF
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9500-008P

DICKEY RIVER BRIDGE (MORA) INSPECTION DATE: 8/21/19

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NONE

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... ONP 2177 / RG2240

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2003-APPROACHES RESURFACED

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

224.0 FT (68.3 M)

88.0 FT (26.8 M)

30.5 FT (9.3 M)

24.0 FT (7.3 M)

N/A

0 °

NO

LOCATION

OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 11.90 (KM PT 19.15)

STATE: ................................. WASHINGTON LOCATION: FROM HWY. 101, 7.8 MI. WEST ON HWY.

110; TURN RIGHT ONTO MORA ROAD; 4.1 MI. TO FACILITY CARRIED: ............ RIALTO BEACH ROAD

BRIDGE.

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. DICKEY RIVER

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete box girder bridge is in fair condition overall due to widespread cracking of the superstructure concrete.

To help reduce the rate of deterioration, the deck surface should be cleaned and sealed with a silane or siloxane sealant. The condition of the superstructure will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

Other problems include moderate to heavy submerged debris accumulation at the west pier, a missing nut from a connection at the west end of the north railing, and pack rust with section loss at the rail expansion joints.

Additionally, the inspection team noticed that all trimmed vegetation (small trees, berry bushes, etc.) in the proximity of the abutments is often left in place; the accumulated debris and untrimmed vegetation makes it difficult to access the end spans underside and it is a potential tripping hazard.

Corrective measures should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. HENSLEY, D. LEHMANN

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JORDAN HENSLEY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7910

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/25/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-008P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

61.4 REMOVE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT WEST PIER. 1 LS

222.9 REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH CROWDING BRIDGE CORNERS. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.1 CLEAN AND SEAL DECK SURFACE WITH APPROVED

SILANE/SILOXANE SEALANT TO PREVENT WATER INTRUSION.

1 LS

58.6 REPLACE NUT MISSING FROM BASE PLATE AT NORTHWEST

RAILING END.

1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... TBD

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis Sticky Note Marked set by john.davis john.davis

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9500-008P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal 5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 6 ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

F1. DECK SLAB

N2. EXPANSION JOINTS

N3. WEARING SURFACE

G4. RIDEABILITY

G5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

G6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

G7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

G8. UTILITIES

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

N10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 5

N1. BEARING DEVICES

F2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

N3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

N5. TRUSSES

N6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

N7. PAINT

N8. FASCIA(E)

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

G10. ALIGNMENT

N11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

58.1 MODERATE (UP TO 0.08"W) TRANSVERSE AND DIAGONAL CRACKING

THROUGHOUT DECK SURFACE. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING IN

DECK SIDES, MAINLY AT PIERS AND END SPANS, WITH HEAVY

EFFLORESCENCE. CONCENTRATED AREAS OF WIDESPREAD

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH MODERATE

EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS AT PIERS.

AREAS OF MINOR MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN

SOUTH DECK OVERHANG IN EAST SPAN. MINOR ABRASION OF

DECK SURFACE WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE. RANDOM MINOR

POPOUTS IN DECK.

MINOR SCRAPES ON GUARD ANGLE AT DECK ENDS.

58.5, 222.6 SIDEWALK ON SOUTH SIDE OF BRIDGE, CURB ON NORTH SIDE;

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING. MODERATE TRANSVERSE AND

LONGITUDINAL CRACKING AND DELAMINATION OF APPROACH

SIDEWALKS. UP TO 3" OF APPROACH SIDEWALK SETTLEMENT AT

BRIDGE ENDS; UP TO 5" DROP-OFF AT SIDEWALK ENDS.

OPEN JOINTS IN SIDEWALK AND CURB WITH MODERATE

VEGETATION GROWTH IN JOINTS.

ASPHALT TRANSITIONS AT BRIDGE ENDS TO ALLEVIATE

SETTLEMENT OF APPROACHES; 1/2" SETTLEMENT REMAINS AT

WEST APPROACH HOWEVER.

58.6 WEATHERING STEEL BRIDGE RAILINGS. NUT MISSING FROM BASE

PLATE AT NORTHWEST RAILING END. MINOR WIDE SPREAD PITTING

IN RAILS AND SUPPORTS. PACK RUST AND SECTION LOSS IN RAIL

EXPANSION JOINTS.

58.7 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES. BOX GIRDER

DRAINS ARE CLEAR.

BIRDS NOTED ENTERING BOX GIRDER DRAINS IN EAST SPAN.

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS N

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11. SLOPE PROTECTION N

12. OTHER N

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G

14. PILE BENTS N

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

16. FOUNDATIONS N

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

19. OTHER N

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 6

G G N F N

LOW

SUFF

16 FT.

MUD, SAND

222. APPROACHES 6

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G G F F F N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.2 WIDESPREAD MODERATE (UP TO .03"W) TRANSVERSE AND

LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH LEAKAGE AND OCCASIONAL

EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER;

SOME CRACKS EXTEND INTO SIDES OF BOX GIRDER. MINOR RUST

STAINING IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS ON UNDERSIDE.

MINOR VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING (UP TO 0.013"W) IN BOX

GIRDER WEBS, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR HORIZONTAL

CRACK (0.02"W) IN SOUTH SIDE OF BOX GIRDER AT CONSTRUCTION

JOINT WITH DECK, EAST END. CRACK GAGE MOUNTED ON NORTH

SIDE OF BOX GIRDER NEAR EAST ABUTMENT IS BROKEN.

MINOR SPALLING ALONG BOX GIRDER HAUNCH AT EAST ABUTMENT

BEARING SEAT.

60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST

ABUTMENT BACKWALL, NORTH SIDE.

60.9 AREAS OF MINOR EROSION OF BOTH ABUTMENT SLOPES. AREAS

OF EROSION AND UNDERMINING ON BOTH SIDES OF BOTH

ABUTMENTS HAVE PREVIOUSLY BEEN REPAIRED WITH CONCRETE;

MINOR DETERIORATION OF CONCRETE AT EAST ABUTMENT. AREA

OF MINOR UNDERMINING REMAINS AT SOUTH END OF EAST

BACKWALL.

60.13 MINOR SCALING OF PIER WALLS AT WATERLINE.

60.17 MINOR SCOUR ALONG PIERS.

61.2 MINOR EROSION OF CHANNEL BANKS UPSTREAM AND

DOWNSTREAM OF STRUCTURE. MODERATE DRIFT ACCUMULATION

ABOUT WEST PIER.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 LOGS AND LARGE DOWNED TREES ALONG RIVER BANKS AND IN

UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL.

61.7 TIDAL ZONE WATER FLOW.

222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS.

MINOR DAMAGE TO NORTHEAST OBJECT MARKER.

222.8 LIMITED VERTICAL SIGHT DISTANCE (BRIDGE IS ON CREST

VERTICAL CURVE).

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

36.A NORTH RAIL AND CURB ARE OF SUBSTANDARD HEIGHT.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9500-008P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 49 44 83 75

HS 66 60 111 101

TYPE 3 65 59 108 98

TYPE 3S2 75 68 126 114

TYPE 3-3 87 79 145 132

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 8/16

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: GIRDER WEB

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-008P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 530 - WASHINGTON (WA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... DICKEY RIVER BRIDGE (MORA) (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - CLALLAM

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9500-008P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 115 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... DICKEY RIVER

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........008P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. RIALTO BEACH ROAD

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 9500008P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ FROM HWY. 101, 7.8 MI. WE

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ONP 2177 (11) MILE POINT: .............................11.90 (KM PT 19.15)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... RG2240 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

88.0 FT (26.8 M)

224.0 FT (68.3 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 66.0 TONS (59.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 8/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9500-008P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 47°55'17.40"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 124°37'10.00"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 199 MI (199 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

24.0 FT (7.3 M)

30.5 FT (9.3 M)

24.0 FT (7.3 M)

20.0 FT (6.1 M)

2.0 FT (0.6 M)

2.0 FT (0.6 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

24.0 FT (7.3 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

4 - STEEL

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.42 FT (0.74 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

TBD

TBD

TBD

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2003-APPROACHES RESURFACED

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

SPAN #1 & #3 - LENGTH 65.8', SPAN #2 - LENGTH 88'; TYPE 205 (CONC. BOX GRD.)

https://124�37'10.00 https://47�55'17.40 john.davis

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9500-008P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9500-008P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST (AHEAD)

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - LOOKING EAST (BACK) TOWARD SR 110

PHOTO #4 - NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST TOWARD SR 110

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL CRACKING AND ABRASION THROUGHOUT DECK

SURFACE; WEST SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING THROUGHOUT BRIDGE

DECK; WEST SPAN SHOW

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL ABRASION THROUGHOUT DECK SURFACE; EAST

SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF EAST SPAN LOOKING

WEST

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF EAST VIEW LOOKING

WEST; NOTE TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN

CONCRETE BOX GIRDER

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL CRACKING AND MOISTURE AROUND BOX

DRAINAGE IN DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF CONCRETE BOX GIRDER;

SOUTH SIDE NEAR PIER #1 SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND

MOISTURE AROUND BOX DRAINAGE IN DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF

CONCRETE BOX GIRDER; EAST SPAN SOUTH OVERHANG SHOWN

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH MOISTURE

STAINING ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER; NORTH SIDE EAST SPAN

SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON OUTSIDE

OF CONCRETE BOX GIRDER AND IN OVERHANG; SOUTH SIDE OVER

PIER #1 SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON OUTSIDE

OF CONCRETE BOX GIRDER AND IN OVERHANG; SOUTH SIDE OVER

PIER #2 SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING

WEST

PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE

THROUGHOUT UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER; CENTER SPAN NEAR PIER

#2 SHOWN

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF WEST SPAN, LOOKING

EAST TOWARD PIER #2

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN

DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF CONCRETE BOX GIRDER; MIDSPAN OF WEST

SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN CONCRETE BOX GIRDER; MIDSPAN WEST

SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS WITH MOISTURE

STAINING ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER; WEST SPAN,

DOWNSTREAM SIDE NEAR ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE IN UPSTREAM SIDE OF CONCRETE BOX

GIRDER;WEST SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #24 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING ALONG BOX GIRDER

HAUNCH AT EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #25 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW NORTH OVERHANG,

MIDSPAN, LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #26 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW SOUTH OVERHANG,

LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #27 - GENERAL VIEW ABUTMENT #1, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #28 - GENERAL VIEW EAST FACE PIER #1

PHOTO #29 - TYPICAL ABRASION AT WATERLINE ON PIERS; NORTH

SIDE PIER #1 SHOWN

PHOTO #30 - GENERAL VIEW WEST FACE PIER #2

PHOTO #31 - GENERAL VIEW EAST FACE PIER #2; NOTE DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION AT NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE OF PIER

PHOTO #32 - TIMBER DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT NORTH (UPSTREAM)

SIDE PIER #2

PHOTO #33 - TYPICAL ABRASION AT WATERLINE ON PIERS; WEST FACE

PIER #2 SHOWN

PHOTO #34 - GENERAL VIEW ABUTMENT #2, LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #35 - GENERAL VIEW OF CURBLINE AND RAILING; NORTH SIDE

OF BRIDGE LOOKING WEST; NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN

CURBLINE

PHOTO #36 - TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH IN SIDEWALK JOINTS;

EAST SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #37 - TYPICAL RUST AND SECTION LOSS AT JOINTS IN RAILS;

SOUTH RAIL AT MIDSPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #38 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF SECTION LOSS AT RAIL JOINTS;

SOUTH RAIL MIDSPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #39 - MISSING NUT FROM BASE PLATE AT NORTHWEST

RAILING END

PHOTO #40 - TYPICAL SETTLEMENT IN APPROACH SIDEWALKS AT

BRIDGE ENDS; EAST END SHOWN; NOTE VEGETATION IN JOINT

BETWEEN APPROACH AND BRIDGE SIDEWALK

PHOTO #41 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING AND DELAMINATION

OF APPROACH SIDEWALKS; EAST APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #42 - TYPICAL SETTLEMENT AT END OF APPROACH SIDEWALK

AT BRIDGE ENDS; WEST END SHOWN

PHOTO #43 - TYPICAL SETTLEMENT OF APPROACH SIDEWALK AT

BRIDGE ENDS; EAST END SHOWN

PHOTO #44 - HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ENCROACHES ON ALL

FOUR CORNERS OF BRIDGE; SOUTHWEST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #45 - HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ENCROACHES ON ALL

FOUR CORNERS OF BRIDGE; NORTHWEST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #46 - EAST APPROACH LOOKING TOWARD SR 110

PHOTO #47 - WEST APPROACH

PHOTO #48 - GENERAL CONDITION OF EAST APPROACH JOINT

LOOKING NORTH; NOTE SETTLEMENT OF APPROACH PAVEMENT

PHOTO #49 - GENERAL CONDITION OF WEST APPROACH JOINT

LOOKING NORTH; NOTE SETTLEMENT OF APPROACH PAVEMENT

PHOTO #50 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING NORTH (UPSTREAM)

PHOTO #51 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM)

PHOTO #52 - LOOKING SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM UNDERSIDE OF

BRIDGE

PHOTO #53 - HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH AT NORTHEAST

EMBANKMENT

PHOTO #54 - HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH AT SOUTHEAST

EMBANKMENT

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .