BIP_STR 5460-196P_Redacted.pdf

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-196P

FOOTHILLS PARKWAY CULVERT #3 INSPECTION DATE: 1/23/19

CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ........ CONCRETE NO. OF BARRELS:

FOUNDATION: ....................... SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L BARREL LENGTH: ............... 57 FT (17 M)

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ... 11.3 FT (3.4 M) SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 27 °

MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ............ 11.3 FT (3.4 M) YEAR BUILT:

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: .......... 000000000000 / NONE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

NPS ROAD CLASS: ............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ....... 2011 - NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 3.50 (KM PT 5.63)

STATE: .................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 3.5 MI FROM U.S. ROUTE 129. AT POST

#8.FACILITY CARRIED: ............. FOOTHILLS PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: ... STREAM

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This one barrel concrete culvert is in good condition overall. Problems include several trees growing along the south headwall and wingwalls and a fallen tree lying across the south wingwalls, heavy soil accumulation with vegetation growth and cut trees at both aprons and in channel, and minor delamination and spalling with exposed rebar due to insufficient concrete cover on the barrel.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M. R. PUTALLAZ, N. KHANHANSUK (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL R. PUTALLAZ, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 7/9/19

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-196P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

62.3,4 REMOVE TREES GROWING ALONG SOUTH HEADWALL AND WINGWALLS AND

FALLEN TREE LYING ACROSS SOUTH WINGWALLS.

1 LS

61.4, 62.5 REMOVE SOIL, VEGETATION GROWTH, AND CUT TREES FROM CULVERT APRONS

AND CHANNEL.

1 LS

62.1 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR ON BARREL AND COAT WITH APPROVED SEALANT. 8 SF

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-196P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.

AVG. CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G G F

11 FT.

LOW

SUFF

N

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

62. CULVERT 7

1. BARREL(S)

2. FOOTINGS

3. HEADWALLS

4. WINGWALLS

5. DEBRIS AND/OR SILT

6. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

7. SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION

8. ADEQUACY OF COVER

9. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

10. ROADWAY SURFACE

11. RIDEABILITY

12. OTHER

G N G G F G G G G G G N

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N G G G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

SILT, STONES

61.4, 62.5 HEAVY SOIL AND VEGETATION ACCUMULATION ON BOTH APRONS.

HEAVY ACCUMULATION OF CUT AND FALLEN TREES IN CHANNEL AT

BOTH ENDS, EXTENDING ONTO APRONS.

62.1 MODERATE SCALING AND CRACKING OF BARREL FLOOR AND

APRONS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF BARREL WALLS IN

SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MINOR DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF

BARREL WITH EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE

COVER; BOTH ENDS OF WEST WALL AND NEAR SOUTH END OF

EAST WALL AND TOP SLAB UNDERSIDE. MINOR LEAKAGE FROM

WEST WALL NEAR SOUTH END. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT JUNCTION OF EAST BARREL WALL AND

SOUTHEAST WINGWALL. MINOR LEAKAGE FROM LONGITUDINAL

CONSTRUCTION JOINT IN TOP SLAB UNDERSIDE NEAR SOUTH END.

MINOR MAP CRACKING OF TOP SLAB UNDERSIDE, SOME WITH

EFFLORESCENCE IN HAUNCH.

62.3,4 MOSS GROWTH ON HEADWALLS AND WINGWALLS. SEVERAL

TREES (SMALL TO LARGE) GROWING JUST BEHIND SOUTH

HEADWALL AND WINGWALLS. FALLEN TREES LYING ACROSS TOP

OF SOUTH WINGWALLS. MINOR SPALL ON TOP EDGE OF

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. MINOR CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTHWEST WINGWALL, MAINLY ALONG TOP.

MINOR TO MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH OVERHANGING

WINGWALLS.

62.9, 222.3 MINOR CHECKING AND SPLINTERING OF STEEL-BACKED TIMBER

RAILINGS. BENT BOLT AT RAIL POST AT CENTERLINE OF STREAM

ON NORTH SIDE LIKELY DUE TO FALLEN TREE; LOOSE NUT

TIGHTENED SINCE LAST INSPECTION.

222.4 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT IN NORTH

LANE AT WEST APPROACH.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required. 3 OF 17

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-196P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 27 24 45 41

TYPE 3 26 24 44 40

TYPE 3S2 42 38 70 64

TYPE 3-3 51 46 85 77

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE AND

CONDITION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-196P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... FOOTHILLS PARKWAY CULVERT #3 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............2 - CULVERT (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - BLOUNT

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-196P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 24 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... STREAM

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........196P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FOOTHILLS PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460196P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 3.5 MI FROM U.S. ROUTE 12

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: .............................3.50 (KM PT 5.63)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

19 - CULVERT

11.3 FT (3.4 M)

11.3 FT (3.4 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.0 TONS (40.8 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 1/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-196P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°35'55.10"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°59'09.50"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 40 MI (64 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

29.0 FT (8.8 M)

21.0 FT (6.4 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

27 °

NO

27.6 FT (8.4 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

7 - TIMBER

3 - SIMPLE RAIL (joints at each

2.25 FT (0.69 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: .........N

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: ..............N

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT:

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1111

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2011 - NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-196P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-196P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD U.S. ROUTE 129

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - BENT BOLT AT RAIL POST AT

CENTERLINE OF STREAM ON NORTH SIDE

PHOTO #5 - LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF

ASPHALT PAVEMENT IN NORTH LANE AT WEST

APPROACH

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #7 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST WALL OF

BARREL

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF

BARREL WALLS; EAST WALL NEAR SOUTH

END SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL DELAMINATION AND

SPALLING OF BARREL WITH EXPOSED REBAR;

WEST WALL NEAR NORTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL DELAMINATION AND

SPALLING OF BARREL WITH EXPOSED REBAR;

EAST WALL NEAR SOUTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF BARREL WITH

EXPOSED REBAR; TOP SLAB UNDERSIDE NEAR SOUTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT

JUNCTION OF EAST BARREL WALL AND SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #13 - LEAKAGE FROM LONGITUDINAL

CONSTRUCTION JOINT IN TOP SLAB

UNDERSIDE NEAR SOUTH END

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL MAP CRACKING OF TOP

SLAB UNDERSIDE WITH EFFLORESCENCE;

EAST HAUNCH NEAR SOUTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - TREES GROWING BEHIND SOUTH HEADWALL AND

WINGWALLS; ALSO NOTE FALLEN TREES LYING ACROSS TOP OF

SOUTH WINGWALLS

PHOTO #16 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTHWEST

WINGWALL; ALSO NOTE TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH AND OVERHANGING

VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON APRONS AND IN

CHANNEL; UPSTREAM APRON AND CHANNEL SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON APRONS AND IN

CHANNEL; DOWNSTREAM APRON AND CHANNEL SHOWN; ALSO NOTE

FALLEN TREES LYING ACROSS TOP OF SOUTH WINGWALLS

PHOTO #19 - LOOKING UPSTREAM THROUGH BARREL

PHOTO #20 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH BARREL