BIP_STR 5460-194P_Redacted.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-22-R-000001
About this file
This document includes a field inspection report and federal contract opportunity. The field inspection report provides details of a culvert inspection for Culvert #1 on Foothills Parkway in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The report documents the culvert's characteristics, condition assessment, recommendations and cost estimates, load rating, photographs, and other structural details.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation for proposals from small businesses only for project NP FOOT 8G16, 8H10. The work includes full depth reclamation of sections of Foothills Parkway, replacing signs and markings, bridge maintenance, drainage structure repairs, guardrail replacement, and other miscellaneous work. The project will be split into multiple schedules with a total cost expected to exceed $10 million. Proposals are due by the date specified in the solicitation to be issued on or about October 6, 2021. Offerors must demonstrate experience on similar projects. The solicitation provides additional qualification requirements and is available on SAM.gov.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-194P
FOOTHILLS PARKWAY CULVERT #1 INSPECTION DATE: 1/23/19
CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ........ CONCRETE NO. OF BARRELS:
FOUNDATION: ....................... SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L BARREL LENGTH: ............... 38 FT (12 M)
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ... 12.0 FT (3.7 M) SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ............ 12.0 FT (3.7 M) YEAR BUILT:
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: .......... 000000000000 / NONE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
NPS ROAD CLASS: ............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ....... 2011-ROADWAY REPAVED.
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 2.10 (KM PT 3.38)
STATE: .................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 2.1 MI FROM U.S. ROUTE 129.
FACILITY CARRIED: ............. FOOTHILLS PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: ... STREAM
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This single-barrel concrete box culvert is in good condition overall and has only minor problems at this time.
Problems include an accumulation of soil, debris, and vegetation on the culvert aprons; scour exposing the floor of the downstream apron; and exposed rebar due to insufficient concrete cover on the barrel walls.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: M.R. PUTALLAZ, N. KHANHANSUK (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
MICHAEL R. PUTALLAZ, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 7/9/19
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-194P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
62.5 REMOVE SOIL, DEBRIS, AND VEGETATION GROWTH FROM CULVERT APRONS. 1 LS
62.6 REPAIR SCOUR AT DOWNSTREAM APRON FLOOR WITH ENGINEERED RIPRAP. 2 CY
62.1 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR ON BARREL WALLS AND COAT WITH APPROVED
SEALANT.
5 SF
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-194P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.
AVG. CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL 7
G G G F
14 FT.
LOW
SUFF
N
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
62. CULVERT 7
1. BARREL(S)
2. FOOTINGS
3. HEADWALLS
4. WINGWALLS
5. DEBRIS AND/OR SILT
6. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
7. SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION
8. ADEQUACY OF COVER
9. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
10. ROADWAY SURFACE
11. RIDEABILITY
12. OTHER
G N G G F F G G G G G N
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
N N G G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
SILT, ROCK
61.2 MINOR SLOUGHING OF CHANNEL BANKS.
61.4, 62.5 MODERATE DEBRIS AND SOIL ACCUMULATION ON CONCRETE
APRONS AT BOTH ENDS WITH TREE AND VEGETATION GROWTH.
62.1 MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING OF BARREL FLOOR AND APRONS.
EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER ON
BOTH BARREL WALLS NEAR BOTTOM, SOUTH END. MINOR
VERTICAL CRACKING OF BARREL WALLS. MINOR MOISTURE
SEEPAGE FROM LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT IN TOP SLAB
UNDERSIDE.
62.3,4 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON HEADWALLS AND
WINGWALLS IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS; WIDESPREAD MOSS
GROWTH. MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH OVERHANGS HEADWALLS
AND WINGWALLS.
TREES AND VEGETATION GROWING BEHIND WINGWALLS.
62.6 MODERATE SCOUR AT DOWNSTREAM APRON END HAS EXPOSED
UP TO 13" OF CONCRETE FLOOR.
62.9, 222.3 MINOR CHECKING AND WEATHERING OF STEEL-BACKED TIMBER
RAILINGS. MINOR ROTATION OF ONE SECTION OF NORTH RAIL
NEAR EAST END OF EAST APPROACH LIKELY DUE TO FALLEN TREE.
222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT
PAVEMENT AT BOTH APPROACHES.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required. 3 OF 16
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-194P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 27 24 45 41
TYPE 3 25 23 42 38
TYPE 3S2 40 36 67 61
TYPE 3-3 49 44 82 74
DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE AND
CONDITION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-194P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... FOOTHILLS PARKWAY CULVERT #1 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............2 - CULVERT (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - BLOUNT
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-194P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 24 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... STREAM
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........194P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FOOTHILLS PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460194P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 2.1 MI FROM U.S. ROUTE 12
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: .............................2.10 (KM PT 3.38)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
19 - CULVERT
12.0 FT (3.7 M)
12.0 FT (3.7 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.0 TONS (40.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 1/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-194P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°35'01.40"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°59'53.80"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 40 MI (64 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
29.0 FT (8.8 M)
21.0 FT (6.4 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
0 °
NO
28.5 FT (8.7 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
8 - TIMBER/OTHER
3 - SIMPLE RAIL (joints at each
2.25 FT (0.69 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: .........N
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: ..............N
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT:
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1111
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N
5 - Stable; scour within limits of
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2011-ROADWAY REPAVED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-194P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-194P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD U.S. ROUTE 129
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF
ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT; WEST APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - ROTATION OF TIMBER RAIL
SECTION ON NORTH SIDE NEAR EAST END OF
EAST APPROACH
PHOTO #6 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW
LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL SCALING OF BARREL FLOOR
PHOTO #8 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST WALL OF BARREL
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL SPALLING OF BARREL
WALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR; WEST WALL
NEAR SOUTH END SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF
BARREL WALLS; EAST WALL NEAR NORTH
END SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - MOISTURE SEEPAGE FROM
LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT IN TOP
SLAB UNDERSIDE
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS;
NORTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN; NOTE
TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION
ON CONCRETE APRONS WITH TREE AND
VEGETATION GROWTH; NORTH END SHOWN
PHOTO #14 - SCOUR AT DOWNSTREAM APRON
END WITH EXPOSED FLOOR
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL SLOUGHING OF CHANNEL BANKS;
DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS SHOWN
PHOTO #16 - LOOKING UPSTREAM THROUGH BARREL
PHOTO #17 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH BARREL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .