BIP_STR 5460-027P_Redacted.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Solicitation number
693C73-22-R-000001
Issued by

About this file

This federal solicitation requests proposals for construction services for the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Project NP FOOT 8G16, 8H10. Work includes full depth reclamation of sections of Foothills Parkway, parking areas, and pull-offs; establishing roadside ditches and reconditioning paved waterways; replacing signs and pavement markings; turf establishment of disturbed areas; installing traffic loop detectors; bridge maintenance repairs; removing and resetting stone curb and sidewalk; and relocating ADA accessibility ramps; replacing and repairing drainage structures; deep patch embankment repairs; replacing sections of steel back timber guardrails and other miscellaneous work. The project cost is expected to exceed $10 million and will be split into multiple schedules. Proposals from certified Small Business Concerns only will be accepted, with qualifications related to experience on similar projects required. The proposal due date will be specified on SF 1442 of the solicitation to be issued on or about October 6, 2021. The Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration is the agency.

View the file

Other files

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P

LOOK ROCK PICNIC AREA BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 5/14/18

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 86.0 FT (26.2 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 35.0 FT (10.7 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.6 FT (10.2 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 25.6 FT (7.8 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 8G4 / 1716A SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2010 - CRACKS SEALED IN WEARING SURFACE AT ABUTMENTS.

2011 - NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY.

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 7.83 (KM PT 12.60)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 7.9 MI TO U.S. ROUTE 129

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ FOOTHILLS PARKWAY (WEST)

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LOOK ROCK ACCESS ROAD

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete slab structure is generally in good condition with only minor problems at this time. Problems include missing object markers at the bridge corners and along the underpass roadway, missing vertical clearance signs along the underpass roadway, vegetation growth in joints between paving blocks at abutment slopes and sides of west abutment, and debris accumulation and vegetation growth on sidewalk joints and along curblines.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: R. SILVESTRY, E. JOHNSON

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

REINALDO SILVESTRY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6251

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 11/8/18

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS AND

ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY. INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS FOR

UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

10 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

2. EXPANSION JOINTS

3. WEARING SURFACE

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

1. BEARING DEVICES N

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS N

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S) G

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS N

5. TRUSSES N

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING N

7. PAINT N

8. FASCIA(E) G

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G

10. ALIGNMENT G

11. OTHER N

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 6

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

2. PILE BENTS

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

5. FOUNDATIONS

6. WINGWALLS

7. WEEP HOLES

8. EXPANSION JOINTS

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

11. SLOPE PROTECTION

12. OTHER

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14. PILE BENTS

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16. FOUNDATIONS

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19. OTHER

G N G G G G G N G N

F N G N N G G N G G G N

G N G N G G N

58.1, 59.3

58.5,7

58.6

60.1

60.6

60.7

60.9,11

60.15

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

MINOR TO MODERATE LEAKING AND EFFLORESCENCE ALONG

LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT ON DECK UNDERSIDE.

MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ELSEWHERE ON DECK

UNDERSIDE AND ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT EAST PIER

CAP.

MINOR MAP CRACKING OF NORTH SIDEWALK WITH

EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND

VEGETATION GROWTH ON SIDEWALK JOINTS AND ALONG

CURBLINES.

APPROXIMATELY 2'-0" LONG SPALL ON WEST END OF NORTH

PARAPET DUE TO INADEQUATE ROOM FOR EXPANSION. MINOR

CRACKING ON PARAPETS WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN SEVERAL

OTHER AREAS.

PATCHED AREA AT SOUTH SIDE OF EAST BREASTWALL (4' LONG +/-)

DETERIORATED AND SPALLED.

FIVE FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACKS AT EAST ABUTMENT, SOME

WITH EFFLORESCENCE.

FOUR FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACKS AT WEST ABUTMENT.

MODERATE LEAKAGE THROUGH EXPANSION JOINTS AT

SOUTHWEST, NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST BREASTWALL

CORNERS.

MINOR CRACKING OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS. FRACTURED

MASONRY BLOCKS PRESENT AT ALL WINGWALLS.

MINOR MATERIAL LOSS FROM WEEP HOLES OF BREASTWALLS AT

EAST ABUTMENT.

MINOR EROSION AT SLOPE PAVING. MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH

IN JOINTS BETWEEN PAVING BLOCKS AT ABUTMENT SLOPES.

MINOR CRACKING ON CENTER OF WEST PIER CAP. SPALL WITH

EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF EAST PIER NEAR NORTH

COLUMN. EFFLORESCENCE ON CAP FROM DECK.

222.7 OBJECT MARKERS MISSING AT BRIDGE AND UNDERPASS

APPROACHES. VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS MISSING AT

UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

223.1 RETAINING WALL AT WEST PIER SUPPORTS WALKWAY.

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL 7

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G G N G G N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P

LOOK ROCK PICNIC AREA BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 5/14/18

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61. CHANNEL N

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 24 22 40 36

HS 32 29 53 48

TYPE 3 29 26 49 44

TYPE 3S2 44 40 73 66

TYPE 3-3 57 52 95 86

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 12/15

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: SHEAR

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... LOOK ROCK PICNIC AREA BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - BLOUNT

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-027P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 24 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... LOOK ROCK ACCESS ROAD

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........027P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FOOTHILLS PARKWAY (WES

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460027P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 7.9 MI TO U.S. ROUTE 129

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................8G4 (11) MILE POINT: .............................7.83 (KM PT 12.60)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 1716A (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

01 - SLAB

35.0 FT (10.7 M)

86.0 FT (26.2 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 32.0 TONS (29.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 53.0 TONS (48.1 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°38'14.80"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°56'15.70"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 5.5 FT (1.7 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

25.6 FT (7.8 M)

33.6 FT (10.2 M)

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

20.0 FT (6.1 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

25.6 FT (7.8 M)

2.8 FT (0.9 M)

2.8 FT (0.9 M)

2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

2 - CONCRETE/ALUMINUM

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.00 FT (0.61 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

14.42 FT (4.40 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2010 - CRACKS SEALED IN WEARING SURFACE AT ABUTMENTS.

2011 - NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P

PHOTO #1 - GENERAL VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #2 - NORTH SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH RAILING LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #5 - AREA OF SPALL AT WEST END OF NORTH PARAPET

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHEAST PARAPET

PHOTO #7 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHEAST PARAPET

PHOTO #8 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #10 - FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK AT WEST ABUTMENT

NEAR CENTER OF ABUTMENT

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF WEST SPAN LOOKING

WEST; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CENTERLINE CONSTRUCTION

JOINT

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN; NOTE

EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINT

PHOTO #13 - TRANSVERSE CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

CENTER SPAN SLAB UNDERSIDE NEAR NORTH END

PHOTO #14 - LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB

UNDERSIDE EXTENDING FROM EAST BENT CAP INTO CENTER SPAN

PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST SIDE OF EAST PIER

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE

ON EXTERIOR OF SLABS, NORTHWEST END SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - AREA OF SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT EAST BENT

CAP NEAR NORTH COLUMN

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF EAST SPAN LOOKING

EAST

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT; NOTE VERTICAL

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO #20 - FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK WITH EVIDENCE OF

ACTIVE LEAKAGE NEAR CENTER OF EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #21 - PATCHED AREA AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE EAST

ABUTMENT STARTING TO CRACK AGAIN

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF THE EAST SPAN LOOKING

EAST; NOTE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG

CONSTRUCTION JOINT

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .