BIP_STR 5460-027P_Redacted.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-22-R-000001
About this file
This federal solicitation requests proposals for construction services for the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Project NP FOOT 8G16, 8H10. Work includes full depth reclamation of sections of Foothills Parkway, parking areas, and pull-offs; establishing roadside ditches and reconditioning paved waterways; replacing signs and pavement markings; turf establishment of disturbed areas; installing traffic loop detectors; bridge maintenance repairs; removing and resetting stone curb and sidewalk; and relocating ADA accessibility ramps; replacing and repairing drainage structures; deep patch embankment repairs; replacing sections of steel back timber guardrails and other miscellaneous work. The project cost is expected to exceed $10 million and will be split into multiple schedules. Proposals from certified Small Business Concerns only will be accepted, with qualifications related to experience on similar projects required. The proposal due date will be specified on SF 1442 of the solicitation to be issued on or about October 6, 2021. The Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration is the agency.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P
LOOK ROCK PICNIC AREA BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 5/14/18
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 86.0 FT (26.2 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 35.0 FT (10.7 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.6 FT (10.2 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 25.6 FT (7.8 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 8G4 / 1716A SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2010 - CRACKS SEALED IN WEARING SURFACE AT ABUTMENTS.
2011 - NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY.
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 7.83 (KM PT 12.60)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 7.9 MI TO U.S. ROUTE 129
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ FOOTHILLS PARKWAY (WEST)
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LOOK ROCK ACCESS ROAD
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete slab structure is generally in good condition with only minor problems at this time. Problems include missing object markers at the bridge corners and along the underpass roadway, missing vertical clearance signs along the underpass roadway, vegetation growth in joints between paving blocks at abutment slopes and sides of west abutment, and debris accumulation and vegetation growth on sidewalk joints and along curblines.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: R. SILVESTRY, E. JOHNSON
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
REINALDO SILVESTRY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6251
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 11/8/18
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS AND
ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY. INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS FOR
UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
10 EA
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK
1. DECK SLAB
2. EXPANSION JOINTS
3. WEARING SURFACE
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10. OTHER
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7
1. BEARING DEVICES N
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS N
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S) G
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS N
5. TRUSSES N
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING N
7. PAINT N
8. FASCIA(E) G
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G
10. ALIGNMENT G
11. OTHER N
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 6
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
2. PILE BENTS
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
5. FOUNDATIONS
6. WINGWALLS
7. WEEP HOLES
8. EXPANSION JOINTS
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
11. SLOPE PROTECTION
12. OTHER
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
14. PILE BENTS
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
16. FOUNDATIONS
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19. OTHER
G N G G G G G N G N
F N G N N G G N G G G N
G N G N G G N
58.1, 59.3
58.5,7
58.6
60.1
60.6
60.7
60.9,11
60.15
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
MINOR TO MODERATE LEAKING AND EFFLORESCENCE ALONG
LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT ON DECK UNDERSIDE.
MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ELSEWHERE ON DECK
UNDERSIDE AND ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT EAST PIER
CAP.
MINOR MAP CRACKING OF NORTH SIDEWALK WITH
EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND
VEGETATION GROWTH ON SIDEWALK JOINTS AND ALONG
CURBLINES.
APPROXIMATELY 2'-0" LONG SPALL ON WEST END OF NORTH
PARAPET DUE TO INADEQUATE ROOM FOR EXPANSION. MINOR
CRACKING ON PARAPETS WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN SEVERAL
OTHER AREAS.
PATCHED AREA AT SOUTH SIDE OF EAST BREASTWALL (4' LONG +/-)
DETERIORATED AND SPALLED.
FIVE FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACKS AT EAST ABUTMENT, SOME
WITH EFFLORESCENCE.
FOUR FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACKS AT WEST ABUTMENT.
MODERATE LEAKAGE THROUGH EXPANSION JOINTS AT
SOUTHWEST, NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST BREASTWALL
CORNERS.
MINOR CRACKING OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS. FRACTURED
MASONRY BLOCKS PRESENT AT ALL WINGWALLS.
MINOR MATERIAL LOSS FROM WEEP HOLES OF BREASTWALLS AT
EAST ABUTMENT.
MINOR EROSION AT SLOPE PAVING. MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH
IN JOINTS BETWEEN PAVING BLOCKS AT ABUTMENT SLOPES.
MINOR CRACKING ON CENTER OF WEST PIER CAP. SPALL WITH
EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF EAST PIER NEAR NORTH
COLUMN. EFFLORESCENCE ON CAP FROM DECK.
222.7 OBJECT MARKERS MISSING AT BRIDGE AND UNDERPASS
APPROACHES. VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS MISSING AT
UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
223.1 RETAINING WALL AT WEST PIER SUPPORTS WALKWAY.
9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
N N N G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL 7
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
G G N G G N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P
LOOK ROCK PICNIC AREA BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 5/14/18
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
61. CHANNEL N
1. ALIGNMENT
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 24 22 40 36
HS 32 29 53 48
TYPE 3 29 26 49 44
TYPE 3S2 44 40 73 66
TYPE 3-3 57 52 95 86
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 12/15
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: SHEAR
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... LOOK ROCK PICNIC AREA BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - BLOUNT
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-027P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 24 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... LOOK ROCK ACCESS ROAD
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........027P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FOOTHILLS PARKWAY (WES
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460027P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 7.9 MI TO U.S. ROUTE 129
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................8G4 (11) MILE POINT: .............................7.83 (KM PT 12.60)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 1716A (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
01 - SLAB
35.0 FT (10.7 M)
86.0 FT (26.2 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 32.0 TONS (29.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 53.0 TONS (48.1 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°38'14.80"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°56'15.70"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 5.5 FT (1.7 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
25.6 FT (7.8 M)
33.6 FT (10.2 M)
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
20.0 FT (6.1 M)
5.0 FT (1.5 M)
5.0 FT (1.5 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
0 °
NO
25.6 FT (7.8 M)
2.8 FT (0.9 M)
2.8 FT (0.9 M)
2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET
2 - CONCRETE/ALUMINUM
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
2.00 FT (0.61 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
14.42 FT (4.40 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL:
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2010 - CRACKS SEALED IN WEARING SURFACE AT ABUTMENTS.
2011 - NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-027P
PHOTO #1 - GENERAL VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #2 - NORTH SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH RAILING LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #5 - AREA OF SPALL AT WEST END OF NORTH PARAPET
PHOTO #6 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHEAST PARAPET
PHOTO #7 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHEAST PARAPET
PHOTO #8 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO #9 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #10 - FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK AT WEST ABUTMENT
NEAR CENTER OF ABUTMENT
PHOTO #11 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF WEST SPAN LOOKING
WEST; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CENTERLINE CONSTRUCTION
JOINT
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN; NOTE
EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINT
PHOTO #13 - TRANSVERSE CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
CENTER SPAN SLAB UNDERSIDE NEAR NORTH END
PHOTO #14 - LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB
UNDERSIDE EXTENDING FROM EAST BENT CAP INTO CENTER SPAN
PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST SIDE OF EAST PIER
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE
ON EXTERIOR OF SLABS, NORTHWEST END SHOWN
PHOTO #17 - AREA OF SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT EAST BENT
CAP NEAR NORTH COLUMN
PHOTO #18 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF EAST SPAN LOOKING
EAST
PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT; NOTE VERTICAL
CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND VEGETATION GROWTH
PHOTO #20 - FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK WITH EVIDENCE OF
ACTIVE LEAKAGE NEAR CENTER OF EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #21 - PATCHED AREA AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE EAST
ABUTMENT STARTING TO CRACK AGAIN
PHOTO #22 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF THE EAST SPAN LOOKING
EAST; NOTE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG
CONSTRUCTION JOINT
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .