BIP_STR 5460-195P_Redacted.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Solicitation number
693C73-22-R-000001
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a federal contract opportunity notice for repair and maintenance services on the Foothills Parkway in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The work includes full depth reclamation of roadway sections, drainage structure repairs, signage replacement, guardrail installation, and other miscellaneous construction activities. The project value is estimated to be greater than $10 million and will be split into multiple contract schedules. Proposals from certified small businesses will be accepted with bid documents to be issued on October 6, 2021 and proposals due as specified in the solicitation. Offerors must demonstrate experience on similar projects. The solicitation provides additional qualification requirements and can be found on SAM.gov using the listed number. Annual representations and certifications must be completed on SAM and VETS-4212 on DOL's website. Questions should be sent to the specified email. SAM registration is required for bidding and payment.

View the file

Other files

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P

FOOTHILLS PARKWAY CULVERT #2 INSPECTION DATE: 1/23/19

CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ........ CONCRETE NO. OF BARRELS:

FOUNDATION: ....................... SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L BARREL LENGTH: ............... 37 FT (11 M)

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ... 10.0 FT (3.0 M) SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 14 °

MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ............ 10.0 FT (3.0 M) YEAR BUILT:

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: .......... 000000000000 / NONE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

NPS ROAD CLASS: ............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ....... 2011-ROADWAY REPAVED.

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 2.90 (KM PT 4.67)

STATE: .................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 2.9 MI FROM U.S. ROUTE 129.

FACILITY CARRIED: ............. FOOTHILLS PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: ... STREAM

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This single-barrel concrete box culvert is in good condition overall. Problems include minor spalling with exposed rebar due to insufficient concrete cover on the barrel walls; accumulation of soil, debris, vegetation, and fallen trees on the culvert aprons and floor; and trees growing adjacent to and behind the southwest and northeast wingwalls.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M.R. PUTALLAZ, N. KHANHANSUK (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL R. PUTALLAZ, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 7/9/19

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

62.1 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR ON BARREL WALLS AND COAT WITH APPROVED

SEALANT.

10 SF

61.4, 62.5 REMOVE SOIL, DEBRIS, VEGETATION GROWTH, AND FALLEN TREES FROM

CULVERT APRONS AND FLOOR AND FROM CHANNEL.

1 LS

62.4 REMOVE TREES FROM SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST WINGWALLS. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.

AVG. CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 6

F G G F

10 FT.

LOW

SUFF

N

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

62. CULVERT 7

1. BARREL(S)

2. FOOTINGS

3. HEADWALLS

4. WINGWALLS

5. DEBRIS AND/OR SILT

6. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

7. SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION

8. ADEQUACY OF COVER

9. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

10. ROADWAY SURFACE

11. RIDEABILITY

12. OTHER (APRONS)

G N G G G G G G G G G G

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

SILT, ROCK

61.1 UPSTREAM CHANNEL APPROACHES CULVERT AT 90 DEGREE

ANGLE.

61.2 MINOR SCOUR (UP TO 2", 4" PREVIOUSLY) AT END OF UPSTREAM

APRON.

61.4 HEAVY ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN CHANNEL ON BOTH ENDS OF

CULVERT WITH VEGETATION GROWTH. SEVERAL FALLEN TREES IN

UPSTREAM CHANNEL AT AND ACROSS CULVERT.

62.1 SEVERAL MINOR VERTICAL CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND

POPOUTS ON BARREL WALLS. MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED

REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER ALONG BOTTOM

OF BOTH BARREL WALLS NEAR MID-LENGTH AND ON WEST WALL

NEAR BOTH ENDS; EMBEDDED TIMBER NEAR NORTH END OF WEST

WALL.

62.3,4 MOSS GROWTH ON HEADWALLS AND WINGWALLS.

62.4,5 LARGE TREES GROWING ADJACENT AND BEHIND SOUTHWEST AND

NORTHEAST WINGWALLS.

MINOR TO MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN BARREL.

62.9, 222.3 MINOR CHECKING OF STEEL-BACKED TIMBER RAILINGS.

62.10, 222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT

PAVEMENT OVER STRUCTURE AND ON APPROACHES.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required. 3 OF 16

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 27 24 45 41

TYPE 3 28 25 46 42

TYPE 3S2 44 40 73 66

TYPE 3-3 54 49 89 81

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE AND

CONDITION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... FOOTHILLS PARKWAY CULVERT #2 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............2 - CULVERT (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - BLOUNT

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-195P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 24 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... STREAM

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........195P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FOOTHILLS PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460195P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 2.9 MI FROM U.S. ROUTE 12

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: .............................2.90 (KM PT 4.67)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

19 - CULVERT

10.0 FT (3.0 M)

10.0 FT (3.0 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.0 TONS (40.8 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 1/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°35'30.60"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°59'33.00"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 40 MI (64 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 1

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

28.0 FT (8.5 M)

20.0 FT (6.1 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

14 °

NO

27.9 FT (8.5 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

7 - TIMBER

3 - SIMPLE RAIL (joints at each

2.25 FT (0.69 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: .........N

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: ..............N

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT:

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1111

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2011-ROADWAY REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD U.S. ROUTE 129

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF

ASPHALT PAVEMENT OVER STRUCTURE

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT

ON APPROACHES; WEST APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #7 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST WALL OF

BARREL

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BARREL WALLS;

SOUTH END OF WEST WALL SHOWN; ALSO

NOTE TYPICAL SPALLING WITH EXPOSED

REBAR

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL SPALLING OF BARREL WALLS WITH EXPOSED

REBAR; EAST WALL NEAR MID-LENGTH SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL SPALLING OF BARREL WALLS WITH EXPOSED

REBAR; WEST WALL NEAR MID-LENGTH AND NORTH END SHOWN;

ALSO NOTE EMBEDDED TIMBER

PHOTO #11 - TREE GROWING BEHIND

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #12 - FALLEN TREES ACROSS

UPSTREAM CHANNEL AT CULVERT; NOTE

UPSTREAM CHANNEL APPROACH ANGLE TO

CULVERT

PHOTO #13 - SCOUR AT END OF UPSTREAM APRON

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN CHANNEL AT

CULVERT; NORTH SIDE SHOWN; ALSO NOTE FALLEN TREE ACROSS

CULVERT

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS WITH VEGETATION

GROWTH IN CHANNEL AT CULVERT AND IN BARREL; SOUTH SIDE

SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - LOOKING UPSTREAM THROUGH BARREL

PHOTO #17 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH BARREL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .