BIP_STR 5460-195P_Redacted.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-22-R-000001
About this file
This document contains a federal contract opportunity notice for repair and maintenance services on the Foothills Parkway in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The work includes full depth reclamation of roadway sections, drainage structure repairs, signage replacement, guardrail installation, and other miscellaneous construction activities. The project value is estimated to be greater than $10 million and will be split into multiple contract schedules. Proposals from certified small businesses will be accepted with bid documents to be issued on October 6, 2021 and proposals due as specified in the solicitation. Offerors must demonstrate experience on similar projects. The solicitation provides additional qualification requirements and can be found on SAM.gov using the listed number. Annual representations and certifications must be completed on SAM and VETS-4212 on DOL's website. Questions should be sent to the specified email. SAM registration is required for bidding and payment.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P
FOOTHILLS PARKWAY CULVERT #2 INSPECTION DATE: 1/23/19
CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ........ CONCRETE NO. OF BARRELS:
FOUNDATION: ....................... SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L BARREL LENGTH: ............... 37 FT (11 M)
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ... 10.0 FT (3.0 M) SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 14 °
MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ............ 10.0 FT (3.0 M) YEAR BUILT:
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: .......... 000000000000 / NONE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
NPS ROAD CLASS: ............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ....... 2011-ROADWAY REPAVED.
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 2.90 (KM PT 4.67)
STATE: .................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 2.9 MI FROM U.S. ROUTE 129.
FACILITY CARRIED: ............. FOOTHILLS PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: ... STREAM
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This single-barrel concrete box culvert is in good condition overall. Problems include minor spalling with exposed rebar due to insufficient concrete cover on the barrel walls; accumulation of soil, debris, vegetation, and fallen trees on the culvert aprons and floor; and trees growing adjacent to and behind the southwest and northeast wingwalls.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: M.R. PUTALLAZ, N. KHANHANSUK (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
MICHAEL R. PUTALLAZ, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 7/9/19
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
62.1 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR ON BARREL WALLS AND COAT WITH APPROVED
SEALANT.
10 SF
61.4, 62.5 REMOVE SOIL, DEBRIS, VEGETATION GROWTH, AND FALLEN TREES FROM
CULVERT APRONS AND FLOOR AND FROM CHANNEL.
1 LS
62.4 REMOVE TREES FROM SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST WINGWALLS. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.
AVG. CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL 6
F G G F
10 FT.
LOW
SUFF
N
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
62. CULVERT 7
1. BARREL(S)
2. FOOTINGS
3. HEADWALLS
4. WINGWALLS
5. DEBRIS AND/OR SILT
6. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
7. SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION
8. ADEQUACY OF COVER
9. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
10. ROADWAY SURFACE
11. RIDEABILITY
12. OTHER (APRONS)
G N G G G G G G G G G G
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
N N N G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
SILT, ROCK
61.1 UPSTREAM CHANNEL APPROACHES CULVERT AT 90 DEGREE
ANGLE.
61.2 MINOR SCOUR (UP TO 2", 4" PREVIOUSLY) AT END OF UPSTREAM
APRON.
61.4 HEAVY ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN CHANNEL ON BOTH ENDS OF
CULVERT WITH VEGETATION GROWTH. SEVERAL FALLEN TREES IN
UPSTREAM CHANNEL AT AND ACROSS CULVERT.
62.1 SEVERAL MINOR VERTICAL CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND
POPOUTS ON BARREL WALLS. MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED
REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER ALONG BOTTOM
OF BOTH BARREL WALLS NEAR MID-LENGTH AND ON WEST WALL
NEAR BOTH ENDS; EMBEDDED TIMBER NEAR NORTH END OF WEST
WALL.
62.3,4 MOSS GROWTH ON HEADWALLS AND WINGWALLS.
62.4,5 LARGE TREES GROWING ADJACENT AND BEHIND SOUTHWEST AND
NORTHEAST WINGWALLS.
MINOR TO MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN BARREL.
62.9, 222.3 MINOR CHECKING OF STEEL-BACKED TIMBER RAILINGS.
62.10, 222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT
PAVEMENT OVER STRUCTURE AND ON APPROACHES.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required. 3 OF 16
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 27 24 45 41
TYPE 3 28 25 46 42
TYPE 3S2 44 40 73 66
TYPE 3-3 54 49 89 81
DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE AND
CONDITION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... FOOTHILLS PARKWAY CULVERT #2 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............2 - CULVERT (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - BLOUNT
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-195P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 24 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... STREAM
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........195P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FOOTHILLS PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460195P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 2.9 MI FROM U.S. ROUTE 12
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: .............................2.90 (KM PT 4.67)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
19 - CULVERT
10.0 FT (3.0 M)
10.0 FT (3.0 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.0 TONS (40.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 1/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°35'30.60"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°59'33.00"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 40 MI (64 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 1
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
28.0 FT (8.5 M)
20.0 FT (6.1 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
14 °
NO
27.9 FT (8.5 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
7 - TIMBER
3 - SIMPLE RAIL (joints at each
2.25 FT (0.69 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: .........N
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: ..............N
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT:
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1111
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N
5 - Stable; scour within limits of
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2011-ROADWAY REPAVED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-195P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD U.S. ROUTE 129
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF
ASPHALT PAVEMENT OVER STRUCTURE
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT
ON APPROACHES; WEST APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #7 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST WALL OF
BARREL
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING
WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BARREL WALLS;
SOUTH END OF WEST WALL SHOWN; ALSO
NOTE TYPICAL SPALLING WITH EXPOSED
REBAR
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL SPALLING OF BARREL WALLS WITH EXPOSED
REBAR; EAST WALL NEAR MID-LENGTH SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL SPALLING OF BARREL WALLS WITH EXPOSED
REBAR; WEST WALL NEAR MID-LENGTH AND NORTH END SHOWN;
ALSO NOTE EMBEDDED TIMBER
PHOTO #11 - TREE GROWING BEHIND
SOUTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO #12 - FALLEN TREES ACROSS
UPSTREAM CHANNEL AT CULVERT; NOTE
UPSTREAM CHANNEL APPROACH ANGLE TO
CULVERT
PHOTO #13 - SCOUR AT END OF UPSTREAM APRON
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN CHANNEL AT
CULVERT; NORTH SIDE SHOWN; ALSO NOTE FALLEN TREE ACROSS
CULVERT
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS WITH VEGETATION
GROWTH IN CHANNEL AT CULVERT AND IN BARREL; SOUTH SIDE
SHOWN
PHOTO #16 - LOOKING UPSTREAM THROUGH BARREL
PHOTO #17 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH BARREL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .