B1 and B2 Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Surveys.pdf

Repair Sewer Mains Northside Housing Area

DKFX 14-1022 A P P E N D I X A

A PP E N DI X A :

ASBESTOS/LEAD REPORT

Terracon Consul tants, Inc. 1450 Fifth Street, West North Charleston, South Carolina 29405

P (843) 884 1234 F (843) 884 9234 terracon.com

March 1, 2019

CEMS Engineering, Inc.

320-C Midland Parkway

Summerville, South Carolina

Attn: Mr. Chris Hinson, P.E.

E: chinson@cems-ae.com

Re: Limited Asbestos Survey and Lead-Based Paint Inspection Update

Building 1 and 2

JBC Naval Weapons Station

Goose Creek, South Carolina

Terracon Project No. EN197065

Dear Mr. Hinson:

Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) is pleased to present the findings of Terracon’s site investigation and limited asbestos survey update for the scheduled renovations to the aforementioned project. This work was performed in accordance with CEMS Work Order #1 and Project Number 15-154M.

The scope of work for this project is in support of the scheduled electrical upgrades for the each building. The SOW involves limited disturbance of building materials, i.e. removal of wallboard, flooring, etc. Terracon was provided a previous lead and asbestos survey report for Building 2 performed by Lorris Environmental dated March 9, 2015. A report was not available for Building

1.

SCOPE OF SERVICES

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) Asbestos

Regulation 61-86.1 require an asbestos inspection report to be current within three years prior to renovation or demolition activities. Additionally the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation 40 CFR 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

(NESHAP), prohibits the release of asbestos fibers to the atmosphere during renovation/demolition activities. NESHAP requires that potentially regulated asbestos-containing building materials be identified, classified and quantified prior to planned disturbances or demolition activities. Our current scope of service was to update the previous findings to satisfy the regulations listed above, the collection of bulk samples, if required, of

Limited Asbestos and LBP Report Update Building 1 and 2 – JBC NWS ■ Goose Creek, South Carolina March 1, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. EN197065

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2 suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM), submission of the samples to an accredited laboratory, and reporting the analytical results.

Additionally Terracon reviewed the paint testing results provided. Our current scope of service was to update the previous findings, the collection of bulk paint samples, if required, of suspect lead-containing paints, submission of the samples to an accredited laboratory, and reporting the analytical results.

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY UPDATE

On January 19, 2019, a site inspection was performed by Mr. Craig C. Langford, a South

Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) licensed asbestos building inspector (License Number ASB-22775).

The findings of these reports were compared to current site conditions and when materials did not appear homogeneous or materials that were not previously identified, additional samples were collected. Suspect ACM was sampled in general accordance with the sampling protocols outlined in EPA Regulation 40 CFR 763 Subpart E763.86 (Asbestos Hazard Emergency

Response Act, AHERA) and SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1 Standards of Performance for

Asbestos Projects. Although reasonable effort was made to survey accessible suspect materials, additional suspect but un-sampled materials could be located in walls, in voids or in other concealed areas. Samples were delivered to an accredited laboratory for analysis by

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), as required.

Suspect paint samples were analyzed via EPA method SW846-7000B/7420.

Lead based paint (LBP) sampling was conducted by collecting paint chip samples. The paint chip samples were collected from painted or lacquered surfaces of building components likely to contain LBP, based on apparent date of application. The paint samples were collected down to the surface substrate so as to include any underlying paint systems in the analysis.

The random paint chip samples were selected based on current paint schemes and may not be inclusive of old paint systems covered with paneling, or existing painted systems. The paint chip samples were submitted to an ELAP approved laboratory for analysis of lead by NIOSH

Method 7082M (atomic absorption). The EPA defines LBP as paint, varnish, stain, or other applied coating that contains lead equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm2, 5,000 mg/kg, or 0.5% by dry weight as determined by laboratory analysis. The SCDHEC regulations 61-107.19 require that painted demolition debris with a lead concentration greater than 0.06% by weight be disposed in a permitted Class II landfill.

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 3

FINDINGS

Asbestos Summary

Suspect ACMs observed and sampled in Building 1 were wallboard (drywall/joint compound) and ceiling tiles. No ACMs were identified by laboratory analysis in the areas of scheduled work for the electrical upgrades. A summary of the suspect ACM samples collected during the survey is presented in Table 1 in Appendix A.

The electrical wiring shown below is assumed ACM until sampling and analysis can be performed safely.

Photo 1: Building 1 – Attic – Old Electrical Wiring Photo 2: The electrical wiring noted in the photo is assumed ACM

Based on our site visit and review of the reports, the site conditions for Building 2 appeared similar to the 2015 report findings by Lorris Environmental. No ACMs were identified on the interior of the building that may be in the proposed scope of work as described to Terracon.

ACMs were identified in roofing materials which are not expected to be disturbed during the electrical upgrades. The previous reports are provided as an attachment. Findings, conclusions, recommendations, and general comments in each report are applicable.

Lead Based Paint Summary

Terracon composite paint chip samples of the beige wall paint in Building 1 and Building 2.

Two samples were collected in Building 1 and laboratory analysis indicated lead concentrations of 0.028% (Sample 1-PB-01) and 0.011% (Sample 1-Pb-02). Building 2 paint chip composite sample (Sample 2-Pb-03) was collected in the shop area, corridor, and office locations of the electrical boxes. Laboratory analysis indicted the sample contained 1.3% lead concentration. Laboratory results are included in the attachment. Any wall paint, in each building, to be disturbed during the course of the electrical upgrades should be considered lead-containing and handled in accordance with applicable OSHA regulations.

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 4

The OSHA Lead Standard for Construction (29 CFR 1926.62) applies to all construction work where an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead. All work related to construction, alteration, or repair (including painting and decorating) is included. The lead-in-construction standard applies to any detectable concentration of lead in paint, as even small concentrations of lead can result in unacceptable employee exposures depending upon on the method of removal and other workplace conditions.

GENERAL COMMENTS

The update survey was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locale. The results, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this report are based on conditions observed during limited sampling event. This letter report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for use and reliance by the Client. The results included herein apply to the renovation area only and not the entirety of the hospital. Based on the project scope of work, Terracon cannot make conclusions about asbestos content in the remainder of the building. If the renovation scope of work changes to include areas or materials other than sampled here, additional investigations will be necessary.

This report is not a bidding document. Contractors or consultants reviewing this limited sampling report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed necessary. Terracon does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other third parties supplying information, which may have been used in the preparation of this report. No warranty, express or implied is made.

Terracon appreciates the opportunity to provide environmental consulting services to you on this project. If you should have any questions regarding this report, please contact the undersigned at (843) 277-8402.

Sincerely, Terracon Consultants, Inc.

For:

Craig C. Langford, OHST Jeffrey A. Gurrie, CIH Senior Industrial Hygienist Senior Industrial Hygienist

Attachment A: Table 1

Attachment B: Lorris Environmental Report

Attachment C: Laboratory Results

ATTACHMENT A

TABLE 1

WB-01 Shop PLM No Asbestos Detected Joint Compound

WB-02 Corridor PLM No Asbestos Detected Joint Compound

WB-03 Storage Room PLM No Asbestos Detected Joint Compound

WB-01 Shop PLM No Asbestos Detected Drywall

WB-02 Corridor PLM No Asbestos Detected Drywall

WB-03 Storage Room PLM No Asbestos Detected Drywall

CT-01 Storage Room PLM No Asbestos Detected 12 " Ceiling Tile

CT-02 Storage Room PLM No Asbestos Detected 12 " Ceiling Tile

CT-03 Storage Room PLM No Asbestos Detected 12 " Ceiling Tile

CT-01 Storage Room PLM No Asbestos Detected 2'x4' Ceiling Tile

CT-02 Corridor PLM No Asbestos Detected 2'x4' Ceiling Tile

CT-03 Storage Room PLM No Asbestos Detected 2'x4' Ceiling Tile

SF - Square Feet LF - Linear

Feet

HA - Homogeneous Area

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy

TEM - Transmission Electron Microscopy

1) Bold and shaded items are identified ACMs

2) Quantities listed above are estimates to be used for inspection purposes only and should be field-verified for all other uses.

3) Quantities listed above should not be used in construction documents or bids

Estimated

Quantity

(Square Feet)

HA-01 Good/Non-friable <200 SF potentially to be disturbed

TABLE 1

ASBESTOS RESULTS SAMPLE SUMMARY

BUILDING 1

GOOSE CREEK, SOUTH CAROLINA

TERRACON PROJECT NO. EN197065

JBC NWS

HA-02

HA-03 Miscellaneous

Sample

Number

Sample

Description HASample Location

Analysis

Method Analytical Results Classification

Friable/Non-

Friable &

Current

Condition

Good/Non-friable 1,500 SF

Good/Non-friable 1,500 SF

Surfacing

Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous

ATTACHMENT B

LORRIS ENVIRONMENTAL 2015 REPORT

ATTACHMENT C

ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

706 Gralin Street Kernersville, NC 27284

Tel/Fax: (336) 992-1025 / (336) 992-4175 http://www.EMSL.com / greensborolab@emsl.com

021901312EMSL Order:

Customer ID: WPCE62

Customer PO: EN197064

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Craig Langford (843) 442-6658

Fax:Terracon, Inc. (843) 884-9234

Received Date:1450 Fifth Street West 02/25/2019 9:00 AM

Analysis Date:North Charleston, SC 29405 02/25/2019

Collected Date: 02/23/2019

Project: EN97064 CEMS

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

WB-01-Drywall

021901312-0001

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)69%Cellulose

Glass

30%

1%

Brown/Gray

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Drywall/Joint

Compound

WB-01-Joint Compound

021901312-0001A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall/Joint

Compound

WB-02-Drywall

021901312-0002

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)30%Cellulose70%Brown/Gray

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Drywall/Joint

Compound

WB-02-Joint Compound

021901312-0002A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

69%

Cellulose1%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall/Joint

Compound

WB-02-Tape

021901312-0002B

None DetectedCellulose100%Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall/Joint

Compound

WB-03-Drywall

021901312-0003

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)40%Cellulose60%Brown/Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall/Joint

Compound

WB-03-Joint Compound

021901312-0003A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

70%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall/Joint

Compound

WB-03-Tape

021901312-0003B

None DetectedCellulose100%Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall/Joint

Compound

CT1-01

021901312-0004

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)3%Cellulose97%Brown/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

12" Ceiling Tile

CT1-02

021901312-0005

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)3%Cellulose97%Brown/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

12" Ceiling Tile

CT1-03

021901312-0006

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)2%Cellulose98%Brown/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

12" Ceiling Tile

CT2-01

021901312-0007

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

5%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

45%

10%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2x4 Ceiling Tile

CT2-02

021901312-0008

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

5%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

45%

10%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2x4 Ceiling Tile

CT2-03

021901312-0009

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

10%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

40%

20%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2x4 Ceiling Tile

Initial report from: 02/25/2019 13:34:06

Page 1 of 2ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 2/25/2019 1:34 PM

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

706 Gralin Street Kernersville, NC 27284

Tel/Fax: (336) 992-1025 / (336) 992-4175 http://www.EMSL.com / greensborolab@emsl.com

021901312EMSL Order:

Customer ID: WPCE62

Customer PO: EN197064

Project ID:

Analyst(s)

Kristie Elliott (5)

Scott Combs (9)

Stephen Bennett, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim

Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non -friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Kernersville, NC NVLAP Lab Code 102104-0, CA ELAP 2689, Virginia 3333-000228, West Virginia LT000321

Initial report from: 02/25/2019 13:34:06

Page 2 of 2ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 2/25/2019 1:34 PM

OrderID: 021901312

Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID Analyzed Weight Lead

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

706 Gralin Street, Kernersville, NC 27284 Phone/Fax: (336) 992-1025 / (336) 992-4175 http://www.EMSL.com greensborolab@emsl.com

Attn: Craig Langford Terracon, Inc.

1450 Fifth Street West North Charleston, SC 29405

Received: 02/25/19 9:00 AM

EN197064 CEMS

Fax: (843) 884-9234 Phone: (843) 884-1234

Project:

2/28/2019Collected:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

021901311 CustomerID: WPCE62 CustomerPO: EN197064 ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

.2564 Site: Paint Wall 1 021901311-00011-Pb-01 0.028 % wt2/25/2019 g2/28/2019

.2687 Site: Paint Wall 1 021901311-00021-Pb-02 0.011 % wt2/25/2019 g2/28/2019

.2596 Site: Paint Wall 2 021901311-00031-Pb-03 1.3 % wt2/25/2019 g2/28/2019

James Cole, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 2/25/2019 1:15:19 PM

*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.010 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.

Definitions of modifications are available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Kernersville, NC EMSL Lab ID 102564 is accredited by the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Program (AIHA-LAP), LLC in the Environmental Lead accreditation program for Lead in Paint Chips.

Initial report from 02/25/2019 13:15:19 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:greensborolab@emsl.com cclangford Text Box

OrderID: 021901311

Repair Sewer Mains Northside Housing Area

DKFX 14-1022 A P P E N D I X B

A PP E N DI X B :

MEETING MINUTES & REVIEW

COMMENTS

P 843 875 3637 P 252 649 0334 320-C Midland Parkway 300 North 3rd Street, Suite 110 Summerville, SC 29485 Wilmington, NC 28401

MEETING MINUTES

Project: Project DKGV 14-2085 – Repair Electrical Distribution, B2 Area

Owner: Joint Base Charleston CEMS Project No.:15154M

Meeting: 35% Review Meeting Meeting Date: 13 March 2018

Location: Building 1, Weapon Station, Goose Creek, SC 29445

Attendees: See attached sign-in sheet

NO. OF PAGES: 5 (including attachments)

MEETING NOTES

A meeting was held the date above to review the comments received on the 35% comments and discuss 65% deliverable expectations with the design team. Action items will identify information necessary to complete the next submittal. The attendance sheet and comment response matrix are attached to these meeting minutes. The following line items capture key discussion points during the meeting.

1. JBC prefers final view specifications 65% submittal. No red lines necessary

2. A/E awaiting Work Clearance Request (see comment matrix no. 3 & 4)

3. A/E review new design for transformer schedule (see comment matrix no.6)

4. A/E verify 3 overhead single-phase transformers (see matrix comment no. 7)

5. A/E identify ATS service rated in 65% submittal (see comment matrix no. 13)

6. A/E identify any need for concrete cover on secondary duct bank (see comment matrix no. 24)

7. A/E evaluate/identify wetlands through 628 CES/CEN (see comment matrix no. 29)

8. A/E identify meters being removed/stay in place

9. A/E request Bldg. 2 contamination report from 628 CES/CEN

10.A/E request GIS data from JBC

11. Meeting concluded with A/E clear to proceed to 65% submittal.

END OF MEETING NOTES

If there are any questions or corrections regarding the above, please notify our office within 5 working days. Otherwise, the information herein will be assumed as correct and accurate.