B08_Attachment_4D_Solit_PSP_Vol_I_PastPerf_REQD(1).pdf

PDF 259 KB Posted

Attached to
ORPI 240841 Replace Primary Water System for Maint
Solicitation number
140P2024R0150
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation No. 140P2024R0150 from the Department of the Interior National Park Service. The questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and requests the reference to evaluate the contractor's performance on a past project in areas such as quality, schedule, cost control, management, small business subcontracting, and regulatory compliance. The reference is asked to provide an overall recommendation on the contractor's ability to perform similar contracts. The related federal contract opportunity is for water distribution systems improvements at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, which involves replacing an existing asbestos-cement pipe system. The solicitation is being issued by the National Park Service.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Sol_140P2024R0150_Amd_0004.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers_for_Solicitation_140P2024R0150_0004.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Sol_140P2024R0150_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
ORPI_Sign_0003.jpeg JPEG file
Sol_140P2024R0150_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
Answered_Clarification_Questions_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2024R0150_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2024R0150.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_4C__Key_Personnel_Resume_Form.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_2b_ORPI_CD_SHEETSET-100__Final_CDs_STAMPED-2.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_4A_Solit_VOLUME_I_PSP_Cover.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_7_Geotech_Replace_Primary_Park_Water_Systems_FINAL.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_4B_Project_Experience_Questionnaire__.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_5E_LmtOnSubconRpt_REQD.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_Attachment_5A_Solit_VOLUME_II_PSP_Cover.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_10_ORPI_Water_System_Replace_Permit_Plan.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_Attachment_8_Hydrogeologic_Assessment.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_6_Construction_Contract_Administration.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_5C_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_GenRefs.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_5D_ORPI_240821_ContractPriceSchedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_P2024R0150__ORPI_240841_SF1442_Clauses_9_30_24.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_1a_ORPI_Final_CDs_DIV_1_Specifications1.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_1b_ORPI_Final_CDs_Division_2_Specifications.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_5B_SF24-23a.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_3_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_9__Water_System_Basis_Design_Report_SD_Submittal.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_2a_ORPI_CD_SHEETSET-100__Final_CDs_STAMPED.pdf PDF
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NO. 140P2024R0150

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.

Notice to Contractor

Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

A. OFFEROR INFORMATION

Company Name Company Street Address Address City City State State Zip Code XXXXX Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number / SAM

XXXXXXX

Point of Contact Name, Email, Phone

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PROJECT

EXPERIENCE)

Project Title Title Contract Number XXXXXXXXXX Contract Type Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other Awarded Contract Price $X,XXX,XXX Current / Final Price $X,XXX,XXX Contract Award Date XX/XX/XXXX Contract Completion Date XX/XX/XXXX Period of Performance XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX Project Location Park or Street address, City, State Client / Owner Company Brief description of the contract & work effort:

Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

Name First, Last Position / Title Title Organization Agency or Company Phone Number XXX-XXX-XXXX Email Address Email Signature Signature Date XX/XX/XXXX

D. EVALUATION

Rating Definition

Exceptional Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Evaluation Area Rating Quality Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)? Choose an item.

Quality of and adherence to quality control plan? Choose an item.

Quality of informational and technical submittals? Choose an item.

Overall Quality Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management) Met project schedule milestones? Choose an item.

Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? Choose an item.

Informational and technical submittals submitted timely? Choose an item.

Promptly addressed scheduling issues? Choose an item.

Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating Choose an item.

Cost Control Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs? Choose an item.

Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications? Choose an item.

Submitted accurate and complete invoices? Choose an item.

Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers? Choose an item.

Overall Cost Control Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management General oversight by project manager and superintendent? Choose an item.

Coordination with and control of subcontractors? Choose an item.

Avoidance of accidents & safety violations? Choose an item.

Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)? Choose an item.

Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives? Choose an item.

Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems? Choose an item.

Overall Management Rating Choose an item.

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Met regulatory and contractual labor standards? Choose an item.

Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses? Choose an item.

Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans? Choose an item.

Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance Met building and life safety codes? Choose an item.

Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating Choose an item.

Overall Recommendation:

Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: Choose an item.

Overall Comments:

E. RETURN:

Return by Submit with your proposal Name Title Organization National Park Service – Denver Service Center Email

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .