B08_Attachment_4B_Project_Experience_Questionnaire__.pdf
PDF 408 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P2024R0150
About this file
This document is a Project Experience Questionnaire and Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity with Solicitation Number 140P2024R0150 for the ORPI 240841 Replace Primary Water System for Maint project.
The key details are:
The Project Experience Questionnaire requires the offeror to provide information on a referenced project, including a description of the work performed by the offeror and any subcontractors, the specific project experience elements addressed, and details on changes to the original price and schedule, problems encountered and how they were resolved, and successful means and methods.
The Past Performance Questionnaire requests the offeror to provide information on a past project, including the contract details, and requests a reference to complete an evaluation of the offeror's performance across various areas such as quality, schedule, cost control, management, small business subcontracting, and regulatory compliance. The reference is asked to provide an overall recommendation for the offeror for similar contracts.
The federal contract opportunity is for water distribution system improvements for the National Park Service to replace an existing asbestos-cement pipe system. The solicitation number is 140P2024R0150.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P2024R0150
Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
Offeror Company Name
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Title Title
Project Location City, State
Brief Project Description
Description
Project Owner Company Name POC: First & Last Name Phone: (XXX) XXX-XXXX
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
Contractor Name
Role on Referenced
Project (Prime or Sub)
Trade
Price (list for each contractor’s specific work)
Performance Period
(calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
Original Final Original Final
Sparky’s Electrical Company Prime Prime $XXX,XXX $X,XXX,XXX XX XX
ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co Subcontractor Plumbing & Mechanical
$X,XXX,XXX $X,XXX,XXX XXX XXX
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NO. 140P2024R0150
INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.
Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.
Notice to Contractor
Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.
This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.
The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.
A. OFFEROR INFORMATION
Company Name Company
Street Address Address
City City
State State
Zip Code XXXXX
Unique Entity Identifier
(UEI) Number / SAM
XXXXXXX
Point of Contact Name, Email, Phone
B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PROJECT
EXPERIENCE)
Project Title Title
Contract Number XXXXXXXXXX
Contract Type Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other
Awarded Contract Price $X,XXX,XXX
Current / Final Price $X,XXX,XXX
Contract Award Date XX/XX/XXXX
Contract Completion Date XX/XX/XXXX
Period of Performance XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX
Project Location Park or Street address, City, State
Client / Owner Company
Brief description of the contract & work effort:
Scope of work description
JEwalt Underline
C. REFERENCE:
Name First, Last
Position / Title Title
Organization Agency or Company
Phone Number XXX-XXX-XXXX
Email Address Email
Signature Signature
Date XX/XX/XXXX
D. EVALUATION
Rating Definition
Exceptional
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Evaluation Area Rating
Quality
Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)? Choose an item.
Quality of and adherence to quality control plan? Choose an item.
Quality of informational and technical submittals? Choose an item.
Overall Quality Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):
Schedule (& Time Management)
Met project schedule milestones? Choose an item.
Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? Choose an item.
Informational and technical submittals submitted timely? Choose an item.
Promptly addressed scheduling issues? Choose an item.
Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):
Cost Control
Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs? Choose an item.
Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications? Choose an item.
Submitted accurate and complete invoices? Choose an item.
Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers? Choose an item.
Overall Cost Control Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):
Management
General oversight by project manager and superintendent? Choose an item.
Coordination with and control of subcontractors? Choose an item.
Avoidance of accidents & safety violations? Choose an item.
Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)? Choose an item.
Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives? Choose an item.
Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems? Choose an item.
Overall Management Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):
Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)
Met regulatory and contractual labor standards? Choose an item.
Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses? Choose an item.
Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans? Choose an item.
Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):
Regulatory Compliance
Met building and life safety codes? Choose an item.
Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating Choose an item.
Overall Recommendation:
Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: Choose an item.
Overall Comments:
E. RETURN:
Return by
Name
Title
Organization National Park Service – Denver Service Center
Send in with your proposal
Notice to Contractor
Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed
Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.
This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.
The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .