Attch 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 19AQMM25R0163_CRC_-_Charleston_Regional_Center_Bldg_D_Renovation
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation #19AQMM25R0163, related to the Charleston Regional Center Building D Passport Office Construction Renovation project. The document provides a structured template for collecting past performance references, requiring detailed feedback from previous project managers or contracting officers on six key performance elements: quality of product/service, schedule, cost control, business relations, management of key personnel, and small business utilization. References are asked to rate performance from "Exceptional" to "Unsatisfactory" and provide comments.
The solicitation is a total small business set-aside issued by the Department of State Office of Acquisition Management, with proposals due by July 9, 2025 at 4:00pm ET. Potential bidders must request access to detailed attachments through SAM.gov, with questions due by June 23, 2025 at 12pm ET. References are required to submit their completed questionnaires directly to edwardsrc@state.gov by 4:00 PM ET on July 9, 2025, with a specific subject line format. The past performance evaluation will cover projects completed within the past five years, helping the government assess potential vendors' performance history.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 19AQMM25R0163 M005.pdf | ||
| QA 4.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch 11 - 10 14 23 - Room Identification Panel Signage.pdf | ||
| Attch 12 - Building D Sprinkler As-Built Drawings.pdf | ||
| CRC Bldg D Pictures.zip | ZIP file | |
| Attch 9 - Site Visit 1 Sign In Sheet.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM25R0163 M004.pdf | ||
| Attch 8 - Campus Site Overall - Laydown Areas.pdf | ||
| QA 3.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch 10 - Site Visit 2 Sign In Sheet.pdf | ||
| QA 2.docx | DOCX document | |
| 19AQMM25R0163 M003.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM25R0163 M002.pdf | ||
| Attch 4 - Infrastructure TSS Documents 6.24.25.pdf | ||
| QA 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 19AQMM25R0163 M001.pdf | ||
| Attch 5 - DBA Wage Determination SC20250023.pdf | ||
| Attch 2 - Final Design Specifications.pdf | ||
| Attch 1 - Statement of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch 6 - Public Release of Information 20250219.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM25R0163.pdf |
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
19AQMM25R00163 Attachment 7
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions to Offerors Sending Reference Questionnaire Forms:
Section A shall be completed by the Offeror (the firm requesting the reference) prior to issuing the questionnaires. The Offeror shall send the questionnaires for relevant projects that are in progress or have been completed in the past five (5) years to the individuals who will provide the reference. For Government contracts, send to the Contracting Officer’s Representative. For commercial references, send to personnel with duties similar to those for Government contracts. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to follow-up and encourage references to submit the questionnaire. The completed questionnaire shall be submitted via e-mail directly from the person providing the reference.
Instructions to Person Providing Reference:
In order to assess potential vendors under the Department of State (DOS), is obtaining past performance information with respect to each Offeror. As a reference for work performed by the firm identified in Section A of this questionnaire, your candid response will assist in the evaluation process. Please complete Section B of the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. The questionnaire must be submitted to edwardsrc@state.gov no later than 4:00 PM ET, July 9, 2025. The subject line in the submission e-mail shall clearly indicate: Solicitation #19AQMM25R0163 – Charleston Regional Center Building D Past Performance Questionnaire. Past Performance Questionnaire Submission for <Company Name> and the message shall originate from the reference’s government or commercial e-mail system.
In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call to confirm or clarify information. If you have questions regarding this questionnaire or require assistance, please submit inquiries to edwardsrc@state.gov.
SECTION A
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR (THE FIRM REQUESTING THE REFERENCE)
PART I: OFFEROR INFORMATION
Company Name and Division Name of Offeror:
Address:
SAM UEI or CAGE Code
PART II: PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Title of Project/Contract Number for which reference is requested:
Procurement Vehicle (e.g. Contract/Order/Subcontract/Other):
Type Of Contract (e.g. Negotiated, Sealed Bid):
_____FP_____FPI_____CPFF_____CPAF_____CPIF_____IDIQ_____BOA
_____Requirements_____Labor-Hour_____T&M_____Other (Specify)
Date of Award:
Period of Performance (Including Options):
Contract Amount:
· Initial Contract Dollar Value (W/Options): _________________
· Final Contract Dollar Value (W/Options): _________________
Role On Project:
_____Prime _____Subcontractor (Explain Type and Extent of Subcontracting, If Applicable: Other (Explain)
General Description of Type of Services/Products Required Under the Contract:
Describe Complexity of Work:
SECTION B
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR (PERSON PROVIDING REFERENCE)
PART I: REFERENCE INFORMATION
Name & Title:
Organization (Including Agency and/or Company):
Contract Role (e.g. CO, COR, PM):
Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail:
PART II: INFORMATION ABOUT PROJECT/CONTRACT FOR WHICH REFERENCE IS REQUESTED
Please identify and correct any information that is not accurate in Section A.
Please objectively assess the requesting firm in each performance element below by assigning an “X” to the most appropriate rating:
• Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
• Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
• Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
• Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
• Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
| Performance Element |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).
Comments:
| Performance Element |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the Contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule).
Comments:
3. COST CONTROL
Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.* *Cost Control – not required for Firm Fixed Price (FFP). If FFP please extend N/A in the comments box.
Comments:
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification of issues in controversy), customer satisfaction, timely award, and management of subcontractors.
Comments:
| Performance Element |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, when necessary, key personnel.
Comments:
6. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS
FAR Subpart 19.7 and 15 U.S.C. 637 contains statutory requirements for complying with the Small Business subcontracting Program. Assess whether the contractor provided maximum practicable opportunity for small business to participate in contract performance consistent with efficient performance of the contract.* *Not required for Small Businesses.
Comments:
8. Additional comments you would like to share:
| _________________________________________ | __________________ | |
| Signature | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .