Attachment L-1 Past Performance Survey.pdf
PDF 310 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amendment 0003 to Screening Information Request/Request for Proposal for Corporate Work Plan Program Management and IT Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 692M15-22-R-00006
About this file
This document includes a solicitation for corporate work plan program management and IT services. The Federal Aviation Administration is seeking these services through a five-year time and materials indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract with a total estimated value over $34 million. This is an 8(a) set-aside acquisition conducted in two phases, with the notice representing Phase I. Phase I involves submitting questions by March 5, 2024, with only participants advancing to Phase II and receiving requests for proposals. Phase II proposals will be due on a date to be specified later. The work includes program management, IT services, and equipment repair and maintenance support at the FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center in Atlantic City, New Jersey.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP Q and A AMD 0003.pdf | ||
| Sol_692M15-22-R-00006_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT C-1 CWP SOW_R1.pdf | ||
| 692M1522R00006 AMD 0003 Final.pdf | ||
| Sol_692M15-22-R-00006_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment L-1-Past Performance Survey.pdf | ||
| Sol_692M15-22-R-00006_Amd_0002 final signed.pdf | ||
| Sol_692M15-22-R-00006_Amd_0001 final signed.pdf | ||
| 692M1522R00006 final signed.pdf | ||
| Sol_692M15-22-R-00006_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| RFP Q and A AMD 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment C-1 CWP Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-1 CWP_FY21_SCD.pdf | ||
| 692M1522R00006.pdf | ||
| Attachment B-1 Pricing Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment C-2 LABOR CATEGORIES AND QUALIFICATIONS.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SIR 692M15-22-R-00006 ATTACHMENT L-1
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE)
A. OFFEROR INFORMATION
Offeror Name:
Offeror Address:
B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Project Title:
Contract Number:
Agency/Customer:
Agency/Customer POC Name:
Agency/Customer POC Email Address
Contract/Order/Subcontract/Other:
Contract Type:
Contract Purpose (e.g., Service, Supply, Deveopment/First Article, R&D)?
Contract Award Date:
Period of Performance
Total Contract Value:
Value of Offeror’s Share
Was the Offeror a Prime Contractor? Yes No
Was the Offeror a Sub Contractor? Yes No
Competitive Award? Yes No
PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONDENT)
Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Commentary to support very high or very low rating should be noted on page 5.
Assign each area a rating of, 4 (Outstanding), 3 (Good), 2 (Satisfactory), and 1 (Unsatisfactory). Use the attached Rating Guidelines which is provided as Exhibit 1 as guidance in making these evaluations.
Circle the appropriate rating.
A. IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDENT
Name:
Title:
Telephone Number:
Address:
Email:
B. EVALUATION
QUALITY OF SERVICE:
# Category Rating
1 2 3 4 N/A
1 Compliance with contract requirements
2 Accuracy of reports
3 Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel
4 Capability of personnel to perform required services
5 Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services
6 Overall quality of service
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
Rating
1 2 3 4 N/A
1 Reliability
2 Responsive to technical direction
3 Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines
COST CONTROL:
Rating
1 2 3 4 N/A
1 Current, accurate and complete billings
2 Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals
3 Cost effectiveness
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT:
# Category Rating
1 2 3 4 N/A
1 Adequate and complete management plan
2 Specific management team dedicated to this project
3 Indications that the provided team had experience in subcontractor management and surveillance
4 Process, or metrics, for the evaluation of their own overall management performance
CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP:
Rating
1 2 3 4 N/A
1 Effective management, including subcontracts
2 Reasonable/cooperative behavior
3 Responsive to contract requirements
4 Notification of problems
5 Flexibility
6 Proactive vs. reactive
OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
Response
Yes No
1 The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:
a. Contractor Manageent Personnel
b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Rating Guidelines
Use the following definitions in your assessment of contractor performance.
RATING
QUALITY OF
PRODUCT OR
SERVICE
COST CONTROL
TIMELINESS OF
PERFORMANCE
BUSINESS RELATIONS
4-Outstanding
Contractor is in compliance with contract requirements and/or delivers quality products/services
Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and complete billings
Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedules
Response to inquiries, technical/service/ administrative issues is effective
3-Good
Minor inefficiencies/error s have been identified
Contractor is usually effective in managing costs
Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedules
Response to inquiries, technical/service/admi nistrative issues is usually effective
2-Satisfactory Some problems have been encountered
Contractor is having some problems in managing costs effectively
Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedules
Response to inquiries, technical/service/admi nistrative issues is somewhat effective
1-Unsatisfactory
Contractor is not in compliance and is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives
Contractor is unable to manage costs effectively
Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives
Response to inquiries, technical/service/admi nistrative issues is not effective
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .