Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
RFQ 1305M222QNMAN0056 - Drydocking and Repairs to NOAA Ship RAINIER
Solicitation number
1305M222QNMAN0056
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire to evaluate contractors for RFQ 1305M222QNMAN0056 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for drydocking and repair services for the NOAA Ship RAINIER. The questionnaire assesses contractors on quality of service, schedule, and management on a past contract and includes ratings of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory. Evaluators are asked to provide comments on each area and return the completed questionnaire by June 21 to NOAA Contract Specialist Bridget Cofo. The related RFQ opportunity solicits drydocking and repair services but does not include the reference documents and drawings, which interested parties must request separately from Contract Specialist Cofo and Contracting Officer Ashley Perry by identifying RFQ 1305M222QNMAN0056 in the email subject line.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ 1305M222QNMAN0056 Rev e.pdf PDF
Amendment 6.pdf PDF
Attachment IV - Price Schedule rev b.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFQ 1305M222QNMAN0056 Rev d.pdf PDF
Attachment I Specification rev d.pdf PDF
Amendment 5.pdf PDF
RFQ 1305M222QNMAN0056 Rev c.pdf PDF
Amendment 4.pdf PDF
RAINIER DD Q and A 3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 3.pdf PDF
S2603.pdf PDF
Attachment I Specification rev c.pdf PDF
4.1 Chill Box Shelving Pictures.pdf PDF
Steering Gear Hose List.pdf PDF
RA5 Hose List.pdf PDF
Emergency Generator Automatic Bus Transfer.pdf PDF
S2806-2.pdf PDF
3.16_3.17_3.18.zip ZIP file
RAINIER DD Q and A 2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
3.67_4.5.zip ZIP file
Amendment 2.pdf PDF
3.19_3.37.zip ZIP file
RFQ 1305M222QNMAN0056 Rev b.pdf PDF
Attachment I Specification Rev b.pdf PDF
3.10_3.13.zip ZIP file
NOAA Rainier Control Philosophy.pdf PDF
3.15.zip ZIP file
RAINIER DD Q and A.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment IV - Price Schedule rev a.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment I - Specification rev a.pdf PDF
Amendment 1.pdf PDF
Attachment I - Specification.pdf PDF
RFQ 1305M222QNMAN0056.pdf PDF
Attachment IV - Price Schedule.pdf PDF
Attachment II - Past Performance Information Form.pdf PDF
Attachment V - AIR Process.pdf PDF
Attachment IV - Price Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment VI - Subcontracting Plan Outline.pdf PDF
Show all 38

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Source Selection Information

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #: _______________________________

(the contract the evaluation is based on)

Evaluator’s Name: ___________________________

Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________

Evaluator’s Agency or Company Name: ____________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to bridget.cofo@noaa.gov no later than June 21, 4:00 PM EDT

QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

Attachment III

1305M222QNMAN0056

mailto:bridget.cofo@noaa.gov

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

Attachment III

3. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

Attachment III

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name:

Rater’s Signature:

Date:

Send Completed Questionnaire to bridget.cofo@noaa.gov no later than June 21, 4:00 PM EDT.

Attachment III

1305M222QNMAN0056

mailto:bridget.cofo@noaa.gov

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
2. SCHEDULE
3. MANAGEMENT
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Untitled

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .