Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1305M222QNMAN0056
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire to evaluate contractors for RFQ 1305M222QNMAN0056 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for drydocking and repair services for the NOAA Ship RAINIER. The questionnaire assesses contractors on quality of service, schedule, and management on a past contract and includes ratings of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory. Evaluators are asked to provide comments on each area and return the completed questionnaire by June 21 to NOAA Contract Specialist Bridget Cofo. The related RFQ opportunity solicits drydocking and repair services but does not include the reference documents and drawings, which interested parties must request separately from Contract Specialist Cofo and Contracting Officer Ashley Perry by identifying RFQ 1305M222QNMAN0056 in the email subject line.
View the file
Other files
Show all 38
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE CONTRACT #: _______________________________
(the contract the evaluation is based on)
Evaluator’s Name: ___________________________
Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________
Evaluator’s Agency or Company Name: ____________________________
Send Completed Questionnaire to bridget.cofo@noaa.gov no later than June 21, 4:00 PM EDT
QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Attachment III
1305M222QNMAN0056
mailto:bridget.cofo@noaa.gov
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Attachment III
3. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Attachment III
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name:
Rater’s Signature:
Date:
Send Completed Questionnaire to bridget.cofo@noaa.gov no later than June 21, 4:00 PM EDT.
Attachment III
1305M222QNMAN0056
mailto:bridget.cofo@noaa.gov
| 1. QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| 2. SCHEDULE |
| 3. MANAGEMENT |
| ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY: |
| Untitled |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .