Attachment III- Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

198 KB Posted

Attached to
Document Shredding Services at Naval Hospital Beaufort, SC and Robins Air Force Base, GA
Solicitation number
HT940626QE002
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire, a standardized form used to evaluate and document a contractor's performance across multiple assessment categories. The form provides space for detailed contract information including the firm/agency name, project details, contract dates, and award values. It includes nine key assessment categories (Quality of Product or Service, Schedule, Cost Control, Business Relations, Management of Key Personnel, Reliability, Customer Support, Overall Performance, and Other Areas) with rating options ranging from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. The form requires an assessing official to provide contact information and allows for additional comments, particularly for ratings of Very Good or Exceptional, to substantiate the performance evaluation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Solicitation Amendment HT940626QE002 0001.pdf PDF
HT940626QE002 Questions and Answers 2 December 2025.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
Attachment II - Pricing Sheet .xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment IV-HT940626QE002 Instructions to Offerors_ Document Shredding Services.pdf PDF
Attachment VI-CUI Notice 2019-03 Destroying Controlled Unclassified Information.pdf PDF
Attachment VII-Naval Hospital Beaufort Bin Locations.pdf PDF
Solicitation HT940626QE002.pdf PDF
Attachment V-78 ABW_IP.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Past Performance Questionnaire

1. NAME OF FIRM/AGENCY PROVIDING FEEDBACK:

PROJECT NAME:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: CONTRACT TYPE (if applicable):

CONTRACT AWARD DATE: CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:

AWARDED VALUE: CURRENT CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE:

2. NAME OF ASSESSING OFFICIAL:

EMAIL: PHONE NUMBER:

ASSOCIATION WITH FIRM BEING RATED (including role):

CONTRACT OR ORDER NUMBER (if applicable):

3. ASSESS THE FOLLOWING AREAS: (Check the appropriate box for each assessment category)

4 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Assessment Categories Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional N/A

a. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE

b. SCHEDULE

c. COST CONTROL

d. BUSINESS RELATIONS

e. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

f. RELIABILITY

g. CUSTOMER SUPPORT

h. OVERALL PERFORMANCE

i. OTHER AREAS:

(1)

(2)

For ratings of Very Good and Exceptional, provide comments supporting the rating.

1 NAME OF FIRMAGENCY PROVIDING FEEDBACK:
PROJECT NAME:
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
CONTRACT TYPE if applicable:
CONTRACT AWARD DATE:
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
AWARDED VALUE:
CURRENT CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE:
2 NAME OF ASSESSING OFFICIAL:
EMAIL:
PHONE NUMBER:
ASSOCIATION WITH FIRM BEING RATED including role:
CONTRACT OR ORDER NUMBER if applicable:
Assessment Categories:
Unsatisfactorya QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Marginala QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Satisfactorya QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Very Gooda QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Exceptionala QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
NAa QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
Unsatisfactoryb SCHEDULE:
Marginalb SCHEDULE:
Satisfactoryb SCHEDULE:
Very Goodb SCHEDULE:
Exceptionalb SCHEDULE:
NAb SCHEDULE:
Unsatisfactoryc COST CONTROL:
Marginalc COST CONTROL:
Satisfactoryc COST CONTROL:
Very Goodc COST CONTROL:
Exceptionalc COST CONTROL:
NAc COST CONTROL:
Unsatisfactoryd BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Marginald BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Satisfactoryd BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Very Goodd BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Exceptionald BUSINESS RELATIONS:
NAd BUSINESS RELATIONS:
Unsatisfactorye MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Marginale MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Satisfactorye MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Very Goode MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Exceptionale MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
NAe MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
Unsatisfactoryf RELIABILITY:
Marginalf RELIABILITY:
Satisfactoryf RELIABILITY:
Very Goodf RELIABILITY:
Exceptionalf RELIABILITY:
NAf RELIABILITY:
Unsatisfactoryg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Marginalg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Satisfactoryg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Very Goodg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Exceptionalg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
NAg CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
Unsatisfactoryh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Marginalh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Satisfactoryh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Very Goodh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Exceptionalh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
NAh OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Unsatisfactoryi OTHER AREAS:
Marginali OTHER AREAS:
Satisfactoryi OTHER AREAS:
Very Goodi OTHER AREAS:
Exceptionali OTHER AREAS:
NAi OTHER AREAS:
1:
Unsatisfactory1:
Marginal1:
Satisfactory1:
Very Good1:
Exceptional1:
NA1:
2:
Unsatisfactory2:
Marginal2:
Satisfactory2:
Very Good2:
Exceptional2:
NA2:
4 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .