Attachment D_Reference Check Form_S-10700-00010923.pdf
PDF 149 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Network Detection and Response (NDR) Solution
- Solicitation number
- S-10700-00010923
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the Oregon Department of Administrative Services (DAS) to procure a Network Detection and Response (NDR) Solution. The RFP seeks proposals for a SaaS, IaaS, or COTS solution that includes all required equipment, configurations, licenses, portals, training, integrations with current security systems, maintenance, and operations support. The project overview indicates that DAS PS and the Agency anticipate awarding one contract from this RFP. The RFP provides details on the proposal submission requirements, evaluation criteria, and the multi-round procurement process, which includes a Proof of Value (POV) and a Best and Final Offer (BAFO) round.
The RFP does not include specific pricing terms or set-asides. It does not mention any incumbent or current environment details. The funding requirements and sources are not explicitly stated. The RFP outlines various administrative requirements, such as insurance, taxpayer identification, business registry, pay equity certification, and nondiscrimination in employment, for the apparent successful proposer.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
Proposer Name: __________________________________________
OregonBuys Bid#: __________________________________________
Reference Entity: __________________________________________
Reference Contact Name: __________________________________________
Contact Telephone Number: __________________________________________
Contact Email Address: __________________________________________
1. If you had the opportunity to purchase an NDR Solution, would you purchase this NDR
Solution again from the NDR Solution Provider? Explain why.
2. Does NDR Solution Provider consistently meet the response objectives outlined in your
Service Level Agreement? Explain.
Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-10 (0 = Not satisfied; 10 = Extremely satisfied):
Item Comments Score
Training
Maintenance/Ongoing
Services
Ability for NDR Solution to meet your security needs and responsiveness
Help Desk
Knowledge Base
| SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION |
| 1.1 INTRODUCTION |
| 1.2 SCHEDULE |
| 1.3 SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT (SPC) |
| 1.4 ATTACHMENTS |
| SECTION 2: AUTHORITY, OVERVIEW, AND SCOPE |
| 2.1 AUTHORITY AND METHOD |
| 2.2 DEFINITION OF TERMS |
| 2.3 OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE |
| 2.3.1 Agency Overview and Background |
| 2.3.2 Project Overview and Background |
| 2.4 SCOPE OF SERVICES, DELIVERABLES, AND SOLUTION FUNCTIONALITY |
| 2.4.1 Scope of Services |
| 2.4.2 Tasks and Deliverables |
| Proposer should include each of the following in its proposed Services description: |
| 2.4.3 NDR Solution Functionality |
| SECTION 3: PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS |
| 3.1 MINIMUM SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS |
| 3.1.1 Round 1 Proposal Submissions |
| 3.1.2 Proposal Page Limits |
| 3.1.3 Proposal Format and Quantity |
| 3.2 ROUND 1 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS |
| 3.2.1 Proposer Information and Certification Sheet |
| 3.2.2 Failure to demonstrate compliance with Oregon Tax Laws and sign Attachment C, Proposer Information and Certification Sheet, may result in a finding of non-Responsibility. |
| 3.2.3 Experience and Capabilities (Scored) |
| 3.2.4 References (Scored) |
| 3.2.5 Staffing Plan, Key Persons, Organizational Chart and Subcontractors (Scored) |
| 3.2.6 Proposer’s Organization Profile (Scored) |
| 3.2.7 Implementation Plan (Scored) |
| 3.2.8 NDR Solution Functionality – Attachment H (Scored) |
| 3.2.9 Scope of Services (Scored) |
| 3.2.10 Security Requirements (Scored) |
| 3.2.11 Performance Metrics and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) (Scored) |
| 3.2.12 Price Proposal (To be scored in later round) |
| 3.2.13 Underlying Agreements (Not Scored) |
| 3.2.14 Value-Added Services (Not scored) |
| 3.2.15 Sample Contract (Attachment A) (Not Scored) |
| 3.2.16 Disclosure Exemption Affidavit (Pass/Fail) |
| 3.2.17 Certified Disadvantaged Business Outreach Plan (Pass/Fail) |
| 3.2.18 Responsibility Inquiry (Attachment G) (Pass/Fail) |
| SECTION 4: ROUND 1 SOLICITATION PROCESS |
| 4.1 Public Notice |
| 4.2 OregonBuys |
| 4.2.1 All Proposers must be registered in OregonBuys to do business with the State. Registration is free. To create a vendor account, click the blue “Register” button in the top right corner of the OregonBuys website: https://oregonbuys.gov/bso. F... |
| 4.2.2 PROPOSERS ARE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THEIR VENDOR INFORMATION IS CURRENT AND CORRECT IN OREGONBUYS. DAS PS WILL ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR MISSING OR INCORRECT VENDOR INFORMATION OR ALTERNATIVE ACCESSIBILITY TO AMENDMENT(S), ATTACHMEN... |
| 4.2.3 OregonBuys Assistance. Parties needing assistance with OregonBuys may contact the OregonBuys Helpdesk by telephone at (855) 800-5046 or by email at support.oregonbuys@oregon.gov. |
| 4.3 Pre-Proposal Conference |
| 4.4 Questions/Requests for Clarification |
| 4.5 SOLICITATION PROTESTS |
| 4.5.1 Protests to RFP |
| 4.5.2 Protests to Amendment |
| 4.5.3 Requirements for Protests: |
| 4.6 PROPOSAL DELIVERY OPTIONS |
| 4.6.1 Delivery through OregonBuys |
| 4.7 PROPOSAL MODIFICATION OR WITHDRAWAL |
| 4.8 PROPOSAL DUE |
| 4.9 PUBLIC OPENING |
| 4.10 PROPOSAL REJECTION |
| 4.11 ROUND 1 EVALUATION PROCESS |
| 4.11.1 Responsiveness and Responsibility Determination |
| 4.11.1.1 Responsiveness determination |
| 4.11.1.2 Responsibility determination |
| 4.11.2 Evaluation Criteria |
| 4.11.2.1 Experience and Capabilities (100 Points) |
| 4.11.2.2 References (100 Points) |
| 4.11.2.3 Staffing Plan, Key Persons, Organizational Chart and Subcontractors (50 Points) |
| 4.11.2.4 Proposer Organizational Profile (50 Points) |
| 4.11.2.5 Sample Implementation Plan (100 Points) |
| 4.11.2.6 NDR Solution Functionality (354 Points) |
| 4.11.2.7 Draft Statement of Work or Description of Scope of Services (250 Points) |
| 4.11.2.8 Security Requirements (100 Points) |
| 4.11.2.9 Performance Metrics and SLAs (100 Points) |
| 4.11.3.1 Reciprocal Preference |
| 4.11.3.2 Recycled Materials |
| 4.11.3.3 Tiebreakers |
| 4.12 ROUND 1 POINT AND SCORE CALCULATIONS |
| 4.13 ROUND 1 RANKING OF PROPOSERS |
| 4.14 ROUND 1 NEXT STEP DETERMINATION |
| 4.15 ROUND 2 |
| 4.15.1 Proof of Value (POV)– 45 days (Scored) |
| 4.16 ROUND 2 NEXT STEP DETERMINATION |
| 4.17 ROUND 3 |
| 4.17.1 Best and Final Offer (Scored) |
| 4.18 SCORING AND RANKING OF PROPOSERS FOR SUBSEQUENT ROUNDS |
| 4.19 POINT AND SCORE CALCULATIONS |
| SECTION 5: AWARD AND NEGOTIATION |
| 5.1 AWARD NOTIFICATION PROCESS |
| 5.1.1 Award Consideration |
| 5.1.2 Intent to Award Notice |
| 5.2 INTENT TO AWARD PROTEST |
| 5.2.1 Protest Submission |
| 5.2.1.1 Protests Requirements: |
5.2.2 Response to Protest
| 5.3 APPARENT SUCCESSFUL PROPOSER SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS |
| 5.3.1 Insurance |
| 5.3.2 Taxpayer Identification Number |
| 5.3.3 Business Registry |
| 5.3.4 Pay Equity Certification |
| 5.3.5 Nondiscrimination in Employment |
| 5.4 CONTRACT NEGOTIATION |
| 5.4.1 Negotiation |
| SECTION 6: AWARD AND NEGOTIATION |
| 6.1 COMMITMENT TO DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION |
| 6.2 CERTIFIED FIRM PARTICIPATION |
| 6.3 GOVERNING LAWS AND REGULATIONS |
| 6.4 OWNERSHIP/PERMISSION TO USE MATERIALS |
| 6.5 CANCELLATION OF RFP; REJECTION OF PROPOSALS; NO DAMAGES. |
| 6.6 COST OF SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL |
| 6.7 STATEWIDE E-WASTE/RECOVERY POLICY |
| 6.8 RECYCLABLE PRODUCTS |
| 6.9 CHECKLIST DISCLAIMER |
| Proposer Name: __________________________________________ |
| OregonBuys Bid#: __________________________________________ |
| Reference Entity: __________________________________________ |
| Reference Contact Name: __________________________________________ |
| Contact Telephone Number: __________________________________________ |
| Contact Email Address: __________________________________________ |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .